MODULE 1 Water Framework Directive, Relation of WFD with Daughter Directives, River Basin Management Planning, Water Bodies, Typology, Classification Environmental.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
EU FORMAL REGULATION – TYPES OF STANDARDS ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY OBJECTIVES ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY STANDARDS.
Advertisements

EU FORMAL REGULATION – TYPES of STANDARD MINIMUM EMISSION STANDARD (sometimes known as LIMIT VALUES) UNIFORM EMISSION STANDARD.
1 Europe’s water – an indicator-based assessment Niels Thyssen.
How close are we in the Water Framework Directive’s Implementation ? Paul C.M. Frintrop Institute for Inland Water Management and Waste-Water Treatment.
Law approximation and implementation in Hungary Ministry for Environment Department of Integrated Pollution Control Nicosia, May 2001 Andrea Nám, desk.
PROYECTO NEREIDAS VISIÓN EUROPEA DE LOS PROYECTOS TEN-T ALEXIO PICCO – CIRCLE Malaga 03/04/2014.
Discharges of Dangerous Substance Directive 76/464/EEC and “daughter” directives Multilateral Screening Meeting - Croatia and Turkey Chapter 27 – Environment.
EU Environmental policy priorities for the period till 2010 Based on the 6 th Environment Action Programme By Nikos Sakkas, LEI Crete, 2002.
ECOLOGICAL STANDARDS OF MARINE ENVIRONMENT QUALITY DEVELOPED BY: Research Organization “Ukrainian Scientific Centre of the Ecology of Sea” (RO UkrSCES)
European Commission, DG Environment Unit B.1: Water, Marine and Soil EU Substitution Conference - Hamburg, 13/14 June 2002 Slide 1 EU Conference on Substitution.
The EU Water Framework Directive and Sediments The Water Framework Directive was transposed into law in EU Member States at the end of Nearly two.
European Commission, DG Environment Brussels, April 2006 Christof Planitzer DG ENV Slide 1 Fish & Shellfish Water Directives 78/659/EEC & 79/923/EEC.
CHEMICAL-PHYSICO MONITORING SUPPORTING ECOLOGICAL STATUS FOR THE EU WATER FRAMEWORK DIRECTIVE BY MICHAEL JACKMAN CHEMISTRY EXPERT.
Water Seminar – 14 April 2010, Athlone European Communities environmental objectives (Groundwater) Regulations 2010 S.I. 9. of 2010 Colin Byrne Water Inspector.
Commission’s Communication A renewed vision for the pharmaceutical sector Peter Korytár European Commission – DG Environment Uppsala, 11 November 2009.
Support for the Modernisation of the Mongolian Standardisation system – EuropeAid/134305/C/SER/MN Training on standardisation Support to the Modernisation.
EU Legislation in the field of environment – key developments in 2007 and rd ECENA Plenary Meeting 18 September 2008.
Extension of the EEA European Topic Centre’s Work Program to the West Balkan Countries in the field of water Norman Green, NIVA Nov 2006, Belgrade.
Water.europa.eu Policy update with regard to Priority and Emerging Substances SOCOPSE Final Conference Maastricht, June 2009 Jorge Rodriguez Romero.
Water Seminar – 14 April 2010, Athlone European Communities Environmental Objectives (Surface Waters) Regulations 2009 S.I. No. 272 of 2009 Pat Duggan.
MODULE 1 Water Framework Directive, Relation of WFD with Daughter Directives, River Basin Management Planning, Water Bodies, Typology, Classification Drinking.
International Network Network of Basin OrganizationsInternationalOffice for Water PARIS Paper of Mr. Jean-François DONZIER Paper of Mr. Jean-François DONZIER.
European Commission - DG Environment Unit D.2: Water & Marine 1 Pau-Plenary Session 14 may 2008 Pau-Plenary Session 14 may 2008 CMA developments and state.
International workshop diffuse sources of water pollution, Amsterdam 28/29 mei 2008, conclusions and way forward 1 The way forward The content of our message.
Management of the coastal and marine environment: The legal framework of the European Union from the first EEC Directives to the Water Framework Directive.
Reporting and compliance checking on RBMP in 2010 WFD Reporting Working Group D on Reporting Brussels, 17/18 October 2006.
Europe-wide monitoring obligations under the EU Water Framework Directive Jos G. Timmerman Institute for Inland Water Management and Waste Water Treatment.
Phare Twinning Project SK 05/IB/EN/01 Establishment of the Environment Quality Standard for Water and Strengthening of Regional and District Environment.
Organized under UNESCO-IHP International Initiative on Water Quality (IIWQ) Hosted by Federal Institute of Hydrology, Germany International Centre for.
June 2009 Regulation on pesticide statistics Pierre NADIN ESTAT E1- Farms, agro-environment and rural development
Health and Food Safety EU strategy for Pharmaceuticals in the Environment Patrizia Tosetti DG SANTE European Commission China/EU Pharmaceutical Industry.
Lithuanian Water Suppliers Association LEGAL REGULATION OF WASTEWATER DISPOSAL AND TREATMENT IN LITHUANIA.
Regulating Nitrate Pollution – European Approaches Helle Tegner Anker Faculty of Life Sciences Copenhagen University.
M O N T E N E G R O Negotiating Team for the Accession of Montenegro to the European Union Working Group for Chapter 27 – Environment Bilateral screening:
Dedicated maps on contaminants
PRESENTATION OF MONTENEGRO
PRESENTATION OF MONTENEGRO
Relationship between EUROWATERNET and the Water Framework Directive, and for broader water reporting Steve Nixon ETC/WTR.
Diffuse Sources of Water Pollution
Groundwater legislative framework
Anna Hall Senior Groundwater Advisor
Christof Mainz European Commission
Restoration target values?
Directive 2006/118/EC Short overview
Models for Assessing and Forecasting the Impact of Environmental Key
Purpose Independent piece of legislation, closely integrated in a larger regulatory framework (complement to WFD): prevent deterioration protect, enhance.
Bruxelles 17 october-2007 WG E Meeting
on Priority Substances Strategic Coordination Group
Directive 2006/118/EC Short overview
Philippe QUEVAUVILLER
Balázs Horváth DG ENV C.1 Water Unit
WFD “case study” Gert Verreet – DG Environment, Unit D.2 marine team
Table of existing standard methods and proposed quality standards for priority substances in water AMPS (2) Jan Wollgast.
Introduction- Link with WG E activity CMEP PLENARY MEETING-PRAGUE
Diffuse Sources of Water Pollution
Drafting group Mixing Zones
Water Framework Directive 2000/60/EC
Workshop on metals bioavailability under the Water Framework Directive
Part I.
PRIORITY (HAZARDOUS) SUBSTANCES
3rd meeting, 8 March 2006 EEA Copenhagen
Preparation of the second RBMP in Romania
13th Working Group E meeting March 2011 Jorge Rodriguez Romero
Water Quality 台灣地區河川污染特性 污染來源 工業廢水污染:老街溪、中港溪、大甲溪、北港溪、八掌溪、二仁溪、花蓮溪。
DG Environment, Unit D.2 Marine Environment and Water Industry
WG Hazardous substances * Marine Strategy 19 November 2003
CIS Expert group on WFD & Agriculture Nitrates Directive and Water Framework Directive Edinburgh 10th October 2012 Luisa Samarelli DG ENV Agriculture,
A general introduction
Shellfish Waters Directive (repealed)
Good groundwater chemical status
Presentation transcript:

