The “Meta-Profession” of Being a College Teacher (C) M. Theall SCC 2011 A presentation for faculty and administrators at Sinclair Community College October.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Successful strategies for improving outcomes through quality assessment and evaluation of programs Leadership Conference Winston Salem, NC June
Advertisements

Continuing and Expanding Action Research Learning Cedar Rapids Community Schools February, 2005 Dr. Susan Leddick.
The Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching Scholarship Reconsidered: Priorities of the Professoriate The scholarship of discovery The scholarship.
April 6, 2011 DRAFT Educator Evaluation Project. Teacher Education and Licensure DRAFT The ultimate goal of all educator evaluation should be… TO IMPROVE.
PEER REVIEW OF TEACHING WORKSHOP SUSAN S. WILLIAMS VICE DEAN ALAN KALISH DIRECTOR, UNIVERSITY CENTER FOR ADVANCEMENT OF TEACHING ASC CHAIRS — JAN. 30,
WELCOME TO THE FACULTY FORUM ON THE FACULTY EVALUATION SYSTEM Thank you for coming! November 2002.
Research Assessment Exercise 2006 University Grants Committee.
New Teacher Induction Program (NTIP) Orientation and Overview.
Southeastern Louisiana University College of Education & Human Development Conceptual Framework: Setting the Standard for Excellence through Best Practice.
The SACS Re-accreditation Process: Opportunities to Enhance Quality at Carolina Presentation to the Faculty Council September 3, 2004.
Weber State University’s Teacher Preparation Program Conceptual Framework.
Evaluation. Practical Evaluation Michael Quinn Patton.
INTRODUCTION.- PROGRAM EVALUATION
Practicing the Art of Leadership: A Problem Based Approach to Implementing the ISLLC Standards, 4e © 2013, 2009, 2005, 2001 Pearson Education, Inc. All.
Analyzing and Improving College Teaching: Here’s an IDEA Alan C. Lacy, Associate Dean College of Applied Science and Technology Illinois State University.
Principal Performance Evaluation System
Professional Growth= Teacher Growth
Reaching and Preparing 21st Century Learners
Scholarly Engagement Mission Pathway Partnership Pathway Epistemological Pathway Pedagogical Pathway Production of Knowledge Improvement of LearningConnection.
Session Materials  Wiki
Presented by: Dr. Gail Wells Vice President for Academic Affairs and Dr. Carole Beere Associate Provost for Outreach (retired) Northern Kentucky University.
Meeting SB 290 District Evaluation Requirements
 Description  The unit has a conceptual framework that defines how our programs prepare candidates to be well-rounded educators. Every course in the.
Arunee Wiriyachitra, Chiang Mai University
C.E.L.T Developing a Comprehensive Faculty Evaluation System Jeff Schlicht, Ph.D. Associate Professor Department of Health Promotion and Exercise Sciences.
Interstate New Teacher Assessment and Support Consortium (INTASC)
Conceptual Framework for the College of Education Created by: Dr. Joe P. Brasher.
TEACHING FOR CIVIC CAPACITY AND ENGAGEMENT : How Faculty Align Teaching and Purpose IARSLCE 2011 | CHICAGO Jennifer M. Domagal-Goldman | November 3, 2011.
Standard 5 - Faculty Qualifications, Performance, and Development Kate Steffens St. Cloud State University.
Developing a Comprehensive Evaluation System at GBC Building a Foundation Step by Step Faculty & Administrative Evaluation Committee Macfarlan.
Learning Objective III: Diverse Learners Teacher candidates and candidates for other professional school personnel roles exhibit knowledge, competence,
APS Teacher Evaluation Module 9 Part B: Summative Ratings.
Monitoring through Walk-Throughs Participants are expected to purpose the book: The Three-Minute Classroom Walk-Through: Changing School Supervisory.
The Scholarship of Civic Engagement Adapted from a presentation by Robert G. Bringle Director, Center for Service and Learning Indiana University-Purdue.
Thomas College Name Major Expected date of graduation address
Faculty Portfolios Cindy C. Wilson, Ph.D., C.H.E.S. Professor Department of Family Medicine Uniformed Services University.
Module 3: Unit 1, Session 3 MODULE 3: ASSESSMENT Adolescent Literacy – Professional Development Unit 1, Session 3.
 This prepares educators to work in P-12 schools (1)  It provides direction (1)  It is knowledge-based, articulated, shared, coherent, consistent with.
NCATE Standard 3: Field Experiences & Clinical Practice Monica Y. Minor, NCATE Jeri A. Carroll, BOE Chair Professor, Wichita State University.
Chapter 1 Defining Social Studies. Chapter 1: Defining Social Studies Thinking Ahead What do you associate with or think of when you hear the words social.
BUILDING CAPACITY THROUGH PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT AND INSTRUCTIONAL LEADERSHIP DR. SANDRA J. MOORE DR. ROBERT C. MCCRACKEN RADFORD UNIVERSITY COLLEGE.
DVC Essay #2. The Essay  Read the following six California Standards for Teachers.  Discuss each standard and the elements that follow them  Choose.
Flexible Learning strategies in Land, Food and Community series courses Sharing Our experiences.
 Traditional View of Excellence Research funding- whatever the topic Number of Doctoral Degree Programs Selectivity Invention/discoveries Size International.
Making Plans for the Future April 29, 2013 Brenda M. Tanner, Ed.D.
Biology Scholars Program Amy Chang American Society for Microbiology Goal: Develop faculty expertise in evidenced-based science education reform Seven.
“A Truthful Evaluation Of Yourself Gives Feedback For Growth and Success” Brenda Johnson Padgett Brenda Johnson Padgett.
Please answer the following questions before the session on the notepad at your table and turn in to the presenter (Mark) 1. How familiar are you with.
East Carolina University’s Conceptual Framework for Preparing Education Professionals.
1. Administrators will gain a deeper understanding of the connection between arts, engagement, student success, and college and career readiness. 2. Administrators.
Critical Thinking By: Nakendra Jones Tyrone Salmon-Jarrett Nikia Johnson Peta-ann Rowe Tiffany Brown.
Conceptual Framework Presentation, 2006, Slide 1 The Conceptual Framework for Programs that Prepare Professionals Who Work in Schools What - Why - and.
EPMS (Employee Performance Management System) Training FOR NON-SUPERVISORS FACILITATOR: ADRIAN WILSON NOVEMBER 17 AND 19.
How to pursue scholarship through your Daily Academic Work?
Assessment Presentation Day For Faculty Cindy J. Speaker, Ph.D. Wells College August 21, 2006.
Learning Goals at St. John Fisher College Peter J. Gray, Ph.D. Director of Academic Assessment United States Naval Academy May 2004.
Introduction to Keypads Agenda 2010 Determining Priorities for State-District Leadership and Action.
Objectives To review the key components of the Nursing Program. To understand the roles and responsibilities of the student, preceptor and faculty liaison.
Overview of SB 191 Ensuring Quality Instruction through Educator Effectiveness Colorado Department of Education September 2010.
Hosted By: Janice Case NASSP Consultant Building Connections Among Principal, Counselor, and Students presented by Judith Richardson & Virginia Minshew.
2007. Faculty of Education ► Staff 300 (incl.100 in Teacher training school) ► 20 professorships ► 80 lecturers ► 9 senior assistants ► 12 assistants.
Beginner’s Guide to the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning September 14, 2006 Jackie Dewar Director, Center for Teaching Excellence Loyola Marymount.
Graduate Program Completer Evaluation Feedback 2008.
FLORIDA EDUCATORS ACCOMPLISHED PRACTICES Newly revised.
Faculty Evaluation Project Montgomery Community College Fall 2010.
Service Learning: What is it and how can it enhance student learning? Kim Buch Psychology.
BREAKTHROUGHS “EE4NJ & BEYOND” Dr. David N. Gentile In Partnership with EIRC.
Avon Grove School District October 2009
Writing Program-level Student Learning Outcomes (PSLOs)
Colorado Department of Education
Presentation transcript:

The “Meta-Profession” of Being a College Teacher (C) M. Theall SCC 2011 A presentation for faculty and administrators at Sinclair Community College October 21, 2011 Michael Theall Ph.D.

Raoul’s tale …. Once upon a time at a bank in Jacksonville, FL …. (C) M. Theall SCC 2011

Proposition # 1 Given the missions of higher education and the nature of teaching and learning as human activities, faculty are the college’s critical resources (C) M. Theall SCC 2011

Corrolary: To be effective, successful, productive, and professionally satisfied, faculty need a variety of skills AND adequate institutional support (C) M. Theall SCC 2011

Professional development… must reflect institutional realities and the interests and needs of the stakeholders WHY? (C) M. Theall SCC 2011

Because … two of the activities most important in the professional lives of the faculty [[ i.e., professional growth and performance evaluation]] are determined, influenced, and carried out by local stakeholders. (C) M. Theall SCC 2011

Basic Premise: Evaluation without development is punitive Development without evaluation is guesswork. (C) M. Theall SCC 2011

Basic Premise: Development and evaluation systems will not be complete until they are based on an understanding of the work that faculty are expected to do, and the skills that are required to do that work successfully! (C) M. Theall SCC 2011

Basic Premise: ALL DEVELOPMENT and EVALUATION ARE LOCAL! (C) M. Theall SCC 2011

In higher education… Who are the stakeholders? What is (or should be) their influence? (C) M. Theall SCC 2011

Traditional stakeholder model (C) M. Theall SCC 2011

Development and Evaluation Stakeholders in a revised model (C) M. Theall SCC 2011

In the Meta-Profession, Collegiality is a foundation for professional development and satisfaction, and the basis for a strong profession. (C) M. Theall SCC 2011

