TERRESTRIAL REFERENCE SYSTEMS FOR GLOBAL NAVIGATION SATELLITE SYSTEMS

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Where do precise orbits and clocks come from? Kristine M. Larson ASEN 6090 Spring 2010.
Advertisements

Principles of the Global Positioning System Lecture 19 Prof. Thomas Herring Room A;
Reference Frames for GPS Applications and Research
Effect of Surface Loading on Regional Reference Frame Realization Hans-Peter Plag Nevada Bureau of Mines and Geology and Seismological Laboratory University.
2-3 November 2009NASA Sea Level Workshop1 The Terrestrial Reference Frame and its Impact on Sea Level Change Studies GPS VLBI John Ries Center for Space.
LINDA MORGAN PRINCIPAL CONSULTANT – SPATIAL POSITIONING WESTERN AUSTRALIA SURVEYING CONFERENCE 2013 Geodetic Stuff You Need to Know: Datums, Standards.
Global Positioning Systems (GPS) for Precision Farming
Map Projections (2/2) Francisco Olivera, Ph.D., P.E. Center for Research in Water Resources University of Texas at Austin.
Better Positions and Improved Access to the National Spatial Reference System  Multi-Year CORS Solution  National Adjustment of 2011  New NGS Datasheet.
Geographic Datums Y X Z The National Imagery and Mapping Agency (NIMA) and the Defense Mapping School Reviewed by:____________ Date:_________ Objective:
Absolute Receiver Autonomous Integrity Monitoring (ARAIM)
Background Accessibility Popularity of GPS and INS –Cell phones Apple iPhone, Blackberry, Android platform –Nintendo Wii Wii Remote, MotionPlus.
GTECH 201 Session 08 GPS.
Laser Ranging Contributions to Earth Rotation Studies Richard S. Gross Jet Propulsion Laboratory California Institute of Technology Pasadena, CA 91109–8099,
Introduction.
Know the Earth…Show the Way NATIONAL GEOSPATIAL-INTELLIGENCE AGENCY Approved for Public Release NGA Case # NGA’s Role in GPS Barbara Wiley.
Aviation Considerations for Multi-Constellation GNSS Leo Eldredge, GNSS Group Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) December 2008 Federal Aviation Administration.
How Global Positioning Devices (GPS) work
DORIS - DAYS Toulouse May 2-3, 2000 DORIS Doppler Orbitography and Radiopositioning Integrated by Satellite  Basic system concept  Main missions  Schedules.
Coordinate Systems in Geodesy By K.V.Ramana Murty, O. S.
ENC-GNSS 2006 – Manchester, UK Civil GPS Interface Committee International Sub-Committee May 7, 2006 John E. Augustine Acting Director, Office of Navigation.
GLONASS Government Policy, Status and Modernization
A New & Improved National Spatial Reference System Refinements of the North American Datum of 1983 through the Multi-Year CORS Solution and the National.
SU 4100 GEODETIC POSITIONING Instructor: Indra Wijayratne.
Faculty of Applied Engineering and Urban Planning Civil Engineering Department Geographic Information Systems Spatial Referencing Lecture 4 Week 6 1 st.
International Geospatial Activities Dr. Neil D. Weston Deputy Director National Geodetic Survey, NOS, NOAA Geospatial Summit, April 13-14, 2015.
Who Needs New Datums? NGS Says… ftp://ftp.ngs.noaa.gov/pub/marti Marti Ikehara California Geodetic Advisor, Sacramento.
Mr.Samniang Suttara B.Eng. (Civil), M.Eng. (Survey) Topcon Instruments (Thailand) Co.,Ltd. Tel Satellite Surveying.
NGS GPS ORBIT DETERMINATION Positioning America for the Future NATIONAL OCEANIC AND ATMOSPHERIC ADMINISTRATION National Ocean Service National Geodetic.
Regional and Global Measurements: The Reference Frame for Understanding Observations Geoff Blewitt University of Nevada, Reno, USA Zuheir Altamimi IGN,
Class 19 – NAVSTAR GPS, GLONASS and Galileo
Space Geodesy (1/3) Geodesy provides a foundation for all Earth observations Space geodesy is the use of precise measurements between space objects (e.g.,
Recent GNSS Activities at Geoscience Australia Gary Johnston, Guorong Hu, Anna Riddell Geodesy & Seismic Monitoring Branch, Geoscience Australia.
Outline  Construction of gravity and magnetic models  Principle of superposition (mentioned on week 1 )  Anomalies  Reference models  Geoid  Figure.
Position, Navigation and Timing Advisory Board: Strategic Engagement & Communication March 27-28, 2008.
