Update on Chesapeake Bay Model Upgrade Projects Briefing to Potomac River Integrated Monitoring Stakeholders March 20, 2006 Presented by: Steve Bieber.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Chesapeake Bay Environmental Model Package A coupled system of watershed, hydrodynamic and eutrophication models The same package used for the 2002 load.
Advertisements

GEF Component B Actual start: January GEF component B Italics: will be completed end 2014 Underlined: completed UP = Un. Philippines WSU = Washington.
Geographical Information System & Modelling LIFE02/ENV/P/
Nutrient Issues at the Blue Plains WWTP February 2004.
OVERVIEW OF SUSPENDED SOLIDS TRANSPORT AND LIVING RESOURCE INTERACTIONS Ross Mandel Interstate Commission on the Potomac River Basin March 8, 2004.
Maryland Assateague Coastkeeper Baltimore Harbor Waterkeeper Chester Riverkeeper Choptank Riverkeeper Patuxent Riverkeeper Sassafras Riverkeeper Severn.
James River Chlorophyll Study Status Update: January 2015 House Agriculture, Chesapeake and Natural Resources Committee David K. Paylor, DEQ Director.
OMSAP Public Meeting September 1999 The Utility of the Bays Eutrophication Model in the Harbor Outfall Monitoring Program James Fitzpatrick HydroQual,
Chesapeake Bay and New York State Water Quality and the Potential for Future Regulations Presented by the Upper Susquehanna Coalition.
Water Policy in the US and the EU K H Reckhow and C Pahl-Wostl Part I: US Total Maximum Daily Load Program.
WP12. Hindcast and scenario studies on coastal-shelf climate and ecosystem variability and change Why? (in addition to the call text) Need to relate “today’s”
Chesapeake Bay Program Monitoring Activities and Monitoring Network Design Chesapeake Bay Program Monitoring Activities and Monitoring Network Design Stephen.
0 The National Hydrography Dataset Plus a tool for SPARROW Watershed Modeling Richard Moore (presented by Alan Rea)
Analyzing Stream Condition Using EMAP Algae Data By Nick Paretti ARIZONA PHYCOLOGY ECOL 475.
Jędrasik J., Kowalewski M., Ołdakowski B., University of Gdansk, Institute of Oceanography Impact of the Vistula River waters on the Gulf of Gdańsk during.
Pomme de Terre Lake Water Quality Summary Pomme de Terre Lake Water Quality Summary US Army Corps of Engineers Environmental Resources Section.
DR. PAUL A. BUKAVECKAS VIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITY Developing water quality standards to Protect the James River against Impacts from Algal Blooms.
Region III Activities to Implement National Vision to Improve Water Quality Monitoring National Water Quality Monitoring Council August 20, 2003.
A T HREE- D IMENSIONAL W ATER Q UALITY M ODEL OF S OUTHERN P UGET S OUND Greg Pelletier, P.E., Mindy Roberts, P.E., Skip Albertson, P.E., and Jan Newton,
DC Draft Phase II Watershed Implementation Plan Stakeholder Meeting March 1, 2012 Metropolitan Washington Council Of Governments Hamid Karimi Deputy Director.
Virginia Assessment Scenario Tool VAST Developed by: Interstate Commission on the Potomac River Basin.
Update on Chesapeake Bay Model Upgrade Projects Blue Plains Regional Committee Briefing November 30, 2004 Presented by: Steve Bieber Metropolitan Washington.
WQSTM Shallow-Water Simulation We received the shallow-water database from CBP circa autumn These are grab samples and measures collected when continuous.
Nicole Reid, Jane Herbert, and Dean Baas MSU Extension Land & Water Program W. K. Kellogg Biological Station Transparency tube as a surrogate for turbidity,
The Non-tidal Water Quality Monitoring Network: past, present and future opportunities Katie Foreman Water Quality Analyst, UMCES-CBPO MASC Non-tidal Water.
Chesapeake Bay Policy Committee Meeting Bay Program Water Quality Goals: Focus on Funding Presented to COG Board of Directors September 10, 2003.
OHHI Beach Modeling Group Meeting March 23, 2006 GLERL, Ann Arbor, MI Project Summary Project Title: Predicting Pathogen Fate in the Great Lakes Coastal.
SJR DWSC DO Modeling HydroQual, Inc. Andy Thuman, P.E. Laurie De Rosa SJR Technical Working Group May 16, 2006.
Submerged aquatic vegetation (SAV) abundance and diversity in the tidal Potomac River and estuary By Nancy Rybicki, Jurate Landwehr, Edward Schenk, and.
Center for Satellite Applications and Research (STAR) Review 09 – 11 March 2010 Hydrologic and Water Quality Modeling of the Chesapeake Bay Watershed Huan.
Restoring VA Waters the TMDL Way Jeff Corbin Senior Advisor to the Regional Administrator U.S. EPA Region 3.
1 Factors influencing the dynamics of excessive algal blooms Richard F. Ambrose Environmental Science and Engineering Program Department of Environmental.
