PEFORMANCE TRACKING & PRACTICE IMPLICATION DIVISION OF FAMILY & CHILDREN SERVICES G-FORCE MEETING June 26, 2008.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Expedited Family Reunification Project
Advertisements

DHR-DFCS Statewide Community Forum Atlanta, Georgia December 19, 2006.
Community Based Care in Florida and the IV-E Waiver.
Child and Family Services Reviews (CFSRs). 2 Child Welfare Final Rule (excerpt from Executive Summary) The child and family services reviews … [focus]
California Department of Social Services Program Improvement Plan
Introduction to Strengthening Families: An Effective Approach to Supporting Families Massachusetts Home Visiting Initiative A Department of Public Health.
A Judicial Perspective on Differential Response Anthony Capizzi Montgomery County Juvenile Court Dayton, Ohio September.
CENTER FOR SOCIAL SERVICES RESEARCH School of Social Welfare, UC Berkeley CFSR2 Data Indicators: The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly Center for Social Services.
1 Child and Family Services Review Program Improvement Plan Kick-Off Division/Staff Name Date (7/30/07)
1 Lessons Learned about the Service Array from the First Round of Child and Family Services Reviews (CFSRs) The Service Array Process National Child Welfare.
1 THE CHILD AND FAMILY SERVICES REVIEW (CFSR) PRACTICE PRINCIPLES: Critical Principles for Assessing and Enhancing the Service Array The Service Array.
1 Strategic Planning. 2 Elements of the Strategic Planning Process Strategic planning is a continual process for improving organizational performance.
Findings From the Initial Child and Family Service Reviews
Program Staff Presentation 1 Program Staff Presentation.
Overview of the Child Welfare System International Center for Innovation in Domestic Violence Practice (ICIDVP)
Services and Resources Available for Families & Children.
Minnesota Child Welfare Program Goals Safety Permanency Well-Being.
The Norfolk Hotline and the Homeless Action Response Team (HART) Presentation by Jill Baker Norfolk Department of Human Services.
May 18, MiTEAM Is Michigan’s guide to how staff, children, families, stakeholders and community partners work together to achieve outcomes that.
Oregon’s Community-Involved Approach to Differential Response Implementation.
10/ Introduction to the MA Department of Children and Families’ Integrated Casework Practice Model (ICPM) Fall 2009.
Systems Change to Achieve Permanency Mountains and Plains Child Welfare Implementation Center Arlington, Texas April 15, 2009.
AB 636 Mental Health/CWS Partnership Sacramento, CA 3/17/06 Barbara Needell, MSW, PhD Center for Social Services Research University of California at Berkeley.
DIVISION OF FAMILY & CHILDREN SERVICES G-FORCE MEETING May 2009.
Bringing Protective Factors to Life in the Child Welfare System New Hampshire.
1 G-FORCE MEETING Division of Family & Children Services September 25, 2009.
WEBINAR, AUGUST 9, 2011 FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES Quality Service Review Ratings on the Quick.
Family Team Meeting Policy Updates Presented by Mitzie Smith August 10, 2009.
AMERICAN HUMANE ASSOCIATION The nation’s voice for the protection of children & animals THE CHILD WELFARE RESPONSE CONTINUUM CHRONIC ISSUES THAT HAVE PLAGUED.
Maine DHHS: Putting Children First
Structured Decision Making Child Welfare and the Law Spring 2006.
+ Jennifer Miller, ChildFocus Melissa Devlin, FFTA Brian Lynch, Children’s Community Programs Sue Miklos, The Bair Foundation Child Welfare Peer Kinship.
Welcome to the Quarterly FTM Facilitator Advanced Training  Please make sure you have signed in.  In order to receive PE training hours you must be registered.
1 G-FORCE MEETING October 23, 2008 ON THE ROAD TO GREATNESS!
1 Bureau of Milwaukee Child Welfare Report to the Community January 13, 2006 Jan. – Dec Progress summary of 2005  Safety  Permanence  Well-Being.
1 DIVISION OF FAMILY & CHILDREN SERVICES G-FORCE MEETING April 23, 2009.
1 Quality Counts: Helping Improve Outcomes for Pennsylvania’s Children & Families September 22, 2008.
Mountains and Plains Child Welfare Implementation Center Maria Scannapieco, Ph.D. Professor & Director Center for Child Welfare UTA SSW National Resource.
Tehama Linkages Commitment Presented by LaDeena Coates, Employment & Training Worker, II Richard Phillips, Social Worker, II.
1 PERMANENCY FOR CHILDREN Division of Family & Children Services July G-Force Meeting July 30, 2009.
Georgia Georgia’s Lead Agency Plan Georgia 2 KVC Behavioral Healthcare The lead agency in the North East Region of Kansas and Metro Kansas City, Kansas.
Los Angeles County’s Department of Children and Family Services Title IV-E California Well-Being Project and Strategic Plan June 3, 2015.
Mountains and Plains Child Welfare Implementation Center Maria Scannapieco, Ph.D. Professor & Director Center for Child Welfare UTA SSW Steven Preister,
1 CPA PROVIDER G-FORCE MEETING January 12, Agenda Maltreatment in Care Permanency Continuum Permanency Status Exercise for February DFCS Data.
1 CCI PROVIDER G-FORCE MEETING January 11, Agenda Maltreatment in Care Permanency Continuum Permanency Status Exercise for February DFCS Data.
SAFE AND THRIVING FOREVER FAMILIES SOONER Division of Family & Children Services G-Force Meeting June 25, 2009.
1. DFCS Performance Update Georgia Child Welfare Reform Council September 16, 2015.
1 Provider “G” What the Heck is That?!. 2 G-Force Process  Georgia has pioneered a performance management approach which shapes practice according to.
1 CHILDREN SAFE AND THRIVING WITH FOREVER FAMILIES, SOONER DIVISION OF FAMILY & CHILDREN SERVICES Isabel Blanco, Deputy Director of Field Operations September.
1 DHS Board Meeting Promoting Safe and Stable Families Program Overview Mark Washington Division of Family and Children Services August 18, 2010.
Family Assessment Response. Welcome & Introduction Introduce yourself to the group: 1.Name 2.Work location 3.Work title 4.What is it about FAR that brought.
DHS Board Meeting DFCS Subcommittee Report Performance Highlights July 21, 2010.
Collaboration: A Different Approach Working with Aboriginal Families in Calgary Hazel Bergen, Program Director Mahmawi-atoskiwin Carmen Esch, Associate.
Improving the Lives of Mariposa County’s Children and Families System Improvement Plan October 2008 Update.
Child and Family Services Reviews Onsite Review Instrument.
Aiken County Dept. of Social Services Christine Wright, County Director Amy Kosh, HS Program Coordinator.
1 1 Child Welfare Policy and Practice for Supervisors.
1 Department of Human Services (DHS)/Child Welfare Services (CWS) Branch Child & Family Services Review (CFSR) & Program Improvement Plan (PIP)
LOS ANGELES COUNTY. To learn about the Katie A. Settlement Agreement and its impact on the Child Welfare and Mental Health systems To appreciate the Shared.
STRONG FAMILIES SELF- SUFFICENT STABLE RELIANT SUPPORTIVE.
Lorain County Children Services
Office of Children's Services
NAEYC Early Childhood Standards
2016 Child & Family Annual Report
GOT PERMANENCE? DIVISION OF FAMILY & CHILDREN SERVICES G-FORCE MEETING
4 Domains Child Welfare, Juvenile Education and Mental/Health
Pathways to Permanency: Safety, Permanency and Well-Being
Los Angeles County Department of Children and Family Services
Texas Department of Family and Protective Services December 19, 2014
Los Angeles County Department of Children and Family Services
Presentation transcript:

PEFORMANCE TRACKING & PRACTICE IMPLICATION DIVISION OF FAMILY & CHILDREN SERVICES G-FORCE MEETING June 26, 2008

2 AGENDA G-Force Scoreboard Georgia SHINES: Exception Reports Performance Tracking & Practice Implications in Social Services & OFI Domestic Violence & Child Welfare Region 8 Presentation

3 G-FORCE SCOREBOARD ACTUALTRENDDESIRED Food Stamp Error Rate 2.99% (3.87% May 2008) 5% Diversions to Unsubstantiated Closed Investigations 3.7:1 April 2008 (3.1: 1 for March 2008 Reports) 4.0: 1 Timely Investigations without Reducing Quality 90% June 23, 2008 (98% for March 2008) 100% Permanency: Foster Care Re-entries 5.82% May 2008 (4.16% for April 2008) 5.0% IV-E Penetration Rate 30.5% March 2008 (30.0% for February 2008) 40%

4 PREVIOUSLY (MAY 2008) Georgia currently at 3.87% Error Rate Fourth Most Improved State in the Nation 1. Maine 2. Wyoming 3. Montana

5 CURRENTLY (JUNE 2008) Georgia currently at 2.99% Error Rate! Georgia is Number 1 in Most Improved in the Nation! 10 th Best State in the Nation! GEORGIA IS IN IT, TO WIN IT!

