The Proposed Materials Test Station at LANSCE Eric Pitcher Los Alamos National Laboratory Presented at the Workshop on High-Power Targetry for Future.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Fusion Materials Irradiation with a Spallation Source Eric Pitcher and Stuart Maloy Los Alamos National Laboratory.
Advertisements

Fermilab Project-X Nuclear Energy Experiments: Spallation Neutron Target and Transuranic Transmutation for Disposing of Spent Nuclear Fuels Yousry Gohar.
HZDR FLUKA activities in support of the MYRRHA Project Short summary with a focus on activation problems Anna Ferrari, Stefan Müller, Jörg Konheiser.
SNS Experimental FacilitiesOak Ridge Target Systems for the Spallation Neutron Source Presented by John R. Haines at the High-Power Targetry for Future.
LANSCE Short-Pulse Target Operation High-power Targetry for Future Accelerators September 11, June 2003 Richard Werbeck Los Alamos National Laboratory.
1 ACPR Advanced, cost competitive, proven technology, and reliable The Third Generation Nuclear Reactor.
for a neutrinos factory
Status of T2K Target 2 nd Oxford-Princeton High-Power Target Workshop 6-7 th November 2008 Mike Fitton RAL.
M. I. Al-Jarallah Future Power Production System 1 Presentation by: M. I. Al-Jarallah Department of Physics King Fahd University of Petroleum & Minerals.
Design on Target and Moderator of X- band Compact Electron Linac Neutron Source for Short Pulsed Neutrons Kazuhiro Tagi.
FETS-HIPSTER (Front End Test Stand – High Intensity Proton Source for Testing Effects of Radiation) Proposal for a new high-intensity proton irradiation.
KIT – University of the State of Baden-Wuerttemberg and National Research Center of the Helmholtz Association Institute for Nuclear and Energy Technologies.
A Materials Evaluation Neutron Source Based on the Gas Dynamic Trap (DTNS) One Element in an Urgently Needed Comprehensive Fusion Materials Program Based.
1 AccApp05 Dedicated High Power Target Test Facilities Summary T. J. McManamy Lead Engineer, SNS Target Systems October 10–14, nd International High-Power.
Yacine Kadi Thorium Energy Conference 2013 Globe of Innovation, CERN, Switzerland October 31, 2013.
ISIS Second Target Station
EURISOL Town Meeting October 2012 – Lisbon High-Power Targets High-Power Targets Developments and Testing of Spallation Neutron Sources Yacine Kadi,
Martin Freer Materials Irradiation at University of Birmingham.
Introduction and Charge to the Review of ESS Target building and Instrument Hall design requirements Roland Garoby November 2014, Lund
Fusion-Fission Hybrid Systems
Nuclear Data for ADS and Transmutation Joint TREND/SANDAT proposal for FP6 ADOPT- Meeting, Dec E. Gonzalez-Romero (CIEMAT) Introduction Sensitivity.
Nuclear Energy Options and Project-X Shekhar Mishra Fermilab Yousry Gohar ANL June 7 th 2010.
Study of a new high power spallation target concept
Department of Nuclear Energy International Atomic Energy Agency CONSIDERABLE EXPERIENCE HAS BEEN ACHIEVED WITH LMRs Development started in USA, USSR, the.
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency IAEA Activities in the Area of Partitioning and Transmutation Alexander Stanculescu Nuclear Energy Department Nuclear.
Chair : - Mrs. Anne Laperrouze - Dr. Wolf Klinz - Mr. Jorgo Chatzimarkakis - Mr. Sarunas Birutis Speaker : Dr. Wolfram Westmeier W. Westmeier ALDE Nuclear.
4/2003 Rev 2 I.4.8 – slide 1 of 60 Session I.4.8 Part I Review of Fundamentals Module 4Sources of Radiation Session 8Research Reactors IAEA Post Graduate.
Simulations of Accelerator Driven Systems (ADS) Aleksander Polanski Joint Institute for Nuclear Research, Dubna, Russia. The Andrzej Soltan Institute for.
ADSRs and FFAGs Roger Barlow. 7 Jan 2008Workshop on ADSRs and FFAGsSlide 2 The ADSR Accelerator Driven Subcritical Reactor Accelerator Protons ~1 GeV.
Tshepo Mahafa P-LABS Necsa 1 CHARGED PARTICLE IRRADIATION EFFECTS ON ZIRCALOY-4 Necsa_Wits Workshop, 10 – 11 September 2015, Necsa, Pelindaba.
Safety And Power Multiplication Aspects Of Mirror Fusion-Fission Hybrids K. Noack 1, O. Ågren 1, J. Källne 1, A. Hagnestål 1, V. E. Moiseenko 2 1 Uppsala.
