New Low-Frequency GW Detector with Superconducting Instrumentation

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Istituto di Fisica dello Spazio Interplanetario A gradiometric measurement of G XCIV Congresso Nazionale SIF Genova, Settembre 2008 V. Iafolla, E.
Advertisements

19. October 2004 A. Freise Automatic Alignment using the Anderson Technique A. Freise European Gravitational Observatory Roma
Laser Interferometer Gravitational-wave Detectors: Advancing toward a Global Network Stan Whitcomb LIGO/Caltech ICGC, Goa, 18 December 2011 LIGO-G v1.
WP-M3 Superconducting Materials PArametric COnverter Detector INFN_Genoa Renzo Parodi.
Design and performance of the Dual detector with large area capacitive readout 4 rd ILIAS-GW Meeting, October 8 th – 9 th 2007, Tuebingen Paolo Falferi.
September 23, 2004Univeristy of Twente1 Superconducting Gravity Gradiometry State of the Art.
Design study for 3rd generation interferometers Work Package 1 Site Identification Jo van den Brand
Paik-1 Standard Model And Relativity Test (SMART) Ho Jung Paik, Lvyuan Chen, M. Vol Moody University of Maryland and Inseob Hahn, Konstantin Penanen, Mark.
Dual Sphere Detectors by Krishna Venkateswara. Contents  Introduction  Review of noise sources in bar detectors  Spherical detectors  Dual sphere.
Paik-1 Inverse-Square Law Experiment in Space: Search for Extra Dimensions Ho Jung Paik, Violeta Prieto, M. Vol Moody University of Maryland and Donald.
Paik-1 Exploring Gravity with Proof-Mass Technologies Ho Jung Paik University of Maryland July 6-10, 2008, Warrenton, VA.
Chapter Two: Radio-Frequency Circuits. Introduction There is a need to modulate a signal using an information signal This signal is referred to as a baseband.
Active Seismic Isolation Systems for Enhanced and Advanced LIGO Jeffrey S. Kissel 1 for the LSC 1 Louisiana State University The mechanical system for.
Generation of squeezed states using radiation pressure effects David Ottaway – for Nergis Mavalvala Australia-Italy Workshop October 2005.
Esci 411, Advanced Exploration Geophysics (Micro)seismicity John Townend EQC Fellow in Seismic Studies
Yuji Otake, Akito Araya and Kazuo Hidano
Harmonic Oscillation 1. If a force F acts on a spring, the length x changes. The change is proportional to the restoring force (Hooke’s Law). A spring.
Recent Developments toward Sub-Quantum-Noise-Limited Gravitational-wave Interferometers Nergis Mavalvala Aspen January 2005 LIGO-G R.
Waves and Sound Ch
GWADW 2010 in Kyoto, May 19, Development for Observation and Reduction of Radiation Pressure Noise T. Mori, S. Ballmer, K. Agatsuma, S. Sakata,
What are GW’s ?? Fluctuation in the curvature of space time, propagating outward form the source at the speed of light Predicted by Einstein’s GTR Gravitational.
Paik-1 Search for Gravitational Waves Ho Jung Paik University of Maryland and Seoul National University January 12, 2006 Seoul, Korea KIAS-SNU Physics.
Annecy/Dec'04 1 ALLEGRO:status Dec 2004 Warren Johnson, Bill Hamilton, Peter Zhang, Andrew Weber, Damon Nettles, Jon Hanson, Mark Burgamy, Jordan Weaver.
Vibration and Waves AP Physics Chapter 11.
STREGA WP1/M1 mirror substrates GEO LIGO ISA Scientific motivation: Mechanical dissipation from dielectric mirror coatings is predicted to be a significant.
Test mass dynamics with optical springs proposed experiments at Gingin Chunnong Zhao (University of Western Australia) Thanks to ACIGA members Stefan Danilishin.
Interferometer Control Matt Evans …talk mostly taken from…
1 Paolo Falferi - ET WG2 meeting - Glasgow, 22/7/2010 Actuator magnetic noise measurement and possible developments Paolo Falferi CNR-FBK Trento and INFN.
Advanced interferometers for astronomical observations Lee Samuel Finn Center for Gravitational Wave Physics, Penn State.
Toward a 3rd generation European Gravitational Wave Observatory Dual R&D: presented by Massimo Cerdonio INFN Section and Department of Physics Padova how.
External forces from heat links in cryogenic suspensions D1, ICRR, Univ. Tokyo Takanori Sekiguchi GWADW in Hawaii.
Masaki Ando, Akiteru Takamori, Kimio Tsubono Department of Physics, University of Tokyo Earthquake Research Institute, University of Tokyo 1st International.
Abstract The Hannover Thermal Noise Experiment V. Leonhardt, L. Ribichini, H. Lück and K. Danzmann Max-Planck- Institut für Gravitationsphysik We measure.
1 Honors Physics 1 Summary and Review - Fall 2013 Quantitative and experimental tools Mathematical tools Newton’s Laws and Applications –Linear motion.
The Quadrupole Pick-up in the CPS -intro and progress report PPC 3 Dec 1999 A. Jansson.
Gravitational Experiment Below 1 Millimeter and Search for Compact Extra Dimensions Josh Long, Allison Churnside, John C. Price Department of Physics,
Vibrating Wire Test 23 March 2007 A wire of mass per unit length μ under tension T, of length L held fixed at each end has a fundamental vibration frequency.
GWADW - La Biodola 20061/20 Underground reduction of Gravity Gradient Noise. Giancarlo Cella INFN sez. Pisa/Virgo GWADW – La Biodola 2006.
Newtonian Noise Mitigation with Tensor Gravitational Wave Detector
External forces from heat links in cryogenic suspensions D1, ICRR, Univ. Tokyo Takanori Sekiguchi.
Torsion Pendulum Dual Oscillator (TorPeDO) David McManus, Min Jet Yap, Robert Ward, Bram Slagmolen, Daniel Shaddock, David McClelland.
ALIGO 0.45 Gpc 2014 iLIGO 35 Mpc 2007 Future Range to Neutron Star Coalescence Better Seismic Isolation Increased Laser Power and Signal Recycling Reduced.
Space Gravitational Wave Antenna DECIGO Project 3rd TAMA Symposium February 7, Institute for Cosmic Ray Research, Japan Seiji Kawamura National.
LOGO Gravitational Waves I.S.Jang Introduction Contents ii. Waves in general relativity iii. Gravitational wave detectors.
G. Cella I.N.F.N. Sezione di Pisa.  The mass density fluctuates..... ..... and the gravitational field will do the same Direct gravitational coupling.
Active Vibration Isolation using a Suspension Point Interferometer Youichi Aso Dept. Physics, University of Tokyo ASPEN Winter Conference on Gravitational.
Yoichi Aso Columbia University, New York, NY, USA University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan July 14th th Edoardo Amaldi Conference on Gravitational Waves.
Studying the use of masses on the microwaves cables to isolate seismic noise in the Schenberg Detector. Carlos Frajuca Fábio da Silva Bortoli São Paulo.
Ho Jung Paik University of Maryland GW Astronomy, Korea August, 2016
Activities in the Homestake mine
Current and future ground-based gravitational-wave detectors
Next Generation Low Frequency Control Systems
(quadrupole) symmetry cylindrical bar
Voronkov Vladimir Vasilyevich
Characterization of the PArametric COnverter detector
Nergis Mavalvala Aspen January 2005
Is there a future for LIGO underground?
(Superconducting Omni-directional Gravitational Radiation Observatory)
Generation of squeezed states using radiation pressure effects
MiniGRAIL “Extreme Make-over” Giorgio Frossati
External forces from heat links in cryogenic suspensions
Superattenuator for LF and HF interferometers
Ho Jung Paik University of Maryland GW Astronomy, Korea August, 2016
Advanced LIGO Quantum noise everywhere
Renzo F. Parodi INFN-Genova
Newtonian Noise Mitigation by Using Superconducting Gravity Gradiometers Ho Jung Paik Department of Physics University of Maryland ICGAC-XIII, Seoul.
LIGO, ground-based Gravitational Wave Detectors
Structural analysis of the SOGRO platform
Improving LIGO’s stability and sensitivity: commissioning examples
Ho Jung Paik University of Maryland E-GRAAL January 10, 2018
Presentation transcript:

New Low-Frequency GW Detector with Superconducting Instrumentation Ho Jung Paik Department of Physics, University of Maryland GWADW, May 26, 2015 (delivered by Krishna Venkateswara, U Wash) LIGO-G1500670

Contents Introduction to Superconducting Gravity Gradiometers (SGG) SGG as a Gravitational-Wave Detector Current and Future SGGs and Sensitivity SOGRO: Design and Important Noise Sources Sensitivity Goal

Introduction

i=j : inline-component Introduction to Superconducting Gravity Gradiometer (SGG) SQUID output is proportional to the difference in displacement of the two masses Gravity gradient tensor i=j : inline-component ij : cross-component Venkateswara

2 limits on new Yukawa interaction Test of Newton’s Inverse-square law using SGG (1993) Illustration of Test Cryostat Schematic Poisson’s equation In free space, 2 limits on new Yukawa interaction Venkateswara

Gravitational Wave Detection

SGG as a Gravitational Wave Detector? In the Newtonian limit, Riemann tensor becomes gravity gradient.  Gravity gradiometer measures Riemann tensor components. Paik

Current and Future SGGs

UM diagonal-component SGG (1993) 3 x 10-11 Hz-1/2 (Moody et al., 2002) Test masses are mechanically suspended (fDM ~ 10 Hz). Development was completed by early 1990s. 100 times better amplitude sensitivity than TOBA 20 years earlier. 104 times better limit than TOBA in GW energy density. Paik

