Blogs and Wikis in the Bb LS Barbara Knauff, Senior Instructional Technologist, Dartmouth College July 10, 2007
2 Session Overview Bb at Dartmouth Why blogs and wikis? Learning Objects implementation Use cases Tips Q & A, discussion
3 Dartmouth 4,100 undergrads 1,600 graduate/professional students 475 faculty courses/term
4 Dartmouth Residential student body No distance ed programs Study abroad > 50% Face-to-face instruction at core of institutional identity Liberal arts Bb used as a supplement
5 Bb at Dartmouth 1999: adopted CourseInfo 2002: integration with Banner 2007: more than 2/3 of courses have active Bb site Cross-platform support crucial (40% Mac users)
6 Bb growth
7 Early uses of Bb Tool adoption weighted towards administrative functions Instructor disseminates content Students consume content One-way street: faculty to student
8 So what’s the problem? “… students do not always complete the readings, so sometimes come to class with no ideas and questions about new knowledge.”
9 So what’s the problem? “The issue with which I really struggle is that […] students seem to not want to think or take responsibility for their own learning.”
10 So what’s the problem? “Another problem that new technologies may address is the range of student competence […]”
11 So what’s the problem? “… students […] often seem unwilling to apply what they know to their classmates’ presentations.”
12 So what’s the problem? “… students […] want to be fed the ‘answers’ to the test questions.”
13 Deeper Learning Principles Social Active Contextual Engaging Student-owned Carmean, Colleen and Jeremy Haefner. "Mind over Matter: Transforming Course Management Systems into Effective Learning Environments." Educause Review, Nov/Dec. 2002, pp
14 Tools for deeper learning Discussion Boards Wikis Blogs or online journals
15 Shared attributes Asynchronous Collaborative Multi-media possible Text-centered
16 Discussion Boards Implemented in Bb Limitations: –Linear structure –Can be cumbersome to read –Focus on text –Cannot easily embed media in page –No commenting –Access: all or nothing
17 Blogs Simple web publishing Chronological presentation Shared or individual Support comments
18 Wikis “A web application that allows users to add content, as on an Internet forum, but also allows anyone to edit the content.” (Source: wikipedia)wikipedia A website (non-linear, hyperlinked) Collectively authored Supports comments
19 Blogs and Wikis in Bb Based on Building Block technology Enterprise clients only Learning Objects: Substantial cost Cross-platform support Excellent customer support Rapid development cycle
20 Basic clients? Link to free services from within Bb No seamless authentication integration No integrated assessment Recommended services: –PB Wiki: –Blogger:
21 Teams LX “Teams Site” = wiki Nomenclature and icon switch =
22 Teams LX Create a wiki in any content area
23 Teams LX Assign name and description
24 Teams LX Grant editing privileges based on groups
25 Teams LX Grant editing privileges to individuals
26 Teams LX Set availability
27 Teams LX Set dates for editing
28 Teams LX Set dates for viewing/commenting
29 Teams LX Ability to create gradebook entry
30 Teams LX Ability to set text direction
31 Teams LX Cross-platform WYSIGYG toolbar –IE –Firefox –Unsupported browsers - can edit HTML
32 Teams LX Toolbar supports: –Word-like changes in display –Links –Images –File uploads –Special characters –HTML editing mode –pseudo-CSS
33 Teams LX Editing history for each page
34 Teams LX Version changes highlighted
35 Teams LX Ability to revert to prior versions Other tools: –Page list –Search tool –Export tool
36 Teams LX Assess Wikis (Control Panel)
37 Wiki examples Scientific Basis of Medicine Program (SBM.Program-AY0607):SBM.Program-AY0607 –Student presentation of medical case studies –Use of pathology images crucial –“Seeded” demo wiki
38 Wiki examples
39 Wiki examples
40 Wiki examples Whitman and Dickinson (ENGL SU06):ENGL SU06 –Class-built literary glossary –Class-built annotated bibliography –Tendency to append, not overwrite
41 Wiki examples Composition and Research (WRIT FA06)WRIT FA06 –Collection of sources –Class-built historical synopsis –Orphaned pages
42 Wiki examples Expository Writing (WRIT FA06)WRIT FA06 –Group web project instead of paper –Multi-media included –Course administration: signup sheets
43 Wiki examples Expository Writing (WRIT FA06)WRIT FA06 –Student-generated questions –Wiki functions like an erasable whiteboard
44 Wiki examples Biology & Politics of Starvation (BIOL SSOC WI06)BIOL SSOC WI06 –Final projects –Charts and images –Some poor design choices (colors, width)
45 Wiki examples Collaborative article (ORG.computing.curricular.CMS-article)ORG.computing.curricular.CMS-article –Used wiki as shared writing space
46 Other wiki assignments Reading club Signup and self-scheduling pages Textbook errata Lecture errata “Expert” wikis (research and documentation) Student-authored study guides
47 Wiki positives Student engagement and ownership Multi-media Sharing work in class / outside of class Wikis enhance other work
48 Wiki positives “Group writing doesn’t produce good papers - but the next individual paper will be improved” Engages deeper learning principles: –Social, active, contextual, engaging, student- owned
49 Wiki problems, 1 Confusion between general course wiki and wikis deployed in content areas Confusion between “edit page” and “new page” Concept of linked web of pages difficult Browser problems (Safari) Locked-up documents Assessment difficult Poorly designed sites, image sizing problems
50 Wiki problems, 2 Long URLs Access configuration difficult for faculty Hesitancy to embrace new notion of authorship Flashy instead of substantive
51 Wiki suggestions, 1 Brief & clear technical instructions Disable course wiki Clearly define expectations of wiki assignments Create demo wiki for students Consider “seeding” wikis/pre-establishing structure Don’t expect beauty Be aware of time commitment required
52 Wiki suggestions, 2 Be aware of file size quota Iterative process: –Create –Review and comment, feedback –Refine –Final Assessment –Consider separating process/product in assessment Require commenting
53 Journals LX Analogous to Teams LX “Journal Site” = blogs Nomenclature and icon switch =
54 Journals LX Single-page Multi-author Users can only edit their own posts Versioning Commenting No assessment tool Option: students can view only own posts Option: RSS feed
55 Sample blog assignments Individual reading or progress journals Group project progress reports Personal showcase in language classes Student blogs Peer review Link collection
56 Blog example Contemporary Issues Feminism (WGST SP07)WGST SP07 –Theoretical glossaries/responses
57 Blog example The Cinematic City (FILM SP07)FILM SP07 –Response papers
58 Blog example Latinos in Media/Arts (LATS FA05)LATS FA05 –Student link collections
59 Blog positives Easy for students to use Good replacement for some single-page wikis Alternative to discussion board
60 Blog problems Less used at Dartmouth than wikis Student engagement seems lower Few technical/conceptual problems –Browser problems Problems similar to discussion board: –Student motivation –Integration with course
61 Expo LX Formerly called “Backpack” Not deployed at Dartmouth Blogs, wikis associated with user Module-based (not course) Rudimentary permissioning E-portfolios Personal student spaces
62 Conclusion Contact: Slides: ld2007/ ld2007/ Questions!