Some Thoughts on IMW And Opportunity We represent a big area of the ANSS national program Bob Smith Univ. of Utah.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
SISMA: Workshop finaleASI, 4 maggio 2011 Il Progetto Progetto SISMA: razionale, attività e principali risultati Roberto Sabadini Università degli Studi.
Advertisements

The SCEC Community Stress Model (CSM) Project Jeanne Hardebeck USGS, Menlo Park, CA.
Update: 2014 Nevada Seismicity Nevada Earthquake Safety Council May 2014.
A magnitude 7.1 struck early Saturday off Japan's east coast. The quake hit at 2:10 a.m. Tokyo time about 170 miles from Fukushima, and it was felt in.
March 25, 2002EarthScope CSIT Workshop Data Archiving and IT Issues for PBO Douglas Neuhauser UC Berkeley Seismological Lab Northern California Earthquake.
WHAT COULD BE THE NEXT EARTHQUAKE DISASTER FOR JAPAN  A difficult question, but ---  It is the one that was being asked long before the March 11, 2011.
1 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Earthquake Monitoring and Reporting through the Advanced National Seismic System Briefing for.
Faults in Focus: Earthquake Science Accomplishments Thomas H. Jordan Director, Southern California Earthquake Cente r 28 February 2014.
Application of GIS for Seismic Observation in Papua New Guinea
March 25-27, 2002EarthScope IT Workshop USArray Breakout Group The USArray system: Sensor  Collection point Collection point  Archive Archive  User.
IMW Strategic Planning August 14, “Options for Political Activism to Get Increased Funding” John G. Anderson Director, Nevada Seismological Laboratory.
Brief Overview, Current Activities & ARRA Improvements David Oppenheimer – USGS Menlo Park.
ILLINOIS EARTHSCOPE I, A PILOT TEACHER WORKSHOP Robert S. Nelson, David H. Malone, Bradley King, and Stephanie Pipis Illinois State University Normal,
Mike Stickney Montana Bureau of Mines and Geology Earthquake Studies Office Montana Regional Seismograph Network ANSS IMW RAC 21 August 2006.
GreatBreak: Grand Challenges in Geodynamics. Characteristics of a Desirable Geodynamic Model Ties together observational constraints on current state.
August 14, 2006 Seismic Monitoring in the Utah Region — Status and Needs Walter Arabasz.
SESAC September 13, “Thoughts on the USGS role in the Intermountain West, in the context of hazard evaluation in extensional settings” John G. Anderson.
29 deaths, destroyed infrastructure, and made permanent changes in Yellowstone geysers. $15M in damage (‘59 $) and $100M+ (2006 $)! Rupture of the 1959.
Science for a changing world The USGS and the Development of the Nevada Great Basin Community Velocity Model.
Using Geodetic Rates in Seismic Hazard Mapping March 30, Geodetic and Geologic slip rate estimates for earthquake hazard assessment in Southern California.
An Earth science program to explore the 4D structure of the North American continent.
Progress Report TIC Working Group E Evolutionary System Architecture Walter Arabasz & David Oppenheimer November 19, 2004.
Regional Review Regional Review Intermountain West Intermountain West (IMW) Region Walter Arabasz Regional Coordinator Nov. 21, 2005.
California Integrated Seismic Network Strategy for Success Woody Savage David Oppenheimer ANSS-IMW Strategic Planning Meeting August 14, 2006 Salt Lake.
SCEC - EarthScope (PBO) a confluence of interests Ken Hudnut U. S. Geological Survey, Pasadena.
Roland Burgmann and Georg Dresen
S OUTHERN C ALIFORNIA E ARTHQUAKE C ENTER Southern California: A Natural Laboratory for Earthquake Science SCEC annual meeting, 2000.
U.S. NATIONAL CENTER FOR ENGINEERING STRONG MOTION DATA (NCESMD) Hamid Haddadi, Anthony Shakal and Moh Huang California Geological Survey and Woody Savage.
S OUTHERN C ALIFORNIA E ARTHQUAKE C ENTER Data collection, synthesis, and products Kenneth W. Hudnut U. S. Geological Survey SCEC 2000 Meeting SCEC Highlights.
Seismic Hazard Assessment for the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
CISN: C alifornia I ntegrated S eismic N etwork The Program Management Group (PMG): Tony Shakal – CGS David Oppenheimer – USGS Menlo Park Peggy Hellweg.
Bill Ellsworth U.S. Geological Survey Near-Source Observations of Earthquakes: Implications for Earthquake Rupture and Fault Mechanics JAMSTEC International.
