 Compensation Philosophy  Implementation Policies and Procedures  Survey  Timing, Position Descriptions, Pay Plan Relationships, Cost  Additional.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Town Hall Presentation January 9-10, 2002 Curtis Powell Vice President for Human Resources The Division of Human Resources and William M. Mercer, Incorporated.
Advertisements

1 Market Pricing Organizations seek to offer market based pay rates in order to attract and retain competent employees There are two basic methods to recognize.
June 17,  Title Conversion  Career Service Pay Plan (Pay Grid)  Differentials  Initial (Partial) Implementation  Accessing Future Pay.
Career Banding in North Carolina and UNC General Administration.
HR Contacts Meeting May 23, 2013 Human Resource Mgmt Services Office of Management & Budget.
1 Miami Dade College Reclassification Study Facilities Presented by the Division of Human Resources February 2007.
1 Miami Dade College Reclassification Study Presented by the Division of Human Resources February 2007.
Faculty & Staff Compensation Programs Board of Regents Meeting
PAYING THEM RIGHT: TOOLS FOR SALARY ADMINISTRATION HR Liaison Network Spring Meeting Texas A&M University, Human Resources DIVISION OF FINANCE February.
Human Resources Office of 1 Classification and Compensation Redesign Job Family Studies Project Overview.
The Catholic University of America Staff Compensation Study Town Hall Meeting February 12, 2003.
Human Resources Peer Network Fundamentals of Compensation and Utilizing the CPCA Compensation & Benefits Survey April 3, 2014 Presented by: Brenda Gilchrist,
Fox, Lawson & Associates Compensation Study Summary Findings
1 Job Evaluation Process Position Description Statement Job Responsibilities, KSA's and Qualifications  Position Evaluation Job content and/or Market.
Staff Compensation Program Update
1 Compensation Update Lori Dougherty Director of Compensation December 8, 2009 Brandeis University pays competitive base market salaries as part of a total.
For Professional Staff Bloomington, East, Indianapolis, Kokomo, Northwest, South Bend, Southeast Compensation Program (CSI)
OS 352 3/25/08 I. Compensation Systems (chapter 11) A. Types of pay B. Job evaluation and job structure. C. Market pricing. D. The big picture II. Syllabus.
Compensation Model Supervisor Training Presented by: Jennifer Larson
Supplemental Salaries. History School Board ask Personnel Policy Committee to look into supplemental pay Personnel Policy Committee formed a Supplemental.
© 2007 Hay Group. All rights reserved. Salary Survey Report January 30, 2007 State of Kansas.
Total Rewards and Compensation
POSITION AND SALARY MANAGEMENT LEAD 2012 Job Categories Position Descriptions Career Bands and Salary Ranges Position/Salary Change Requests 1.
STAFF COMPENSATION PROGRAM TOWN HALL MEETINGS FEBRUARY 2004.
Competitive Market Compensation Review July 2009 Project Overview.
1 Classified Staff Salary Study. 2 Overview Provide an overview of study Provide an overview of study Review study methodology Review study methodology.
What is the Global Grading Project
PUSD Compensation Project Overview Governing Board Meeting March 14, 2013.
Pay Structure Decisions
21 st Century Maricopa Review of Process Human Resources Projects Steering Team Meeting May 12, 2010.
SECCP Salaried Employees Compensation and Classification Program June, 2005.
Erin Packwood 2005 Competitive Compensation Review Electric Reliability Council of Texas (ERCOT) January 17, 2006.
© 2007 Hay Group. All rights reserved. Review of Unclassified Pay Plan February 1, 2007 State of New Hampshire.
Non-Academic Staff Compensation Program Employee Presentation 2013.
Chapter #11 Strategic Pay Plans. Fair Labor Standards Act Are you Exempt or Non exempt ???????
2005 Supervisory and Professional Salary Survey Final Report September 14, 2005.
1 ACC FY07 Classification and Compensation Study.
HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT MIHE Mashal Institute of Higher Education.
Compensation:  Compensation is the methods and practices of maintaining balance between interests of operating the company within the fiscal budget and.
Classification & Compensation Study Outside firm (BCC) was hired to perform: Classification Study Internal Equity Pay equity compliance Study.
Compensation Project Faculty & Staff Compensation Programs Board of Regents Finance Committee Meeting Project Overview
© 2015 Texas Association of School Boards, Inc. All rights reserved. January 29, 2015 Presented by: Ann R. Patton Managing Compensation Consultant Compensation.
1 Fall Managing TXSTATE For Supervisors Office of Human Resources 601 University Drive Suite340 J. C. Kellam Bldg San Marcos, Texas Classification.
JOB EVALUATION & SALARY STRUCTURE DESIGN
-09/06/13, - Page 1 The Ohio State University - Classification and Compensation Talking Points - CONFIDENTIAL – for internal use only -  Compensation.
The University of Texas at San Antonio June 19, 2013 Merit Policy.
TOTAL REWARDS ANNUAL ACTION ITEM #2. 2 AGENDA  Purpose of the Presentation  Our Approach  Total Rewards Philosophy Review  Compensation- Current State/Future.
Chapter 5 Compensation & Benefits
Lecture 11: Compensation. Strategic Issues and Compensation  Why do dome employers pay more than other employers?  Why are different jobs within the.
MAG Management Advisory Group, Inc.
Compensation Management. Compensation Employee compensation – refers to extrinsic and intangible rewards. – refers to all forms of pay or rewards going.
JOB EVALUATION A Tool for Measuring Internal Equity September 2009.
Chapter 9 Managing Compensation
Advances in Human Resource Development and Management Course code: MGT 712 Lecture 12.
Agenda Study Process Outreach Summary Salary Quartile Analysis
© 2008 by Prentice Hall9-1 Cost of Living When prices rise over a period of time and pay does not, real pay is actually lowered Some firms index pay increases.
Discussion on Compensation. Goal To assist in securing and retaining a staff of necessary quality to achieve the goals and objectives of the organization.
Town of Carolina Beach Executive Summary for the Town Council Classification and Pay Study March 2015.
City of Galveston Classification & Compensation Study Discussion Preliminary Findings and Recommendations.
New Mexico Highlands University
2012 COMPENSATION STUDY RESULTS July 18, 2012 Board of Aldermen Worksession.
Classification and Compensation
Compensation Structure and Merit Process
Staff Compensation Structure
Compensation: Creating an Equitable and Market-driven Pay System
Fox, Lawson & Associates Compensation Study Summary Findings
Job Evaluation Salary Administration Program
Career Banding Program for North Carolina State Government Employees
Title and Total Compensation Project
Classification and Compensation Department of Human Resources
Presentation transcript:

 Compensation Philosophy  Implementation Policies and Procedures  Survey  Timing, Position Descriptions, Pay Plan Relationships, Cost  Additional Information and Reporting

 Compensation program enables the institution to attract and retain the highly skilled and talented employees necessary to meet its operational needs and priorities.

 Establish compensation levels for positions on the basis of their duties and responsibilities, external competitiveness within relative labor markets, and relative internal worth.  Reward employees on the basis of work performance and longevity.  HR encourages implementing 100% of market results.

 Administer pay equitably and consistently.  Administer the compensation program in a judicious manner within funding availability, the Rules and Regulations of the TSUS, and federal and state statutory requirements.

 Work/Research Begins  Sent to PC  Comp Philosophy Update

 The compensation program will be well communicated to the campus.  The compensation program under the Texas State Philosophy does not include benefits or other amenities outside of pay.  Salary surveys of relative labor markets will be conducted each fiscal year.  PC approves markets and pay plan relationships prior to survey process each fiscal year.

 Benchmark jobs- representative positions which are commonly found in most participating organizations. This means that not all jobs/positions are surveyed.  3 Markets: Local, University, Athletics

 University Market  Defined by PC.  CUPA-HR Mid-Level Administrative and Professional Salary Surveys.  Positions that are recruited nationally and/or are unique to institutions of higher education.  Median rate used to establish pay plan minimums. “Unweighted Median Salary by Budget Quartile- Doctoral Institutions.”

 Local Market  Defined by PC.  Our primary local market survey data comes from purchased surveys for the Austin/San Antonio area.  I-35--San Antonio-Austin Corridor- Local Vendors  Unweighted median rate used to establish pay plan minimums.

 Local Market  Titles determined by PC which are not recruited nationally and are not unique to higher education.  Recruited locally.  Approximately 100 survey titles.  Data from purchased surveys from local human resources management groups in conjunction with national consulting firms.  Represents local (public and private) employers and employees in benchmark jobs.  Examples: Accountants, IT positions, HR positions, Admin Assts, Custodians, Nurses.

 Athletics Market:  CUPA-HR administrative and professional data.  Median rates used.

 Coaches:  CUPA median data, FCS and FBS data reported for each coaching position.  “Data on Demand”-CUPA  Coach data for comparison purposes only.  FCS data used for football coaches (Div I-AA).  FBS data used for all other sports (Div I-A).

