M. Gilchriese Disk Geometry January 18, 2005. M. Gilchriese 2 ATLAS Coordinate System.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
19.Dez Volker Prahl Space frame endplate. 1 1 WPM 186, Volker Prahl Guide ring necessary HV-Connector.
Advertisements

HFT PXL Mechanical WBS 1.2 March 2010 Howard Wieman LBNL 1.
1 Short update Itzhak Tserruya HBD meeting BNL, April 11, 2006.
ATLAS Pixel Detector September 2002 N. Hartman LBNL 1 Pixel Support Tube: Design, Prototyping, and Production PST Progress Update September 2002.
ATLAS Pixel Detector February 2003 N. Hartman LBNL 1 Pixel Support Tube PRR: Assembly, Production, Schedule February 2003.
Assembly Procedure ALICE Outer Barrel Stave 14 Module 2 Cold Plates 1 Stave.
Specification section 3.3
MICE RFCC Module Update Allan DeMello Lawrence Berkeley National Lab MICE CM26 at Riverside California March 26, 2010.
DELTA Quadrant Tuning Y. Levashov, E. Reese. 2 Tolerances for prototype quadrant tuning Magnet center deviations from a nominal center line < ± 50  m.
M. Gilchriese Status Report Sectors, Rings, Frame December 2002.
Chiho Wang ATLAS TRT Duke University CERN, Feb TRT Barrel assembly status & schedule Feb. 9, 2005.
Upgrade news and Proposed interventions during YETS for the Muon Barrel Alignment Szillási Zoltán, Béni Noémi (ATOMKI ) This project is supported by Hungarian.
Pixel Support Tube Requirements and Interfaces M.Olcese PST CDR: CERN Oct. 17th 2001.
M. Gilchriese Upgrade Stave Assembly and Robotics August 3, 2007 LBNL.
ATLAS Pixel Detector Pixel Support Tube Interfaces LBNL Internal PST Review E. Anderssen, LBNL.
Ron Madaras, LBL U.S. Pixel Meeting, SCIPP, July 9-10, 2003 Patch Panel 1 (PP1) Brief Review Cost and Effort Estimate.
SCT Endcap Module Initial Alignments Using Survey Data Paul S Miyagawa University of Manchester.
1m 3 SDHCAL Mechanic Structure M.C Fouz 8/10/2010 The 1m 3 prototype Mechanical Structure is financed by: Spanish HEP National Program by the project FPA
M. Gilchriese - November 12, 1998 Status Report on Outer Support Frame W. Miller Hytec, Inc E. Anderssen, D. Bintinger, M. Gilchriese LBNL.
09/03/2010 ADO-PO section meeting Beam Pipe Extraction/Insertion R. Vuillermet.
M. Gilchriese Module Assembly and Attachment at LBNL M. Gilchriese for F. Goozen April 2000.
M. Gilchriese Overview of Production Plan for Pixel Global Support and Disk Support Rings M. G. D. Gilchriese Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory February.
ZDC Remote Handling Tool Structure and Force Analysis P. Debbins University of Iowa December 10, 2009.
BARREL ALIGNMENT PLATFORM POSITIONING Goal: Positioning of the platforms at their nominal position on the MDT chambers (No position measurement in a database).
M. Gilchriese Sectors, Rings, Frame Assembly and Installation July 18.
ATLAS Pixel Detector February 2002 Cooling Services Connections N. Hartman LBNL Cooling Connections Status Report: LBNL Effort February, 2002 N. Hartman,
U.S. Deliverables Cost and Schedule Summary M. G. D. Gilchriese Revised Version December 18, 2000.
Assembly Procedure ALICE Outer Barrel Stave 14 Module 2 Cold Plates 1 StaveMarco Kraan Paul Kuijer.
M. Gilchriese U.S. Pixel Mechanics Overview M. G. D. Gilchriese Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory April 2000.
M. Gilchriese Disk Sector Production Pixel Local Supports Production Readiness Review.
19 January 2006VELO installationEddy Jans 0 VELO-installation meeting CERN, January 17, 2006 preparation IP8-area SX8 moving SX8 -> IP8.
DOE/NSF Review of U.S. ATLAS /March 2001 WBS Pixel Overview and WBS Pixel Mechanics M. G. D. Gilchriese Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory.
ATLAS 1 Beam Pipe Support Structure (BPSS) Interface and Assembly Final Design Review, April 2003 E. Anderssen, N. Hartman LBNL.