MODULE 1 Water Framework Directive, Relation of WFD with Daughter Directives, River Basin Management Planning, Water Bodies, Typology, Classification Environmental Quality Standards (EQS) for Water Directive R. Michael Jackman Antalya December, 2014

DIRECTIVE 2008/105/EC OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL Environmental Quality Standards In The Field Of Water Policy, Repealed Council Directives 82/176/EEC, 83/513/EEC, 84/156/EEC, 84/491/EEC, 86/280/EEC and amending Directive 2000/60/EC

Scope  Sets out environmental quality standards concerning the presence in surface waters of certain pollutants and substances or groups of substances identified as priority owing to risks they pose to or via the aquatic environment. Background  Article 16(7) of the Water Framework Directive required the establishment of environmental quality standards applicable to water.  The environmental quality standards for priority substances and certain other pollutants must be respected in order to achieve a good surface water chemical status.  Must implement the necessary measures to progressively reduce pollution from priority substances and ceasing or phasing out emissions, discharges and losses of priority hazardous substances

Parameters  The priority substances are defined by the Water Framework Directive with a list of 33 priority substances. Annex X  Includes cadmium, lead, mercury, nickel and its compounds, benzene, polyaromatic hydrocarbons (PAH) and DDT total.  Twenty priority substances are classed as hazardous

Application of Standards The planned environmental quality standards are limits to the concentrations, - threshold levels. Value types 1)The annual average (AA) value of concentration of the parameter calculated over a one-year-The purpose of this standard is to ensure the long-term quality of the aquatic environment; 2)The maximum allowable concentration (MAC) of the substance measured specifically.- The purpose of this second standard is to limit short-term pollution peaks.

