1 October 24, 2006 Doris Baker Rachell Katz Jorge Preciado B-ELL Leadership Session © 2006 by the Oregon Reading First Center Center on Teaching and Learning.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Accelerating Achievement in Boston Public Schools: Academic Achievement Framework.
Advertisements

PERSONAL LITERACY PLANS AT THE SECONDARY LEVEL December 12, 2003.
PAYS FOR: Literacy Coach, Power Hour Aides, LTM's, Literacy Trainings, Kindergarten Teacher Training, Materials.
Digging Deeper with DIBELS Data
Understanding DIBELS Next
Delta Sierra Middle School Napa/Solano County Office of Education School Assistance and Intervention Team Monitoring Report #8 – July 2008 Mary Camezon,
B-ELL Leadership Professional Development Oregon Reading First October 2 nd, 2008 University of Oregon © 2008 by the Oregon Reading First Center Center.
90-Minute Reading Block Scheduling Cohort B August 23, Minute Reading Block Scheduling Cohort B August 23, 2005 Examples from William Walker
Assessment: Purpose, Process, and Use HMR Kindergarten.
North Penn School District Phase III Update Introduction to Response to Instruction and Intervention (RTII): A Schoolwide Framework for Student Success.
*This is a small school district of fewer than 1000 students located in northern Illinois. *The district consists of: an Elementary School (Pre-K--4 th.
Response to Intervention (RTI) Lindenhurst Schools
1 Reading First at Oak Grove Elementary School Medford School District 549C Julie York – District Person Julie Evans – Principal Barbara Low – Reading.
Coordinating Spanish and English Reading Instruction Doris Luft Baker Rachell Katz B-ELL Schools IBR August 24, 2006.
Thinking Smart About Assessment Ben Clarke, Ph.D. Rachell Katz, Ph.D. August 25, 2004 Oregon Reading First Mentor Coach Training © 2004 by the Oregon Reading.
Building Our 90 Minute Reading Block Westside Elementary Maria Randle, Reading Coach
Oregon Reading First (2009)1 Oregon Reading First Webinar Data-based Action Planning Winter 2009.
Oregon Reading First Evaluating Fall Data and Planning Instruction for ELL Students Receiving Spanish and English Instruction.
Oregon Reading First (2010)1 Winter 2010 Data Based Planning for Instructional Focus Groups.
Doris Luft Baker Institute on Beginning Reading Day 2 June 24, 2005 Cross-linguistic Transfer of Reading Skills for Children Learning to Read in English.
1 Oregon Reading First: Cohort B Leadership Session Portland, Oregon May 27, 2009.
Reading First Assessment Faculty Presentation. Fundamental Discoveries About How Children Learn to Read 1.Children who enter first grade weak in phonemic.
Aligning Interventions with Core How to meet student needs without creating curricular chaos.
Oregon Reading First Cohort B B-ELL Leadership Session Jorge Preciado University of Oregon March 5th, 2009 © 2009 by the Oregon Reading First Center Center.
Vision: Every child in every district receives the instruction that they need and deserve…every day. Oregon Response to Intervention Vision: Every child.
Schoolwide Reading Improvement Model - RTI Name:___________________________ Grade:___________________________ School:__________________________ CONSULTING.
The 90 Minute Reading Block. What does research evidence tell us? Effective reading instruction requires: At least 90 uninterrupted minutes per day At.
Wake County Public School System
October 18, It is the largest federal assistance program for our nation’s schools. The purpose of Title I is to ensure that all children have a.
Blending Academics and Behavior Dawn Miller Shawnee Mission School District Steve Goodman Michigan’s Integrated Behavior and Learning.
1 RtII: Response to Instruction and Intervention Wissahickon School District.
