Ivana Poljančić Physics Department University of Rijeka, Croatia IHY-ISWI Regional Meeting Heliophysical phenomena and Earth's environment 7-13 September 2009, Šibenik, Croatia
IHY-ISWI Regional Meeting Heliophysical phenomena and Earth's environment 7-13 September 2009, Šibenik, Croatia...with R. Brajsa 1, D. Ruzdjak 1, D. Hrzina 2, R. Jurdana-Sepi ć 3, H. Wöhl 4, W. Otruba 5 1 Hvar Observatory, Faculty of Geodesy, University of Zagreb 2 Zagreb Astronomical Observatory, Croatia 3 Department of Physics, University of Rijeka, Croatia 4 Kiepenheuer-Institut für Sonnenphysik, Freiburg, Germany 5 Solar Observatory Kanzelhöhe, Austria
Solar differential rotation - Scientific context one of the fundamental properties of the Sun as the star observational constraint on theoretical models of the rotating convection zone MHD dinamo -> solar magnetic activity Results for the time period 1874 – 1976: dependence of solar rotation on time (Brajša et al. 2006) relationship between the solar rotation and activity (Brajša et al. 2007) -> to extend present
Motivation and aims 1. Greenwich Photoheliographic results (GPR) -> 1874 – Solar Optical Observing Network (SOON), United States Air Force (USAF), National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) -> present data in almost the same format the aim is to check the precision of the second data set and compare it with the first one
Data sets Positions of sunspot groups : GPR SOON/USAF/NOAA A comparison with other data sets: Kanzelhöhe data, drawings (1947 – present) To identify sunspot groups we also used: Debrecen Photoheliographic Data ( present)
Data selection for test 1972: GPR & Kanzelhöhe 1993: SOON/USAF/NOAA & Kanzelhöhe aproximately the same phases of different solar cycles mostly isolated single H and J sunspot groups (Zürich types)
Methods determining positions and angular velocities of selected sunspot groups from the digitized Solar Observatory Kanzelhöhe drawings comparing the determined Kanzelhöhe sunspot group coordinates and angular velocities with those from GPR (1972) and SOON/USAF/NOAA (1993) Sungrabber: a special software for determination of tracer’s positions in full disk solar images
Sungrabber images in the several graphical formats (jpg, gif, bmp...) for different purposes (determination of tracer’s heliographic coordinates in full disk solar images) Hrzina et al., 2007 ( Kanzelhöhe drawing (25th Jan. 1993)
Sungrabber Seetings -> Coordinate system, Zero Point, Date and Time
Sungrabber Input -> Sun’s limb, Daily parallel, New Object
Sungrabber Input -> New Object; File -> Save
Sungrabber
Number of analysed sunspot groups Zürich types sunspot groups Year Number of analysed sunspot groups Observer 1Observer 2 Single H and J Complex
Results – Single H and J sunspot groups (GPR vs. Kanz. & SOON vs. Kanz., heliographic coordinates) Year limit of CMD L (deg) B (deg) Obs. 1Obs. 2Obs. 1Obs All 0,4790,4290,2310, ,3710,3250,2600, ,3420,2590,2720, All 0,8510,8470,6120, ,7640,7840,6090, ,6940,8560,6260,770 L, B – difference between Kanzelhöhe and other data sets longitude (latitude)
Results – Single H and J sunspot groups (GPR vs. Kanz. & SOON vs. Kanz., angular velocities) Year limit of CMD (deg/day) Obs. 1Obs All 0,5660, ,4950, ,5380, All 0,9190, ,8400, ,6970,977 – difference between Kanzelhöhe and other data sets angular velocities
Results – Complex sunspot groups (heliographic coordinates & angular velocities) Year limit of CMD L (deg) B (deg) (deg/day) 1972 All 1,0740,5241, ,1060,5571, ,9860,5591, All 1,0750,6031, ,9450,6071, ,8950,5941,022 Results: Observer 1
Difference between the two observers (Average absolute deviation) Year limit of CMD L (deg) B (deg) (deg/day) 1972 All 0,1440,1240, ,1880,1680, ,2060,1290, All 0,1220,0770, ,1010,0790, ,0970,0790,140
Conclusions With the assumption of constant reliability of Kanzelhöhe drawings –> SOON/USAF/NOAA data are somewhat less precise then GPR the precision of the second data set (SOON/USAF/NOAA ) is still suitable for the investigation of long term measurments of solar rotation as a global parameter of the Sun as the star future work: to reduce more data and to include further data sets to apply the residual methods (one value per year) on SOON/USAF/NOAA temporal variations and relationship with the level of solar activity
Acknowledgements This work is sponsored by the Air Force Office of Scientific Research, Air Force Material Command, USAF, Under grant member FA Also, the research leading to the results presented here has partly received funding from European Community’s Seventh Framework Programme (FP7/ ) under grant agreement no
Acknowledgements Finally, we are thankfull to E. Cliver and N. Gopalswamy for usefull suggestions and discussions. Thank you for your attention!