Workshop 12/04/2006AT/MTM SM18 Test Facility A. Siemko "Workshop on Test Facilities and measurement equipment needed for the LHC exploitation"

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
K. Potter RADWG & RADMON Workshop 1 Dec WELCOME TO THE 4th RADWG & RADMON WORKSHOP 1 December 2004.
Advertisements

September 2007 FP7-IA HFM JRA proposal G. de Rijk (CERN)1 FP7-IA HFM JRA proposal   The proposal is under discussion: we welcome input from potential.
LHC HARDWARE COMMISSIONING REVIEW May 2005 CRYOGENIC VACUUM SYSTEM Paul Cruikshank for AT/VAC.
Status of the LHC Project L.Evans - C.Wyss Riunione CSN1 INFN Napoli, 21 Settembre 2005.
LINACs Michael Bevins May 17, GeV Upgrade - Beam Transport Injection, Linac, Extraction, & Correctors Preliminary Design and Safety Review.
Crab Cavities in IR1 and IR5 Some considerations on tunnel integration What will be the situation in the tunnel after the LHC IR Phase-1 Upgrade. What.
Maintenance and Engineering Procedures and Tools at Soreq Applied Research Accelerator Facility I. Gertz, Y. Buzaglo, A. Grin, R. Michael, R. Raizman,
The HiLumi LHC Design Study (a sub-system of HL-LHC) is co-funded by the European Commission within the Framework Programme 7 Capacities Specific Programme,
1 / 19 M. Gateau CERN – Geneva – CH 14th International Magnetic Measurement Workshop September 2005, Geneva, Switzerland.
REVIEW OF THE CRYOGENIC BY-PASS FOR THE LHC DS COLLIMATORS ELECTRICAL CIRCUIT MODIFICATION, INCLUDING OPERATIONAL CONSIDERATIONS PRESENTED BY A. SIEMKO.
Prospects of SC Quadrupole Production at IHEP-Protvino The 2nd Institutes Meeting on International Construction of the FAIR Accelerator Complex Protvino,
Expected Quench Levels of the Machine without Beam: Starting at 7 TeV ? P. Pugnat CERN, Geneva, Switzerland LHC Project Workshop Chamonix XV, Tuesday 24.
Injection test1 Injection test in 2006 The installation schedule version 1.7 recently approved includes a ‘possible injection test’ - foreseen in April.
Injector/Re-injection Chicane Michael Bevins May 17, GeV Upgrade - Beam Transport Injection, Linac, Extraction, & Correctors Preliminary Design.
Present status of TTF-cryomodules short overview Bernd Petersen DESY MKS March, 7, 2005 Main design features of TESLA-cryomodules Design changes for XFEL-cryomodule.
Workshop Chamonix XIV Shortcuts during installation and commissioning: risk and benefit H. Gruehagen, G. Riddone on behalf of the AT/ACR group 18 January.
1 Second LHC Splice Review Copper Stabilizer Continuity Measurement possible QC tool for consolidated splices H. Thiesen 28 November 2011 K. Brodzinski,
R2E Report M. Brugger for the R2E Study Group RadWG Meeting, August 20 th 2009.
CLIC Implementation Studies Ph. Lebrun & J. Osborne CERN CLIC Collaboration Meeting addressing the Work Packages CERN, 3-4 November 2011.
LAUC Proposal: Feedboxes and System Engineering bnl - fnal - lbnl - slac US LHC Accelerator Research Program Michael Lamm LARP+LAUC DOE Review June 21,
RSSO refresher meeting J. Pedersen M. Tavlet, T. Otto.
M. Karppinen TE-MSC-ML on behalf of S. Atieh, P. Cruikshank, M. Duret, J-C. Perez, V. Parma, T. Renaglia, S107, S108, Dubna teams Pressure relief valve.
The HiLumi LHC Design Study is included in the High Luminosity LHC project and is partly funded by the European Commission within the Framework Programme.
Review of the operation scenarios and required manning of the activities P. Schnizer and L. Serio.
General Considerations for the Upgrade of the LHC Insertion Magnets
CLIC Workshop th -17 th October 2008 Thomas Zickler AT/MCS/MNC 1 CLIC Main Linac Quadrupoles Preliminary design of a quadrupole for the stabilization.
Extraction Michael Bevins May 17, GeV Upgrade - Beam Transport Injection, Linac, Extraction, & Correctors Preliminary Design and Safety Review.
