PPAR activation & lipid metabolism
Diabetic dyslipidaemia Lipid profiles and hyperinsulinaemia in newly diagnosed type 2 diabetic patients Niskanen L et al. Diabetes Care 1998;21: Type 2 diabetesControlp HDL-C (mmol/L) <0.05 Triglycerides (mmol/L) <0.05 LDL-C (mmol/L) NS Total-C (mmol/L) NS Fasting insulin (mU/L)
Effects of pioglitazone vs gliclazide addition to metformin on dyslipidaemia % change from baseline after 2 yrs Triglycerides HDL cholesterol LDL cholesterol TC / HDL ratio p< Pioglitazone + Metformin Gliclazide + Metformin Betteridge DJ, Verges B. Diabetologia 2005; 48:
Changes in dyslipidaemic profile with TZDs *p<0.05 vs baseline; † p<0.001 between treatment groups Goldberg RB et al. Diabetes Care 2005; 28: 1547–1554 Goldberg RB et al. Circulation 2005; 111: 1727–1728 * † * Change from baseline to endpoint (%) after 24 weeks † * Mean baseline mmol/L Mean endpoint mmol/L * * TriglyceridesHDL-CNon-HDL-C
Sulfonylurea + TZD or metformin: Comparison of lipid and renal effects Hanefeld M et al. Diabetes Care. 2004;27: N = 639 with poorly controlled DM2 * † ‡ † † *P = 0.008, † P < 0.001, ‡ P = NS Pioglitazone 15–45 mg + sulfonylurea Metformin 850–2550 mg + sulfonylurea Change after 52 wks (%)
TZDs and metformin reduce risk of MI Case-control study of insulin-sensitizing therapy and first MI in patients with type 2 diabetes *Adjusted for age, sex, BMI, ACE inhibitor use, history of hypertension or hypercholesterolemia Sauer WH et al. Am J Cardiol. 2006; 97: Monotherapy Metformin TZD TZD + sulfonylurea Metformin + sulfonylurea Insulin-sensitizing drugs Sulfonylurea monotherapy P Odds ratio for MI (95% CI)* Combination therapy PatientsControls n