LOOKING FOR CLUES DEDUCTIVE REASONING. DEDUCTIVE LOGIC “The process of reasoning from one or more general statements (premises) to reach a logically certain.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
KEY TERMS Argument: A conclusion together with the premises that support it. Premise: A reason offered as support for another claim. Conclusion: A claim.
Advertisements

The Scientific Process
Why Logic? A proof of any form requires logical reasoning. Logical reasoning ensures that the conclusions you reach are TRUE - as long as the rest of.
2.5 If-Then Statements and Deductive Reasoning
Chapter 3 Elementary Number Theory and Methods of Proof.
DEDUCTIVE REASONING We reason deductively when we draw a conclusion from a set of given facts using the laws of logic.
Other Info on Making Arguments
LogicandEvidence Scientific argument. Logic Reasoning –Deductive –Inductive.
Reading: Chapter 4, section 4 Nongraded Homework: Problems at the end of section 4. Graded Homework #4 is due at the beginning of class on Friday. You.
Inductive and Deductive Reasoning Geometry 1.0 – Students demonstrate understanding by identifying and giving examples of inductive and deductive reasoning.
How to Argue Successfully Deductive and Inductive Reasoning.
Logic and Philosophy Alan Hausman PART ONE Sentential Logic Sentential Logic.
Geometry Unit 2 Power Points Montero to 2.3 Notes and Examples Patterns, Conditional Statements, and BiConditional Statements Essential Vocabulary.
Introduction to Geometric Proof Logical Reasoning and Conditional Statements.
Aristotelian Logic & Fashioning an Argument A Study of Deductive Reasoning.
Arguments A falasafaz! presentation 1. Which arguments? Not this More like this 2.
Deductive Reasoning Chapter 2 Lesson 4.
Question of the Day!  We shared a lot of examples of illogical arguments!  But how do you make a LOGICAL argument? What does your argument need? What.
2.4 Ms. Verdino.  Biconditional Statement: use this symbol ↔  Example ◦ Biconditional Statement: The weather is good if and only if the sun is out 
Inductive and Deductive Reasoning. Inductive Observing the data, recognizing a pattern and making generalizations Do you see a pattern Can you describe.
PROCESS OF ELIMINATION INDUCTIVE REASONING. DISCLAIMER Logic is a very complex field of study. Our goal in this unit is just to starting thinking about.
Review from Yesterday…. Rhetoric vs. Dialectic Deduction : conclusion is necessitated by, or reached from the previously stated facts (premises). Remember.
 I can identify and use the properties of real numbers.
Thinking Mathematically Problem Solving and Critical Thinking.
Deductive and Inductive Reasoning. Inductive Reasoning involves an observer to look at the evidence around them and draw a conclusion about said evidence.
Unraveling the mystery of Inductive & Deductive Arguments An Introduction What is an Argument? What is the difference between an Inductive and Deductive.
Inverse, Contrapositive & indirect proofs Sections 6.2/6.3.
Section 2.3: Deductive Reasoning
Deductive and Inductive Reasoning
1.4 Properties of Real Numbers ( )
Rhetoric of Argument. Rhetorical Situation Image from Exigence Purpose.
Higher / Int.2 Philosophy 12. Our Learning  Fallacy Reminder  Summary following Homework NAB  Class NAB.
3.1 Inductive and Deductive Reasoning Warm-up (IN) Learning Objective: to use deductive reasoning to reach conclusions, make a convincing argument, and.
A Basic Guide OBSERVATION & INFERENCE.  Inference comes from the verb “to infer” which means to conclude by using logic  Therefore, inference (n.) is.
LG 1: Logic A Closer Look at Reasoning
1.2 Reasoning Mathematically Two Types of Reasoning Remember to Silence Your Cell Phone and Put It in Your Bag!
 Have homework out ready to check.  Ask a neighbor for help if needed!
Do now Can you make sure that you have finished your Venn diagrams from last lesson. Can you name 5 famous mathematicians (including one that is still.
WRITING MYSTERIES.
DEDUCTIVE vs. INDUCTIVE REASONING
Reasoning and Proof Unit 2.
CSI Detectives: Gathering Evidence
Chapter 1 Lessons 1-4 to 1-8.
Drill: Tuesday, 10/14 2. Determine if the conditional “If x is a number then |x| > 0” is true. If false, give a counterexample. OBJ: SWBAT analyze.
Deductive and Inductive
2-1 Patterns and Inductive Reasoning
Applying Deductive Reasoning
Philosophy Logic Lesson 1.
Inductive and Deductive Reasoning
Sec. 2.3: Apply Deductive Reasoning
A falasafaz! presentation
Confirmation The Raven Paradox.
Logic, Philosophical Tools Quiz Review…20 minutes 10/31
Drill: Tuesday, 10/18 2. Determine if the conditional “If x is a number then |x| > 0” is true. If false, give a counterexample. OBJ: SWBAT analyze.
EXAMPLE 1 Use the Law of Detachment
Formulating an Argument
2.3 Apply Deductive Reasoning
Drill: Wednesday, 11/1 Determine if the conditional “If x is a number then |x| > 0” is true. If false, give a counterexample. Write the contrapositive.
Premise: If it’s a school day, then I have Geometry class.
Logic & Reasoning.
2-1: Logic with Inductive Reasoning
Deductive Reasoning.
For Wednesday, read Chapter 4, section 3 (pp )
Syllogisms.
Chapter 5 Parallel Lines and Related Figures
2-1 Inductive Reasoning and Conjecture
EXAMPLE 1 Use the Law of Detachment
If there is any case in which true premises lead to a false conclusion, the argument is invalid. Therefore this argument is INVALID.
If there is any case in which true premises lead to a false conclusion, the argument is invalid. Therefore this argument is INVALID.
1-5 Conditional statements 1-6 deductive reasoning
Presentation transcript:

LOOKING FOR CLUES DEDUCTIVE REASONING

DEDUCTIVE LOGIC “The process of reasoning from one or more general statements (premises) to reach a logically certain conclusion” In other words… Use only the facts to guide you to a conclusion

IN MINE SWEEPER The facts or premises are the numbers the conclusion is where the mines are. Fact 1 Fact 2 Conclusion

THE FACTS GUIDE YOU TO THE CONCLUSION Fact 1 Fact 2 + Conclusion By putting the clues together you come to a conclusion. Much like a detective coming onto a crime scene.

IS SHE A WITCH? Watch: Facts: 1.We Burn Witches 2.We Burn Wood. Conclusion 1: “Witches are made of wood” 3. Wood Floats in Water 4. Ducks also float in water. Conclusion 2: Using conclusion 1 and facts 3 and 4 we conclude that she is a witch.

WARNING Your conclusions are only as good as your premises or facts. If you start with false premises your argument is meaningless. What implications does this have on how we think about real life?

IN CONCLUSION 1.You are using deductive reason when you are working towards a conclusion from a series of facts. (like a detective looking at clues) 2.Your conclusions are only as good as your facts! This is easy in Minesweeper since the facts are indisputable.

WHAT’S NEXT? Inductive Reasoning: Starting from a set of possible conclusions and use the process of elimination until there is only one possible conclusion left.

YOUR ASSIGNMENT Beat a level of mine sweeper that you have not beat previously.