Assessment: Purpose, Process, and Use HMR Kindergarten, Grade 1, and Grade3.
Vision: Every child in every district receives the instruction that they need and deserve…every day. Oregon Response to Intervention Vision: Every child.
Dynamic Measurement Group (DMG) Part 2.
School-wide Data Analysis Oregon RtI Spring Conference May 9 th 2012.
Vision: Every child in every district receives the instruction that they need and deserve…every day. Oregon Response to Intervention Vision: Every child.
Aligning Interventions with Core How to meet student needs without creating curricular chaos.
Systems Review: Schoolwide Reading Support Cohort 5: Elementary Schools Winter, 2009.
Instructional Leadership and Reading First Component 3-Part B Sara Ticer, Principal, Prairie Mountain School District Support for Instructional Leadership.
B-ELL Leadership Session May 26, 2009 Jorge Preciado University of Oregon © 2009 by the Oregon Reading First Center Center on Teaching and Learning.
School-wide Data Team Meeting Winter NSIF Extended Cohort February 10, 2012.
1 Oregon Reading First Cohort B-ELL Coaches’ Meeting April 25, 2008 © 2008 by the Oregon Reading First Center Center on Teaching and Learning.
DIBELS Data: From Dabbling to Digging Interpreting data for instructional decision-making.
1 The Oregon Reading First Model: A Blueprint for Success Scott K. Baker Eugene Research Institute/ University of Oregon Orientation Session Portland,
Coaching Teachers to Use Assessment to Inform Instruction The Florida Center for Reading Research
Data Analysis MiBLSi Project September 2005 Based on material by Ed Kameenui Deb Simmons Roland Good Ruth Kaminski Rob Horner George Sugai.
MCLASS Reading 3D: Class Summary Reports. Desired Outcomes Understand how to access and analyze Class Summary Reports for whole class and individual students.
HOW DO WE USE DIBELS WITH AN OUTCOMES-DRIVEN MODEL? Identify the Need for Support Validate the Need for Support Plan Support Evaluate Effectiveness of.
Class Action Research: Treatment for the Nonresponsive Student IL510 Kim Vivanco July 15, 2009
READING FIRST IN ACTION Knowing and Acting: A Practical 8-Week System to Improve Achievement By Betsy Eaves and Jessica Evans.
Orange County School District Benchmark Three Consultative Session.
What is Title I and How Can I be Involved? Annual Parent Meeting Pierce Elementary
Digging Deeper with Screening Data: Creating Intervention Groups Gresham-Barlow School District September 8, 2011.
Overview For Parents Introduce yourself and any co-trainers to your staff.
DIBELS: Doing it Right –. Big Ideas of Today’s Presentation Reading success is built upon a foundation of skills DIBELS (Dynamic Indicators of Basic Early.
Interpreting data for program evaluation and planning.
Data-based Decisions: A year in review Sharon Walpole University of Delaware.
The 90 Minute Reading Block. What does research evidence tell us? Effective reading instruction requires: At least 90 uninterrupted minutes per day At.
Intensive Reading Support 6.0 Evaluate Instructional Support 21.
K-5: Progress Monitoring JANUARY, 2010 WAKE COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOL SYSTEM INTERVENTION ALIGNMENT.
Middle School Training: Ensuring a Strong Foundation of Supports
DIBELS.
Assistant Principal’s Meeting Miami-Dade County Public Schools
Module 10 Assessment Logistics
Data-Based Leadership
B-ELL Leadership Session
DIBELS Next Overview.
Reading Goals and Reading Growth A Proposal for Cohort A
Reading Goals and Reading Growth A Proposal for Cohort A
Implementation of Data-Based Decision-Making in an Urban Elementary School Doug Marston Jane Thompson Minneapolis Public Schools March 26, 2009.
Presentation transcript:

1 October 24, 2006 Doris Baker Rachell Katz Jorge Preciado B-ELL Leadership Session © 2006 by the Oregon Reading First Center Center on Teaching and Learning

2 Objectives Understand and discuss fall DIBELS/IDEL data Supporting and coordinating instructional delivery Role of leaders: coaches, principals,district leaders Critical features of Spanish instruction Critical features of English instruction: transferable and nontransferable skills Progress monitoring

3 Cohort B-ELL All Schools DIBELS Grade/Benchmark Goal Measure Percent at Low Risk Fall 2006 Percent at Some Risk Fall 2006 Percent At Risk Fall 2006 Kindergarten-ISF33/11529%36/11531%46/11540% Kindergarten-LNF9/1158%18/11516%88/11576% First Grade- NWF19/9719%20/9721%58/9760% Second Grade-ORF11/8613%23/8627%52/8660% Third Grade-ORF8/7411%17/7423%49/7466% Table 1B Data for K-3 ELL Students in Spanish, Fall 2006 IDEL Grade/Benchmark Goal Measure Percent at Low Risk Fall 2006 Percent at Some Risk Fall 2006 Percent At Risk Fall 2006 Kindergarten-FNL16/12413%3/1242%105/12485% Kindergarten-FSF15/12412%19/12415%90/12473% First Grade-FPS23/10322%20/10320%60/10358% Second Grade-FLO30/8934%19/8921%40/8945% Third Grade- FLO14/7518%17/7523%44/7559% Table 1A Data for K-3 ELL Students in English, Fall 2006

4

5

6

7

8 Reading Measures in DIBELS and IDEL DIBELSIDEL Phonemic Segmentation Fluency (PSF) Fluidez en la Segmentación de Fonemas (FSF) Nonsense Word Fluency (NWF)Fluidez en las Palabras sin Sentido (FPS) Oral Reading Fluency (ORF)Fluidez en la Lectura Oral (FLO) Letter Naming Fluency (LNF)Fluidez en el Nombramiento de las Letras (FNL)

9 Supporting and Coordinating Instructional Delivery Team approach to improving classroom instruction. This is especially critical when supporting instructional delivery in Spanish and English for ELL students. Teamwork is a must! Role of Coaches Role of Principal Role of District

10 Role of Coaches in B-ELL School Analyze English and Spanish data for ELLs at grade level team meetings Coordinate the focus of instructional time for English and Spanish Work collaboratively to support instruction May involve “English coach” supporting English instruction for ELLs

11 Role of Coaches Providing necessary training to teachers and instructional assistants on the use of Spanish and English instructional materials. Follow up on training and provide necessary support for effective delivery of instruction. Accessibility of materials for instructors.

12 Role of Principal Review goals with staff Fluency in both languages for all ELL students Drop in on Spanish and English instruction Classroom management and student engagement can be observed regardless of the language of instruction. Communicate the expectation of using Spanish templates particularly for strategic and at risk students.

13 Role of District Leader Set specific and non-negotiable goals with your B- ELL teams. Monitor the progress of your ELL students towards goals of achieving reading proficiency in BOTH languages Plan for necessary professional development to support effective instruction (i.e. training for instructional assistants who deliver Spanish reading instruction)

14 District Support of Teacher’s Language Development How can we ensure that ELLs are receiving high quality Spanish reading instruction? Supporting teachers and assistants who are not fluent in the language by: Providing language development classes focused on teacher academic language Help teachers use effective features of instruction (minimize teacher talk, consistent language, etc.)

15 Critical Features of Spanish Instruction Effective signals for unison responding Model, Lead, Test Error correction (follow Model, Lead, Test) Teach to mastery phonemic awareness, phonics, and fluency. (Vocabulary, and comprehension have to be taught with a high level of student success).

16 Critical Features Continued Review behavioral expectations (praise 4:1 ratio; specific praise) Provide a phonics skill warm up (students read 6-10 previously taught words the fast way) Pre-teach 3-5 vocabulary words from basal reader During lesson pay attention to pacing and providing opportunities to respond

17 Critical Features of English Instruction for ELLs Integrated with Native English Speakers ELLs require more structured support and explicit instructions with no room for misinterpretation. Non-examples Where is my class? Give me your eyes and ears. Front row you all did such a good job blending. Would you do it again and show everyone how good you are?