ATLAS 1 Beam Pipe Support Structure (BPSS) Services Interface and Assembly Final Design Review, April 2003 E. Anderssen, N. Hartman, A Smith, LBNL S. Coelli,
Proposal for the assembly of the PHOBOS ring counters (H.P. 3/20/98) I would like to propose and discuss with you an alternative layout and assembly procedure.
December 1999 Frame and Assembly Planning Status E. Anderssen, D. Bintinger, M. Gilchriese and F. Goozen LBNL W. Miller Hytec, Inc.
ATLAS Pixel Detector September 2002 N. Hartman LBNL 1 Pixel Support Tube: Cost and Production Schedule September 2002.
M. Gilchriese - September 2000 Pixel Insertable Layouts September 2000.
ATLAS Pixel Detector Pixel Support Tube Interfaces Pixel Support Tube PRR CERN, Geneve E. Anderssen, LBNL.
A2-A5: The drawing has been revised (minor changes), the bid has been approved by INFN management and the invitation letter to the companies will be sent.
M. Gilchriese Towards Fabrication of a Mechanical Prototype Stave.
Bedanga MohantyALICE offline meeting, CERN, Oct :3 rd – 7 th 1 Bedanga Mohanty, VECC, Kolkata ALICE PMD alignment issues  Align-able parts  Alignment.
VELO Integr - Jan06Jean-Christophe GAYDE TS/SU EDMS n° SURVEY FOR VELO INSTALLATION 1.SURVEY AT GROUND FLOOR - FIDUCIALISATION 2.SURVEY FOR INSTALLATION.
D. Peterson, for discussion of LC-TPC LP, interface of Endplate and Field cage, Discussion of the LP endplate and field cage geometry A version.
DOE CD-2/3a Review of the BTeV Project – December 14-16, BTeV Pixel Detector Pixel Module Assembly and Half-Plane Assembly Guilherme Cardoso James.
VTX Half LAYER 4 LAYER 3 LAYER 1 LAYER 2 EACH LAYER’S BARRELL MOUNT NEEDS TO BE REFERENCED TO KINEMATIC MOUNTS AND IT’S MOUNTED LADDERS.
IRC/SAC status Venelin Kozhuharov for the SAC/IRC working group NA62 Meeting
Ladder Mount R&D T. Tsuboyama (KEK) 2 Oct T. Tsuboyama (KEK) 2 Oct
FP420 Hybrid Mechanical Design Ray Thompson / Manchester Manchester Xmas O7 Ray Thompson Julian Freestone, Andy Elvin.
QXF Reaction / Impregnation Fixtures J. Schmalzle 4/9/13.
USCMS Pixel PMG, Nov 29, Mechanics Status Disks, ½ Service Cylinders Installation USCMS FPIX FNAL PMG Joe Howell Bruno Gobbi Nov. 29, 2006.
M. Gilchriese - February 2001 Disk Sector Status E. Anderssen, M. Gilchriese, F. Goozen, N. Hartman, T. Johnson, F. McCormack, J. Taylor, T. Weber, J.
Sentek Technologies Joining EnviroSCAN Probes. Probe Components 20-way probe cable connector (special order) Cable spacer (Part No 80015) Probe rods Probe.
Grid Pix Field Simulations and precision needed for a module Peter Kluit, Jan Timmermans Prepared 16 May 2016.
ATLAS 1 Beam Pipe Support SCT TRT Side CSide A Services and Beampipe Support Frame Services and Beampipe Support Frame Pixel Detector Composite support.
LumiCal High density compact calorimeter at the ILC Wojciech Wierba Institute of Nuclear Physics PAS Cracow, Poland.
A.Ryazantsev, IHEP-Protvino, RussiaPANDA Russia Workshop at Moscow, May 2015 Status on Barrel Mechanics Andrey Ryazantsev on behalf of the IHEP-Protvino.
Assembly of steering.
Berkeley status Aug 10th, 2012.
Sector 002 Assembly status report
End-cap Mechanics FDR Overview of the Project
- STT LAYOUT - SECTOR F SECTOR A SECTOR B SECTOR E SECTOR D SECTOR C
Grid Pix Field Simulations and precision needed for a module
Barrel EMC assembling (EDMS DOCUMENT NUMBER /1)
Report on construction of LP2 spaceframe endplate
Step-by-step assembly instructions
Preliminary PXL support models with assembly fixtures
Station and Module Support Frames
BCM Overview Placement such that system is sensitive to all types of beam accidents. => 2 independent subsystems Halo losses inside the Pixel volume ie.
CNGS horn / reflector in 2005: The story of the glass ring insulator
Presentation transcript:

M. Gilchriese Disk Geometry January 18, 2005

M. Gilchriese 2 ATLAS Coordinate System

M. Gilchriese 3 The Parts Modules on disk sectors – Ron’s talk Sectors mounted on rings Rings mounted into disk frame sections Disk frame sections joined to barrel section(barrel to disk alignment) Pixel mounts attached to plate at ends of disk frame section Pixel mounts engage Pixel Support Tube(PST) PST(barrel) mounted to SCT barrel structure SCT attached to TRT TRT mounted on rails inside cryostat

M. Gilchriese 4 Ideal Module Locations on Disk

M. Gilchriese 5 The Rings Adjustable mounts glued into frame Sectors precisely bolted to ring

M. Gilchriese 6 Ring Survey All rings were surveyed literally years ago using the SmartScope However this was done before the final mounts were in place(just pins used). This translates into a small uncertainty in the 0,0 location that we propose is done in the alignment software.

M. Gilchriese 7 Ring 3(C3)

M. Gilchriese 8 Frame is Drilled Z DRILL Z BARREL+ENDCONE X Z IP NOT TO SCALE! Z(Barrel+Endcone) is measured Other numbers are averages of measured values. We could correct sector by sector and ring-by-ring using measurements. The corrections would be max about 20 microns

M. Gilchriese 9 Ring and Mounts Glued Precision tooling is used to glue the ring-part of the mounts into the rings. Different tooling is then used to position the rings and glue part that goes into the frame. The tooling determines the ring position. We believe this was accurate to roughly 15 microns but no survey has been done(and would be hard to improve on this accuracy anyway)

M. Gilchriese 10 Disk Insertion This will utilize pretty much the same tooling that was used to glue the ring mounts into the frame. Thus the Z-locations will be identical to just bare rings. The X-Y locations might vary, since the mounts have to be backed out and then screwed in when the ring is in position. We will try this more to understand the reproducibility. This will also give us a measurement of the ring hole locations relative to the barrel endcones – a starting point on barrel-disk alignment

M. Gilchriese 11 Frames and Pixel Mounts The ring locations will be “transferred” to the pixel mounts through the EndFrame EndFrame is pinned and bolted to the barrel frame EndPlate is bolted to EndFrame and pixel mounts are aligned(pinned) to EndFrame. The four mounts are adjusted to lie within a plane.

M. Gilchriese 12 Support Tube

M. Gilchriese 13 Current Plan Review ring survey data(ring for disk 3, side C) by Jan. 24. Jon and I are doing this. Measure reproducibility of rings in end-frame and develop simple(non-CMM) means to reference to pins in EndFrame by March. Do not survey modules on disks – sectors on rings. Too risky. Practically this means taking the sector and ring measurements and creating a new XY “drawing” – actually a table - for each module. Z is more complicated but much less sensitive. Note that forces from pipes and cables will deflect sectors by amounts that cannot be measured during assembly – no access. We need to decide how to use module-on-sector Z measurements.