Administration and Supervision of Gifted Programs Weekend 1 February 25-6, 2011

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
WV High Quality Standards for Schools
Advertisements

Practice Profiles Guidance for West Virginia Schools and Districts April 2012.
Gifted and Talented Programming. Programming Options? Pull out –Weekly –Full day a week –Daily Self-contained Push in Acceleration Options Cluster Grouping.
Program Evaluation in Gifted Education Rebecca Mann EDPS 540.
Parents as Partners in Education
STRATEGIC PLAN Community Unit School District 300 7/29/
JEFFERSON COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS LEADERSHIP PROFILE REPORT March 19, 2015.
Campus Improvement Plans
Ingham RtI District Leadership Team November 4, 2009.
Family Resource Center Association January 2015 Quarterly Meeting.
INSTRUCTIONAL LEADERSHIP FOR DIVERSE LEARNERS Susan Brody Hasazi Katharine S. Furney National Institute of Leadership, Disability, and Students Placed.
Overview of Gifted Implementation and Advanced Learning Program (ALP)
Gifted Program Review Spring Process  In February 2013 a team of 41 individuals met to develop questions: parent, teachers, psychologists and administrators.
Reflective Pathways from Theory to Practice Brewton-Parker College Education Division.
1 GENERAL OVERVIEW. “…if this work is approached systematically and strategically, it has the potential to dramatically change how teachers think about.
TIMELESS LEARNING POLICY & PRACTICE. JD HOYE President National Academy Foundation.
Webinar: Leadership Teams October 2013: Idaho RTI.
Inclusive Education Defining Inclusive Education Inclusive Education(IE): “ …Means that all students in a school regardless of their differences are.
Gifted and Talented Academy Session 2 November 29, 2011.
Integrating Differentiated Instruction & Understanding by Design: Connecting Content and Kids by Carol Ann Tomlinson and Jay McTighe.
What is HQPD?. Ohio Standards for PD HQPD is a purposeful, structured and continuous process that occurs over time. HQPD is a purposeful, structured and.
Planning and Integrating Curriculum: Unit 4, Key Topic 1http://facultyinitiative.wested.org/1.
Teaching Today: An Introduction to Education 8th edition
Assuring Gifted Program Quality Through Self-Study. Gail Hanninen, Ed. D.
1. Housekeeping Items June 8 th and 9 th put on calendar for 2 nd round of Iowa Core ***Shenandoah participants*** Module 6 training on March 24 th will.
Administration and Supervision of Gifted Programs Weekend 2 March 4-5, 2011
Eloise Forster, Ed.D. Foundation for Educational Administration (FEA)
Raising standards, improving lives The use of assessment to improve learning: the evidence 15 September Jacqueline White HMI National Adviser for Assessment.
1 RESPONSE TO INSTRUCTION ________________________________ RESPONSE TO INTERVENTION New Opportunities for Students and Reading Professionals.
“A Truthful Evaluation Of Yourself Gives Feedback For Growth and Success” Brenda Johnson Padgett Brenda Johnson Padgett.
March 23, NYSCSS Annual Conference Crossroads of Change: The Common Core in Social Studies.
The Conceptual Framework: What It Is and How It Works Linda Bradley, James Madison University Monica Minor, NCATE April 2008.
Readiness for AdvancED District Accreditation Tuscaloosa County School System.
Gifted and Talented Academy Session 2 November 17, 2015
Gifted and Talented Academy Year 2 Curriculum and Instruction Session 2 HAEAnet-public Password: education0309.
ANNOOR ISLAMIC SCHOOL AdvancEd Survey PURPOSE AND DIRECTION.
NOTE: To change the image on this slide, select the picture and delete it. Then click the Pictures icon in the placeholder to insert your own image. THE.
Gifted and Talented Academy West Des Moines Session 1 September 16, 2011
Gifted and Talented Academy Year 2 Curriculum and Instruction Session 1 HEAEnet-public Password: education0309.
Gifted and Talented Academy Year 2 Curriculum and Instruction Session 1 HAEAnet Password: education
Sept. 16, Session #2 PED3106 : Agenda - Housekeeping: Hardcopy course outlines, Assignment 1 (8:30AM-8:45AM) - Complimen-tree, Inclusion in I/S Schools.
Administration and Supervision of Gifted Programs Weekend 1 February 25-6, 2011
Designing Comprehensive Gifted Programming Session 1 December 17, 2015
Gifted and Talented Academy Session 3 March 12, 2010
Administration and Supervision of Gifted Programs Weekend 2 February 22-23, 2013
Best Practices in CMSD SLO Development A professional learning module for SLO developers and reviewers Copyright © 2015 American Institutes for Research.
Instructional Leadership Supporting Common Assessments.
Gifted and Talented Academy Year 2 Curriculum and Instruction Session 1 HAEAnet-public Password: education0309
DPI Javits Grant: Expanding Excellence Initiative State Leadership Cadre March 2016.
Best Practices in Gifted Education
Phyllis Lynch, PhD Director, Instruction, Assessment and Curriculum
Administration and Supervision of Gifted Programs
Gifted and Talented Academy
Highly Capable Education
Designing Comprehensive Gifted Programming
Gifted and Talented Academy year 1
Board Presentations Protocol:
Gifted and Talented Academy year 1
Administration and Supervision of Gifted Programs
Unit 7: Instructional Communication and Technology
Designing Comprehensive Gifted Programming
Best Practices in Gifted Education
Best Practices in Gifted Education
Best Practices in Gifted Education
Designing Comprehensive Gifted and Talented Programming
Designing Comprehensive Gifted Programming
Gifted and Talented Academy year 1
Gifted and Talented Academy
Best Practices in Gifted Education
Gifted and Talented Academy
Presentation transcript:

Administration and Supervision of Gifted Programs Weekend 1 February 25-6,

Look with favor upon a bold beginning. --Virgil, Roman poet

Winnie the Witch Why do children need gifted services? Winnie the Witch Winnie on the Web She’s even on Facebook!

Agenda  Welcome and Introductions  Goals  Norms  Iowa Code  Foundation –Vision –Mission –Beliefs  Program Goals  Home Play  Closure

Course Outcomes  To deepen understanding of the components of comprehensive gifted and talented programming  To determine the extent to which g/t services are infused in the total education program  To construct and/or improve a written comprehensive gifted and talented program plan  To determine how to set priorities for g/t programming and students served  To identify and use data necessary to provide, drive, and improve g/t programming

Group Norms  Talk freely - think out loud  Questions establish a culture of curiosity  Freedom to change your mind  Connect to Iowa Core, previous learning and district initiatives  Support one another in the learning

Introductions  Name  School  Current role/gifted aspiration  One important thing you hope to gain from this class

Reflections

What Are You?  Enthusiast?  Explorer?  Sightseer?  Vacationer?  Prisoner?

Iowa Code, NAGC Program Standards, & PK-12 National Gifted Education Standards  Iowa Code provides requirements in law for minimum compliance (Chs. 12 & 59)  NAGC PK-12 Gifted Programming Standards provide guidance toward best practices  PK-12 National Gifted Education Standards identify essential knowledge and skills for teachers of gifted

Comprehensive Gifted and Talented Programming  Comprehensive: –Including many things –Having a wide scope or full view –Extensive; wide; large; full; compendious (dictionary.com)

So what is it? Work with a partner to list the components/characteristics of comprehensive gifted and talented programming. Think: comprehensive physical, comprehensive exam

Comprehensive Gifted and Talented Programming  Includes and integrates multiple domains of giftedness  Provides multiple programming options matched to student need  Addresses both cognitive and affective needs  Is articulated K-12  Is evolutionary in nature  Is essential to and embedded in an effective educational program  Is based on student need  Identifies children with unmet educational needs

CONSENSU S

Managing Complex Change = Change Confusion = = = = = ++++ VisionSkillsIncentivesResources Action Plan Adapted from Knoster, T., Villa R., & Thousand, J. (2000). A framework for thinking about systems change. In R. villa & J. Thousand (Eds.), Restructuring for caring and effective education: Piecing the puzzle together (pp ). Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes Publishing Co. Anxiety Resistance False Starts Frustration ++++ SkillsIncentivesResources Action Plan ++++ VisionIncentivesResources Action Plan ++++ VisionSkillsResources Action Plan ++++ VisionSkillsIncentives Action Plan ++++ VisionSkillsIncentivesResources