How do you promote collegiality? In general? At Sinclair CC? Please take a few moments to identify some critical (and observable) behaviors that you would consider “collegial.” Please share your thoughts with others so that we can create a list of possibilities to consider, choose from, and connect to today’s presentation. (C) M. Theall SCC 2011

Collegial behaviors: (C) M. Theall SCC 2011

How do you promote collegiality? At Sinclair CC? Please take a few moments to identify the ways in which the faculty and the College can promote these collegial behaviors. Again, please share your thoughts with others so that we can create a list of possibilities to consider, choose from, and connect to today’s presentation. (C) M. Theall SCC 2011

Institutional strategies (C) M. Theall SCC 2011

An approach… Thinking“Meta-Professionally” about the work and skills of the faculty (C) M. Theall SCC 2011

Faculty are “Meta-Professionals” (C) M. Theall SCC 2011 BaseProfession College Teaching Profession

(C) M. Theall SCC 2011 Accountant Nurse Historian The Academy Accounting Professor Nursing Professor History Professor Base Profession All faculty are drawn from a pool of people prepared in a content- specific ‘base’ profession.

Base profession includes…. Content Expertise Practice/Clinical Skills Practice/Clinical Skills Research Techniques Research Techniques (strategies for keeping current) (C) M. Theall SCC 2011

Roles of the Professoriate: Teaching Scholarly & Creative Activities ServiceAdministration (C) M. Theall SCC 2011

Roles of the Professoriate The performance of these roles often requires skills and knowledge beyond that of one’s disciplinary expertise. (C) M. Theall SCC 2011

24

Teaching Context Differences (C) M. Theall SCC 2011

Expertise in, and Need for Skills How do we know which skills are necessary? How do we know if we are skilled enough? (C) M. Theall SCC 2011

Expertise and Frequency of Need (C) M. Theall SCC 2011

Expertise and need … Do all academics share opinions about the levels of expertise in, and need for the skills? (C) M. Theall SCC 2011

Disciplinary Differences in Ratings (C) M. Theall SCC 2011

Administrator and Faculty Ratings (C) M. Theall SCC 2011

You may ask ….. How can a “Meta-Professional” approach support and improve professional enrichment and fair evaluation? (C) M. Theall SCC 2011

The Institutional Expertise Advantage

Development and Evaluation Stakeholders in a revised model (C) M. Theall SCC 2011

Figure 1. Scholarship & Practice (C) M. Theall SCC 2011

Figure 2. Scholarship & Practice Interactions (C) M. Theall SCC 2011

Figure 3. Scholarship & practice: Assessment - SoTL - Improvement Synergy (C) M. Theall SCC 2011

8 Steps to Develop a Comprehensive Faculty Evaluation System (Arreola, 2007) Determine the faculty role model the faculty role model the faculty role model parameter values the faculty role model parameter values the definitions of the roles the definitions of the roles the role component weights the role component weights the appropriate sources of information the appropriate sources of information the source weights the source weights the data gathering methods the data gathering methods the design & selection of forms the design & selection of forms (C) M. Theall SCC 2011

Source – Impact Matrix (Arreola, 2007) (C) M. Theall SCC 2011

8 Steps to Develop a Comprehensive Professional Enrichment System (Theall, 2008) Determine: the needs for enrichment functions; the needs for enrichment functions; the principal clients of services; the principal clients of services; the configuration & location of programs; the configuration & location of programs; the allocation of resources; the allocation of resources; the intended impact of programs; the intended impact of programs; the connections to other campus programs. the connections to other campus programs. the leadership structure; the leadership structure; the processes to create & implement programs. the processes to create & implement programs. (C) M. Theall SCC 2011

Function – Client Matrix (Theall, 2008) (C) M. Theall SCC 2011

A question (or two) … “Whatever happened to THE faculty?” (Schuster, 1990) “What has happened to the professoriate?” (Katz, 2006) (C) M. Theall SCC 2011

What is … “a body of persons having a common purpose or common duties” (C) M. Theall SCC 2011

What is … “a body of persons having a common purpose or common duties” … a college (C) M. Theall SCC 2011

Who is: “One who chooses to, or is chosen to work with others” (C) M. Theall SCC 2011

Who is: “ One who chooses to, or is chosen to work with others” …a colleague (C) M. Theall SCC 2011

In the Meta-Profession, Collegiality is a foundation for professional development and satisfaction, and the basis for a strong meta-profession so that … so that … (C) M. Theall SCC 2011

Somewhere, some time, back at the bank… We might hear, “Let me help you with this. After all, you’re a college professor.” (C) M. Theall SCC 2011

A sampling of sources Go to: for a discussion of the ‘meta-profession’ of the professoriate to access a series of short essays on teaching & evaluation for an overview & bibliography of faculty evaluation for access to on-line resources on teaching and learning (C) M. Theall SCC 2011