204377409 Rising Grocery Prices and Australia's anti-trust law Wolfgang Hellmann 21 May 2008 ABA Section of International Law Committee on International.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Private Labels & Brand Competition Dr Ariel Ezrachi, The University of Oxford Centre for Competition Law and Policy 16 January 2009, CCP UEA.
Advertisements

Hayden Green Consultant, NERA Australia 18 November 2007 Market Definition in the C7 Case Business Law Workshop.
Competition Policy and Competition Law 23 April 2008 Adolph Leung Senior Economist Commerce and Economic Development Bureau.
1 Competition Law and Policy Workshop March 30-31, 2011 Savannah Hotel.
Copyright©2004 South-Western 15 Monopoly. Copyright © 2004 South-Western While a competitive firm is a price taker, a monopoly firm is a price maker.
IMPACT ESTIMATION PROJECT h o r i z o n s c a n n i n g Observations on retail-MFNs and RPM Nelson Jung Director, Mergers Office of Fair Trading The views.
Australian Health Insurance Association “ The ACCC View of Key Competition Issues Impacting on Private Health” Presented By John Martin Commissioner Australian.
Slides developed by Les Wiletzky Wiletzky and Associates Copyright © 2006 by Pearson Prentice-Hall. All rights reserved. Antitrust Law.
Mergers and Acquisitions (M&As): Running Afoul of Antitrust Laws Jennifer Sawayda Program Specialist Anderson School of Management University of New Mexico.
Session 8: Remedies in Competition Policy Mergers and Unilateral Conduct Fifth Annual African Consumer Protection Dialogue Conference Livingstone, Zambia.
COMMISSION For The SUPERVISION Of BUSINESS COMPETITION The REPUBLIC Of INDONESIA REGIONAL ANTITRUST WORKSHOP ON ABUSE OF DOMINANCE.
COMPETITIVE STRATEGY - Dolly Dhamodiwala.
Effective competition review : Mobile February 2001.
Competition Issues in the Agri-Food Sector Monday 10 th April 2006 Declan Purcell Director, Advocacy Division The Competition Authority.
Copyright 2006 – Biz/ed Business Economics.
Monopoly While a competitive firm is a price taker, a monopoly firm is a price maker. A firm is considered a monopoly if it is the sole seller of.
Some basic observations
1 9 Corporate Strategy: Horizontal Integration, Vertical Integration, and Strategic Outsourcing.
The Groceries Market Investigation 2008 Carole Begent Deputy Chief Legal Adviser Competition Commission IDRC, Kyoto 13 April 2008.
ECP 6701 Competitive Strategies in Expanding Markets
HL2 MARKETING THEORY: PORTER’S FIVE FORCES IB BUSINESS AND MANAGEMENT A COURSE COMPANION P
1 Is there a conflict between competition law and intellectual property rights? Edward Whitehorn Head, Competition Affairs Branch Carrie Tang Assistant.
18 Competition Law and Policy © Oxford University Press, All rights reserved.
1 Recent Developments in Competition Law in Australia ABA Spring Meeting, Global Antitrust Panel (The East) Washington DC, April 2009 Elizabeth M. Avery.
Explain causes of stock price fluctuations. Where Did the Terms Come From? The bear and bull markets are named after the way in which each animal attacks.
Chapter 15 notes Monopolies.
Business Economics. The Growth of Firms Internal Growth: Generated through increasing sales To increase sales firms need to:  Market effectively 
Copyright©2004 South-Western Monopoly. Copyright © 2004 South-Western While a competitive firm is a price taker, a monopoly firm is a price maker.
Monopoly ETP Economics 101. Monopoly  A firm is considered a monopoly if...  it is the sole seller of its product.  its product does not have close.
Introductory course on Competition and Regulation Pál Belényesi University of Verona October 2006.
 How firms compete Easy as PIE: Presenting in English 09/03/2011.
Chapter 22 Microeconomics Unit III: The Theory of the Firm.
MERGERS Clayton 7 as amended by the Celler-Kefauver Act:
Copyright© 2010 WeComply, Inc. All rights reserved. 10/17/2015 Canadian Competition Law.
Antitrust. “Is there not a causal connection between the development of these huge, indomitable trusts and the horrible crimes now under investigation?
Merger Remedies By Kenneth L. Danger Presented at the OECD-Korea Regional Centre for Competition.
First edition Global Economic Issues and Policies PowerPoint Presentation by Charlie Cook Copyright © 2004 South-Western/Thomson Learning. All rights reserved.
RESEARCH IN THE CONTEXT OF COMPETITION BY MOKUBUNG N. MOKUBUNG 1.
Barriers to Entry Brenton Philp Director, Mergers and Asset Sales Branch Australian Competition and Consumer Commission.
Merger Antitrust Law Fundamentals Dale Collins Shearman & Sterling LLP April 18, 2013.
Trends in Retail Competition: Private Labels, Brands and Competition Policy A Symposium on the Role of Private Labels in Competition between Retailers.
“Implementing Spectrum Trading” the recent consultation Presentation to SMAG Open Forum December 2002 Geoff Chapman Radiocommunications Agency.
Introduction to Competition Policy & Law
The dominance concept: new wine in old bottles Miguel de la Mano * Member of the Chief Economist’s Office DG COMP, European Commission FTC/DOJ Hearings.
Copyright©2004 South-Western 15 Monopoly. Copyright © 2004 South-Western Monopoly While a competitive firm is a price taker, a monopoly firm is a price.
Place your chosen image here. The four corners must just cover the arrow tips. For covers, the three pictures should be the same size and in a straight.
February 10 th, 2009 Ticketmaster Live Nation. The Players  Ticketmaster Largest primary ticketing provider in the U.S. (80%) Largest primary ticketing.
1 Consumer Protection & Anti- competitive conduct in Telecommunications Part V & Part XIB of the Trade Practices Act 1974 Australian Communications and.
COPYRIGHT © 2011 South-Western/Cengage Learning. 1 Click your mouse anywhere on the screen to advance the text in each slide. After the starburst appears,
© 2004 West Legal Studies in Business, a Division of Thomson Learning 20.1 Chapter 20 Antitrust Law.
 CHANNELS OF DISTRIBUTION  DISTRIBUTION STRATEGY  SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENT/LOGISTICS Place (Distribution)
Market Structures Chapter 7. PERFECT COMPETITION Section One.
The Economic Environment of Business – Lecture 5 Competition Policy.
1 Click your mouse anywhere on the screen to advance the text in each slide. After the starburst appears, click a blue triangle to move to the next slide.
PHILIPPINE COMPETITION ACT
Business Economics.
Contract & Consumer Law Chapter 11
MICROECONOMICS: Theory & Applications
Lear - Laboratorio di economia, antitrust, regolamentazione
Mark Basile, Australian Competition and Consumer Commission
CHAPTER 38 Antitrust.
Introduction to Competition Policy & Law
This is the prescribed textbook for your course.
Chapter 9 Corporate-Level Strategy: Horizontal Integration, Vertical Integration, and Strategic Outsourcing.
Pre-Close Rules of Engagement
Legal Aspects Of Corporate Business
Chapter 9 Corporate-Level Strategy: Horizontal Integration, Vertical Integration, and Strategic Outsourcing.
Horizontal Restraints
Chapter 9 Corporate-Level Strategy: Horizontal Integration, Vertical Integration, and Strategic Outsourcing.
9 Chapter 9: Corporate Strategy: Horizontal Integration, Vertical Integration, and Strategic Outsourcing BA 469 Spring Term, 2007 Prof. Dowling.
Presentation transcript:

Rising Grocery Prices and Australia's anti-trust law Wolfgang Hellmann 21 May 2008 ABA Section of International Law Committee on International Antitrust Law

AUSTRALIA - Grocery Industry & Antitrust Law 1.Structure of Australia's Grocery Industry 2.Merger Review in the Grocery Industry 3.Charter to promote independent sales of supermarkets (2005) 4.Grocery Inquiry

Structure of Australia's Grocery Industry Suppliers National and regional producers Overseas suppliers and importers Wholesale Woolworths (vertically integrated) Coles (vertically integrated) Metcash ("independent")

Structure of Australia's Grocery Industry Retail Woolworths (750+ supermarkets / ~44% market share) Coles (500+ / ~34%) Independent Retailers/Banner Groups (4,000+ / ~18%) Typically: medium-sized retailers with smaller range of products (eg. IGA) New entry in 2000: Germany's Aldi (300+ / ~4%) Mainly private label and less recognised "cheaper" brands [Specialist retailers with single product category – not part of the supermarket market] NOTE: market data only indicative

Merger Review in the Grocery Industry Section 50 of the TPA prohibits any acquisition of shares or assets that would result in a "substantial lessening of competition" in a "substantial" market in Australia. No mandatory pre-merger notification requirement in Australia (unlike in the US + EU, similar to UK regime) Standard practice of seeking "informal clearance" from the regulator if competition concerns The regulator, the Australian Competition & Consumer Commission (ACCC), has the power to seek injunction from the Court to stop a merger from proceeding

Merger Review in the Grocery Industry Since 2005, the ACCC has reviewed 13 acquisitions in the grocery industry Metcash / Foodland 2005: 82 stores Woolworths / Action Stores: 19 stores (1 divestiture) others: only one supermarket ("creeping acquisitions") further acquisitions in the liquor industry Expansion strategy of the two national retailers was to acquire independent stores in locations where they are not yet present no geographic overlap – no SLC effect of "creeping acquisitions" on wholesale level and demand side?