Review of the operation scenarios and required manning of the activities P. Schnizer and L. Serio.
Hardware Commissioning  Preparation Documentation MTF Programme  Status The Review The commissioning activity in Resources  Outlook The new.
LHC-CC Validity Requirements & Tests LHC Crab Cavity Mini Workshop at CERN; 21. August Remarks on using the LHC as a test bed for R&D equipment.
JRA on Development of High Temperature SC Link Motivation Work Packages Partners & resources Amalia Ballarino Esgard open meeting CERN,
Spreaders & Recombiners Beam Transport Michael Bevins May 30, GeV Upgrade - Beam Transport Spreader/Recombiner Dipoles and Layout, & Installation.
Eric Prebys/LARP 2/17/2016.  CERN has taken unprecedented steps to control information about this event, including altering the electronic LHC log to.
4/27/06 1 US LHC ACCELERATOR RESEARCH PROGRAM brookhaven - fermilab – berkeley - slac US LARP Inner Triplet Cryogenics and Heat Transfer LARP Collaboration.
Superconducting Technologies for the Next Generation of Accelerators CERN, Globe of Science and Innovation 4-5 December Superconducting Links for the Hi-Lumi.
Magnet Test Facilities at Fermilab Peter Limon April 12, 2006.
The integration of 420 m detectors into the LHC
E. Todesco MAGNET (RE)Training E. Todesco Magnets, Superconductors and Cryostats Group Technology Department, CERN LHC risk review, 5 th March 2009 Acknowledgements:
Conclusions on UPS powering test and procedure I. Romera Acknowledgements: V. Chareyre, M. Zerlauth 86 th MPP meeting –
Machine Protection Review, R. Denz, 11-APR Introduction to Magnet Powering and Protection R. Denz, AT-MEL-PM.
Interface of FP420 to LHC FP420 meeting 28-Sep-2006.
TE-CRG Activities D. Delikaris, TE-CRG.
TE-MPE-CP, RD, LHC risk review 06-Mar R. Denz TE-MPE-CP Radiation Hardness of Cold By-pass Diodes Acknowledgements: D. Hagedorn (former project.
Proposed integration of cryo BLMs in LHC during LS1 V.Parma, CERN, TE-MSC With contributions/input from: M.Sapinski (BE-BI) Th.Renaglia (EN-MME) N.Bourcey.
The HiLumi LHC Design Study (a sub-system of HL-LHC) is co-funded by the European Commission within the Framework Programme 7 Capacities Specific Programme,
Logo area HL LHC IT STRING M. Bajko CERN TE-TM and QXF Review.
The Large Hadron Collider The 19 th Sep 2008 incident [R. Alemany] [CERN AB/OP] [Engineer In Charge of LHC] NIKHEF Seminar ( )
AB-CO Review, 23 September 2005 L. Walckiers AT-MTM p. 1 Project description  To maintain for LHC completion  Magnet Rescue Activities [MAR]  Support.
Common Systems – Holger Kollmus Holger Kollmus FAIR - Machine Advisory Committee Meeting Common Systems and Controls.
Infrastructure status and plans at CERN 1) W. Weingarten/CERN TTC Milano 28 February - 3 March W. Weingarten/CERN 1)Most of the slides are based.
HL-LHC IT STRING and Series test of SC link
SLHC –PP WP6 LHC IR Upgrade - Phase I.
Roadmap for triplet cryostats
Testing of SC Magnets Status - November 2010
Internal review of IR2 LEP cryostats (WP11/WP5) Close out session
Feasibility and implication of installation of the string test in SM18 with a slope M. Bajko WP16.
The LHC - Status Is COLD Is almost fully commissioned
Hollow e- lens, Cryogenic aspects
Accelerator and Experiment Interface Session: LS2, LS3
MPE main activities planned for LS2
Renovation of the 45-year old PS magnets
The 11T cryo-assembly: summary of design and integration aspects
UK RFD Pre-Series cryomodule
DEBRIS IMPACT IN THE TAS-TRIPLET-D1 REGION
TEST PLANS for HL LHC IT STRING
LHC OPERATION AND SUPPORT
US-LARP Task: IR Commissioning
Extraction Michael Bevins May 17, 2007
US-LARP Task: IR Commissioning
Review of hardware commissioning
Presentation transcript:

Workshop 12/04/2006AT/MTM SM18 Test Facility A. Siemko "Workshop on Test Facilities and measurement equipment needed for the LHC exploitation"

A. Siemko AT-MTM Workshop – 12 April 2006 Outline u Expected Hardware Commissioning And Machine Exploitation Needs u Expected MAR Project Needs u Teams to perform the cold tests u 1 st estimate of infrastructure needs u Conclusions

A. Siemko AT-MTM Workshop – 12 April 2006 u The series tests of the LHC magnets in SM18 test facility are expected to be completed beginning u The test facility will then be modified to support the accelerator exploitation. SM18 Test Facility at present in future

A. Siemko AT-MTM Workshop – 12 April 2006 Hardware Commissioning And Machine Exploitation Needs u During hardware commissioning and further machine exploitation there will be intermittent (most probably) need to replace cryo- magnets due to: u Performance failures u Cryo and vacuum integrity u Electrical integrity u Quench performance u Beam-related accidents

A. Siemko AT-MTM Workshop – 12 April 2006 Hardware Commissioning And Machine Exploitation Needs u During hardware commissioning and machine exploitation there will be recurrent need to test and retest the spare magnets u Qualification of newly assembled magnet units (MS and DS) u Qualification of magnets after repair u Retest after long duration storrage

A. Siemko AT-MTM Workshop – 12 April 2006 Hardware Commissioning And Machine Exploitation Needs u Extended performance studies will have to be performed - as it is expected - at the request of the AB teams and AT equipment owners u Extended Performance Studies u Quench performance studies u Electrical integrity studies u Cryo and vacuum integrity studies u Magnetic field performance studies

A. Siemko AT-MTM Workshop – 12 April 2006 Hardware Commissioning And Machine Exploitation Needs u Quench Performance Studies not performed during the series tests u Quench performance limitation due to the beam losses u Quench performance limitation due to the cooling limitations u Re-assessment of the performance if questionable during hardware commissioning and exploitation

A. Siemko AT-MTM Workshop – 12 April 2006 Hardware Commissioning And Machine Exploitation Needs u Electrical Integrity Studies u Long term stability and limitation u Reproduce at laboratory level issues encountered in the machine. Study solutions. u R&D on new diagnostic techniques u Cryo-Integrity Studies not performed during the series tests u Thermal tests: heat loads - static vs. dynamic, efficiency etc. u Mechanical studies to assess the mechanical and vacuum limitations

A. Siemko AT-MTM Workshop – 12 April 2006 Hardware Commissioning And Machine Exploitation Needs u Extended Magnetic Field Performance Studies u Precision transfer function measurements u Impact of powering history on field quality u Stability of harmonics u Stability of field direction vs. mechanical stability u Dynamic effects u Cold alignment u Corrector’s performance and alignment u R&D on new magnetic measurement techniques

A. Siemko AT-MTM Workshop – 12 April 2006 Expected MAR Project Needs u Standard performance tests and measurements will have to be performed on newly assembled magnets and magnets after repair u Certification or re-certification of magnets before installation u Extended performance studies at request of equipment owners

A. Siemko AT-MTM Workshop – 12 April 2006 Particular issues related to different magnet types u Arc magnets u Spare policy: u Substantial number of spares will be available at startup of LHC u But: u Knowledge of magnet performance towards efficient commissioning and reaching the LHC nominal luminosity is limited. u Need to perform extended performance tests on a number of spare magnets u Field quality – FAME for FIDEL u Power tests – beam induced quench levels u Expected at present rate of magnets to be repaired and re- qualified for the tunnel use seems to be very limited