Determination of seasonal geocenter variations from DORIS, GPS and SLR data.
Faculty of Applied Engineering and Urban Planning Civil Engineering Department Introduction to Geodesy and Geomatics Position, Positioning Modes, and the.
PNT Advisory Board Panel 2: Strategic Engagement and Communication October 4, 2007 Washington D.C Panel Members: Gerhard Beutler, Chet Huber, Dave Logsdon.
01/0000 HEO and Daylight Ranging “Reality and Wishes” Ramesh Govind ILRS Fall Workshop, 4 th October 2005.
Global Navigation Satellite Systems Progress through Cooperation 5 March 2009 Michael Shaw, Director U.S. National Coordination Office.
Who Needs New Datums? NGS Says… ftp://ftp.ngs.noaa.gov/pub/marti Marti Ikehara California Geodetic Advisor, Sacramento.
The ICRF, ITRF and VLBA Chopo Ma NASA’s Goddard Spaceflight Center.
SNARF: Theory and Practice, and Implications Thomas Herring Department of Earth Atmospheric and Planetary Sciences, MIT
National Geodetic Survey – Continuously Operating Reference Stations & Online Positioning User Service (CORS & OPUS) William Stone Southwest Region (UT,
Geodesy and Datums Ellipsoid and Geoid Geographic Coordinate system.
Introduction to GPS/GNSS Introduction to Tidal and Geodetic Vertical Datums Corbin Training Center January 7, 2009 Jeff Little Guest Speaker ,
Introduction To Localization Techniques (GPS)
NGOS NORDIC GEODETIC OBSERVING SYSTEM NKG Task Force Markku Poutanen, Per Knudsen, Mikael Lilje, Hans-Peter Plag, Hans-Georg Scherneck.
Reference Frame Theory & Practice: Implications for SNARF SNARF Workshop 1/27/04 Geoff Blewitt University of Nevada, Reno.
Understanding North American Geocentric Reference Frames in Geographic Calculator Dr. Qassim Abdullah, Woolpert, Inc. The 2015 Blue Marble User Conference.
Earth Surface and Interior Focus Area Space Geodetic Networks for Maintaining the Reference Frame Geodesy's Critical Contributions to NASA (Earth Science)
, , ,
Alice Wong, Senior Advisor U.S. Department of State Bureau of Oceans and International Environmental and Scientific Affairs Office of Space and Advanced.
GPS collection Survey Grade Receivers Mapping Grade Receivers Recreational Grade Receivers Differential correction Real time CORS beacon WAAS Subscription.
© ИАЦ КВНО ЦНИИмаш Собственность ИАЦ. All rights reserved GLONASS Status and Progress Sergey Revnivykh CGSIC Meeting , Savannah, GA, US.
U.S. International Activities Supporting Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) Compatibility and Interoperability October 16, 2008 David A. Turner.
View on GPS and Galileo ‘From across the Atlantic…’ Ruth E. Neilan International GNSS Service (IGS) Central Bureau Jet Propulsion Laboratory/California.
Catherine LeCocq SLAC USPAS, Cornell University Large Scale Metrology of Accelerators June 27 - July 1, 2005 Coordinate Systems 1 Coordinate Systems Purpose:
1. The International Terrestrial Reference Frame (ITRF) needs to be made more robust and stable over multi-decadal time scales. –target accuracy is 0.1.
Projections and coordinate systems
Munich SATNAV, Munich Satellite Navigation Summit February 21-23, 2006 Michael E. Shaw Director, U.S. National Space-Based PNT Coordination Office.
Earth Surface and Interior Focus Area Space Geodetic Networks for Maintaining the Reference Frame Geodesy's Critical Contributions to NASA (Earth Science)
Importance of SLR in the Determination of the ITRF Zuheir Altamimi IGN, France Geoscience Australia, Canberra, August 29, 2005 SLR Strength: its contribution.
19-21 February 2008 Michael Shaw, Director U.S. National Coordination Office for Space-Based Positioning, Navigation, and Timing (PNT) GPS-Galileo Progress.
Geodetic Control and Datums Where is it? How Accurately can we map it?
Ggim.un.org Positioning geospatial information to address global challenges Global and National Geodetic Reference Frames: how they are connected and why.
The Global Positioning System Rebecca C. Smyth April 17 - May 2, 2001.
Reference Frame Representations: The ITRF from the user perspective
X SERBIAN-BULGARIAN ASTRONOMICAL CONFERENCE 30 MAY - 3 JUNE, 2016, BELGRADE, SERBIA EARTH ORIENTATION PARAMETERS AND GRAVITY VARIATIONS DETERMINED FROM.
Presentation transcript:

TERRESTRIAL REFERENCE SYSTEMS FOR GLOBAL NAVIGATION SATELLITE SYSTEMS James A. Slater Basic and Applied Research Office National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency National Space-Based PNT Advisory Board Meeting October 4, 2007

Objectives of a “Reference System” Satisfy the need to answer the questions: Where am I (at some instant in time)? What is the location of some object or someone else? In absolute terms or in relative terms and at varying accuracies For the military: Missile launch sites, precision weapons and targets Landmines Battlespace coordination For the general civilian population: International borders Car, ship or plane navigation Mineral resources For the scientific community: Crustal motion Sea level change Satellite orbits

Need for a Terrestrial Reference System Create a foundational structure that we call a Terrestrial Reference System to quantitatively and consistently specify position locations Define a set of conventions, constants, models and parameters which form the mathematical basis for representing locations on, above or below the Earth. Example: Construct 3-dimensional coordinate system, fixed to the Earth, with its origin at the Earth’s center of mass, oriented with the equator and the prime meridian. Model figure of the Earth as an ellipsoid that rotates with the Earth, whose center coincides with coordinate system origin, and whose axes are aligned with coordinate system axes.

Need for a Standard Global Terrestrial Reference System What happens if every country implements a different version of a geodetic reference system?

International Terrestrial Reference System Scientific community rigorously establishes international standard for terrestrial reference system International Earth Rotation and Reference Systems Service (IERS) maintains the standard International Terrestrial Reference Frame (ITRF) defined (realized) to be Geocentric coordinate system Aligned close to mean equator of 1900 and Greenwich meridian (coordinate axes oriented to the BIH Terrestrial System at 1984.0 for historical consistency) Set of reference points on topographic surface of the Earth Based on multiple data sources: Very Long Baseline Interferometry (VLBI) Satellite Laser Ranging (SLR) GPS DORIS Reference station coordinate solutions and velocities define frame at specific time Solutions based on consistent set of conventions, constants and models

U.S. Department of Defense World Geodetic System (WGS) Global Geocentric Terrestrial Reference System 1950s early space exploration offered first global view satellite tracking and ICBMs required global coordinate systems WGS 1960 provided first standard global coordinate system for Dept. of Defense (DoD) WGS 1966 and 1972 answered the need for greater accuracy and broader application to DoD requirements WGS 1984 represented significant improvement DoD World Geodetic Systems have always conformed to and adopted international standards Applied to all DoD products and services – maps, charts, airfields, features data, topography, satellite orbits, real-time positioning,…

Department of Defense World Geodetic System Earth-Centered Earth-Fixed Coordinate System Adopted ITRF definition Standard Earth Model Ellipsoid with mass and rotation rate of Earth Center coincides with coord. system origin and axes coincide with those of coord. system Earth Gravitational Model (EGM) Mathematical representation of the gravitational field (current version EGM96, next version EGM07) Global “mean sea level” surface (i.e. elevation = 0) for referencing topographic elevations (“geoid” surface) International Standard Physical Constants and Models Adopted Examples: Flattening (f) and semi-major axis of ellipsoid (a), speed of light (c), gravitational constant (GM), Earth rotation rate (ω), precession, nutation, … ω b a GM

“Realization” of WGS 84 Reference Frame Defined (realized) by the coordinates of a globally-distributed set of reference points on the topographic surface of the Earth – constituted solely by a network of “permanent” GPS stations WGS 84 reference frame periodically adjusted to maintain close alignment to ITRF: Positions of the reference points (DoD monitor stations) are estimated using GPS observations at these points combined with simultaneously-collected data from Int’l GNSS Service (IGS) stations roughly as follows: Given: High level of consistency between the WGS and ITRS conventions, constants and models Known ITRF coordinates of IGS stations Hold IGS station coordinates fixed* in the computations, solve for DoD station positions* and GPS satellite orbit parameters Result: DoD station coordinates and by definition WGS 84 reference frame is coincident with the ITRF within some level of uncertainty *Note: Plate tectonic motion is accounted for.