Chesapeake Bay Policy in Virginia - TMDL, Milestones and the Watershed Agreement Russ Baxter Deputy Secretary of Natural Resources for the Chesapeake Bay.
NWQMC July 26, 2005 Developing A National Water Quality Monitoring Network Design.
PROJECT OBJECTIVE To identify and evaluate a suite of management scenarios to address the Old Tampa Bay issues using integrated modeling tools.
Water Quality Modeling of Bonnet Carré Freshwater Flows in the Pontchartrain Estuary Rachel Roblin Alex McCorquodale Ioannis Georgiou.
WATERS Network MISSION STATEMENT: To transform understanding of the Earth’s water and related cycles across spatial and temporal scales to enable forecasting.
Baird Claytor Hydroelectric Project Sedimentation Study.
Integrated Ecological Assessment February 28, 2006 Long-Term Plan Annual Update Carl Fitz Recovery Model Development and.
Water Quality and the Chesapeake Bay David O’Brien NOAA Fisheries Service Gloucester Point, VA.
2004 Tributary Strategies: Assessment of Implementation Options Steve Bieber Water Resources Program Presented at: COG Chesapeake Bay Policy Committee.
Clifton Bell, P.E., P.G. Chesapeake Bay Modeling Perspectives for the Regulated Community.
Chesapeake Bay Program’s Baywide and Basinwide Monitoring Networks: Options for Adapting Monitoring Networks and Realigning Resources to Address Partner.
Narragansett Bay Environmental Monitoring Li-Ling Yang Roger Williams University.
Chesapeake Bay TMDL 2017 Midpoint Assessment: A Critical Path Forward Lucinda Power EPA Chesapeake Bay Program Office Citizens Advisory Committee Meeting.
Estimating future scenarios for farm-watershed nutrient fluxes using dynamic simulation modelling – Can on-farm BMPs really do the job at the watershed.
Development of the Neuse Estuary Eutrophication Model: Background and Calibration By James D. Bowen UNC Charlotte.
Development, Testing and Application of the Multi-Block LTFATE Hydrodynamic and Sediment Transport Model Earl J. Hayter See instructions for customizing.
Maryland Association of Counties Conference August 12, 2009 Bob Koroncai USEPA Region III The Chesapeake Bay TMDL.
Integrating the NAWQA approach to assessments in rivers and streams By Donna Myers, Bill Wilber, Anne Hoos, and Charlie Crawford U.S. Geological Survey,
A Shallow-water Coastal Habitat Model for Regional Scale Evaluation of Management Decisions in the Chesapeake Region C. L. Gallegos, D. E. Weller, T. E.
Focus Group Meeting: November 12, 2013 Truckee River Water Quality Standards Review.
OVERVIEW: CHESAPEAKE BAY PROGRAM DEVELOPMENTS AND WATER & CLIMATE CHANGE ACTIVITIES Water Resources Technical Committee Oct. 29, 2015 Presented by Tanya.
State Agency Needs for Remote Sensing Data Related to Water Quality By Bob Van Dolah Marine Resources Research Institute South Carolina Department of Natural.
PROJECT PLAN: The Nature Conservancy Corps of Engineers ICPRB Presentation Potomac Watershed Roundtable January 9, 2009.
Upstate Freshwater Institute Markensten et al. NYWEA 2008 Simulating multiple functional groups of phytoplankton in Cannonsville Reservoir Hampus Markensten.
Water Quality Indicators and Monitoring Design to Support the Albemarle-Pamlico National Estuary Program: A Progress Report Dean E. Carpenter and William.
Chesapeake Bay Watershed Implementation Plans: Why, What, and When Katherine Antos U.S. EPA Chesapeake Bay Program Office MACo Winter Conference January.
HAMPTON ROADS REGIONAL WATER RESOURCES MANAGEMENT PROGRAM Presentation John M. Carlock, AICP Deputy Executive Director, Physical Planning Hampton Roads.
Smithsonian Environmental Research Center. Temporal Changes in SAV Coverage Total # of Species Total No. of All Species Eurasian Watermilfoil Dominant.
Aquatic Resource Monitoring Overview Anthony (Tony) R. Olsen USEPA NHEERL Western Ecology Division Corvallis, Oregon (541)
The Chesapeake Bay: How is it Doing? An Overview of The Chesapeake Bay Watershed.
Nitrogen loading from forested catchments Marie Korppoo VEMALA catchment meeting, 25/09/2012 Marie Korppoo, Markus Huttunen 12/02/2015 Open DATA: Nutrient.
High Rock Lake Nutrient Modeling Update Pam Behm - NC Division of Water Resources Environmental Management Commission Water Quality Committee Information.
Chesapeake Bay Program
Hypoxia Forecasts as a Tool for Chesapeake Bay Fisheries
Citizens Advisory Council
Elizabeth River PCB TMDL Study: Numerical Modeling Approach
Michael, B. D. , Trice, T. M. , Heyer, C. J. , Stankelis, R. M
James River PCB TMDL Study: Numerical Modeling Approach
Presentation transcript:

Update on Chesapeake Bay Model Upgrade Projects Briefing to Potomac River Integrated Monitoring Stakeholders March 20, 2006 Presented by: Steve Bieber Metropolitan Washington Council of Governments Briefing to Potomac River Integrated Monitoring Stakeholders March 20, 2006 Presented by: Steve Bieber Metropolitan Washington Council of Governments

March 28, Project Description Potomac Upgrade Potomac Upgrade –Better spatial scale to simulate water quality responses to management efforts at a local scale. –Better simulation of algal species and their impacts on water quality. –Sediment and pH- alkalinity dynamics critical to the Potomac and Anacostia will be modeled. Chesapeake Bay Upgrade Chesapeake Bay Upgrade –Sediment types and physical processes affecting sediment loads will be incorporated. –Water quality responses to sediment control actions will be more accurately reflected. –Improved sediment controls may reduce the need for WWTP upgrades.

March 28, Water Quality Issues Unique to Potomac Large pool of particulate inorganic phosphorus (PIP) that may not become available for algal growth Large pool of particulate inorganic phosphorus (PIP) that may not become available for algal growth Large blooms of Microcystis (blue-green algae) Large blooms of Microcystis (blue-green algae) Algal growth more limited by phosphorus than by nitrogen, especially in tidal fresh portion Algal growth more limited by phosphorus than by nitrogen, especially in tidal fresh portion Potential for nitrogen fixation Potential for nitrogen fixation DC waters listed as impaired due to high pH DC waters listed as impaired due to high pH pH-Alkalinity influence on sediment phosphorus flux pH-Alkalinity influence on sediment phosphorus flux

March 28, Project Partners Blue Plains Users & COG Blue Plains Users & COG U.S. EPA U.S. EPA U.S. Army COE U.S. Army COE State of Maryland State of Maryland District of Columbia District of Columbia State of Virginia State of Virginia ICPRB ICPRB Univ. of Maryland Univ. of Maryland VIMS VIMS LimnoTech LimnoTech Hydroqual Hydroqual Smithsonian ERC Smithsonian ERC USGS USGS Occoquan WML Occoquan WML

March 28, Benefits of Upgrade to Potomac Model Scientific Scientific –Better understanding of load-response relationships in Potomac River and Estuary –More accurate representation of nutrient cycling, transport and delivery to the main Bay –Design tool for fine scale monitoring programs in nearshore areas and local embayments Management Management –Explicit representation of Potomac water quality issues –Improved capability for load allocations to sources within the tidal fresh Potomac –Improved capability for investigating trade-offs among nitrogen, phosphorus and solids loads

March 28, Status Commencement of the project outlined in the Corps PMP was April Commencement of the project outlined in the Corps PMP was April Scheduled completion is April Scheduled completion is April We are 22 months into a planned 36 month project. We are 22 months into a planned 36 month project. Congress was good to us this year. Planned commitments from DC and EPA will fulfill major project goals. Congress was good to us this year. Planned commitments from DC and EPA will fulfill major project goals.

March 28, Estuarine Phosphorus Model Simulate the relationship between phosphorus loading and production and biomass of living resources in the Potomac River Estuary. Simulate the relationship between phosphorus loading and production and biomass of living resources in the Potomac River Estuary. This is key to predicting the frequency and severity of harmful algae blooms. This is key to predicting the frequency and severity of harmful algae blooms. One year of really exciting field work has been completed. One year of really exciting field work has been completed. A new estuarine phosphorus model has been proposed. A new estuarine phosphorus model has been proposed. A second year of process-oriented field work is planned. A second year of process-oriented field work is planned.