6

7

Georgia SHINES EXCEPTION REPORTS

9 FRAMING OUR APPROACH TO PERFORMANCE IMPROVEMENT Over the past year, DFCS has focused on creating a culture of high performance, quality services and accountability. We have provided focus, common language, and a way of keeping score that engaged staff’s creativity. We have applied the Four Disciplines to child welfare and family independence services. We are currently motivated by a feeling that our progress matters. We can sense a moderate amount of anxiety and a sense of urgency.

10 OutcomeMedian Percentage of Cases Rated as Substantially Achieved Across States Range of Percentage of Cases Rated as Substantially Achieved Across States Georgia Percentage of Cases – Substantially Achieved – 2001 Georgia Percentage of Cases – Substantially Achieved Safety Outcome 1: Children are first and foremost, protected from abuse and neglect  Safety Outcome 2: Children are safely maintained in their homes when possible and appropriate  Permanency Outcome 1: Children have permanency and stability in their living situations  Permanency Outcome 2: The continuity of family relationships and connections is preserved  Well-Being Outcome 1: Families have enhanced capacity to provide for children’s needs  Well-Being Outcome 2: Children received services to meet their educational needs  Well-Being Outcome 3: Children receive services to meet their physical and mental health needs 

11 Today, we will consider… 1.What we have accomplished and what have we learned along the way. 2.What changes are needed as indicated by the work. 3.What leadership considerations and actions are critical to the success of our work.

12 SOCIAL SERVICES: VOLUME OF WORK COMPARISON Previous Year: Investigations (9/06 – 2/07; Family Preservation (9/06 - 3/07); Diversions (9/06 - 2/07) and Placements (7/ ). Current Year: Investigations (9/07 - 2/08); Family Preservation (9/07 - 3/08); Diversions (9/07 - 2/08) and Placements (7/07 - 3/08).

13 SOCIAL SERVICES’ WORK ANALYSIS 1. Changes in Social Services workload: 31% decrease in Investigations (from 12,540 to 8,658). 13% decrease in Family Preservations (from 9,181 to 7,961). 7% decrease in Placement (from 16,991 to 15,732). 43% increase in Diversions (from 2,397 to 3,424). 2. Reduction in caseloads have led to lowering the ratio of caseworker to cases

14 CPS ACTIVE CASES Our front door policy has changed since mid-2004 when diversions was instituted. Since then the number of investigations and active cases have decreased by 63%.

15 CHILD PROTECTIVE SERVICES ACTIVE CASES Diversions were implemented in SFY By SFY 2006, the number of active CPS cases had decreased by 29%. These numbers reflect the beginning of each fiscal year (July).

16 LEAD MEASURE 1: ELIMINATE OVERDUE PENDING CASES EXISTING AS OF JUNE 30, 2007 In June 2007, there were 3,378 overdue pending cases. Our goal was to complete these cases by December 31, 2007.

17 LEAD MEASURE 2: BEGINNING JULY 1, 2007, ALL NEW INVESTIGATIONS WILL BE COMPLETED WITHIN 30 BUSINESS DAYS Timely completion of investigations increased from 81% in June 2007 to 99% in February 2008.

18 COMPARISON OF INVESTIGATIONS DUE & NUMBER COMPLETED TIMELY The gap between total investigations due each month and the number completed timely has diminished.

19 DIVERSIONS SCREENOUTS SUB/ CLOSED SUB/OPEN UNSUB/ CLOSED DESIRED RESPONSE PATTERN REPORTS RECEIVED IN APRIL 2008 Note: Desired Response Pattern Based on Research on Family Centered Practices. REPORTS RECEIVED IN APRIL 2007 UNSUB/ CLOSED 30% RESPONSE PATTERN STATEWIDE DIVERSIONS 51% SCREENOUTS 17% DIVERSIONS 29% SCREENOUTS 15% SUB/OPEN 13% SUB/ CLOSED 11% UNSUB/ CLOSED 14% SUB/OPEN 11% SUB/ CLOSED 6%

20 SHIFT – PRACTICE CONCERNS Even in situations where imminent risk of harm is low, individual caseworker experience and skill in utilizing available tools may not adequately recognize and respond to the harm that can accumulate from multiple incidents of neglect, which if only viewed as isolated events, do not appear to impact the safety of the children

21 FAMILY SUPPORT & PERCENT THAT BECAME SUBSTANTIATED CPS CASES - STATEWIDE 5.86% 1.62% There were a total of 88,887 cases diverted statewide; 5.86% of them have become substantiated CPS cases. From May 2007 to April 2008, we have diverted 37,829 cases and only 1.62% of them have become substantiated CPS cases.