A. Siemko AT-MTM Workshop – 12 April 2006 Particular issues related to different magnet types u Insertion magnets u Spare policy: u Spare magnets and all other components are available to cover the needs of one Dispersion Suppressor (3 units) and one Matching Section (4 units). Any SSS from Q4 to Q10 can be assembled and replaced. Expected production duration of a new unit at best in 4-6 weeks. u Almost all individual spare magnets will be cold tested in B4 u In case of performance failure in the machine the insertion magnets will stay on the critical path for the HC and operation u We will need an efficient rescue and cold test facility operational all time during commissioning and accelerator exploitation

A. Siemko AT-MTM Workshop – 12 April 2006 Test of magnets after repair Radioprotection issues u A designated cluster which permits to work with the risk of exposure must be allocated and equipped for the purpose of retesting of the activated magnets (subject not studied yet) u Protection of the personnel u Protection of the environment u Monitoring of the dose rates u Local shielding u Use of personal protective equipment u All personnel must be trained for this specific work

A. Siemko AT-MTM Workshop – 12 April 2006 Cold tests of Separation Dipoles and Low-β Quads u Adaptation/modification of the test benches needs to be studied

A. Siemko AT-MTM Workshop – 12 April 2006 Equipment Dedicated to Separation Dipoles and Low-β Quads u Dedicated test Equipment for Separation Dipoles and Low-β Quads needs to be studied

A. Siemko AT-MTM Workshop – 12 April 2006 Teams to perform the cold tests u At present u Transport, preparation of magnets, their installation on the test benches and removal work is presently executed by external contractor (ICS) u Cryogenic test preparation and operation is presently executed by external contractor (ALLS) u Routine cold tests and measurements are presently executed exclusively by external Indian collaborators and temporarily detached AB operators u Special tests and measurements are assured by MTM and ACR experts

A. Siemko AT-MTM Workshop – 12 April 2006 Teams to perform the cold tests u In future u The external contractor’s know-how and relevant tooling must be re-in sourced to CERN teams (plus associated FSU’s) before the end of the present contracts u Key CERN experts should be identified and/or trained (mechanical, electrical, electro-mechanical, vacuum, cryogenics technicians). Know-how transfer from US Labs should be included u The competence of the CERN cold test expert technicians and engineers should be preserved and integrated in the future extended performance tests and/or repair and retest activities u Cryo operation from CCC needs to be studied

A. Siemko AT-MTM Workshop – 12 April st estimate of infrastructure needs - proposal u 8 stands ought to be available for testing any of the LHC arc and insertion magnet sets u 1 stand for MB/Arc SSS power tests (existing) u 1 stand for DS/MS power tests (existing) u 1 stand for Separation dipoles (adaptation/modification to be studied) u 1 stand for Low-b quadrupoles (adaptation/modification to be studied) u 2 stands for magnets with the risk of exposure (adaptation/modification to be studied) u 2 stands for FAME project (existing)

A. Siemko AT-MTM Workshop – 12 April st estimate of infrastructure needs - proposal u It is economically favorable to maintain the present size of the SM18 magnet test facility rather then to decommission part of it u Remaining test stands can be put on stand-by to be ready for: u Unforeseen major retest needs, u GSI magnet tests? u Planned OSQAR experiment. u LHC upgrade programmes u Possible SPS/PS « supra » upgrade

A. Siemko AT-MTM Workshop – 12 April 2006 Possible SM18 layout after series tests Activated magnets DS/MS Low-β Sep. Dip. MB/SSS power tests FAME A B C D E F OSQAR Exp. FAME

A. Siemko AT-MTM Workshop – 12 April 2006 Conclusions u SM18 test facility can fulfill all major cold test needs of LHC magnets related to: u MAR Project u and also for the LHC exploitation u Required resources must still be defined in details and ….allocated