Data Slides for Children & Students with IEPs in 2010 Michigan Department of Education Office of Special Education and Early Intervention Services

Children & Students w/IEPs Age Groups

3 Children with IEPs Ages – 2010 Source: Annual Special Education Child Count

4 Students With IEPs Ages – 2010 Source: Annual Special Education Child Count

Students With IEPs Ages Source: Annual Special Education Child Count

Students with IEPs Ages 22 – 26 in 2010 Source: Annual Special Education Child Count

Number of Students with IEPs Ages in 2010 Source: Annual Special Education Child Count

Students with IEPs Ages in 2010 Source: Annual Special Education Child Count

Students with IEPs Ages in 2010 Source: Annual Special Education Child Count

10 Students with IEPs by Age Groups in 2010 Age Groups Source: Annual Special Education Child Count

Identification Rates By Eligibility

Special Education Eligibility Source: Annual Special Education Child Count

Identification Rates By Eligibility in 2010 Source: Annual Special Education Child Count

Identification Rates By Eligibility in 2010 SLD SLI CI OHI EI ASD ECDD PI SXI HI VI TBI D/B Source: Annual Special Education Child Count

Trends in Disability Categories

16 Cognitive Impairment Source: Annual Special Education Child Count

17 Emotional Impairment Source: Annual Special Education Child Count

18 Physical and Other Health Impairments Source: Annual Special Education Child Count

19 Early Childhood Developmental Delay Source: Annual Special Education Child Count

20 Severe Multiple Impairment Source: Annual Special Education Child Count

21 Visual Impairment Source: Annual Special Education Child Count

22 Hearing Impairment Source: Annual Special Education Child Count

23 Speech and Language Impairment Source: Annual Special Education Child Count

24 Physical (PI) & Other Health Impairments (OHI) Source: Annual Special Education Child Count

25 Specific Learning Disability Source: Annual Special Education Child Count

26 Specific Learning Disability Eligibility Age Groups Source: Annual Special Education Child Count

27 Autism Spectrum Disorder Source: Annual Special Education Child Count

Number of Students with Autism Spectrum Disorder by Age Source: Annual Special Education Child Count

Number of Students with Autism Spectrum Disorder by Age Source: Annual Special Education Child Count

Number of Students with Autism Spectrum Disorder by Age Source: Annual Special Education Child Count

Number of Students with Autism Spectrum Disorder by Age – 2008, 2009 and 2010 Compared Number of Students with Autism Spectrum Disorder by Age through 2010 Compared Source: Annual Special Education Child Count

Race/Ethnicity for Students w/IEPs

Race/Ethnicity Ages 3-26 in 2010 Source: Annual Special Education Child Count

Gender for Students with IEPs

35 Gender by Age Groups in 2010 Source: Annual Special Education Child Count

36 Gender Distribution of Students with IEPs Ages 3-26 in 2010 Source: Annual Special Education Child Count

Educational Environments for Students with IEPs

38 Educational Environment Students with IEPs Ages 3 – 5 in 2010 Source: Annual Special Education Child Count

39 Educational Environment Students with IEPs Ages 6-12 in 2010 Source: Annual Special Education Child Count

40 Educational Environment Students with IEPs Ages in 2010 Source: Annual Special Education Child Count

41 Educational Environment Students with IEPs Ages 6-21 in 2010 Source: Annual Special Education Child Count

Educational Environment Students with IEPs Ages 22 – 26 in 2010 Source: Annual Special Education Child Count

State Performance Plan Indicator Performance

Graduation* for Students with IEPs Target is 80% *Calculations using Cohort Four-Year Graduation Rate Methodology and using OSEP’s Prescribed One Year Data Lag Source: Annual Special Education Child Count

Dropout* for Students with IEPs Target is <10% *Calculation using Consolidated State Performance Report Event Dropout Rate Methodology, and using OSEP’s Prescribed One Year Data Lag. Source: Annual Special Education Child Count

Indicator 3A: AYP percent = [(# of districts with a disability subgroup that meets the State’s minimum “n” size that meet the State’s AYP targets for the disability subgroup) divided by the (total # of districts that have a disability subgroup that meets the State’s minimum “n” size)] times 100. Source: Michigan Department of Education, Bureau of Assessment and Accountability Measurable and Rigorous Targets FFYBaselineTargetActual % %92.7% %98.5% %99.4% %99.7%

Indicator 4A: Rates of suspension and expulsion: Percent of districts identified by the State as having a significant discrepancy in the rates of suspensions and expulsions of children with disabilities for greater than 10 days in a school year. Source: Single Record Student Database, verification review Measurable and Rigorous Targets FFYBaselineTargetActual Calculations Using Previous Definition of Significant Discrepancy* % 2006 < 10.0% 1.5% 2007 < 9.0% 1.4% OSEP Prescribed a One Year Data Lag for This Indicator 2008 ( data) < 9.0%1.4% Calculations Using Current Definition of Significant Discrepancy 2009 ( data) 5.1%< 5.5%5.1% *Definition of Significant Discrepancy: A district was identified as having a significant discrepancy in rates of suspensions and expulsions if more than five percent of its students with IEPs received out- of-school suspensions/expulsions for greater than 10 days cumulatively during the school year. Districts with fewer than five students with IEPs suspended/expelled for more than ten days were exempt from significant discrepancy calculations. This new protocol was reported in Michigan’s FFY 2008 State Performance Plan (SPP).

Indicator 5A: Increase the percentage of students served inside the regular class 80% or more of the time. Measurable and Rigorous Targets A. Increase the percentage of students served inside the regular class 80% or more of the day FFYBaselineTargetActual % 2006> 55.0%50.3% 2007> 57.0%53.5% 2008> 59.0%57.6% 2009> 61.0%61.1% Source: Michigan Compliance Information System

Indicator 9: Percent of districts with disproportionate representation of racial and ethnic groups in special education and related services that is the result of inappropriate identification. Measurable and Rigorous Targets FFYBaselineTargetActual %0% 20070%0.3% % 0.1% % 0.1% Sources: Michigan Compliance Information System, Single Record Student Database, Michigan Student Data System

Indicator 10: Percent of districts with disproportionate representation of racial and ethnic groups in specific disability categories that is the result of inappropriate identification. Measurable and Rigorous Targets FFYBaselineTargetActual % 20060%3.2% 20070%1.7% 20080%1.4% 20090%0.9% Sources: Michigan Compliance Information System, Single Record Student Database, Michigan Student Data System

Indicator 11: Percent of children with parental consent to evaluate, who were evaluated within 30 days or a mutually agreed upon extension. Compliance target is 100%. Source: Michigan Student Data System