Economics and Statistics Administration U.S. CENSUS BUREAU U.S. Department of Commerce Assessing the “Year of Naturalization” Data in the American Community.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 The Foreign-Born Population in the United States: 2003.
Advertisements

Citizenship Acquisition in the United States of America Ather H. Akbari (Saint Marys University & Atlantic Metropolis Centre)
1 Avalaura L. Gaither and Eric C. Newburger Population Division U.S. Census Bureau Washington, D.C. June 2000 Population Division Working Paper No. 44.
Exploring Administrative Records Use for Race and Hispanic Origin Item Non-Response Sonya Rastogi, Leticia Fernandez, James Noon, Ellen Zapata and Renuka.
Indianapolis-Carmel MSA
University as Entrepreneur A POPULATION IN THIRDS Arizona and National Data.
North Texas Demographic Characteristics and Trends DFW International Luncheon Dallas Public Library May 19, 2010 Dallas, TX.
Indicators of Marriage and Fertility in the United States from the American Community Survey: 2000 to 2003 Tallese Johnson and Jane Lawler Dye Population.
U.S. Hispanic Population: 2000 Helping You Make Informed Decisions.
Carl E. Bentelspacher, Ph.D., Department of Social Work Lori Ann Campbell, Ph.D., Department of Sociology Michael Leber Department of Sociology Southern.
1 Assessing the Effect of Rent Control on Homelessness Grimes, Paul W. & Chressanthis, George A. “Assessing the Effect of Rent Control on Homelessness.”
Migration Patterns and Mover Characteristics from the 2005 ACS Gulf Coast Area Special Products Kin Koerber Housing and Household Economic Statistics Division.
Texas: Demographic Characteristics and Trends Texas Association of Healthcare Interpreters and Translators August 19, 2011 Dallas, TX.
THE UNIVERSITY OF MISSISSIPPI The University of Mississippi Institute for Advanced Education in Geospatial Science Census to American Community Survey.
1 Evaluation of New Content on the 2008 ACS: Service-Connected Disability Status and Ratings Kelly Ann Holder Housing and Household Economic Statistics.
U.S. Hispanic Population: Population Size and Composition 13.3% of the U.S. population is Hispanic. People of Mexican origin comprise 66.9% of the.
Children of Immigrants in Unmarried Families: A Double Jeopardy? Yolanda C. Padilla, PhD, LMSW Melissa Radey, Eunjeong Kim, Robert Hummer Population Research.
U.S. Census Bureau Demographic Census 2000 July 8, 2003.
The Gender Gap in Educational Attainment: Variation by Age, Race, Ethnicity, and Nativity in the United States Sarah R. Crissey, U.S. Census Bureau Nicole.
CITY DEMOGRAPHIC ANALYSIS Understanding Your City’s Population | 2 mi | 2 mi | 200’
Economics and Statistics Administration U.S. CENSUS BUREAU U.S. Department of Commerce Comparing IRS Exemptions to 2010 Census Population Counts Esther.
Household Surveys ACS – CPS - AHS INFO 7470 / ECON 8500 Warren A. Brown University of Georgia February 22,
The American Community Survey Texas Transportation Planning Conference Dallas, Texas July 19, 2012.
Liesl Eathington Iowa Community Indicators Program Iowa State University October 2014.
HOME ALONE: DETERMINANTS OF LIVING ALONE AMONG OLDER IMMIGRANTS IN CANADA AND THE U.S. SHARON M. LEE DEPARTMENT OF SOCIOLOGY POPULATION RESEARCH GROUP.
Supplemental Poverty Measure 2013 Kathleen S. Short April 13, 2015 Thanks are extended to the many individuals who assisted in the research on developing.
American Community Survey ACS Content Review Webinar State Data Centers and Census Information Centers Gary Chappell ACS Content Review Project Lead April.
Father Involvement and Child Well-Being: 2006 Survey of Income and Program Participation (SIPP) Child Well-Being Topical Module 1 By Jane Lawler Dye Fertility.
The American Community Survey and Its Benefits to the 2010 Census Frank A. Vitrano Associate Director for 2020 Census US Census Bureau Geneva, Switzerland.
Academic Performance and Immigration Experience Prof. Maria Aysa Research Methods Fall 2007.
Understanding Health Disparities in Texas Maureen Rubin, Ph.D., MSW Assistant Professor Department of Social Work University of Texas at San Antonio Nazrul.
