New Brighton Planning Commission Meeting March 21, 2006 Public Hearing: Special Use Permit (06-004) for a porch addition at 557 12 th Avenue NW.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
WHAT DOES THE CITY of New Orleans ZONING ORDINANCE DO?
Advertisements

Accessory Living Quarters Proposed Amendments (R-12-01) Board of Supervisors May 22, 2012.
Planning & Community Development Department 245 South Los Robles Avenue Predevelopment Plan Review City Council December 8, 2014.
Fences, Walls and Drinking Establishments City Council Public Meeting July 7, 2015.
PALM COAST COMMERCIAL & INDUSTRIAL CENTER – PHASE Application No. SP-MAJ
B IG I DEAS part 2 May 19, 2014 City of Duluth Unified Development Code.
HRB Meeting June 9, 2015 City Council Remand of AP 14-02/ZC
Community Development Department GRAND HAVEN DEVELOPMENT OF REGIONAL IMPACT City Council June 3, 2014.
City of New Brighton Planning Commission Meeting October 18, 2005 Agenda Item: 6A (Public Hearing) Special Use Permit for Detached Garage Exceeding 624.
Planning & Community Development Department Hillsides Residential Care and Educational Center Master Plan City Council July 20, 2015.
New Brighton Planning Commission Meeting April 18, 2006 Public Hearing: Zoning Ordinance Amendment: Section Regarding Commercial/Industrial Park.
Subcommittee on Heights, Massing, and Alternate Standards    Third Report – January 20, 2009 Planning & Zoning Commission.
Community Development Department GRAND HAVEN DEVELOPMENT OF REGIONAL IMPACT Planning & Land Development Regulation Board May 21, 2014.
February 20, 2007 Macon County Planning Board. Structure Height Ordinance Allows construction to 4 stories or 48 feet, whichever is greater Measured from.
Northwest Quadrant Draft Zoning Ordinance NWQ Draft Zoning Ordinance Planning Commission Review February 21, 2006 Phil Carlson, AICP DSU Planning Consultant.
Request to Downzone from R-36 To RU-2 Zoning District Applicant: Marshall Miles of GM Propane Docket Z Request for a Rezoning Board of Supervisors.
ADOPTION PUBLIC HEARING DONATION BIN ORDINANCE Zoning Division June 24, 2014.
FIRST PUBLIC HEARING DONATION BIN ORDINANCE Zoning Division June 3, 2014.
Design Standards in Saint Paul Proposed Design Standards Zoning Amendments December 16, 2009 Department of Safety & Inspections / Department of Planning.
Design Standards in Saint Paul Proposed Design Standards Zoning Amendments October 16, 2009 Department of Safety & Inspections / Department of Planning.
The Three Levels of Development Planning 1 Small Area Plan Zone / CDD DSP / DSUP.
April 14, 2015 Second Public Hearing 1.  Workshop proposed ULDC changes: 1/27/15  Request to Advertise: 1/27/15  First Public Hearing: 2/24/15  Second.
Proposed LDC Amendments to Setbacks for Swimming Pools City Council December 1, 2015.
Proposed LDC Amendments to Setbacks for Swimming Pools and Standards for Accessory Uses City Council Workshop November 17, 2015.
CTC Planned Development and Development Agreement Modification January 26, 2016 Planning Commission Hearing Greg Turner, Land Use Manager.
Community Development Department APPLICATION 2922 VARIANCE TO REDUCE LANDSCAPE BUFFER.
Allen Variance Application No. VR-SBK Application Request  Variance for an oversized detached garage in the Single-Family Residential (SFR-3)
Planning & Community Development Department Board of Zoning Appeals: Hillside Development Permit # Hillcrest Place City Council March 14, 2016.
Single Family Districts Working with staff, we ultimately settled on two districts.
6 JOSEPHINE STREET APPEAL OF DR/CUP/EA Project Site: Land Use Designation High Density Residential R-3 Zoning District Multiple-Family.
Presentation and public hearing review of Zoning Map Amendments pursuant to Zoning Code Rewrite Planning and Zoning Board Hearing.
Planning & Community Development Department Zoning Code Amendment: Neighborhood District Overlay Zone City Council April 25, 2016.
4650 Alhambra Circle Building Site Separation. Request: The applicant is requesting consideration of a building site separation in accordance with Section.
Planning & Community Development Department Olivewood Village Project (530, 535 E. Union St., 95, 99, 119 N. Madison Ave. and 585 E. Colorado Blvd.) Predevelopment.
Single Family Districts Working with staff, we ultimately settled on two districts.
ACCESSORY DWELLING UNIT REGULATIONS ZOA Tuesday, October 9, 2012.
Small Town Service ~ Community Stewardship ~ Future Focus ALBRIGHT OFFICE PARK Planned Development PD Architecture and Site S Environmental.
Joy Patterson, Principal Planner City of Sacramento March 16 th, 2016 For the 2016 Planning Academy.
DOMESTIC USE OF CHICKENS Proposed options to amend Chapter 7 of the Municipal Code June 8, 2009 Work Session.
Christopher Brown, Planner II December 4th, 2014 Case No. 14ZONE1036 La Grange Road Office Louisville Metro Planning Commission Public Hearing.
Planning & Community Development Department Appeal of the Board of Zoning Appeals Decision on Hillside Development Permit # Kaweah Drive City.
G & A Lloyd, LLC ZOM Location Map. G & A Lloyd, LLC ZOM Aerial.
Longhorn Steakhouse Variance Request Applicant has requested a variance to the Land Development Code watershed regulation that restricts impervious cover.
206 THIRD STREET DR/TRP Appeal of. Planning Commission Hearing March 12, 2014, P/C approved a Design Review Permit: - Demolition of the existing.
Public Hearing Amendments to Chapter 38 Horizon West Development Standards Orange County BCC May 24, 2016.
1 Villa Laguna MXD3 Site Plan Review. 2 Request: The applicant is requesting site plan review of a proposed mixed-use project pursuant to the recently.
New Brighton Planning Commission Meeting May 16, 2006 Public Hearing Continuation: Zoning Ordinance Amendment: Section Regarding Commercial/Industrial.
ACCESSORY DWELLING UNITS: CLEARING UP THE CONFUSION
Zoning Code Amendment: Neighborhood District Overlay Zone
Hillside Development Permit 09-38
Washoe County Board of Adjustment June 1, 2017
Nonconforming Lots and Minimum Lot Sizes
New Brighton Planning Commission Meeting January 17, 2006
Washoe County Board of Adjustment February 2, 2017
Proposed Thorndike-Madrillo Landmark District Public Hearing
New Brighton Special Planning Commission Meeting January 31, 2006
Special Exception Elite Custom Tattooing Studio Application #3322
PALM COAST PARK DRI/MPD PLDRB Public Hearing on August 16, 2017
File No A request for a Site Plan Review to construct a 1,425 square-foot covered balcony, a 14.5 square-foot balcony and a 5,157 square-foot.
City Council Meeting October 23, 2017
City Council Meeting February 26, 2018
City Council Meeting April 29, 2019
Article XIII – Form Districts Community Meeting
Article XIII – Form Districts Community Meeting
Washoe County Board of Adjustment
Washoe County Board of Adjustment April 6, 2017
Washoe County Board of Adjustment
12 D. Variance Request – 211 Jennifer Lane
Washoe County Board of Adjustment June 6, 2019