18 Critical Features cont… Positive Examples of explicit instruction for ELLs Directions need to be clear and explicit Front row you all did such a good job blending. Can you blend all these sounds again? (If necessary, remind students to wait for the signal). Eyes on me Let’s segment words together (Ensure that students understand the meaning of “segment” and “blend”).

19 English Instruction for ELLs Separated from Native English Speakers Need to maintain high standards for adequate progress of ELLs on English DIBELS measures Target specific skills, particularly phonics, and vocabulary building. Anticipate student phonics errors, and preteach words that have those sounds Ex: silent “e”; letter combinations: kn, oo, ea, au, etc.

20 Transfer of skills Reminder of the importance of explicit English instruction. Which skills transfer and which skills don’t, must be taught explicitly during English reading time.

21 Evidence of PA Transfer Strong phonological awareness (PA) skills are good predictors of reading in the first and second languages. (Durgunoglu, Nagy, and Hancin-Bhatt, 1993; Lindsey, Manis, & Bailey, 2003). Ceiling effect of PA in Spanish Spanish has phonemes and 30 letters (including ll, rr, and ch). English has phonemes and 26 letters

22 What does NOT transfer from Spanish to English? *Vowel Sounds (e.g., long /e/ in eat or short /i/ in it, etc.) *English consonant sounds in the beginning or ending of words (e.g., /sp/, /h/, /th/, etc.) *Grammar Features (e.g., definite articles, subject omission, adjective after noun, etc.) False cognates (e.g., realize vs. realizar (Sp), gas (En), etc.) Polysemus words (e.g., “banco,”(Sp.) “dirt”(En.)) *Reference: Handbook for English Language Learners. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin; pp R5-R15)

23 Progress Monitoring K-3 Kindergarten PSF (DIBELS: Phonemic Segmentation Fluency) Start in Winter FPS (IDEL: Nonsense Word Fluency) Start in Winter  Progress monitor at least 10 intensive students three times a month  After collecting three data points compare results with aim line  Decision making: Discuss Progress Monitoring at GLT EnglishSpanish

24 Progress Monitoring First Grade First Grade PSF and NWF* (DIBELS: Phonemic Segmentation Fluency and Nonsense Word Fluency) FPS (IDEL: Nonsense Word Fluency)  Progress monitor at least 10 students three times a month  After collecting three data points compare results with aim line  Decision making: Discuss Progress Monitoring at GLT Progress monitor on at least one measure in each language depending on fall benchmark score. EnglishSpanish

25 Progress Monitoring Second Grade Second Grade NWF and ORF* (DIBELS: Nonsense Word Fluency and Oral Reading Fluency FPS and FLO* (IDEL: Nonsense Word Fluency and Oral Reading Fluency)  Progress monitor at least 10 students three times a month  After collecting three data points compare results with aim line  Decision making: Discuss Progress Monitoring at GLT Progress monitor on FPS and ORF one measure depending on fall benchmark score. EnglishSpanish

26 Progress Monitoring Third Grade Third Grade NWF and ORF* (DIBELS: Nonsense Word Fluency and Oral Reading Fluency FPS and FLO* (IDEL: Nonsense Word Fluency and Oral Reading Fluency)  Progress monitor at least 10 students three times a month  After collecting three data points compare results with aim line  Decision making: Discuss Progress Monitoring at GLT * Progress monitor on FPS and ORF measures depending on fall benchmark score English Spanish

27 1.If three (3) consecutive data points are above the aimline, student is making adequate progress towards the benchmark goal. Data Decision Rules

28 Stay the Course! Data Decision Rules 2. If the date points align with the aimline, student is making adequate progress towards the benchmark goal.

29 Decisions Rules- Basics “Don’t Wait!” 3. If three (3) consecutive data points are below the aimline, change the intervention. Data Decision Rules

30 Logistics Are materials (DIBELS and IDEL) available? Have teachers and educational assistants been trained on progress monitoring? Where should teachers enter IDEL progress monitoring data?

31

32 Aprenda Report

33 Discussion and Questions