The Materials Test Station Eric Pitcher Los Alamos National Laboratory Presentation to: AHIPA Workshop, Fermilab October 19, 2009.
The Materials Test Station: An Accelerator Driven Neutron Source for Fusion Materials Testing Eric Pitcher Presented at: Sixth US-PRC Magnetic Fusion Collaboration.
Troitsk ADS project Russia Institute for Nuclear Research RAS, Moscow
Beam test possibilities at JINR and Fermilab V. Pronskikh Fermilab 02/15/2012.
1 BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES NSLS-II Overview Satoshi Ozaki Director, Accelerator Systems Division NSLS-II Project March 27, 2007.
Solid Targets for Neutron Spallation Sources Eric Pitcher Los Alamos National Laboratory Presented to: AHIPA Workshop October 20, 2009.
1 Target Station Design for Neutrino Superbeams Dan Wilcox High Power Targets Group, Rutherford Appleton Laboratory NBI 2012, CERN.
PAC on Nuclear Physics 20-th Session April 1-2, 2004, Dubna SAD STATUS REPORT ON THE SAD PROJECT & LONGTIME PERSPECTIVES V. Shvetsov FLNP.
Mitja Majerle for the “Energy Plus Transmutation” collaboration.
Study on the Neutronic Characteristics of Subcritical Reactors Driven by an Accelerated Pulsed Proton Beam Ali Ahmad.
The International Workshop on Thin Films. Padova 9-12 Oct of slides Present Status of the World- wide Fusion Programme and possible applications.
A Low Power ADS Demonstrator Hywel Owen School of Physics and Astronomy University of Manchester.
Present status of production target and Room design Takashi Hashimoto, IBS/RISP 2015, February.
Accelerator Driven Systems: Outlook Stuart Henderson Fermilab With thanks to Shekhar Mishra, Yousry Gohar, Jerry Nolen.
ADS Activities at Argonne National Laboratory Yousry Gohar Argonne National Laboratory Proton Accelerators for Science and Innovation Workshop FERMILAB,
HEBT Design Considerations Jingyu Tang, Xiangqi Wang, Hao Hao, Jiajia Tian IHEP, USTC International Review Meeting on Accelerator Physics Design of C-ADS,
Update on the ESS monolith design Rikard Linander Monolith and Handling Group ESS Target Division TAC 10, Lund, Nov 5,
Project X Energy Station Spallation Target March 20, 2012 D. Wootan, D. Asner 1.
Status of the SAD Project V. Shvetsov, FLNP. SAD Project Objectives Coupling all major components of ADS; Core design, safety assessment, licensing; k.
Materials – Status Report TAC-10 Yongjoong Lee Group Leader – Materials Target Division November 5, 2014.
1 Target Introduction Chris Densham STFC/RAL Mu2e Target, Remote Handling, and Heat & Radiation Shield Review Nov
Using step-like nonlinear magnets for beam uniformization at target in high intensity accelerarors Zheng Yang, Jing-Yu Tang, IHEP, China P.A. Phi Nghiem,
ADSR Workshop, May ‘08 ADSR Systems for Power Generation: some practical considerations Bob Cywinski 7 May 2008, Daresbury.
Introduction to Nuclear Energy Candace Davison Senior Reactor Operator Penn State University.
1 1 מ חויבות ל מ צוינות - ג רעין להצלחה 200 kW Liquid Lithium Neutron Source G. Shimel, A. Arenshtam, I. Eliyahu, A. Kreisel, I. Silverman 6 th High Power.
The ESS Target Station Eric Pitcher Head of Target Division February 19, 2016.
Nuclear Physics LOS ALAMOS NATIONAL LABORATORY 1 Line B preparations Hardware issues Install Fast Kicker (up to 200  C/sec). Reinstall Line B transport.
Design and Optimisation of the ISIS TS1 Upgrade Target Dan Wilcox High Power Targets Group, RAL 6 th High Power Targetry Workshop, 12/04/2016.
The ESS Target Station F. Mezei ESS target division NPPatLPS, 2013.
Study on IFMIF Beam-Target Interface
Zheng Yang, Jing-Yu Tang, IHEP, China
The BLAIRR Irradiation Facility Hybrid Spallation Target Optimization
Analyses to Support Waste Disposition of SNS Inner Reflector Plug
Designing Safety into a High-power Neutron Spallation Source
Advanced-Fusion Neutron Source
Emanuele (ESS), Alessandro (CERN), Mikel (Tekniker), Hayley (ISIS)
Summary of session 5: Innovative Ideas and New R&D
JOINT INSTITUTE FOR NUCLEAR RESEARCH
Test Beamline System Requirements and Charge to PDR Committee
Presentation transcript:

The Proposed Materials Test Station at LANSCE Eric Pitcher Los Alamos National Laboratory Presented at the Workshop on High-Power Targetry for Future Accelerators Brookhaven National Laboratory September 8, 2003

The Advanced Fuel Cycle Initiative and GEN IV programs require a fast neutron spectrum facility for fuels and materials testing Advanced fuel concepts (e.g., nitride, metallic dispersion, fertile-free) are proposed for closing the nuclear fuel cycle, as well as for some GEN IV reactors Nearly all nuclear waste transmuter concepts, and most GEN IV reactor concepts, operate with a fast neutron spectrum Fuel cladding must be tested in prototypic radiation environments with appropriate coolants (e.g., Pb-Bi)

There is a clear need for a U.S. fast spectrum irradiation facility With the termination of the FFTF, there is no longer a domestic fast neutron spectrum irradiation facility There are a limited number of viable facilities abroad: –PHENIX (France) –JOYO (Japan) –BOR-60 (Russia) Irradiation campaigns abroad are time-consuming and expensive –Irradiation of eight 11-cm-high fuel pins in PHENIX by AFCI will take four years from initial discussions with CEA to the start of irradiation, with a cost for irradiation services of $5M

LANSCE is a cost-effective and logical choice for locating a fast-spectrum irradiation facility A new fast reactor would cost at least $800M LANSCE proton beam power is 800 kW (1 mA at 800 MeV)

Materials Test Station (MTS) Functions and Requirements Intense fast neutron flux (up to n.cm –2.s –1 ) over a 1-liter volume with minimal proton flux contamination –High burnup of fuel specimens (~6%/year) –High damage rate of materials specimens (~7 dpa/year) Radiation damage environment similar to that encountered in a fast reactor –He/dpa ratio near 0.5 appm/dpa High proton flux for spallation source materials testing Separate cooling loops for test specimens Capability of testing to failure –Negligible reactivity from fuel specimens (deeply subcritical)

The Materials Test Station will be located in an existing experimental area

Experimental Area A in 1971 proton beam path

The A-1 target, shown here during construction in 1973, is the proposed location for the MTS

The MTS 13-foot-diameter vacuum vessel would fit within the existing shielding

The MTS includes a neutron source, irradiation positions, shielding, and vacuum vessel Target Assembly Vacuum Vessel Reflector and Shielding Existing Shielding Removable Shielding Beam Line Existing Base Plate on top of Concrete Slab

The target and irradiation zones will sit on a stalk that is inserted into the vacuum vessel from above

A conceptual design of a flowing Pb-Bi target has been developed

A phased approach in spallation targets is proposed for achieving ever-greater neutron fluxes Heavy-water cooled clad tungsten target –Extensive development within the Accelerator Production of Tritium program gives high confidence that this target will work reliably Flowing Pb-Bi target –Moderate risk whose design will draw from lessons learned in the MEGAPIE project Heavy-watered cooled uranium target –Testing of uranium alloys under proton irradiation is required to validate target lifetimes

The U-shaped target canister provides excellent target window cooling direction of coolant flow proton beam footprint on target

The U-shaped target canister provides excellent target window cooling direction of coolant flow W or U target material proton beam footprint on target

MTS takes advantage of the pulsed nature of the LANSCE beam to illuminate two spots on target Beam frequency is 120 Hz, pulse duration is 1 ms

MTS takes advantage of the pulsed nature of the LANSCE beam to illuminate two spots on target Beam frequency is 120 Hz, pulse duration is 1 ms During a single 1-ms pulse, the beam is directed onto one spot on the target

MTS takes advantage of the pulsed nature of the LANSCE beam to illuminate two spots on target Beam frequency is 120 Hz, pulse duration is 1 ms During a single 1-ms pulse, the beam is directed onto one spot on the target During the 8 ms the beam is off between pulses, a dipole magnet directs the beam to the alternate position on the target

MTS takes advantage of the pulsed nature of the LANSCE beam to illuminate two spots on target Beam frequency is 120 Hz, pulse duration is 1 ms During a single 1-ms pulse, the beam is directed onto one spot on the target During the 8 ms the beam is off between pulses, a dipole magnet directs the beam to the alternate position on the target The next 1-ms pulse hits the other target position

MTS takes advantage of the pulsed nature of the LANSCE beam to illuminate two spots on target Beam frequency is 120 Hz, pulse duration is 1 ms During a single 1-ms pulse, the beam is directed onto one spot on the target During the 8 ms the beam is off between pulses, a dipole magnet directs the beam to the alternate position on the target The next 1-ms pulse hits the other target position The beam is rastered vertically at a high frequency (~1 kHz)

Spatial distribution of the proton flux for an LBE-cooled U-10Mo target p.cm –2.s –1.mA –1

Spatial distribution of the neutron flux for an LBE-cooled U-10Mo target n.cm –2.s –1.mA –1

Spatial distribution of the power density for an LBE-cooled U-10Mo target W.cm –3

The flux spectrum the MTS with a D 2 O-cooled U target compares favorably with the FFTF Flux Mean Energy (n.cm –2.s –1 ) (MeV). FFTF1.00× Upstream MTS 0.35× Downstream MTS 0.85×

The MTS can be completed in 3 years at a cost of $20M MTS Schedule and Cost FY04 FY05 FY06 FY07 FY08 Installation/Commission Operation/Testing Costs (Operating Funds) $5M $8M $7M $3M $3M

Breakdown of $20M Cost Estimate

MTS Status Pre-conceptual design completed in FY02. No work performed in FY03. Safety authorization plan completed. MTS is within the existing Environmental Impact Statement. Total installation cost estimated at $20M, and can be completed in 3 years. Project will replace an experimental station that is no longer used. It will be installed with operating funds because we are replacing a test station within an existing experimental area. Seeking authorization from DOE-NE to start work in FY04.

Summary We need a domestic fast neutron source for materials and fuels irradiations. The alternative is expensive irradiations abroad. The MTS meets this need at a reasonable cost.