 Our budget is $415,730,473.  CUPA Survey Quartile is: $292.7-$543.4 (Admin Comp)  CUPA Survey Quartile is $286.2-$493.1 (Mid-level)  2 nd Quartile for both surveys  Median is the middle figure of a rank ordered list or the average of the two middle figures.  Examples: $28,000$42,000 $36,000$44,000 $43,000$46,000 $36,000 is median$54,000 $45,000 is median

 Previous surveys focused on comparison to market pay plan minimums.  Medians are greater than pay plan minimums.  Results in higher pay ranges, greater maximums and minimums.

 “Market rate” is median rate  Local, University and Athletics pay plan minimums= 96% of median rate placed on nearest grade.  Nearest grade: Minimum could be higher or lower than median rate.  HR only makes recommendations on pay plan minimums, not actual salaries.  HR encourages implementing 100% of market results.

 Every year  Feb-March PC receives current pay plan relationships for review and comment  Receive survey data in March-April from vendors  Analyze data April-May.  Present data to PC in June prior to salary review and Legislative Appropriations Request (LAR).

 Texas State does not collect or use survey data based upon titles or credentials.  Only duties are used to compare positions.

 Survey position descriptions represent a summary of the most important duties, not all duties.  Survey position descriptions do not represent individual GOJAs.  Represent duties performed by a class of employees, not individual employees.

 Plug- Used by all employers to establish the relative value of positions. Used when evaluating a position which does not have a match in the market data.  5PC- Used by president’s cabinet to determine the proper pay plan minimum.  5CB- Indicates a continuation of the current pay plan minimum.  GA- Indicates the number of “grades above” another position in relative value. Represents usage of a plug.  GB- Indicates the number of “grades below” another position in relative value. Represents usage of a plug.

 Commonly used by all organizations to assign appropriate base (entry) rates to positions which are not found in survey documentation.  Can be set at any rate acceptable by management (PC).  Shows the relative value of one job to another in a hierarchy.

 Example:  Duplicating Equipment Operator- market data  Printer II- 140% Dup. Equip. Op.  Printer I, Bindery Operator, Phototypesetter, Camera Operator- 90% Printer II.  PC members approve plugs for positions in their division and approve pay plan relationships.

 University Mkt  Unclassified Academic Advisor I 5GB Academic Advisor II Academic Advisor II Academic Advisor/Counselor Admin Financial Analyst 1 GB Acct III Apartment Manager Res Hall Mgr-Rm and Board Classified Accompanist 5PC Admissions Processor Academic Evaluator Child Care Teacher Aide 6GB Child Care Teacher Construction Contract Admin Coord Construction Projects  Local Mkt  Unclassified  Accountant II Accountant II  Accountant III 3 GA Accountant II  Plant Engineer 3 GA Crew Supv, CRO  Procurement Analyst 100% Procurement Specialist  Systems Analyst I 4 GB Systems Analyst II Systems Analyst II Systems Analyst II  Classified  Accountant I Accountant  Accounting Clerk I Accounting Clerk I  Accounting Clerk II 1 GA Accounting Clerk I Administrative Asst I Admin Asst  Administrative Asst II 2GB Admin Asst III Define terms in pay plan relationship documents: 5PC, 5CB, GA, GB

 HR provides PC the total cost and method cost of implementing market results.  This year Total Cost:  $3,245,606  University Market$986,030  Local Market$2,151,662  Athletics Market$107,914

 Method Costs:  $1,695,635  University Market$568,695  Local Market$1,126,940  Athletics Market$0.00

 HR tracks the “cost of living” represented in the CPI-U.  CPI-U as of 6/23/10 was 1.9% for YTD  Recommendations made to increase pay plan by CPI-U figure.  Recommendations made both with and without implementing “no cost reallocations.” Total cost of implementing w/wo no cost reallocations # of employees affected With: $110, Without: $63,070123

 No cost reallocations as of 6/23/10:  Includes titles in which an increase to the pay plan minimum would not result in a cost.  All employees in these titles are above the proposed market pay plan minimum. #/% Titles% before/after no cost reallocation # before /after no cost reallocation At mkt.16%/65%98/399 Below mkt.81%/32%495/194 Above mkt.3%/3%19/19

 Market Index Data:  % distance of each title from market combined with turnover data, rank ordered.  Number of employees in each title and number of employees affected.  Cost to bring titles to market, including BRP.

 Final report with recommended pay plan minimums.  PC considers data and makes final approval/decision on proposed changes.  “President’s Cabinet, at its discretion, may set minimum pay plan salaries at levels different from those derived by the methodologies described above. The reason for such a decision will be documented and on file in the Texas State Human Resources Office.”