Nuclear Level Density 1.What we know, what we do not know, and what we want to know 2.Experimental techniques to study level densities, what has been done.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Stefan Roesler SC-RP/CERN on behalf of the CERN-SLAC RP Collaboration
Advertisements

Γ spectroscopy of neutron-rich 95,96 Rb nuclei by the incomplete fusion reaction of 94 Kr on 7 Li Simone Bottoni University of Milan Mini Workshop 1°-
Temperature and isospin dependencies of the level-density parameter. Robert Charity Washington University in St. Louis.
Neutrino Interactions with Nucleons and Nuclei Tina Leitner, Ulrich Mosel LAUNCH09 TexPoint fonts used in EMF. Read the TexPoint manual before you delete.
Yoshitaka FUJITA (Osaka Univ.) Hirschegg Workshop /2006, Jan GT (  ) : Important weak response GT transitions of Astrophysics Interest.
Compound nucleus reactions Consider the data Propose a model.
Accelerator technique FYSN 430 Fall Syllabus Task: determine all possible parameters for a new accelerator project Known: Scope of physics done.

12C(p,g)13N g III. Nuclear Reaction Rates 12C 13N Nuclear reactions
Using GEMINI to study multiplicity distributions of Light Particles Adil Bahalim Davidson College Summer REU 2005 – TAMU Cyclotron Institute.
EURISOL User Group, Florence, Jan Spin-Dependent Pre-Equilibrium Exciton Model Calculations for Heavy Ions E. Běták Institute of Physics SAS,
25 9. Direct reactions - for example direct capture: Direct transition from initial state |a+A> to final state B +  geometrical.
Resonant Reactions The energy range that could be populated in the compound nucleus by capture of the incoming projectile by the target nucleus is for.
1 III. Nuclear Reaction Rates Nuclear reactions generate energy create new isotopes and elements Notation for stellar rates: p 12 C 13 N  12 C(p,  )
Nuclear Level Densities of Residual Nuclei from evaporation of 64 Cu Moses B. Oginni Ohio University SNP2008 July 9, 2008.
W. Udo Schröder, 2007 Semi-Classical Reaction Theory 1.
The angular dependence of the 16 O(e,e’K + ) 16  N and H(e,e’K + )  F. Garibaldi – Jlab December WATERFALL The WATERFALL target: reactions on.
Oslo, May 21-24, Systematics of Level Density Parameters Till von Egidy, Hans-Friedrich Wirth Physik Department, Technische Universität München,
Coupled-Channel Computation of Direct Neutron Capture and (d,p) reactions on Non- Spherical Nuclei Goran Arbanas (ORNL) Ian J. Thompson (LLNL) with Filomena.
Heat Capacities of 56 Fe and 57 Fe Emel Algin Eskisehir Osmangazi University Workshop on Level Density and Gamma Strength in Continuum May 21-24, 2007.
Α - capture reactions using the 4π γ-summing technique Α. Lagoyannis Institute of Nuclear Physics, N.C.S.R. “Demokritos”
Nuclear Level Densities Edwards Accelerator Laboratory Steven M. Grimes Ohio University Athens, Ohio.
Isotopically resolved residues produced in the fragmentation of 136 Xe and 124 Xe projectiles Daniela Henzlova GSI-Darmstadt, Germany on leave from NPI.
1 Formation spectra of  -mesic nuclei by (  +,p) reaction at J-PARC and chiral symmetry for baryons Hideko Nagahiro (RCNP) Collaborators : Daisuke Jido.
Ohio University: A.V. Voinov, S.M. Grimes, C.R.Brune, T. Massey, B.M. Oginni, A.Schiller, Oslo University: M. Guttormsen, A.C. Larsen, S.Siem, N.U.H. Syed.
FermiGasy. W. Udo Schröder, 2004 FermiGas Model 2 Particles in Ideal 1D Box Approximate picture: independent particles in mean field produced by interactions.
Lecture 16: Beta Decay Spectrum 29/10/2003 (and related processes...) Goals: understand the shape of the energy spectrum total decay rate sheds.
Probing the isospin dependence of nucleon effective mass with heavy-ion reactions Momentum dependence of mean field/ –Origins and expectations for the.
1 Reaction Mechanisms with low energy RIBs: limits and perspectives Alessia Di Pietro INFN-Laboratori Nazionali del Sud.
Pygmy Dipole Resonance in 64Fe
Where next (with HDU)? Q-value mass. excitation energies. Angular distributions of recoils l -value spectroscopic information.
Chiral phase transition and chemical freeze out Chiral phase transition and chemical freeze out.