March 28, pH - Alkalinity This task involves developing a mathematical modeling framework that relates pH to nutrient loading, primary production, and other factors. This task involves developing a mathematical modeling framework that relates pH to nutrient loading, primary production, and other factors. –This relates directly to the investigation of harmful algae blooms in the Potomac. –The Potomac Estuary is listed as impaired for violating the pH water quality criteria. Field investigation of pH effects on sediment phosphorus release commenced April Completion summer Field investigation of pH effects on sediment phosphorus release commenced April Completion summer No modeling activity has commenced due to lack of funding. No modeling activity has commenced due to lack of funding. Funding by DCDHMH is in progress. Two funding increments. Funding by DCDHMH is in progress. Two funding increments. Delivery date should be pushed back to April 2008 Delivery date should be pushed back to April 2008

March 28, Erosion Rate Measures This task involves the measurement and analysis of sediment erosion rates in the Potomac and upper Chesapeake Bay. This task involves the measurement and analysis of sediment erosion rates in the Potomac and upper Chesapeake Bay. Two years field work completed by VIMS, Horn Point, ERDC – mostly in the Potomac. Two years field work completed by VIMS, Horn Point, ERDC – mostly in the Potomac. Third-year effort is devoted to data analysis. Third-year effort is devoted to data analysis.

March 28, Light Attenuation This task involves fundamental measures of the effects of suspended solids on light attenuation. This task involves fundamental measures of the effects of suspended solids on light attenuation. Two years field work completed by Smithsonian. Two years field work completed by Smithsonian. Chuck Gallegos is working on a FORTRAN code to complete this project. Chuck Gallegos is working on a FORTRAN code to complete this project.

March 28, Particle Settling Velocity The goal of this phase of the project is to produce statistically sound relationships that relate concentration and sinking of mineral solids (TSS-POC) with seasonal and regional variations in plankton community structure and dynamics. The goal of this phase of the project is to produce statistically sound relationships that relate concentration and sinking of mineral solids (TSS-POC) with seasonal and regional variations in plankton community structure and dynamics. Analysis of field data has been completed. Analysis of field data has been completed. Three protocol lab experiments have been completed. One more in progress now. Three protocol lab experiments have been completed. One more in progress now. Hope for delivery of an algorithm in an April-May time frame. Hope for delivery of an algorithm in an April-May time frame.

March 28, CE-QUAL-ICM The model is up and running for The model is up and running for Substantial effort has been devoted to data acquisition and processing. Substantial effort has been devoted to data acquisition and processing. Reformulation and/or recalibration is required to bring DO into calibration Reformulation and/or recalibration is required to bring DO into calibration Scheduled completion = 50%. Actual = 50%. Scheduled completion = 50%. Actual = 50%.

March 28, Phase V Watershed Model We have flows mapped to new grid. Used to drive CH3D We have flows mapped to new grid. Used to drive CH3D We lack Phase V loads for WQM. We lack Phase V loads for WQM. We lack Phase V flow and loads for 2000 We lack Phase V flow and loads for 2000

March 28, Other Activities Anacostia Monitoring – Three-year project proceeding as planned. Anacostia Monitoring – Three-year project proceeding as planned. Fall-line monitoring – Ongoing program. Fall-line monitoring – Ongoing program. Surface Waves – Basic wave model is complete. Results have been passed to VIMS for insertion into boundary layer model. Surface Waves – Basic wave model is complete. Results have been passed to VIMS for insertion into boundary layer model.

March 28, Other Activities (Cont’d) Bank Loads – Spatially detailed estimates of shoreline erosion are being created for the upper bay and Potomac. Bank Loads – Spatially detailed estimates of shoreline erosion are being created for the upper bay and Potomac. Loads for the Maryland portion of the bay, including Potomac north shore, are being evaluated by Jeff Halka of MGS. Loads for the Maryland portion of the bay, including Potomac north shore, are being evaluated by Jeff Halka of MGS. Loads for the Virginia portion of the bay, including Potomac south shore, are from existing reports. Loads for the Virginia portion of the bay, including Potomac south shore, are from existing reports.

March 28, Other Activities (Cont’d) Anacostia Stream Bank Erosion – better estimates of sediment inputs from streams. Report is completed. Anacostia Stream Bank Erosion – better estimates of sediment inputs from streams. Report is completed. Boundary layer dynamics - The boundary layer model is “almost completed.” Incorporates currents from CH3D and waves from wave model. Boundary layer dynamics - The boundary layer model is “almost completed.” Incorporates currents from CH3D and waves from wave model. Algal Speciation – No activity and no funding identified. Algal Speciation – No activity and no funding identified.

March 28, Summary Progress for the core of this project, suspended solids, is on schedule and proceeding well. Progress for the core of this project, suspended solids, is on schedule and proceeding well. Peripheral efforts are behind (pH) or unfunded (algal species modeling). Peripheral efforts are behind (pH) or unfunded (algal species modeling).

March 28, Summary Funding to project completion has been identified. Funding to project completion has been identified. The next year is “crunch time.” The next year is “crunch time.” More detailed info available at More detailed info available at