Economics and Statistics Administration U.S. CENSUS BUREAU U.S. Department of Commerce Research on Estimating International Migration of the Foreign-Born.
The American Community Survey: An Overview
Introduction to the Public Use Microdata Sample (PUMS) File from the American Community Survey Updated February 2013.
Overview of error model for estimates of foreign-born immigration using data from the American Community Survey Mary H. Mulry U.S. Census Bureau 2011 International.
American Community Survey. Outline American Community Survey basics Accessing ACS data products Resources for learning more 2.
IMMIGRATION IN CANADA AND THE UNITED STATES BARBARA BOYLE TORREY BIXBY VISITING SCHOLAR POPULATION REFERENCE BUREAU.
Internet versus paper mode effects in the 2011 Census of England and Wales: analysis of Census Quality Survey agreement rates Cal Ghee 26 September 2014.
U.S. Census Bureau’s Population Estimates Program Victoria Velkoff Population Division U.S. Census Bureau APDU 2010 Annual Conference Public Data 2010:
Current Population Survey Sponsor: Bureau of Labor Statistics Collector: Census Bureau Purpose: Monthly Data for Analysis of Labor Market Conditions –CPS.
1 Basic requirements for using a household survey to produce good quality migration data Dean H. Judson, Ph.D. Immigration Statistics Staff.
Community Assessment By Patricio Merino. Lawrenceville Population (year 2000): Population (year 2000): Rate of growth: 28.82% Rate of growth:
Data on the Foreign Born in 2010: Accessing Information on Immigrants and Immigration from the U.S. Census Bureau’s American Community Survey Thomas A.
Demographic Analysis Update This presentation is released to inform interested parties of research and to encourage discussion. Any views expressed.
Measurement of Income in NCHS Surveys Diane M. Makuc NCHS Data Users Conference July 12, 2006 Centers for Disease Control and Prevention National Center.
The 2006 American Community Survey (ACS) Content Test Questions on International Migration: Improving Data on the U.S. Foreign-Born Dean H. Judson For.
Census 2000 Supplementary Survey: An Operational Feasibility Test Nancy M. Gordon Associate Director for Demographic Programs U.S. Census Bureau July 2001.
Network Effects & Welfare Culture Marianne Bertrand, Erzo Luttmer, and Sendhil Mullainathan Oct. 29, 2004.
Household Surveys: American Community Survey & American Housing Survey Warren A. Brown February 8, 2007.
Economics and Statistics Administration U.S. CENSUS BUREAU U.S. Department of Commerce The Foreign-Born Population in New Mexico Size, Distribution, and.
Rensselaer County Community Health Needs Assessment Sociodemographic Indicators.
Analysis of the characteristics of internet respondents to the 2011 Census to inform 2021 Census questionnaire design Orlaith Fraser & Cal Ghee.
Jump to first page How Houston Has Changed, /8 Data From the 1997/8 American Community Survey Small Area File.
Workshop on Collection and Dissemination of Socio-economic Data from Population and Housing Censuses New Delhi, India, May 2012 United Nations Demographic.
U.S. Foreign-Born Population: 2000 Helping You Make Informed Decisions.
U.S. Hispanic Population: Population Size and Composition.
Quality of Race and Hispanic Origin Reporting on Death Certificates in the US Elizabeth Arias, Ph.D. Mortality Statistics Branch Division of Vital Statistics.
REPUBLIC OF TURKEY TURKISH STATISTICAL INSTITUTE TurkStat Demography Statistics Department Population and Migration Statistics Group EXPERIENCES.
1 Joint UNECE/Eurostat Seminar on Migration Statistics Geneva March 2005 International Migration Statistics: Current Activities of the United Nations.
1 Economically Active Population Survey Dong-Wook JEONG Employment Statistics Div. Statistics Korea.
Presentation to Travis County Commissioners Court March 8, 2011.
Trends and Characteristics of the Elderly Population in West Virginia Christiadi WVU Bureau of Business and Economic Researc h.
Measuring International Migration: An Example from the U. S
Elizabeth M. Grieco Chief, Foreign-Born Population Branch
Mesfin S. Mulatu, Ph.D., M.P.H. The MayaTech Corporation
U.S. Hispanic Population: 2000
The European Statistical Training Programme (ESTP)
Chapter 5: The analysis of nonresponse
Presentation transcript:

Economics and Statistics Administration U.S. CENSUS BUREAU U.S. Department of Commerce Assessing the “Year of Naturalization” Data in the American Community Survey Characteristics of Naturalized Foreign Born Who Report – and Don’t Report – the Year They Obtained Citizenship Elizabeth M. Grieco and David M. Armstrong Population Division U.S. Census Bureau This paper is released to inform interested parties of research and to encourage discussion. Any views expressed on methodological or technical issues are those of the author and not necessarily those of the U.S. Census Bureau. Presented at the Applied Demography Conference San Antonio, TX, January 8-10, 2014

Economics and Statistics Administration U.S. CENSUS BUREAU U.S. Department of Commerce Introduction American Community Survey includes a question asking foreign-born citizens: “Print year of naturalization.” Not all foreign born who have naturalized provide the year they became citizens Analysis uses logistic regression to determine the characteristics of those who report – and fail to report – a year of naturalization 2

Economics and Statistics Administration U.S. CENSUS BUREAU U.S. Department of Commerce Survey Nonresponse Two types of nonresponse behavior: Unit nonresponse –When the sample unit does not respond to the request to be surveyed Item nonresponse –Failure to obtain answers to individual survey questions when unit response is obtained This paper examines item nonresponse by foreign-born citizens to the year of naturalization question. 3

Economics and Statistics Administration U.S. CENSUS BUREAU U.S. Department of Commerce Results from the Literature Literature emphasizes influence of individual characteristics on item nonresponse: –Age, sex, education, socioeconomic status Household and neighborhood characteristics also considered: –Population density, crime rates, household composition, household size, language use, geographic location, culture Survey mode also noted: –Item nonresponse higher in mail modes when compared with telephone or face-to-face interviewing 4

Economics and Statistics Administration U.S. CENSUS BUREAU U.S. Department of Commerce Analytical Framework 5 The ACS is a survey of the resident population –The sample is divided into group quarters and household –In the household sample Housing units are selected into sample Data collected on each individual who is part of the household Information for most household members provided by proxy through primary respondent –Most often, primary respondent is the householder How/what information moves through the household from each household member to the householder and then to Census Bureau depends on: –Survey mode –Social distance from primary respondent

Economics and Statistics Administration U.S. CENSUS BUREAU U.S. Department of Commerce 6

Economics and Statistics Administration U.S. CENSUS BUREAU U.S. Department of Commerce 7

Economics and Statistics Administration U.S. CENSUS BUREAU U.S. Department of Commerce Statistical Model Data 2011 American Community Survey Statistical Method Logistic regression analysis Universe Naturalized citizens in the United States aged 18 and over, where citizenship status was not imputed Dependent Variable Dichotomous variable based on year of naturalization –Those who reported a year –Those who did not report a year 8

Economics and Statistics Administration U.S. CENSUS BUREAU U.S. Department of Commerce Statistical Model Primary Explanatory Variables Survey environment –Operationalized using mode –3-category dummy variable –Mail (reference), CATI, and CAPI CATI = Computer Assisted Telephone Interview CAPI = Computer Assisted Personal Interview Social distance from primary respondent –Operationalized using relationship –5-category dummy variable –Householder (reference), natal family, extended family, other relative, nonrelative 9

Economics and Statistics Administration U.S. CENSUS BUREAU U.S. Department of Commerce 10

Economics and Statistics Administration U.S. CENSUS BUREAU U.S. Department of Commerce 11

