ELL Data Collection and Reporting Update

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
NCLB Accountability Title III of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965 (ESEA) as Amended by the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001 (NCLB) Presented.
Advertisements

Presented By WVDE Federal Programs Staff July 15, 2009 Title III Monitoring and Fiscal Updates.
Jonathan Gibson & Kulwadee Axtell Nevada Department of Education.
Title III-A All identified English language learners assessed for English language proficiency (ELP) with the ACCESS for ELLs TM, with all 4 domains (Reading,
ESEA Title III AMAOs Ensuring Academic Success for English Learners Dr. Shereen Tabrizi, Manager Special Populations Unit Maria Silva, EL Consultant Office.
Integration of State Planning and Reporting Functions Using Indistar® Indistar® Summit March 24-25, 2014 Office of School Improvement Virginia Department.
Final Determinations. Secretary’s Determinations Secretary annually reviews the APR and, based on the information provided in the report, information.
1 Alternative Language Services (ALS) November 10, 2008.
Title III Notice of Proposed Interpretations & Implications for California’s Accountability System Robert Linquanti Cathy George Project Director & Sr.
Special Education Accountability Reviews Let’s put the pieces together March 25, 2015.
New Title III Guidance U.S. Department of Education and U.S. Department of Justice Jointly Released: January 7, 2015 Office of Program Administration.
ESEA FLEXIBILITY RENEWAL PROCESS: FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS January29, 2015.
IDENTIFICATION 1 PROPOSED REGULATORY CHANGECOMMENTS Implement a four step ELL identification process to ensure holistic and individualized decisions can.
Financial and Programmatic Monitoring ESEA/Act 807 ACSIP Arkansas Department of Education Division of Academic Accountability.
Certification and HQT Christina Linder, Director Certification and Professional Standards Teacher Quality
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Jack O’Connell, State Superintendent of Public Instruction Bilingual Coordinators Network November 20-21, 2008 Sacramento,
Developing Monitoring and Pre-Scoring Plans for Alternate/Alternative Assessments Virginia Department of Education Division of Student Assessment and School.
Questions and Responses: New Joint Title III Guidance U.S. Department of Education and U.S. Department of Justice Jointly Released: January 7, 2015 Office.
PEIMS and Accountability. Clear System of Data Quality Documentation (Enrollment, Special Program, etc.) PEIMS Data Entry Pearson Data File Answer Documents.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Jack O’Connell, State Superintendent of Public Instruction State Performance Plan (SPP) & Annual Performance Report.
Oregon Department of Education September 24,
Fall 2012 LEP Coordinator Meeting Helga Fasciano Section Chief, K-12 Programs Federal Update.
RESPRO Area 1C Area 1C RESPRO Meeting RESPRO Area 1C November 24, 2009.
Title III Notice of Proposed Interpretations Presentation for LEP SCASS/CCSSO May 7, 2008.
1 DRAFT Monitoring/Evaluation Overview September 20, 2010 Title III Director’s Fall Meeting.
Title III, Part A: Language Instruction for Limited English Proficient (LEP) and Immigrant Students  The purpose of Title III, Part A is to help ensure.
1 Charting the Course: Smoother Data Sharing for Effective Early Childhood Transition Wisconsin’s Journey Lori Wittemann, Wisconsin Department of Health.
Presented by: Dr. Jobi Lawrence Director, Title III Iowa Department of Education.
IDEA and NCLB Standards-Based Accountability Sue Rigney, U.S. Department of Education OSEP 2006 Project Directors’ Conference.
May 29, 2013 Chanute USD 413 And Kansas State Department of Education.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Tom Torlakson, State Superintendent of Public Instruction CAIS Overview for FPM Reviews and Title III Improvement Plans.
Region Three Pilot “Virtual” Consolidation. Consolidation Legislation and Guidance Title I Schoolwide Fiscal Guidance issued February, 2008 [Section E]
On Site Review Process Office of Field Services Last Revised 8/15/2011.
Title III Desk Monitoring Oregon Department of Education September 24,
Timeline, Preparation & Implementation
Presented by: Jan Stanley, State Title I Director Office of Assessment and Accountability June 10, 2008 Monitoring For Results.
ANNUAL MEASURABLE ACHIEVEMENT OBJECTIVES (AMAO) North Carolina Department of Public Instruction K-12 Programs Title III/ESL Office.
Private School Participation Administrator Webinar December 16, 2014 Keystone AEA.
1 Title IA Coordinator Training Preparing for Title IA Monitoring
LEP SYSTEM REQUIRED ANNUAL DATA COLLECTION SYSTEM FOR SD/CS/AVTS/CTC Presenter: Barbara Mowrey ESL/Bilingual Education Advisor Pennsylvania.
State Practices for Ensuring Meaningful ELL Participation in State Content Assessments Charlene Rivera and Lynn Shafer Willner GW-CEEE National Conference.
Welcome to today’s Webinar: Tier III Schools in Improvement We will begin at 9:00 AM.
Understanding AMAOs Annual Measurable Achievement Objectives for Title III Districts School Year Results.
English as a Second Language (ESL) Requirements Limited English Proficient (LEP) Ivanna M T Anderson, NCDPI ESL/Title III Consultant
Developing Monitoring and Pre-Scoring Plans for Alternate/Alternative Assessments Virginia Department of Education Division of Student Assessment and School.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Tom Torlakson, State Superintendent of Public Instruction 2011–2012 Federal Program Monitoring English Learner Accountability.
Title III Native American and Alaska Native Children in School Program Grantee Performance Reporting June 19, 2014 Prepared under the Data Quality Initiative.
Superintendents’ Memo: Explained What does this mean for us?
Title III: 101 Jacqueline A. Iribarren Ph.D. Title III, ESL & Bilingual Ed. Consultant October 20, 2011.
1 Willa Spicer, Assistant Commissioner Cathy Pine, Director Carol Albritton, Teacher Quality Coordinator Office of Professional Standards, Licensing and.
1 Restructuring Webinar Dr. Zollie Stevenson, Jr., Ph.D. Director Student Achievement and School Accountability Programs Office of Elementary and Secondary.
Title III and ESOL. Chapter 7: Serving Students with Special Needs IDEA Section 504 ESOL Chapter 8 – Student Discipline, Suspension, and Expulsion Student.
Virginia Department of Education November 5, 2015.
STUDENT ASSESSMENT LISA COTTLE, DIRECTOR OF TEST ADMINISTRATION TEA, CHARTER SCHOOL ADMINISTRATION ©
Charter District Participation in the Student Assessment Program Lisa Cottle, Director of Test Administration Student Assessment Division Texas Education.
ELL – ACCESS for ELLs PIMS Data Collection School Year.
2016 TELPAS Online Testing & Data Collection. Disclaimer  These slides have been prepared by the Student Assessment Division of the Texas Education Agency.
Community Liaison Training NCLB Parental Involvement Requirements “Creating an Audit Trail” October 19, 2007 Eduardo Elizondo, Director Federal Programs.
Agenda Review Public Comments Election of Chair NDE ELL Program Professionals: Jane Splean – Program Supervisor Kulwadee Axtell Jonathan Gibson Blakely.
March 23, SPECIAL EDUCATION ACCOUNTABILITY REVIEWS.
Please check, just in case…
Virtual Network Meeting: Consolidated Application
October CEDARS Statewide: English Learners Data
Be Prepared: Federal Program Monitoring
Special Education Child Count
EL Identification: Parent/Family Notification Requirement
ESSA Updates for Title V, Part B, Subpart 2
ESL Program Data Protocols Montgomery County Public Schools
ELP Assessment: Screening, Placement, and Annual Test Participation
Technical Assistance Webinar
Presentation transcript:

ELL Data Collection and Reporting Update Developed by: Dr. Jobi Lawrence Director, Title III Iowa Department of Education

Agenda Welcome and Overview USDE Title III Federal Monitoring Review of Findings Related to ELL Data Review of IDE Responses to Clear Citation Flowchart Review Joint Guidance OCR/DOJ Document Q/A

welcome and overview

USDE Title III Federal Monitoring Finding: The IDE did not demonstrate that it has a reliable data collection system or procedures in place for collecting data to meet all Title III requirements as evidenced by the following: The IDE does not store the ELP assessment results in the State’s main data system, ED Insight. Districts are not able to access the annual ELP assessment data. Currently, the IDE handles those data separately and manually, which causes many data errors. The IDE did not provide evidence that it has a procedure in place for collecting data for monitoring the academic content performance of students for two years after exiting English learner status. The IDE did not provide evidence that it ensures all required students are tested or students who are not tested are properly assigned a reason code. For example, the SEA has no guidance on transfer students from another LEA. They are not able to check in the data system to determine whether a student had been administered the annual assessment in the previous district or if they should test the student. This may lead to students not being annually assessed. Additionally, the SEA has not provided LEAs with guidance regarding how to code students’ reasons for not testing or for an incomplete test. The SEA provides reason codes, but the LEAs do not understand when to assign a particular code.

USDE Title III Federal Monitoring IDE Response Approved by USDE The IDE has submitted plans and a timeline for constructing an ELP assessment data system within the State’s Ed Insight data system. All ELP summative assessment results will be housed in this system which will be updated annually. The ELP screener assessment results will be updated weekly. The IDE plans to build a report suite that will allow districts to access the ELP assessment data through Ed Insight. In August 2015, the IDE plans to provide training and guidance to districts. By November 2015, the IDE will submit plans to build an LEP exit hierarchy within its certification process in the SRI system. This system should prevent LEAs from prematurely exiting students from LIEP services. The IDE stated that it will link the LEP certification in the SRI system in an effort to monitor the students’ progress for two years after a student has exited the LEP program. Additionally, the State intends to submit a comprehensive corrective action plan to ED to ensure all students are identified, placed, served, and exited according to the Title III requirements. The SRI team will assist with the development of this plan beginning in January 2015. ED will consider the findings resolved once the State has constructed an ELP assessment data system and a report suite within the State’s Ed Insight data system that address all Title III requirements. IDE, through technical assistance and monitoring, will ensure all students are identified, placed, served, and exited according to the Title III requirements.

Review of flowchart

Joint Guidance OCR/DOJ Document What It was issued on January 7th to ALL Superintendents nationwide So What It is an indication that OCR and DOJ are very active and that they are sending a strong message about legal requirements in regards to Els as a protected class of students Now What Ensure all staff responsible for serving and supporting Els understand the implications of the information outlined in the guidance document

Questions/comments