Presentation transcript:

New Brighton Planning Commission Meeting March 21, 2006 Public Hearing: Special Use Permit (06-004) for a porch addition at th Avenue NW

Request & Background Applicant: Chris & Jessica Italiano, property owners Applicant: Chris & Jessica Italiano, property owners Zoning is R-1, Single Family Residential Zoning is R-1, Single Family Residential Required front yard setback = 30 ’ Required front yard setback = 30 ’ Existing front yard setback = 30’ Existing front yard setback = 30’ Proposed porch measuring 6’ x 11’ Proposed porch measuring 6’ x 11’ Proposed front yard setback = 24’ Proposed front yard setback = 24’

Special Use Permit Analysis Section (3) (B) allows for a 6’ encroachment into the front yard setback when the following conditions can be met: Section (3) (B) allows for a 6’ encroachment into the front yard setback when the following conditions can be met: The proposed addition uses the same exterior structure materials and colors as the principal structure and accessories, The proposed addition uses the same exterior structure materials and colors as the principal structure and accessories, The roof is properly proportioned to and integrated with the roof of the principal structure on the property, The roof is properly proportioned to and integrated with the roof of the principal structure on the property, The base of the addition is not open and its appearance is consistent with the base of the building, and The base of the addition is not open and its appearance is consistent with the base of the building, and The structure shall not exceed 35% of the width of the front of the dwelling, excluding the garage, or shall not exceed 12’ in width, whichever is less. The structure shall not exceed 35% of the width of the front of the dwelling, excluding the garage, or shall not exceed 12’ in width, whichever is less.

Special Use Permit Analysis (cont.) Additionally, Section of the Zoning Ordinance specifies the additional findings by the Planning Commission: Additionally, Section of the Zoning Ordinance specifies the additional findings by the Planning Commission: Establishment of the special use will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, morals, or comfort of the general public, Establishment of the special use will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, morals, or comfort of the general public, The special use will not be injurious to use or enjoyment of other property in the vicinity, The special use will not be injurious to use or enjoyment of other property in the vicinity, Establishment of the special use will not impede normal or orderly development in the district, Establishment of the special use will not impede normal or orderly development in the district, Adequate utilities, access roads, drainage, etc. are provided, and Adequate utilities, access roads, drainage, etc. are provided, and The special use conforms to all other regulations. The special use conforms to all other regulations.

Staff Recommendation Staff finds that all conditions of both Sections (3) (B) and are met and therefore, Staff finds that all conditions of both Sections (3) (B) and are met and therefore, Recommends approval of the request as submitted. Recommends approval of the request as submitted.