Economics and Statistics Administration U.S. CENSUS BUREAU U.S. Department of Commerce Statistical Model Household and Individual Control Variables Household Level –Characteristics of the household in which naturalized citizen resides –Number of adults in household, home ownership, poverty status, region of residency –Characteristics of the householder: educational attainment, language spoken at home, and nativity Individual Level –Characteristics of the naturalized citizen –Age, sex, region of birth, period of entry, moved in the last year (internationally or domestically) 12

Economics and Statistics Administration U.S. CENSUS BUREAU U.S. Department of Commerce Statistical Model Nonresponse Control Variables To control for correlation of nonresponse between the dependent and each explanatory variable –For example: Are respondents who don’t report year of naturalization also likely not to report year of entry? Alternative to excluding cases with some missing data Variables included: –Relationship, householder’s level of education, householder’s language spoken at home, householder’s nativity status, homeownership, poverty status, age, sex, place of birth, year of entry, and moved in last year –No nonresponse control for mode, number of adults in household, or region of residency 13

Economics and Statistics Administration U.S. CENSUS BUREAU U.S. Department of Commerce Results Summary Both mode and relationship to householder significantly influence the likelihood of reporting a year of naturalization Most household and individual control variables behave as predicted –Exceptions: householder’s language spoken at home and householder’s nativity Nonresponse controls alter likelihoods associated with householder’s education, region of residence, number of adults, age, sex, and period of entry 14

Economics and Statistics Administration U.S. CENSUS BUREAU U.S. Department of Commerce 15

Economics and Statistics Administration U.S. CENSUS BUREAU U.S. Department of Commerce 16

Economics and Statistics Administration U.S. CENSUS BUREAU U.S. Department of Commerce 17

Economics and Statistics Administration U.S. CENSUS BUREAU U.S. Department of Commerce 18 HOUSEHOLD CHARACTERISTICS: Association with Reporting Year of Naturalization VariableWithout Nonresponse ControlsWith Nonresponse Controls Householder’s level of education High school degree or higher education, more likely to report Not significant Householder’s language spoken at home Speaks only English at home, less likely to report Householder’s nativity statusIf native, less likely to report Region of residenceCompared with West, Midwest then Northeast less likely to report; South not significant Number of adults aged 18 and older More adults, less likely to reportMore adults, more likely to report HomeownershipOwn home, more likely to report Poverty statusNot in poverty status, more likely to report

Economics and Statistics Administration U.S. CENSUS BUREAU U.S. Department of Commerce 19 VariableWithout Nonresponse ControlsWith Nonresponse Controls AgeCompared with 60+, most likely to report, followed by then Compared with 60+, more likely to report; and not significant SexMales less likely than females to report Males more likely than females to report Region of birthCompared with respondents from Europe, those from other regions, Asia, and Latin America less likely to report, in that order Compared with respondents from Europe, those from other regions, Latin America, and Asia less likely to report, in that order Period of entryCompared with respondents who entered in 1996 or earlier, those who arrived and more likely to report while less likely Compared with respondents who entered in 1996 or earlier, those who arrived and were more likely to report; not significant. Moved in the last yearDid not move last year, more likely to report INDIVIDUAL CHARACTERISTICS: Association with Reporting Year of Naturalization

Economics and Statistics Administration U.S. CENSUS BUREAU U.S. Department of Commerce 20

Economics and Statistics Administration U.S. CENSUS BUREAU U.S. Department of Commerce 21

Economics and Statistics Administration U.S. CENSUS BUREAU U.S. Department of Commerce 22

Economics and Statistics Administration U.S. CENSUS BUREAU U.S. Department of Commerce Conclusion Mode and relationship to householder significantly influence year of naturalization reporting –Association remains even after inclusion of nonresponse controls, although strength is tempered Results of analysis support model of survey environment and social distance from respondent Using nonresponse control variables is an alternative to excluding cases with some imputed data 23

Economics and Statistics Administration U.S. CENSUS BUREAU U.S. Department of Commerce Contact Information 24 Elizabeth M. Grieco David M. Armstrong