Family Outcomes Montana’s Method of Partnering with Families.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Back to the Drawing Board Summary of the work of the Human Services Redesign Committee from May 2012 forward.
Advertisements

The NDPC-SD Intervention Framework National Dropout Prevention Center for Students with Disabilities Clemson University © 2007 NDPC-SD – All rights reserved.
HOW TO EXAMINE AND USE FAMILY SURVEY DATA TO PLAN FOR PROGRAM IMPROVEMENT Levels of Representativeness: SIOBHAN COLGAN, ECO AT FPG BATYA ELBAUM, DAC -
Welcome! Review of the National Part C APR Indicator 4 Family Data FFY 2011 ( ) Siobhan Colgan, ECTA, DaSy Melissa Raspa, ECTA.
Missouri Schoolwide Positive Behavior Support (MO SW-PBS) Implementation Mary Richter MO SW-PBS State Coordinator.
Use of the NCSEAM Preschool and Part C Surveys to Address the SPP/APR Parent/Family Indicators Batya Elbaum, Ph.D. University of Miami National Center.
Experiences Developing and Conducting Training on the ECO Child Outcomes Summary Form Ted Maloney, MT Pam Reising-Rechner, IL.
A Logic Model for the Effective Implementation of Service Coordination: Culmination of Five Years of Research Michael Conn-Powers, Indiana University Julia.
Linking Early Intervention Quality Practices With Child and Family Outcomes Technical Assistance for Local Early Intervention Systems Infant & Toddler.
Determining if the Family Survey Response is Representative 1.
Improving Falls Clinic client engagement in falls prevention activities National Ageing Research Institute with Royal Melbourne Hospital; Royal Park Campus,
Family Outcome Principles and Measurement Approaches Melissa Raspa Don Bailey ECO at RTI International International Society on Early Intervention (ISEI)
CHILD OUTCOMES BASELINE AND TARGETS FOR INDICATOR 7 ON THE STATE PERFORMANCE PLAN State Advisory Panel for Exceptional Children November 12, 2009 January.
Maureen Sullivan Vermont’s Family Infant and Toddler Program October 7, 2009 Understanding and Utilizing Family Survey Data.
GUIDE TO THE DEVELOPMENT OF IMPROVEMENT ACTIVITIES USING FAMILY SURVEY DATA Jim Henson 1.
Using Data for Program Improvement Christina Kasprzak May, 2011.
SWIFT School Wide Integrated Framework for Transformation
1 Statewide Assessment Elements of a Successful Statewide Assessment.
What is the Parent Involvement Plan (PIP)? Why do we have a Parent Involvement Plan (PIP)? (PIP) PARENT INVOLVEMENT PLAN 1.
Are your C4 data reflective of the families you serve? Joy Markowitz, Director Jean Dauphinee, TA Specialist Measuring Child and Family Outcomes Conference,
Transition Assessments Matrix Great Prairie AEA Transition Coordinators  Transition Assessment  Living, Learning and Working.
Systems Change 3 Integrated Jobs Strategy Policy Funding Outcome Data Capacity Development Innovation Leadership Values Collaboration Hall et al (2007)
9/2/20151 Ohio Family and Children First An overview of OFCF structure, membership, and responsibilities.
Project SEARCH Mercy Regional Medical Center Lorain, Ohio Varnum Award Video.
Parent Involvement in Michigan Schools What is Meaningful Parent Involvement?
Creating a New Vision for Kentucky’s Youth Kentucky Youth Policy Assessment How can we Improve Services for Kentucky’s Youth? September 2005.
May 20, Purpose of the Self- Assessment Required by the Head Start Performance Standards (i)(1) Head Start Ac 2007 Head Start Act Section.
NCI Survey Respondents Who Are Verbal and Non-Verbal: A Profile.
ESRD-CAHPS Field Test Beverly Weidmer, M.A. RAND Corporation CAHPS RAND Team.
Minnesota Continuous Improvement Process: Program Evaluation Report Writing Post School Outcome and Parent Survey Minnesota Department of Education Conference.
Chase Bolds, M.Ed, Part C Coordinator, Babies Can’t Wait program Georgia’s Family Outcomes Indicator # 4 A Systems Approach Presentation to OSEP ECO/NECTAC.