3-axis Cross-component SGG Gravity gradient sensitivity Cryostat Schematic 3 x 10-10 Hz-1/2 1E = 10-9 s-2 Gravity gradient sensitivity GW strain sensitivity Venkateswara

New Superconducting tensor gravity gradiometer More sensitive SGG is under development with NASA support. Test masses are magnetically suspend (fDM ~ 0.01 Hz). Very high sensitivity Test masses are levitated by a current induced along a tube. Six test masses mounted a cube form a tensor gradiometer. Paik

Superconducting Omni-directional Gravitational Radiation Observatory SOGRO: Superconducting Omni-directional Gravitational Radiation Observatory

Superconducting tensor gravitational wave detector SOGRO (Superconducting Omni-directional Gravitational Radiation Observatory) Each test mass has three degrees of freedom. Combining six test masses, a tensor GW detector is formed. By detecting all six components of the Riemann tensor, the source direction (, ) and wave polarization (h+, h) can be determined by a single detector. “Spherical” Antenna Paik

Suspension of SOGRO  Active isolation unnecessary. Go underground to reduce seismic and gravity gradient noise, as well as to be far away from moving objects. Nodal support prevents odd harmonics from being excited. Cable suspension gives fr < 103 Hz for three angular modes.  Active isolation unnecessary. 25-m pendulum gives fp = 0.1 Hz for two horizontal modes.  Provide passive isolation for high frequencies. Problem: Platform is not rigid enough.  Triangulate with struts. Alternative suspension: Optical rigid body  Simpler cryogenics, larger baseline (up to 3 km?) Paik

Superconducting negative spring Magnetic levitation Stanford (1976) 1 ton Al antenna wrapped with Nb-Ti sheet was levitated magnetically. Field required to levitate 5-ton mass: The biggest challenge: To obtain symmetry, vertical DM resonance frequencies must also reduced to 0.01 Hz. Employ “push-pull levitation” plus negative spring. Superconducting negative spring Push-pull levitation Paik

Parametric transducer Near quantum-limited SQUIDs have 1/f noise below 100 kHz. Signal needs to be upconverted to fp = 100 kHz by pumping at fp by using a parametric transducer. An inductance bridge can be coupled naturally to a SQUID. Physical Review D Paik

Tuned capacitor-bridge transducer Capacitor bridge coupled to a near quantum-limited SQUID thru S/C transformer. LC resonance increases energy coupling  by Qp . Oscillator noise is rejected by the bridge balance. Maintain precise bridge balance by feedback. Parametric gain: Energy coupling constant: Paik

Achievable detector noise For CW signal with impedance-matched bridge transducer, Parameter SOGRO 1 SOGRO 2 Method Employed (SOGRO 1 /2) Each mass M 5 ton Nb square tube Separation L 30 m 100 m Over “rigid” mounting platform Antenna temp T 1.5 K 0.1 K Superfluid He / dilution refrigerator DM frequency fD 0.01 Hz Magnetic levitation w/ negative spring DM quality factor QD 108 109 Surface polished pure Nb Signal frequency f 0.1-10 Hz Detector noise computed at 1 Hz Pump frequency fp 50 kHz Tuned capacitor bridge transducer Amplifier noise no. n 200 10 Near-quantum-limited SQUID Detector noise Sh1/2(f ) 21020 Hz1/2 21021 Hz1/2 Two phase development SOGRO can also be operated as tunable resonant detector. Paik

Seismic noise Seismic noise of bedrock: 107 m Hz 1/2 Could be reduced to the required level by combining active isolation with CM rejection of the detector. 20-m pendulum with nodal support  Passive isolation for f > 0.1 Hz. 107 108 109 1010 1011 1012 1013 1014 1015 1016 1017 1018 1019 Seismic background Active isolation _____________ Axis alignment and scale factor match Error compensation Detector sensitivity Seismic noise of underground sites Amplitude noise level (m Hz1/2) Paik

Newtonian gradient noise The Newtonian noise from seismic and atmospheric density fluctuations cannot be shielded. GWs are transverse and cannot have longitudinal components whereas the Newtonian gradient does.  Could be distinguished in principle from near-field Newtonian gradients. Paik

Sensitivity Goal Paik

Sensitivity goals of SOGRO SOGRO 1: T = 1.5 K, SOGRO 2: T = 0.1 K Detector cooled to 1.5 K or 0.1 K and integrated with near-quantum- limited amplifiers. Seismic noise rejected by 1012 by combining CMRR, passive & active isolation. Newtonian noise rejected by 102~104 using tensor nature of the detector and external sensors. Major challenges: Large-scale cryogenics. Mitigation of Newtonian noise. Paik

Thank you! Paik