22 REGIONAL TREND: SUBSTANTIATIONS State Sub Open 10% State Sub Close 8% Wide margins among regions for both dispositions. Substantiated/ opened range from 5% to 18% and substantiated/closed range from 3% to 16%.

23 INSIGHT REFLECTED IN PERFORMANCE As we refined the practice of investigating mainly those cases rising to the standards of abuse and neglect, the percentage of cases in which allegations are substantiated rises. Practice still needs to become more consistent.

24 SUBSTANTIATIONS & UNSUBSTANTIATIONS From April 2007 to April 2008, the percent of investigations being substantiated rose by 11% and the number of unsubstantiated cases decreased by 11%.

25 RECURRENCE OF MALTREATMENT STATEWIDE National Standard: 5.40% (Effective 1/2007) National Standard: 6.10% ( )

26 RECURRENCE OF MALTREATMENT National Standard: 5.40% (Effective 1/2007)

27 State’s Overall Rate = 2.61%

28 CASEMANAGERS WITH 30 OR MORE CPS CASES - STATEWIDE

29 PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT TAKE AWAY We pursued information to reduce uncertainty and found ways to do better. We drew staff into active and enthusiastic participation. We taught the skills that matter and as a result, kids are safer.

30 FAMILY-CENTERED PRACTICE “A framework based on the belief that the best way to protect children, in the long run, is to strengthen and support their families, whether it be nuclear, extended, foster care, or adoptive.” Source: Best Practice, Next Practice: Family-Centered Child Welfare. National Child Welfare Resource Center for Family- Centered Practice, Summer 2000.

31 SHIFT IN CHILD WELFARE PHILOSOPHY TRADITIONAL CHILD WELFARE PRACTICES FAMILY-CENTERED CHILD WELFARE PRACTICES ENGAGEMENTEfforts focus on getting the facts and fathering information, and not in the building of the relationships. Families are engaged in ways relevant to the situation and sensitive to the values of their culture. ASSSESSMENTFocuses on the facts related to the reported abuse and neglect. Focuses on the families’ strengths and resources throughout the life of the case and are continuously assessed and discussed. SAFETY PLANNING The plan is developed by CPS, courts, or lawyers without input from the family or from those that know the child. Families are involved in designing a safety plan based on information and support of worker/team members. IMPLEMENTATION OF SERVICE PLAN Generally consists of determining whether the family has complied with the case plan, rather than providing services and supports or coordinating with informal and formal resources. Workers ensure that families have reasonable access to flexible, affordable, individualized array of services and resources so that they can maintain themselves as a family.

32 SHIFT IN THE PRACTICE - STRENGTH Child Protection services intervention is now aimed at assisting the parent in recognizing and remedying the conditions that are or may be harmful to the child, and in fulfilling their parenting role.

DOMESTIC VIOLENCE & CHILD WELFARE Policy and Practice Forum Kim Washington DFCS / Family Violence Unit Family Violence Unit Manager

34 CPS & DIVERSION WITH RELATED OFI CASES (APRIL 2008) Notes 4.4% of CPS cases receive TANF, 51.8% receive Food Stamps, and 50.5% receive Medicaid benefits. 2.7% of Diversion cases receive TANF, 30% receive Food Stamps, and 35.6% receive Medicaid.

35 OFFICE OF FAMILY INDEPENDENCE

36

37

38

39 State: 98.3%

40 State: 97.3%

41 State: 99.1%

42 State: 98.2%

43 State: 99.2%

44 REGION 8: PERFORMANCE TRACKING

45 Note: There has been a 63% decrease in the number of Active CPS cases from May 2004 to May 2008.

46

47 CPS ACTIVE CASES 44% decrease in the number of CPS active cases from May 2007 to May 2008.

48 CPS INVESTIGATIONS 60% decrease in the number of CPS investigations from May 2007 to May 2008.

49 FAMILY PRESERVATION 30% decrease in the number of Family Preservation cases from May 2007 to May 2008.

50

51 DISPOSITION OF REPORTS APRIL 2007 TO APRIL 2008 Notable changes occurred in diversions and unsubstantiated and closed cases: a 22% increase in the number of diversions and a 16% decrease in the number of unsubstantiated and closed cases.

52 Note: There has been a 21% decrease in the number of Placement cases since May 2004.

53

54 CHILD PLACEMENT SERVICES ACTIVE CASES - STATEWIDE

55 PLACEMENT SERVICES 14% decrease in the number of Placement cases from May 2007 to May 2008.

56

57 FOSTER CARE RE-ENTRY National Standard: 8.60%

58 MALTREATMENT IN CARE: SUBSTANTIATED & UNSUBSTANTIATED March 2008 April 2008 Largest number of reports in Non-DFCS Foster Homes. Higher substantiation rates in Non-DFCS foster homes Fewer Incidents in April 2008.