GT (  ) : Important weak process  decay : absolute B(GT), limited to low-lying state CE reactions : relative B(GT), highly Ex region  decay  isospin.
Monte Carlo methods in ADS experiments Study for state exam 2008 Mitja Majerle “Phasotron” and “Energy Plus Transmutation” setups (schematic drawings)
Francis H. Burr Proton Therapy Center Massachusetts General Hospital December 2005 CRONUS Annual Meeting Irradiations at LANSCE May 2 – Flight.
Test of Level Density models from Nuclear Reactions Babatunde M. Oginni Ohio University Nuclear Seminar December 3, 2009.
Radiochemistry Dr Nick Evans
NUCLEAR LEVEL DENSITIES NEAR Z=50 FROM NEUTRON EVAPORATION SPECTRA IN (p,n) REACTION B.V.Zhuravlev, A.A.Lychagin, N.N.Titarenko State Scientific Center.
ANC Techniques and r-matrix analysis Santa Fe, April 2008 ANC Techniques and r-matrix analysis Grigory Rogachev.
Nuclear and Radiation Physics, BAU, 1 st Semester, (Saed Dababneh) Nuclear and Radiation Physics Why nuclear physics? Why radiation.
Nucleosynthesis in AGB Stars: the Role of the 18 O(p,  ) 15 N Reaction Marco La Cognata.
The concept of compound nuclear reaction: a+B  C  d+F The particle transmission coefficients T are usually known from cross sections of inverse reactions.
Lecture 21: On to Finite Nuclei! 20/11/2003 Review: 1. Nuclear isotope chart: (lecture 1) 304 isotopes with t ½ > 10 9 yrs (age of the earth) 177.
Interactions of Hadrons and Hadronic Showers
Neutrino cross sections in few hundred MeV energy region Jan T. Sobczyk Institute of Theoretical Physics, University of Wrocław (in collaboration with.
Nuclear Astrophysics ARUNA Workshop, Notre Dame, IN Carl R. Brune Ohio University, Athens Ohio June 12-13, 2014.
Question 1 (Activity 12A, page 207) Do now: Paraire, 29 Kohi-tātea 2016 Use Einstein’s mass-energy equivalence (E=mc 2 ) to analyze and explain nuclear.
Effects Of Distortion On Trojan Horse Applications Rosario Gianluca Pizzone INFN – Laboratori Nazionali del Sud Catania.
Jan. 18, 2008 Hall C Meeting L. Yuan/Hampton U.. Outline HKS experimental goals HKS experimental setup Issues on spectrometer system calibration Calibration.
Monday, Sept. 18, 2006PHYS 3446, Fall 2006 Jae Yu 1 PHYS 3446 – Lecture #5 Monday, Sept. 18, 2006 Dr. Jae Yu 1.Nuclear Phenomenology 2.Properties of Nuclei.
February 12-15,2003 PROCON 2003, Legnaro-Padova, Italy Jean Charles THOMAS University of Leuven / IKS, Belgium University of Bordeaux I / CENBG, France.
Pion-Induced Fission- A Review Zafar Yasin Pakistan Institute of Engineering and Applied Sciences (PIEAS) Islamabad, Pakistan.
Nuclear and Radiation Physics, BAU, First Semester, (Saed Dababneh). 1.
Systematical Analysis of Fast Neutron Induced Alpha Particle Emission Reaction Cross Sections Jigmeddorj Badamsambuu, Nuclear Research Center, National.
Honors Physics Chapter 25: Subatomic Physics.  Nucleons  Protons and Neutrons that Make Up the Nucleus  Atomic Number (Z)  # of Protons  Atomic Mass.
Study of repulsive nature of optical potential for high energy 12 C+ 12 C elastic scattering (Effect of the tensor and three-body interactions) Gaolong.
Production mechanism of neutron-rich nuclei in 238 U+ 238 U at near-barrier energy Kai Zhao (China Institute of Atomic Energy) Collaborators: Zhuxia Li,
1 Cross sections of neutron reactions in S-Cl-Ar region in the s-process of nucleosynthesis C. Oprea 1, P. J. Szalanski 2, A. Ioan 1, P. M. Potlog 3 1Frank.
Stanislav Pospíšil et al, Brightness Vidyo meeting
Open quantum systems.
Giant Monopole Resonance
12C(p,)13N Nuclear Reaction Rates  12C 13N Nuclear reactions
Content Heavy ion reactions started fragmenting nuclei in the 1980’s. Its study taught us that nuclear matter has liquid and gaseous phases, phase.
gamma-transmission coefficients are most uncertain values !!!
Isospin Symmetry test on the semimagic 44Cr
Chapter 4 Mechanisms and Models of Nuclear Reactions
The need for cross section measurements for neutron-induced reactions
Duality in Nuclei: The EMC Effect
Catalin Borcea IFIN-HH INPC 2019, Glasgow, United Kingdom
Presentation transcript:

Nuclear Level Density 1.What we know, what we do not know, and what we want to know 2.Experimental techniques to study level densities, what has been done until now 3.What kind of experiments we need to develop in the future

Excitation energy Level density Bn Level density is known for most of the stable nuclei Level density is unknown for most of the nuclei Traditionally, for most of the nuclei, the level density is estimated on the basis of experimental information from low-lying discrete levels and neutron resonance spacing E How is nuclear level density estimated ?

Nuclear level density models Fermi-gas model : comes from consideration of noninteracting fermi-particles moving in a common potential Constant temperature model : does not have a theoretical justification for nuclei (only for classical ideal gas) Microscopical models : calculations based on different representation of nuclear potentials plus collective effects

Additional problems: 1.spin cutoff parameter at neutron binding energy is not known 2.ratio of levels with negative and positive parities is not known 3.possible deviations of the shape of real level density from model functions assumed for interpolation might lead to extra uncertainties of total level densities We need to develop some experimental techniques capable to measure the precise energy dependence of TOTAL level densities in the whole excitation region

The level density from particle evaporation spectra of compound nuclear reactions The concept: The problem : Make sure that the compound reaction mechanism dominates. Possible solutions: 1. Select appropriate reactions (beam species, energies, targets). 2.Measure angular distributions to study reaction mechanism 3. Compare reactions with different targets and incoming species leading to the same final nuclei

Compound nulceus + (Wikipedia) Maxwell–Boltzmann distribution (Hauser-Feshbach theory)

Early works on level densities from evaporation spectra: H. Vonach (Vienna, Austria): S.Grimes (OU): B.Zhuravlev (Obninsk, Russia): (n,p); (n,a); (a,n) (p,n) Advantage: The compound nuclear mechanism dominates. Drawback: Negative Q-values of reactions that require higher energy beams if we want to measure level density at higher excitation energies. Pre-equilibrium processes become important ! Other options: d, 3 He, 12 C, 6 Li, 7 Li … beams Q-reactions are positive (for some of them), less beam energy is needed Smaller E/A which decreases pre-equilibrium contributions. Beam energies: up to 15 MeV

Particle evaporation measurements at Edwards Lab of Ohio University 3 He 58 Fe 59 Co d Ni n p α 60 Ni 60 Co 57 Fe Compound nucleus Make sure that features of spectra of outgoing particles are determined by internal nuclear properties of a compound nucleus !!! Compound nucleus formation 6 Li 55 Mn + 11 MeV 15 MeV 7.5 MeV

d, 3 He neutrons NE213 Flight path 8m target Swinger facility at Edwards Lab. Ohio University

beam Target Si 2m flight path Scheme of experimental set-up for charge-particle spectra measurements Edward’s Accelerator Lab, Ohio University

Experimental level densities from (d,n) reactions measured at Edwards Lab. of Ohio University Testing the level density with 27 Al(d,n) 28 Si Excitation energy, MeV Level density, 1/MeV

Points are from our experiment, red line the the Fermi-gas model with parameters found from the fit to discrete levels and neutron resonance spacing, black line is the Fermi-gas model fit to experimental points

Simulation with Empire reaction code 6 Li+ 55 Mn 60 Ni+n 60 Co+p

Level density off stability line S.I. Al-Quraishi, S.Grimes et al, Phys.Rev.C63, Possible theoretical explanation could be that the level density is lower off stability line because levels which have too wide width should not be counted in compound nuclear reactions because no equilibration can take place.

What is next ? Study evaporation spectra from ion induced reactions. Advantages: Lower E/A compared to nucleon induced reaction (n,p,a) that makes the compound nuclear mechanism dominant. Larger energy interval for outgoing particles allowing us to study level density in a larger excitation energy range ( at least up to MeV). Possibility to study nuclei off stability line (proton rich nuclei). GARFIELD is the new generation state of the art spectrometer to study nuclear level density and physics of compound nuclear reactions

D.R. Chakrabarty et al Nuclear Physics A 712 (2002) 23–36