P2 Results Data System Richard Yoder, PE Tyler Rubach R5/R7 P2 Roundtable March 13, 2007 EPA Region 5 Thanks to: Ken Grimm, PPRC Prabin Kanel, P2RIC.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
DC Responses Received WA OR ID MT WY CA NV UT CO AZ NM AK HI TX ND SD NE KS OK MN IA MO AR LA WI IL MI IN OH KY TN MS AL GA FL SC NC VA WV PA NY VT NH.
Advertisements

National Core Indicators Overview for the State of Washington Lisa A. Weber, Ph.D. Division of Developmental Disabilities.
Pollution Prevention Data Flow Prabin Kanel (PPRC) Andrew Putnam (CDPHE) Ken Grimm (PPRC) April 25 th, 2007.
P2Rx Mission: The Pollution Prevention Resource Exchange (P2Rx) is a national network of regional centers dedicated to improving the dissemination of.
Sustainability Reporting: GRI NICE Presentation March 19, 2009 HDR, 8404 Indian Hills Drive, Omaha, NE Richard Yoder, P2RIC.
Pollution Prevention Resource Exchange Jean Waters, P2Rx
Pollution Prevention Resource Exchange (P2Rx) Pollution Prevention Resource Exchange (P2Rx) a national network of regional centers dedicated to improving.
Pollution Prevention Resource Exchange (P2Rx). NEWMOA WRRC GLRPPR P2RIC Zero Waste WRPPN PPRCPeaks A national network of regional P2 information centers.
Desk Top & Web-Based Tools for Assistance & P2 Program Measurement Desk Top & Web-Based Tools for Assistance & P2 Program Measurement Terri Goldberg NEWMOA.
Jean S. Waters P2Rx program manager Nebraska Business Development Center 1313 Farnam #230 Omaha, NE (fax)
Pollution Prevention Resource Exchange Jean Waters, P2Rx
What do these have in common? slideshow. The Commons: Moving from Tragedy to Triumph Environmental Summit May 10, 2006 Atlanta, GA.
Agencies’ Participation in PBMS January 20, 2015 PA IL TX AZ CA Trained, Partial Data Entry (17) Required Characteristics & 75% of Key Indicators (8) OH.
Pollution Prevention Resource Exchange (P2Rx). NEWMOA WRRC GLRPPR P2RIC Zero Waste WRPPN PPRCPeaks A national network of regional P2 information centers.
Medicaid Eligibility for Working Parents by Income, January 2013
House Price
Medicaid Enrollment of New Eligibles in Expansion States, by Party Affiliation of Governor New Eligibles as a Percent of Total Medicaid Enrollment, as.
WY WI WV WA VA VT UT TX TN SD SC RI PA OR* OK OH ND NC NY NM* NJ NH
Children's Eligibility for Medicaid/CHIP by Income, January 2013
Open Water Certification Count
The State of the States Cindy Mann Center for Children and Families
Avaya Consultant Relations Program
BUSINESS DEVELPOMENT TEAM DIRECTOR, STRATEGIC MPS BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT
Medicaid Costs are Shared by the States and the Federal Government
Expansion states with Republican governors outnumber expansion states with Democratic governors, May 2018 WY WI WV◊ WA VA^ VT UT TX TN SD SC RI PA OR OK.
Non-Citizen Population, by State, 2011
Ken Grimm National Environmental Partnership Summit May 10, 2006
Status of State Medicaid Expansion Decisions
Share of Women Ages 18 – 64 Who Are Uninsured, by State,
Coverage of Low-Income Adults by Scope of Coverage, January 2013
Executive Activity on the Medicaid Expansion Decision, May 9, 2013
WY WI WV WA VA VT UT TX TN1 SD SC RI PA1 OR OK OH ND NC NY NM NJ NH2
WY WI WV WA VA VT UT TX TN1 SD SC RI PA OR OK OH1 ND NC NY NM NJ NH NV
WY WI WV WA VA* VT UT TX TN SD SC RI PA OR* OK OH ND NC NY NM* NJ NH
WY WI WV WA VA VT UT TX TN SD SC RI PA OR* OK OH ND NC NY NM* NJ NH
Mobility Update and Discussion as of March 25, 2008
Current Status of the Medicaid Expansion Decision, as of May 30, 2013
IAH CONVERSION: ELIGIBLE BENEFICIARIES BY STATE
WAHBE Brokers / QHPs across the country as of
State Health Insurance Marketplace Types, 2015
State Health Insurance Marketplace Types, 2018
HHGM CASE WEIGHTS Early/Late Mix (Weighted Average)
Status of State Medicaid Expansion Decisions
Status of State Participation in Medicaid Expansion, as of March 2014
Train-the-Trainer Sessions 394 sessions with 11,460 participants
Status of State Medicaid Expansion Decisions
State Health Insurance Marketplace Types, 2017
S Co-Sponsors by State – May 23, 2014
Seventeen States Had Higher Uninsured Rates Than the National Average in 2013; Of Those, 11 Have Yet to Expand Eligibility for Medicaid AK NH WA VT ME.
Employer Premiums as Percentage of Median Household Income for Under-65 Population, 2003 and percent of under-65 population live where premiums.
Employer Premiums as Percentage of Median Household Income for Under-65 Population, 2003 and percent of under-65 population live where premiums.
Average annual growth rate
Percent of Children Ages 0–17 Uninsured by State
Executive Activity on the Medicaid Expansion Decision, May 9, 2013
Current Status of State Medicaid Expansion Decisions
Current Status of State Medicaid Expansion Decisions
How State Policies Limiting Abortion Coverage Changed Over Time
United States: age distribution family households and family size
Status of State Medicaid Expansion Decisions
Employer Premiums as Percentage of Median Household Income for Under-65 Population, 2003 and percent of under-65 population live where premiums.
Percent of Adults Ages 18–64 Uninsured by State
Train-the-Trainer Sessions 401 sessions with 11,639 participants
States including quality standards in their SSIP improvement strategies for Part C FFY 2013 ( ) States including quality standards in their SSIP.
Status of State Medicaid Expansion Decisions
Train-the-Trainer Sessions 416 sessions with 11,878 participants
Current Status of State Individual Marketplace and Medicaid Expansion Decisions, as of September 30, 2013 WY WI WV WA VA VT UT TX TN SD SC RI PA OR OK.
Status of State Medicaid Expansion Decisions
WY WI WV WA VA VT UT TX TN SD SC RI PA OR OK OH ND NC NY NM NJ NH NV
Train-the-Trainer Sessions 429 sessions with 12,141 participants
Train-the-Trainer Sessions 436 sessions with 12,254 participants
Presentation transcript:

P2 Results Data System Richard Yoder, PE Tyler Rubach R5/R7 P2 Roundtable March 13, 2007 EPA Region 5 Thanks to: Ken Grimm, PPRC Prabin Kanel, P2RIC

Putt’s Law Those who understand information technology don’t manage it; Those who manage information technology don’t manage it.

Northeast Waste Management Officials’ Association Regions 1 & 2 - CT, ME, MA, NH, RI, VT, NJ, NY / Waste Reduction Resource Center Regions 3 & 4 - DE, MD, PA, VA, WV, DC, AL, FL, GA, KY, MS, NC, SC,TN wrrc.p2pays.org / Great Lakes Regional P2 Roundtable Region 5 - IL, IN, MI, MN, NY,OH, PA, WI, Ontario / P2 Regional Information Center Region 7 - IA, KS, MO, NB / Southwest P2 Information Center Region 6 - AK, LA, NM, OK, TX / Peaks to Prairies P2 Information Center Region 8 - CO, MT, ND, SD, UT, WY / Western Regional P2 Network Region 9 - AZ, CA, HI, NV / Pacific Northwest P2 Resource Center Region 10 - AK, ID, OR, WA /

P2 Results Data System: A dream

P2 Results Measurement Worries: –Double counting, info quality, info use/abuse System issues –UP, NFM; Jevons Paradox Environmental outcomes of measurement system

P2 Results Measurement If you must tell me your opinions, tell me what you believe in. I have plenty of doubts of my own. ~ Goethe

Overview Background & structure of P2 Results Data System Your opportunity for action

National P2 Results Task Force Joint Project: NPPR & P2Rx Includes representatives of states in every EPA Region, P2Rx Centers, EPA HQs & Regional Offices Has been meeting for over 2 years Focused on developing core national P2 measures, data aggregation tool, & report on the results