Water Types  The quality standards are differentiated for inland surface waters (rivers and lakes) and other surface waters (transitional, coastal and territorial waters).  Specific standards are also set for metals and certain other substances.  Must also verify that the concentration of substances concerned does not increase significantly in sediments and/or the relevant biota.

Exceedances  Member States can define transitional mixing areas, where the quality standards may be exceeded provided that the rest of the surface water body complies with those standards.  These areas must be clearly identified in the river basin management plans established in accordance with the Water Framework Directive

Inventory  For each river basin, countries must establish an inventory of emissions, discharges and losses of all substances identified in the priority substances.  On the basis of this inventory, the EU must verify whether, by 2018, the objectives of reducing pollution from priority substances and of ceasing or phasing out emissions, discharges and losses of priority hazardous substances are reached.

WFD ANNEX IX EMISSION LIMIT VALUES AND ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY STANDARDS The ‘limit values’ and ‘quality objectives’ established under the re Directives of Directive 76/464/EEC shall be considered emission limit values and environmental quality standards, respectively, for the purposes of this Directive. They are established in the following Directives: (i) The Mercury Discharges Directive (82/176/EEC) (1); (ii) The Cadmium Discharges Directive (83/513/EEC) (2); (iii) The Mercury Directive (84/156/EEC) (3); (iv) The Hexachlorocyclohexane Discharges Directive (84/491/EEC) (4); and (v) The Dangerous Substance Discharges Directive (86/280/EEC) (5).

Benefits of Compliance  Reduce the costs of treating drinking water  Improve the quality of organisms living in these waters  Improve health of livestock drinking these waters.  Reduce administrative burden.

Useful References _Substances_in_Europe.

RELATED EU ACTS  EU Commission Communication of 2006 entitled "Integrated prevention and control of chemical pollution of surface waters in the European Union" [COM(2006)]  EU leaves the adoption of measures concerning surface water to the Member States on the grounds of efficacy, flexibility and costs.  It considers that the relevant EU legislation already ensures a high level of protection of the aquatic environment and public health, provided it is applied correctly and comprehensively. To this end it proposes several measures, including :Amendment of the IPPC Directive  Amendment of Pesticides Directive,  Enhanced implementation and enforcement of legislation via a system of information exchange,  Introduction of procedures for Member States to provide useful information for decision-making, and improved access to information via a water information system (WISE).

RELATED EU ACTS Directive 2006/11/EC on Pollution caused by certain dangerous substances discharged into the aquatic environment  Replaces Directive 76/464/EEC, and makes it obligatory for all discharges of certain substances to be authorised.  Sets limit for emissions of these substances.  Requires Member States to improve the quality of their waters.

EQS Considerations  The calculation of the arithmetic mean, the analytical method used and, where there is no appropriate analytical method meeting the minimum performance criteria, the method of applying an EQS must be in for chemical monitoring and quality of analytical results, in accordance with WFD.  Most EQS are expressed as total concentrations in the whole water sample.  For heavy metals (cadmium, lead, mercury and nickel) the EQS refers to the dissolved concentration, i.e. the dissolved phase of a water sample obtained by filtration through a 0,45 μm filter

EQS Considerations  Member States may, when assessing the monitoring results against the EQS, take into account: (a) natural background concentrations for metals and their compounds, if they prevent compliance with the EQS value; (b) Hardness e.g. Cadmium, pH or other water quality parameters that affect the bioavailability of metals.

WFD ANNEX VIII INDICATIVE LIST OF THE MAIN POLLUTANTS 1. Organohalogen compounds and substances which may form such compounds in the aquatic environment. 2. Organophosphorous compounds. 3. Organotin compounds. 4. Substances and preparations, or the breakdown products of such, which have been proved to possess carcinogenic or mutagenic properties or properties which may affect steroidogenic, thyroid, reproduction or other endocrine-related functions in or via the aquatic environment. 5.Persistent hydrocarbons and persistent and bioaccumulable organic toxic substances.

WFD ANNEX VIII INDICATIVE LIST OF THE MAIN POLLUTANTS 6. Cyanides. 7. Metals and their compounds. 8. Arsenic and its compounds. 9. Biocides and plant protection products. 10. Materials in suspension 11. Substances which contribute to eutrophication (in particular, nitrates and phosphates). 12. Substances which have an unfavourable influence on the oxygen balance (and can be measured using parameters such as BOD, COD, etc.).

More chemicals have been produced and discharged into the environment, though we need these industries to fulfil are needs this must be done in a sustainable manner. This Directive is an important step to achieve this and needs to be globally supported not just the EU Thank you for your attention.