Council for Responsible Nutrition FDA Public Meeting on New Dietary Ingredients Annette Dickinson, Ph.D. November 15, 2004
Council for Responsible Nutrition COUNCIL for RESPONSIBLE NUTRITION (CRN) A leading trade association for the dietary supplement industry Members include: –mainstream manufacturers of dietary ingredients and of national brand name and private label dietary supplements –marketers with an international scope
Council for Responsible Nutrition PURPOSE OF DSHEA Ensure consumer access to a wide variety of safe dietary supplements Provide consumers with more information about these products Affirm the safety of a broad array of existing dietary ingredients and establish a notification process for new dietary ingredients, distinct from and less burdensome than the food additive approach
Council for Responsible Nutrition DIETARY INGREDIENTS Categories intended to be broad Safety is an important factor in determining whether an ingredient may be marketed but is not a factor in defining the category per se
Council for Responsible Nutrition EXAMPLES Minerals – not limited to essential nutrients Botanicals Dietary substances
Council for Responsible Nutrition “GRANDFATHERED” INGREDIENTS Dietary supplements on the market in the U.S. prior to October 15, 1994 Majority of dietary supplements on the market now are “grandfathered” “Legally marketed” prior to 1994 not a requirement – selenium, chromium, amino acids
Council for Responsible Nutrition NEW DIETARY INGREDIENT NOTIFICATION Some of the information outlined may be desirable but not essential and some information may be proprietary CRN urges the agency to include some affirmative reassurance regarding the protection of proprietary information
Council for Responsible Nutrition INFORMATION ABOUT THE DIETARY SUPPLEMENT Appropriate for an NDI notification to include some information about its intended use in the finished product However, FDA should not specifically require submission of a label in all cases
Council for Responsible Nutrition REASONABLE EXPECTATION OF SAFETY Core question: What types of information should be included in an NDI notification in order to establish a reasonable expectation of safety? –Questions posed should not been seen as absolute requirements for inclusion in a notification –Evidence of traditional use should include evidence from foreign and U.S. uses
Council for Responsible Nutrition SAFETY STANDARDS “reasonably be expected to be safe” No FDA approval of NDI But manufacturer or distributor must support conclusion regarding the reasonable expectation of safety
Council for Responsible Nutrition OTHER SAFETY MODELS GRAS evaluation EPA new chemicals program Canada’s Natural Health Products Directorate FDA health claim evaluations for psyllium and stanol and sterol esters FDA’s guidance on new plant varieties
Council for Responsible Nutrition OTHER DEFINITIONS All terms should be understood broadly and literally Issues having to do with safety or other considerations should be dealt with directly and NOT used as reasons for restricting the definition itself
Council for Responsible Nutrition NDI NOTIFICATION GUIDANCE CRN endorses the seven recommendations listed in the meeting notice (October 20, 2004 Federal Register), all of which would improve the format and content of the notifications
Council for Responsible Nutrition CONCLUSION CRN congratulates FDA for undertaking this initiative and for fully involving all stakeholders in the discussion CRN looks forward to future opportunities to work cooperatively with FDA in developing regulatory approaches that will best serve the needs of the agency, industry and the consuming public
Council for Responsible Nutrition Annette Dickinson, Ph.D. President Council for Responsible Nutrition L Street, N.W., Suite 900 Washington, D.C , FAX