Consensus-Building Tool #3 Managing Complex Change + VisionSkills IncentivesResources Action Plans CONFUSION ++ +

Consensus-Building Tool #3 Managing Complex Change Vision Skills IncentivesResources Action Plans ANXIETY ++ ++

Consensus-Building Tool #3 Managing Complex Change VisionSkills IncentivesResources Action Plans Resistance ++ ++

Consensus-Building Tool #3 Managing Complex Change VisionSkills IncentivesResources Action Plans FRUSTRATION

Consensus-Building Tool #3 Managing Complex Change VisionSkills IncentivesResources Action Plans FALSE STARTS ++ ++

Talk About It…  With regard to g/t programming in your district –which areas are strengths? –which areas need attention/work?

Survey Results Download Excel sheet from Wiki Transfer item values  Section 1 – Vision  Section 2 – Skills  Section 3 – Incentives  Section 4 – Resources  Section 5 – Action Plan

It All Starts With…

Vision  What we aspire to  Requires “stretch” Example: ITAG envisions a time when all students, including the gifted and talented, are given an appropriate educational experience that matches their abilities and potential, where they have abundant opportunities for their intellectual and creative challenge and growth, and those who work with them are effectively trained to appreciate, understand, and nurture their unique talents and needs.

Sample Vision  Waukee – “New learning all day every day for each identified gifted child.” Consider: In what ways will vision impact programming?

Victory Circle  Three years from now, the DE awards your district the “Outstanding GT Program” distinction for the state.  What would we see, hear, experience, etc. that would give credence to the award? Group 1Group 2Group 3

Creating Stretch  What aspects of your victory are worthy of achieving but would require significant stretch?  Consider these ideas to help you write a statement of vision.

S-W-O-R Analysis  What are the strengths in our school that would help us achieve our victory?  What weaknesses do we need to overcome?  What opportunities exist if we achieve our victory?  What risks do we face along the way?

Mission/Philosophy Answers the questions  What is our purpose?  Why does the program(ming) exist? What it does  Creates cohesiveness, commitment, and understanding  Gives meaning to our work –Choosing how we’ll work –What work we choose to do --Conzemius & O’Neill, 2002

Traits  Comprehensiveness  Rationale  Consistency  Clarity --Purcell & Eckert, 2006

Sample Mission/Philosophy The mission of the Iowa Talented and Gifted Association is to recognize, support, and respect the unique and diverse needs of talented and gifted learners through ADVOCACY: by encouraging informed educational professionals, parents, policy makers, and all other stakeholders to take appropriate action for the benefit of talented and gifted learners. EDUCATION: by strengthening and encouraging the recognition and implementation of practices that support identification of talented and gifted learners and accommodation of the social, emotional, and intellectual levels. NETWORKING: by increasing opportunities for collaboration and cooperation among all stakeholders with the goal of advancing the abilities and developing the potential of talented and gifted learners.

Beliefs …are firmly held …guide what we do …influence practice

Assumptions  What assumptions do you hold about gifted children? (+ or -)  What assumptions do classroom teachers, administrators, and parents in your district/building hold? Group 1Group 2Group 3

Putting It All Together… Consider  desired state (victory) –components requiring stretch  current state (S-W-O-R)  why your program exists  assumptions which drive beliefs Create a draft of your vision, mission/philosophy, and beliefs.