Merger Review in the Grocery Industry Definition of the relevant grocery markets Supermarket retailing - local Provision of a bundle of grocery products to consumers within a local geographic area Delimitation of the relevant geographic area depends on local circumstances (particularly, consumers' purchasing pattern) Supermarket wholesaling – national or State-based Market in which supermarket wholesalers supply products to supermarkets for retail sale, either nationally or State-based Supermarket procurement markets – national or regional National or regional (eg. perishable products) markets for the procurement of the various products sold by supermarkets

Merger Review in the Grocery Industry Horizontal Acquisitions ACCC clearance if no geographic overlap or if sufficient competition in relevant geographic area Note: Convenience stores constrain supermarkets only to a limited extent: service - but not price If geographic overlap: divestiture may be available to address competition concerns (eg. Woolworths / Action Stores in 2005) Barriers to entry Access to suitable sites Economies of scale

Merger Review in the Grocery Industry Creeping acquisitions Definition: several acquisitions of independent retailers, each resulting only in a small increase in concentration with little effect on competition Issue: While each single acquisition (assessed individually) is unlikely to result in a substantial lessening of competition (absent local competition issues), a series of acquisitions may have a significant cumulative effect on competition.

Merger Review in the Grocery Industry Creeping acquisitions – 3 main ACCC concerns 1.Loss of sales volumes and loss of scale economies of the independent wholesalers vis-à-vis Woolworths and Coles 2.Loss of the independent wholesalers' bargaining power with suppliers vis-à-vis Woolworths and Coles 3.Increase of the buying power of Woolworths and Coles with the suppliers

Merger Review in the Grocery Industry Theories of competitive harm ("vicious circle") Higher cost of independent wholesalers If absorbed by independent wholesalers, this will result in less retail support and customer service in the short run In the long run, independent wholesalers will pass on higher cost to independent retailers, which will become less price competitive Consumers will switch from independent retailers to Woolworths or Coles Further: Increasing risk of oligopsony power by Woolworths or Coles on the demand side

Charter to promote competitive sales of independent supermarkets Charter took effect on 1 July 2005 Good-faith commitments by the "Big Three" wholesalers (Woolworths, Coles & Metcash) Objective promote fair competition between potential buyers of independent supermarkets, particularly by ensuring competitive bidding process benefit consumers by promoting competition in the supermarket sector, particularly by helping to address concerns about creeping acquisitions

Charter to promote competitive sales of independent supermarkets Party must not in connection with the acquisition of a supermarket prior to entering into a Sale Agreement: seek to secure from the Independent Retailer the right to exclusively negotiate or to otherwise prevent or inhibit the owner of the supermarket from dealing with other parties to secure the best price for the supermarket; or otherwise act to limit the right or ability of the Independent Retailer to seek other potential purchasers for the supermarket or frustrate the attempts of the Independent Retailer to do so, including by imposing unnecessarily broad confidentiality obligations.

Charter to promote competitive sales of independent supermarkets If a Party considers that another Party has breached the Charter, these Parties will, in good faith, seek to agree on whether a breach has occurred and, if so, negotiate an appropriate outcome.

Grocery Inquiry Background Recent OECD data suggests that food price inflation has been much higher in Australia than in other OECD countries Australia's new Labour Government includes (for the first time) a "Minister for Competition Policy & Consumer Affairs" (Chris Bowen) On 22 January 2008, Mr Bowen directed the ACCC to commence a formal inquiry into grocery prices

Grocery Inquiry The "heart" of the grocery inquiry is a public consultation process, including public hearings in all major cities in Australia The ACCC has used its compulsory information gathering powers (section 155 TPA) The final ACCC report is due by 31 July 2008

Grocery Inquiry The inquiry covers the following matters structure of the grocery industry at supply, wholesale and retail level ("farm gate to cash register") mergers and acquisitions by national retailers nature of competition competitive position of small and independent retailers pricing practices factors influencing the pricing of inputs and any impediments to efficient pricing of inputs