59 ABSENCE OF ABUSE/NEGLECT IN FOSTER CARE National Standard: 99.68%

60

REGIONAL COMPOSITE SCORES & TARGETING FAMILY ENGAGEMENT

79 REGIONAL COMPOSITE SCORES MAY 2008 SafetyPermanencyWell-BeingOverall May 2008Overall for April 2008 Region 187%79%84%83%86% Region 285% 75%82%84% Region 386%73%86%82% Region 482%80%76%79%76% Region 595%89%80%88%93% Region 693%83%79%85%84% Region 793%86%84%88%90% Region 885%83% 84% Region 992%79%81%84%86% Region 1094%91% 92%86% Region 1194%80%79%84%80% Region 1284%69%71%75%67% Region 1480%76%79%78%77% Region 1596%81%96%91%81% Region 1689%83%55%76%81% Region 1784%56%64%68%74% State89%80%79%82% Notes: Green indicates 95% or above; yellow indicates that the region either remained the same or increased in that area and red indicates a decrease from cases reviewed in April 2008.

80 COMPOSITE TREND STATEWIDE

81 SAFETY 1 AND 2 STATE AND & REGIONS Safety 1Safety 2 Region 187% Region 284%85% Region 383%88% Region 481%83% Region 594%96% Region 694%91% Region 795%90% Region 892%77% Region 988%95% Region 1093%95% Region 1195%94% Region 1280%89% Region 1472%88% Region 1598%94% Region 1698%80% Region 1776%91% State88%89% Red = a decrease from last month. Yellow = an increase from last month. Green = 95% or above.

82 Permanency 1Permanency 2 Region 179% Region 285% Region 371%74% Region 475%84% Region 587%90% Region 681%86% Region 787%84% Region 883% Region 975%83% Region 1091% Region 1177%82% Region 1266%72% Region 1472%79% Region 1579%83% Region 1678%87% Region 1751%62% State77%82% PERMANENCY 1 AND 2 STATE AND & REGIONS Red = a decrease from last month. Yellow = an increase from last month.

83 Well-Being 1Well-Being 2Well-Being 3 Region 184%81%87% Region 274%72%79% Region 380%89%90% Region 474%77% Region 576%89%74% Region 682%75%79% Region 782%84%87% Region 882%85%83% Region 980%81%83% Region 1087%99%88% Region 1174% 88% Region 1271% 70% Region 1477%82%78% Region 1595% 97% Region 1662%49%53% Region 1764%49%78% State78% 76% Red = a decrease from last month. Yellow = an increase from last month. WELL-BEING 1, 2 & 3 STATE AND & REGIONS

84 CASE REVIEWS COUNTY DIRECTORS & PEAS

85 REGION 4 MARCH 2008

86 REGION 5 APRIL 2008

87 REGION 6 MARCH 2008

88 REGION 8 DECEMBER 2007

89 REGION 11 MAY 2008

90 REGION 12 APRIL 2008

91 TARGETING FAMILY ENGAGEMENT Caseworker Visits to Children Caseworker Visits to Family Diligent Search Conducted Family Team Meetings Response Time Met

92 TARGETING FAMILY ENGAGEMENT TREND

93 CASEWORKER VISITS TO CHILDREN

94 EVERY CHILD EVERY MONTH Note: OF the 51% of children visited every month they were in care in FFY 2007, 82% of those visits occurred in the child’s residence.

95 DateLocationFacilityRegions July Metro Atlanta AreaGA Tech Conf. Ctr.Statewide July 31-Aug 1Morrow Clayton State UniversityMetro 13, 16 Aug. 4-5DuluthHilton Garden InnNorth 3, 15 Aug. 6-7GainesvilleHoliday Inn Lanier Ctr.North 1, 2 Aug SavannahHampton Inn & SuitesSouth 7, 12 Aug MaconFairfield Inn & SuitesMiddle 4,6 Aug AthensHoliday InnNorth 5,17 Aug DecaturHoliday Inn Conf. Ctr.Metro 13, 14 Sept ValdostaComfort Inn & SuitesSouth 9,11 Sept Albany Holiday Inn Albany MallSouth 8,10 Oct. 1-2ColumbusColumbus MarriottOverflow Location PSSF CASEWORKER VISIT TRANINGS

96 CASEWORKER VISITS TO FAMILIES

97 DILIGENT SEARCH CONDUCTED

98 FAMILY TEAM MEETINGS

99 THE BEST IS YET TO COME! NEXT G-FORCE MEETING JULY 24, 2008