Evaluating Your Mission/Philosophy Rate your mission/philosophy with regard to  Comprehensiveness  Rationale  Consistency  Clarity

Sample Academically talented children in Jonesville may possess characteristics that necessitate qualitatively different instruction. Our program is designed to provide the atmosphere for stimulating above- average-ability students. Trait54321 Comprehensiveness Rationale Consistency Clarity --Purcell & Eckert, 2006

Sample Academically talented children in Jonesville may possess characteristics that necessitate qualitatively different instruction. Our program is designed to provide the atmosphere for stimulating above- average-ability students. Trait54321 ComprehensivenessX RationaleX ConsistencyX ClarityX --Purcell & Eckert, 2006

Makeover The mission of the Jonesville School District is to ensure that each child has equal opportunity to receive a suitable program of educational experiences. The school board recognizes that some students possess, or are capable of possessing, extraordinary learning ability and/or outstanding talent. These students come from all socioeconomic, cultural, and ethnic backgrounds. The school board affirms the following:

 Curricular modifications as described in our comprehensive program design will occur in the regular classroom to provide continuous levels of challenge for all students, including those with unique gifts and talents.  In addition to the regular classroom, a range of instructional settings, both within the school as well as the community, will be available for specialized instruction that is integrated with the regular curriculum and the intellectual and social and emotional needs of gifted and talented children.  It is the responsibility of the school district and the larger community to ensure the following: –Ongoing identification of gifted and talented children –Provision of appropriate and systematic educational services to meet the unique learning needs of gifted and talented children. --Purcell & Eckert, 2006, p

Building Consensus Determine  With whom you will share  How you will determine/build consensus Reflect on  How the message was received  Further work needed

Program Evaluation  Baseline data –Complete Self-Audit/Reflection section(s)Self-Audit/Reflection –Bring results to next session  Basis for program goals  Means to improve programming

Goals and Performance Measures  Program Goals –Provide focus for evaluation and planning –Provide direction toward a particular purpose –“living” - will be revised as needed –Based on clear mission and definition of giftedness (target population) --Purcell & Eckert, p. 63

Goals and Performance Measures  Performance Measures –What does success look like? –How will we know when we get there? –What data will we collect? –How good is good enough?

Traits  Alignment  Validity  Comprehensiveness  Clarity Purcell & Eckert, p. 64-5

Using SART to Establish Program Goals  Complete selected sections of the Self-Audit/Reflection Tool.  Identify area(s) most in need of improvement.  Target goal(s) to the area.  At the end of the year review the SART section and data to ascertain goal attainment.

Sample Program Goals  Urbandale  District 196, Minnesota –Based on NAGC Program Standards

Examine Your Program Goals  Do you have program goals?  Are they program goals or student outcomes? –What’s the difference? –Why is each important?  How do they stack up against the traits of high-quality goals on p. 64?

Memory Mingle 1.How has the information you’ve engaged with so far “pushed” your thinking? 2.Share in triads 3.Identify connections and/or conclusions 4.Share with large group

Gifted and Talented Identification What is it? Why do it? What then?

The Target Population  Definition of “gifted”  Multiple Criteria used/analyzed

State of Iowa Definition  General Intellectual Ability  Specific Ability Aptitude  Creativity  Leadership  Visual and Performing Arts

Characteristics  With your team  Review areas in your target population  Talk about the assessments that help you find kids in each category  How is that working?  What other assessments might you need?

Starting the Process  Screening –Use existing data sources  Nomination/Referral –Who may/should refer? –How will they do it? –How will they know they can?

Digging Deeper  What stands out about the child?  What more do you need to know? –Cast a wider net –No single piece of data screens a child “in” or “out”  Are the criteria valid for the construct being measured?  How will you analyze the information?  At what point can you make a decision with confidence?  Notification

Activity  Consider the list of multiple criteria  Identify which area(s) of giftedness for which each would be a valid criterion to consider.  Are all the criteria appropriate at all grade spans?  Add other examples at the bottom.  Share with someone you haven’t yet worked with today.

Placement  Which children need which services?  Not about assigning a label  According to need

Some Things to Ponder  Once identified, always identified?  Procedure for staffing out?  Your questions?

Gap Analysis With your team 1.Study Guiding Principles, Attributes That Define High-Quality Identification Procedures (p. 51-2), and SART results 2.Identify desired state 3.Outline your current identification procedures (current state) 4.List steps needed to move toward desired state

Home Play  Complete two sections of SA/RT –Program Goals –Identification  Share draft of Mission/Philosophy with GT Advisory, Administrative Team, and/or School Board –Get input –Get mission/philosophy approved