Public Hearing: Special Use Permit (SP06-05) & Site Plan Review (LP06- 01) for a 4-story office/residential building at 1820 Old Highway 8 NW

Request & Background Applicant: FW Gordon Construction, LLC. Applicant: FW Gordon Construction, LLC. Owner: TJ Holdings, LLC. Owner: TJ Holdings, LLC. Zoning: MX, Mixed Use Zoning: MX, Mixed Use Past Use: former Hubcap Warehouse site Past Use: former Hubcap Warehouse site Previous approvals for both a Special Use Permit and Site Plan review were approved in April of 2005 Previous approvals for both a Special Use Permit and Site Plan review were approved in April of 2005 Those approvals have expired as a building permit was not submitted within 6 months, as required by the Zoning Ordinance. Those approvals have expired as a building permit was not submitted within 6 months, as required by the Zoning Ordinance.

Project Overview 4-story office & residential building to include 3 floors of office and a 4 th floor of residential that will contain 2 condominium units. 4-story office & residential building to include 3 floors of office and a 4 th floor of residential that will contain 2 condominium units. The Special Use Permit is triggered by the 4 th story and height exceeding 40’ (actual height proposed is ~52’). The Special Use Permit is triggered by the 4 th story and height exceeding 40’ (actual height proposed is ~52’). The Site Plan Review is a requirement of all new construction in commercial zones. The Site Plan Review is a requirement of all new construction in commercial zones. The mixed office/residential use complies with the permitted uses noted in the MX District regulations. The mixed office/residential use complies with the permitted uses noted in the MX District regulations.

Project Overview A combination of surface and underground parking is provided. A total of 71 stalls are shown on the plan whereby 77 are required by code (79 stalls are noted in the 2005 staff report). A combination of surface and underground parking is provided. A total of 71 stalls are shown on the plan whereby 77 are required by code (79 stalls are noted in the 2005 staff report). 30 surface stalls and 41 underground stalls are shown on the plan. 30 surface stalls and 41 underground stalls are shown on the plan. Parking regulations require 1 stall/200 s.f. of office and 3 stalls/residential unit (2/unit + 1 visitor stall/unit). Parking regulations require 1 stall/200 s.f. of office and 3 stalls/residential unit (2/unit + 1 visitor stall/unit). Developer has submitted revised plans prior to tonight’s meeting depicting 32 surface stalls and 45 underground stalls for a total of 77 stalls. Developer has submitted revised plans prior to tonight’s meeting depicting 32 surface stalls and 45 underground stalls for a total of 77 stalls.

Project Overview A monument style ground sign is proposed measuring 53 s.f. in area and 12’ in height, which conforms to the commercial sign standards. A monument style ground sign is proposed measuring 53 s.f. in area and 12’ in height, which conforms to the commercial sign standards. No wall signs are shown. No wall signs are shown. Additionally, a stairway access structure (requirement of the building code) is proposed at the northern end of the site meeting the required 25’ setback from Old Highway 8. It would be constructed with materials to match the principal building. Additionally, a stairway access structure (requirement of the building code) is proposed at the northern end of the site meeting the required 25’ setback from Old Highway 8. It would be constructed with materials to match the principal building. The principal building will consist of ledgerstone, hardiplank siding and stucco. All these materials comply with the performance standards noted in the MX regulations. The principal building will consist of ledgerstone, hardiplank siding and stucco. All these materials comply with the performance standards noted in the MX regulations.

Summary of Changes The newly submitted plans are almost identical to those approved in April of The 2005 staff report is attached for your reference. The newly submitted plans are almost identical to those approved in April of The 2005 staff report is attached for your reference. The landscaping plan has changed slightly with the City Forrester providing recommended revisions with regard to plant types. Those will be forwarded onto the developer. The landscaping plan has changed slightly with the City Forrester providing recommended revisions with regard to plant types. Those will be forwarded onto the developer. Most importantly, the number of parking spaces has been reduced by approximately 8 stalls, however the square footage of office and residential remain unchanged. Most importantly, the number of parking spaces has been reduced by approximately 8 stalls, however the square footage of office and residential remain unchanged.

Staff Recommendation Staff is recommending approval of the Special Use Permit and Site Plan Review stipulating the following conditions (similar to 2005 conditions): Staff is recommending approval of the Special Use Permit and Site Plan Review stipulating the following conditions (similar to 2005 conditions): 8 more parking stalls are implemented into the plan, either as surface or underground parking or a combination thereof, 8 more parking stalls are implemented into the plan, either as surface or underground parking or a combination thereof, Approval and submission of a permit by the Watershed District, Approval and submission of a permit by the Watershed District, The necessary relocation of the storm sewer pipe be at the applicant’s expense, The necessary relocation of the storm sewer pipe be at the applicant’s expense, An easement for the relocated storm sewer be dedicated by the applicant, and An easement for the relocated storm sewer be dedicated by the applicant, and Implementation of the City Forrester’s recommendations with regard to the Landscape Plan. Implementation of the City Forrester’s recommendations with regard to the Landscape Plan.