1 EarthScope: Plate Boundary Observatory William Prescott UNAVCO, Inc AAPG Meeting Salt Lake City, Utah 12 May 2003.
Missouri Geological Survey Joe Gillman The Central U.S. is Earthquake Country: The Science Behind Earthquakes Hazard Preparedness Response.
Overview of EarthScope 2010 May, 2010 Slides that may be used and modified for presentations involving instrumentation, data, science results, and education.
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Natural Hazards Science – Reducing the World’s.
Kenneth W. Hudnut USGS, Pasadena, CA West Newport Beach Association Public Forum, Newport Beach City Hall March 5, 2003 Coping with ‘quakes.
CISN: C alifornia I ntegrated S eismic N etwork The Program Management Group (PMG): Doug Given – USGS Pasadena Egill Hauksson - Caltech Peggy Hellweg &
Brief history, Current Activities & ARRA Improvements David Oppenheimer – USGS Menlo Park.
Overview of CISN Operations and Products David Oppenheimer USGS Menlo Park, CA.
Broadband Earthquake Monitoring at OAUIFE Station, Nigeria
Research opportunities using IRIS and other seismic data resources John Taber, Incorporated Research Institutions for Seismology Michael Wysession, Washington.
Lessons from SCIGN and BARGEN Ken Hudnut & Brian Wernicke USGS/Caltech This presentation will probably involve audience discussion, which will create action.
PG&E and CISN: An Earthquake Country Partnership Stu Nishenko CISN Advisory & Steering Committees Meeting October 13, 2010 Sacramento CA.
Using IRIS and other seismic data resources in the classroom John Taber, Incorporated Research Institutions for Seismology.
DPC High-resolution multi-disciplinary monitoring of active fault test-site areas in Italy S5S5S5S5 Roma 24/03/ 2010 S5 Project High-resolution.
Workshops for Establishing a Stable North American Reference Frame (SNARF) to Enable Geophysical and Geodetic Studies with EarthScope: Annual Report
On Parallel Time Domain Finite Difference Computation of the Elastic Wave Equation and Perfectly Matched Layers (PML) Absorbing Boundary Conditions (With.
Seismic Hazard in the Eastern & Southern Alps: State of the Art and New Challenges S. Parolai / M. Pilz (M. Weber) GFZ-German Research Centre for Geosciences.
Lg Q Across the Continental US Dan McNamara and Rob Wesson with Dirk Erickson, Arthur Frankel and Harley Benz.
Real Time Data From the Plate Boundary Observatory Continuous GPS Network Mike JacksonUNAVCO PBO Directorand the PBO Staff AGU Joint Assembly May 26, 2009.
CISN: Draft Plans for Funding Sources: OES/FEMA/ANSS/Others CISN-PMG Sacramento 10/19/2004.
Of EgyptSeismicity BadawyAhmed National Research Institute of Astronomy and Geophysics, Cairo, EGYPTHelwan Abstract. Spatial distribution of earthquake.
Walter Arabasz Regional Coordinator Aug. 14, 2006 Goals & Desirable Outcomes of Meeting.
Center for Engineering Strong Motion Data (CESMD) Update March 25, 2013 CISN Advisory & Steering Committees Meeting.
Processing and Analysis of GeoEarthscope and Other Community LiDAR Topography Datasets April 30 - May 1, 2008 Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ Christopher.
By Tim Ahern, Director of Data Services, IRIS An Overview of IRIS Incorporated Research Institutions for Seismology.
Preliminary Assessment of the Potential for Sequestration of Carbon Dioxide in Geological Settings in Nevada from the Nevada Bureau of Mines and Geology.
06/22/041 Data-Gathering Systems IRIS Stanford/ USGS UNAVCO JPL/UCSD Data Management Organizations PI’s, Groups, Centers, etc. Publications, Presentations,
Next-Level ShakeZoning for Earthquake Hazard Definition in the Intermountain West John N. Louie, Will Savran, Brady Flinchum, Gabriel Plank, Graham Kent,
1 Current Status of USArray and EarthScope Thanks to Bob Woodward USArray Director.
Dr. Walter Hays US Geological Survey (Retired) Global Alliance for Disaster Reduction.
Department of Conservation Geologic Sequestration of CO 2 in California.
EARTHQUAKE REPORT SOUTH AMERICA WEEK OF FEBRUARY 3 RD TO FEBRUARY 9 TH, 2016 OLIVIA HELPRIN.
A New View into Earth A Science and Facilities Program for study of the structure, dynamics and evolution of the North American continent.
Lessons from EarthScope
Wells, Nevada Earthquake February 21, 2008
VII. Earthquake Mitigation
EARTHSCOPE FROM THE MONTANA REGIONAL SEISMIC NETWORK PERSPECTIVE
Presentation transcript:

Some Thoughts on IMW And Opportunity We represent a big area of the ANSS national program Bob Smith Univ. of Utah

What We Are Up Against! $4.1B US, with only $0.2B in the Intermountain West FEMA Annualized Earthquake Loss Estimate (2000) IMW has twice the area of the west coast (lower 48) and some of the highest population growth centers in the entire U.S. We need to just justify a proposal with consensus and as an integrated regional program within a ANSS national scheme.

Historic Seismicity of the Intermountain West Properties: 1. Nucleation at the mid-crustal brittle- ductile transition, 2. 45° to 70° dipping, planar dip- and oblique-slip faulting, 3. Fault-bounded sedimentary basins, 4. Large dynamic stresses and large hanging-wall accelerations. Working Model For Normal-Faulting Earthquakes

What’s Driving Earthquakes Now! GPS velocity field (interpolated) Deviatoric Strain-rate Tensor Field

We are different from California IMW unique earthquake shaking scenarios need normal-fault/basin data that ANSS can provide. (after Archuleta and Smith, 2006) Need S-wave data of fault-bounded valleys for local site effects, attenuation, etc. for dynamic ground shaking models with unexpectedly large PGAs and PGVs.

IMW NEHRP and ANSS Earthquake Research Needs Evaluate site-specific amplification on fault-bounded alluvial valleys and with appropriate stress drops and dynamic stress conditions. Incorporate local site conditions, Vs30, and directivity in hazard assessments and scenarios. Report earthquake catalogs using 3D velocity models. Acquire strong to weak-ground-motions and develop attenuation relationships for extensional regimes. Evaluate stochastic, characteristic, and cluster earthquake recurrence models. Understand the relationship of contemporary deformation to inter-seismic loading and post- seismic relaxation of active faults. Integrate seismic, geologic, and geodetic for time-dependent seismic hazards focusing on broader geographic, including need urban assessments. Take advantage of data acquired by EarthScope arrays, before they are gone! Understand the physics of lithospheric extension and the mechanisms of normal faults.

IMW & USArray Stations

Earthquake Monitoring of the eastern Intermountain West, 2006 Seismic Networks: - Montana Bureau of Mines and Geology - University of Utah Seismograph Stations - Idaho National Engineering and Environmental Lab - USGS Teton Network - United States National Seismic Network - Northern Arizona University

USArray Transportable Array Siting and Recon for the Deployment - Non Reconned - Reconned

A Dense Array USArray Array + Existing Networks, A Dense Array - Non Reconned - Reconned

An Unprecedented Opportunity Integrated Intermountain Earthquake Monitoring An Unprecedented Opportunity - USArray Seismographs - GPS - Regional Seismic Networks

Areas of possible TA adoptions (blue), , and ANSS Expansion (red)

A Partial Solution: Adoption of selected ANSS stations

A Partial Solution: Adoption of selected USArray stations ANSS has up to 80 of 400 existing instruments available and 60 have six channels for FBAs Document by TA resulting from discussions of TA, USGS and NSF being prepared.

Recommendations  Develop a unified plan (patterned after CISN) that documents a consensus of needs for all of ANSS-IMW with integrated recording and archiving.  Highlight the importance of IMW as a key element of the national ANSS network.  Point out the parallel science needs to improve earthquake science and the ANSS network.  Emphasize partnerships that can benefit ANSS with University matching funds and direct support, state funds, EarthScope, USGS, other agencies, etc.  Make explicit plans for new ANSS stations and for USArray adoptions.  Develop data access for non-seismological users: engineering-science and for general educational and outreach.  Catch University faculty are restricted from making direct congressional contacts for lobbying purposes, particularly if funds are already being sought for parallel purposes.

Complimentary GPS Array, ~90 sites GPS Networks: - University of Utah - Plate Boundary Observatory - Basin and Range Geodetic Network - National Geodetic Survey - Regional Networks - PBO Backbone