DoD WGS 84 (G1150) Reference Stations This is a more detailed view of the WGS 84 (G1150) TRF stations. NIMA DGRS refers to the Differential GPS Reference Stations used by NGA field survey groups in very precise positioning in support of DoD test range activities. NIMA MSN Test stations include one in St. Louis and one In Austin, TX The St. Louis station is used primarily for training NGA personnel and testing new monitor station software deployments. The Austin station is used by the Applied Research Laboratories of the University of Texas at Austin (ARL:UT) in the development and initial testing of new monitor station hardware and software. Data from these stations are not generally used in the computing NGA precise ephemerides for the GPS satellites. The Naval Surface Warfare Center Dahlgren Division (NSWCDD) stations are used for developmental work by that organization. All of the NIMA MSN stations will eventually feed data to the GPS Master Control Stations for use in integrity monitoring and filter computations.

IGS Reference Stations for WGS 84 (G1150) These are the IGS stations with ITRF2000 positions that were used to “float” WGS 84 into better alignment with the ITRF and “tighten-up” the WGS 84 TRF accuracy. Most of these stations were held fixed at the ITRF2000 positions during the G1150 solution. Note that station velocities were used to “move” the stations to the same time as the GPS observations used to compute the G11500 solution.

Operational GPS Orbits from DoD Refinements of WGS 84 Reference Frame (reference positions): WGS 84 (G730) – June 1994  ~ 10 cm accuracy WGS 84 (G873) – January 1997  ~ 5 cm accuracy WGS 84 (G1150) – January 2002  ~ 1-2 cm accuracy Operational Implementation: GPS observations from only DoD station network (NGA + AF) DoD station coordinates ‘fixed’ to (ITRF-aligned) WGS 84 coordinates in the orbit computation Result – Precise orbits and broadcast orbits in WGS 84 reference frame Positioning and navigation based on these orbits  WGS 84 position coordinates (alternate realization of reference frame) WGS 84 Adopted by NATO, ICAO, and IHO

Exploiting GNSS in the Future – Standardization Multiple Constellations Want to optimize positioning and navigation performance from multiple constellations and signals So many choices… GPS III – new satellites with more signals GLONASS – new satellites with more satellites Galileo – new global constellation Compass – new global and regional satellites Space-based augmentations from India, Japan and U.S. WAAS Users and Manufacturers want: Interoperability, Compatibility and Standardization Improved availability, Improved integrity and Higher accuracy (we hope)  Real-time, seamless operation Standardization should start with: Common geodetic reference frame Common time reference

Effect on GLONASS Broadcast Orbits from Standardization of GLONASS Terrestrial Reference Frame PZ90.02 with ITRF2000 (Sept. 20, 2007)

Exploiting GNSS in the Future – Quality Assurance and Enhanced Performance for GPS III Long-term geodetic objectives: 1. Achieve a stable geodetic reference frame with an accuracy at least 10 times better than the anticipated user requirements for positioning, navigation, and timing. 2. Maintain a close alignment of the WGS 84 reference frame with the International Terrestrial Reference Frame (ITRF). 3. Provide a quality assessment capability independent of current radiometric measurements used to determine GPS orbit and clock performance. 4. Ensure interoperability of GPS with other Global Navigation Satellite Systems (GNSS’s) (e.g., GLONASS, Galileo) through a common, independent measurement technique. A Case for Laser Retro-reflectors on GPS III: Help achieve long-term geodetic objectives Achieve compatibility with GLONASS and Galileo Allow direct ties between GPS and SLR reference frames Contribute to identification of anomalous satellite behavior and improved modeling of long-term and long wavelength effects on satellite orbits Potentially improve in combination of GPS, GLONASS and Galileo data resulting in improved positioning and navigation

Summary A Global Standard Terrestrial Reference System is critical to future positioning and navigation with Global Navigation Satellites. Exploitation of multiple systems to support increased demands of a wide range of users (millimeters to 10s of meters) and long-term stability would be facilitated by, if not require, use of interoperable reference systems consistent with conventions, constants and models of the International Terrestrial Reference System. Accordingly, The WGS 84 reference frame has been and will continue to be periodically re-aligned to the ITRF. Galileo plans to define its operational reference frame based on the ITRF. GLONASS has recently redefined its realization of the PZ90.02 reference frame based on the ITRF. Other GNSS’s should be encouraged to do the same.