Help sell the economic and environmental value of P2 and consequently….. YOUR program Promotes new opportunities and connection with clients Help policy makers assess P2 efforts and determine funding Provide (EPA) quality data regarding P2 efforts Purpose

Current Accomplishments Designed Framework Developed a Data Dictionary for a set of core metrics – Behavioral, Activity and Outcome MOA with P2 programs – 35 signatories, 31 states Programmed regional aggregation modules that reside at P2Rx Centers

The Framework Customers Data Collection Desktop Tracking Regional Aggregation National Roll-up Of Results

Data Dictionary Defines: Data elements for reporting Units to be used Categories of Core Elements Crosswalk with other EPA/State Programs Addresses EPA P2 Strategic Targets Helps meet accountability and budget needs

Core Measures Activity Measures Behavioral Measures Outcome Measures

Activity Measures (Level 1) Trainings, workshops, meetings, conferences and roundtables P2 Plans Site visits Brief assistance P2 information developed P2 information distributed Grants awarded Web visitors to online information Awards Programs Leadership Programs

Behavioral Measures (Level 2) Clients reporting adoption of P2 policies People trained in P2 by clients Clients developing EMSs Clients that have developed a P2 Team Clients that have mapped their processes Clients reporting compliance improvements Clients reporting implemented P2 suggestions Clients reporting increased understanding of P2 Opportunities

Outcome Measure (Level 3) Reduced Operating Costs (dollars/year) Non-Hazardous (pounds/year) Hazardous Materials (pounds/year) Hazardous Wastes (pounds/year) Air Emissions (pounds/year) Solid Waste (pounds/year) Energy (KwH/year or therms/year) Green Energy (KwH/year or therms/year) Water Use (gallons/year) Water Pollution (pounds/year)

Regional Aggregation Modules Key component of the “framework” Tell the Regional “P2 Story” Can provide local program anonymity & control Can provide reports for individual programs Helps sell the value of programs to regional, state and local decision makers Feeds the National Report

Current Action Opportunity (NEIEN Funded Effort) “Call for Data” for years 2004 and 2005 (October 2006) P2Rx Centers organize regional measurement stakeholder workgroups (September 2006) Submit regional measurement needs and changes to regional module (January 2007) Program changes to all regional modules (March-May 2007)

Current Action Opportunity (NEIEN Funded Effort) Data entry training for P2 programs (January – June 2007): Today it’s Tyler Regional Module Version 2.1 released to P2Rx Centers (May 2007) –Recent Improvements –Next Round of Improvements

Future Action Opportunity (NEIEN Funded Effort) Regional Measurement Workgroups to discuss Version 2.1 (May-July 2007) “Call for Data” - Calendar Year 2006 (July 2007) Version 2.1 modifications (July-September 2007) –Regional Reporting –National Reportiing

Data Entry The bucket is built; we’re ready for programs to fill it! So what’s next?

Workgroups Regional workgroups developed to discuss data collection, metrics, calculators, reports and user interface of the Regional P2 Results Aggregation Module.

Questions? Contact Info

Useful Links… –Regional contact person information er_guide.pdfhttp:// er_guide.pdf –User Guide eas_background.pdfhttp:// eas_background.pdf – Background About the National P2 Results Data System –Technical Documents

One More Useful Link –A WIKI-style storehouse of information, questions and tips on using and improving the P2 Results Data System.

Workgroup Tasks Identify current P2 data management systems in use in the region Develop regional or state-specific cost calculators (16 currently) Identify additional regional metrics (may not be reported nationally) Identify data collection barriers and needs from regional P2 programs

Other Issues - Next Steps What is context, bigger picture? –UP freight: total tonnage & revenues up % of total freight transport down System issues – what is total impact? –NFM: game between service & warehouse

Next Steps What will happen to the information? –What can it be used for? Funding justification. –Baseline & improvement – or – compare approaches? Impact in the field? –Can it be used for environmental improvement?

Next Steps Feedback mechanism – How can the information influence action? Possibilities for repurposing information?

NEIEN Funding Cont…

Richard Yoder, PE UNO - NBDC P2RIC Director 6001 Dodge St. RH308 Omaha, NE