Bradford R. Findell, Ph.D. bradfindell.com. The Dominant View Many current education reform proposals focus on the recruitment, preparation, and evaluation.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Ohios Educator Standards. Ohios Standards for the Teaching Profession.
Advertisements

Pioneer Career and Technology Center, Shelby, Ohio Criteria of the Master Teacher Designation Criterion A: Consistent Leadership Criterion A: Consistent.
Strengthening Institutional Commitment to STEM Teacher Preparation and STEM Education: Lessons Learned from The Leadership Collaborative (TLC). Miami,
Career and College Readiness Kentucky Core Academic Standards Characteristics of Highly Effective Teaching and Learning Assessment Literacy MODULE 1.
Assessment Literacy Kentucky Core Academic Standards Characteristics of Highly Effective Teaching and Learning Career and College Readiness MODULE 1.
Working Together to Prepare Illinois School Leaders Initiative School Leader Advisory Council March 27, 2009.
February 29,  Name  Regional Rep & Location or Planning Committee  Organization.
Building Effective Leadership Teams: A Practitioner’s Look
Brad Findell, Past President, ASSM Suzanne Mitchell, President, NCSM.
April 6, 2011 DRAFT Educator Evaluation Project. Teacher Education and Licensure DRAFT The ultimate goal of all educator evaluation should be… TO IMPROVE.
RTI as a Lever for School Change School Partnerships for Change in Teacher Education Tom Bellamy—February 2, 2011.
August 2006 OSEP Project Director's Conference 1 Preparing Teachers to Teach All Children: The Impact of the Work of the Center for Improving Teacher Quality.
“The Primary Goal of the Cleveland Metropolitan School District is to become a premier school district in the United States of America.” The Cleveland.
Ohio Improvement Process (OIP) August Core Principles of OIP  Use a collaborative, collegial process which initiates and institutes Leadership.
Education Commission of the States Working Together to Address a Common Need: Partnerships for Teacher Quality Bruce Vandal Director, Postsecondary Education.
1 Presentation to USED Review Panel August 10, 2010 North Carolina Race to the Top Proposal R e d a c t e d.
Center of Excellence in Mathematics and Science Education Cooperative Partners College of Arts and Sciences College of Education Dr. Jack Rhoton East Tennessee.
Teruni Lamberg, Ph.D University of Nevada, Reno (775) Math Science Partnership Regional Meeting Sponsored by the U.S Department.
International Workshop on Graduate Programs for Secondary Mathematics and Science Teachers at Tokyo University of Science Tad Watanabe Kennesaw State University.
Common Core Implementation Plan Whittier City School District Board of Education Meeting April 7, 2014.
This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation Grant No Building, Supporting, and Sustaining Professional Growth.
Ensuring Quality and Effective Staff Professional Development to Increase Learning for ALL Students.
Milwaukee Math Partnership Year 1 External Evaluation Lizanne DeStefano, Director Dean Grosshandler, Project Coordinator University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.
+ Hybrid Roles in Your School If not now, then when?
Developing School-Based Systems of Support: Ohio’s Integrated Systems Model Y.S.U. March 30, 2006.
LAUSD / SCALE / QED Year 5: 2007 Continuing our work in Partnership….
Report to the Board of Education October 15, 2007.
1 Ohio’s Entry Year Teacher Program Review Ohio Confederation of Teacher Education Organizations Fall Conference: October 23, 2008 Presenter: Lori Lofton.
Webinar: Leadership Teams October 2013: Idaho RTI.
Southern Regional Education Board HSTW An Integrated and Embedded Approach to Professional Development and School Improvement Using the Six-Step Process.
Educator Preparation, Retention, and Effectiveness Ed Fuller University Council for Educational Administration and The University of Texas at Austin February.
Iowa’s Teacher Quality Program. Intent of the General Assembly To create a student achievement and teacher quality program that acknowledges that outstanding.
Leading Change Through Differentiated PD Approaches and Structures University-District partnerships for Strengthening Instructional Leadership In Mathematics.
Oregon State Board of Education January 19, 2012.
EFFECTIVE PRINCIPALS & LEADERSHIP TASK FORCE Staff Lead: Gia Truong.
Reaching for Excellence in Middle and High School Science Teaching Partnership Cooperative Partners Tennessee Department of Education College of Arts and.
UNIVERSITY OF LOUISVILLE Center for Research on Mathematics and Science Teacher Development William S. Bush Director and Professor of Mathematics Education.
National Parent Leadership Development Project for ICCs and the A.P.P.L.E. Project Models of Parent Leadership Development.
1 Milwaukee Mathematics Partnership Program Evaluation Year 4 Results Carl Hanssen Hanssen Consulting, LLC Cindy Walker University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee.
Distributed Leadership for Mathematics Bringing Together District, School, & University Leadership to Support Highly Qualified Teachers University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee.
The Improving Teacher Quality State Grants Program California Postsecondary Education Commission California Mathematics & Science Partnership 2011 Spring.
ISLN Network Meeting KEDC SUPERINTENDENT UPDATE. Why we are here--Purpose of ISLN network New academic standards  Deconstruct and disseminate Content.
1 PLCi Common Core Standards Initiative (CCSI) Oakland PLCi November 1, 2012.
Milwaukee Mathematics Partnership External Evaluation Schools and School Leadership Report by Tanya Suarez, Suarez & Associates June 9, 2005.
OCTM Standards Task Force Update Math and Science Supervisors Meeting May 11, 2015.
Mathematics and Science Partnerships: Summary of the Performance Period 2008 Annual Reports U.S. Department of Education.
Kathi Schoonover Director of Research & Sponsored Programs Northeastern State University.
1 Milwaukee Mathematics Partnership Program Evaluation Year 5 Results Carl Hanssen Hanssen Consulting, LLC Cindy Walker University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee.
Engage, Inquire and Inspire IMSS Leadership Institute Fall 2012.
Paris, N.A. (2006) AACTE Session #334 V Conspicuous Excellence: Embracing Accountability, Documenting Impact & Building Trust Nita A. Paris, PhD, Associate.
Effective Teaching Each person will take a piece of string when it is their turn 2. Once you have your piece of string you will describe the.
Mathematics and Science Partnerships: Summary of the Performance Period 2008 Annual Reports U.S. Department of Education.
NOVA Evaluation Report Presented by: Dr. Dennis Sunal.
Project P.O.S.T. Preparing Outstanding Science Teachers A Partnership of GCS & UNCG A Partnership of GCS & UNCG.
Middle School Social Studies September 19, 2007 Department Meeting.
Boston MSP Regional Day One Table Talk Results. Common Vision/Goals/Expectations IHE improvement of instructional Expectations delineated in RFP Communication.
Zimmerly Response NMIA Audit. Faculty Response Teacher input on Master Schedule. Instructional Coaches Collaborative work. Design and implement common.
College of Education and Behavioral Sciences Empowering Individuals to Lead and Serve Our Dynamic World Overview Video Welcome – Dr. Evans New Literacy.
PLMLC Leadership Series London Region Day 2 Ellen Walters, YCDSB Shelley Yearley, TLDSB Tuesday March 1, 2011.
Kentucky Core Academic Standards Pike County Schools.
Iowa Administrators Association and PLS 3 rd Learning A conversation with Steve Barkley Facilitators: Dana Schon, School Administrators of Iowa Margaret.
Promoting Teachers as Professionals: The Common Core Toolkit MSRI: Teacher Education in View of the Common Core Ellen Whitesides, University of Arizona.
The Eugene T. Moore School of Education Working together to promote the growth, education, and social development of children and youth David E. Barrett.
Professional Development: Imagine Difference Shapes and Sizes
“An Impact School Partnership”
GOVERNANCE COUNCILS AND HARTNELL’S GOVERNANCE MODEL
Targeted District Review Report
Educator Effectiveness Summit Evaluation and Support Systems and Common Core State Standards Implementation October 2013.
Team Goal Setting Karen Meyers, Director and
Presentation transcript:

Bradford R. Findell, Ph.D. bradfindell.com

The Dominant View Many current education reform proposals focus on the recruitment, preparation, and evaluation of teachers These approaches implicitly assume that effective teaching is an innate ability that some folks have but that most do not

Another View The dispositions, knowledge, and skills of effective teaching can be learned, but the educational system is not set up to support such learning Low-quality instruction is not a failure of recruitment, preparation, or evaluation but rather a failure to build a system in which instruction can improve systematically and in which the wisdom of practice gets refined

Instructional Quality Much of the rhetoric is about teachers, but real improvement requires that we focus much more on teaching Instructional quality, in other words, is better viewed as a characteristic of the system than as a measure of individuals And the system is broken

MET2 Draft Recommendation 5. Mathematics teaching, including the mathematical education of teachers, can be greatly strengthened by the growth of a professional community that includes mathematicians as one of many constituencies committed to working together to improve mathematics education.

Creating Community Build networks within and across states, including K-12 teachers and district supervisors University faculty in mathematics and mathematics education State education agencies and regional support Attend to both organizations and individuals Administrators, … Goal: Establish collaboration as normal and natural

Examples of Networks Focus on Math (Boston) TEAM-Math (Alabama) Math in the Middle (Nebraska) Other Mathematics and Science Partnerships Park City Mathematics Institute Math for America K-3 Impact (Ohio) Few such networks serve as state networks

Standards Revision in Ohio Writing teams of teachers, district leaders, and university faculty Advisory committee of representatives from key organizations Draft remained internal when Ohio focused toward the Common Core State Standards Draft informed Ohio’s input to the CCSS Committees contributed to Ohio’s CCSS feedback More group feedback than any other state Committees formed natural infrastructure for CCSS rollout

Some Lessons Establishing trust and mutual respect is critical work that takes time Specific tasks and deliverables can facilitate the process of finding common ground In some PD projects, teachers learn little the first year But the project directors learn a lot Border crossing is both rare and necessary Law of the Few (Gladwell)