1 What did Connecticut do?. 2 The Basics A group of people who hold stakes met to give the lead agency suggestions. We chose the NCSEAM survey and we.
NATIONAL CORE INDICATORS ADULT CONSUMER SURVEY
1 MODULE III Orientation to the UCEDD. 2 Introductions Name Part of state you are from Experience with disability Parent? Self-Advocate? Provider?
How to Explain the Numbers: Helping Staff, Parents, and Other Stakeholders Understand the Results of the NCSEAM Surveys for Part C and 619 Batya Elbaum,
Michigan Partnering with Parents to Help Measure Outcomes for Young Children and Families Chandra Jones Vanessa Winborne MICC Parent Michigan Part C Coordinator.
Putting the Pieces Together: The Parent Perspective Measuring Child and Family Outcomes Conference August 27,2008 Measuring Child and Family Outcomes Conference.
Council for Exceptional Children/Division of Early Childhood Conference October 2010 Kim Carlson, Asst. Director/619 Coordinator Ohio Department of Education.
Parent Involvement: Who’s Accountable? Who Benefits? Batya Elbaum, Ph.D. University of Miami Annual Meeting of The Family Cafe Orlando, FL June 3, 2006.
Michigan’s Experience Preparing for OSEP Results Visit Lisa Wasacz – Part C Consultant Michigan Department of Education Michigan Office of Great Start.
Using Family Survey Data for Program Improvement Measuring Child and Family Outcomes Conference Encore Presentation October 7, 2009 Don Bailey, ECO at.
Massachusetts Part C Department of Public Health (LA) 62 programs, 38 vendor agencies 6 Regions 6 Regional Specialists.
Analyzing Community-Based Services & Social Capital General Approaches.
Using Family Survey Data for Program Improvement Pam Roush, Director WV Birth to Three October 7, 2009.
1 MODULE III Orientation to the UCEDD. 2 Topics of Presentation 1. Orientation to the UCEDD 2. Themes of the DD Act 3. Core Functions 4. Areas of Emphasis.
C4K Overview Collaborating for Iowa’s Kids Partnering with Iowa’s Local Schools.
Strange Bedfellows: Building and Maintaining Collaborations between, among, and within State agencies for PROMISE Grant partnerships.
© National Literacy Trust 2009 Partners in Literacy: Improving outcomes for families through local coordination Diagram showing how the PiL strategy can.
Performance audit: Commissioning social care Claire Sweeney & Cathy MacGregor, 15 September 2011.
Documenting Family Outcomes: Decisions, Alternatives, Next Steps Don Bailey, Ph.D. Mary Beth Bruder, Ph.D. Contact information: Mary Beth Bruder, Ph.D.
School/City/Community Work Plan Year 1 Progress Report.
Midwest Child Welfare Implementation Center MCWIC Purpose Our purpose is to facilitate the implementation of systemic change to improve outcomes for children.
Engaging Families in NH’s Part C Child and Family Outcomes Systems Presented by: Michelle Lewis (Parent, ICC Vice Chair, New Hampshire PTI)
Report on the NCSEAM Part C Family Survey Batya Elbaum, Ph.D. National Center for Special Education Accountability Monitoring February 2005.
2011 OSEP Leadership Mega Conference Collaboration to Achieve Success from Cradle to Career 2.0 Connecting the Dots—Linking Indicators for Program Improvement.
1 Assuring the Quality of Data from the Child Outcomes Summary Form.
Pickaway County Board of Developmental Disabilities THREE YEAR STRATEGIC PLAN
Independent Monitoring for Quality: An Evidence-Based Strategy for Building and Sustaining Effective Programs Guy Caruso and MaryJo Caruso 2011 National.
Everyday Lives: Values in Action Using IM4Q Data to Improve Statewide
2016 Improving Data, Improving Outcomes Conference
NATIONAL CORE INDICATORS FAMILY SURVEY RESULTS FY10-11
Using Family Survey Data for Program Improvement
Nebraska’s National Core Indicators Project: A Partnership Between DHHS-DD Services and the Nebraska UCEDD NCI Annual Meeting August 1, 2018 Brad Wilson,
Measuring Outcomes for Programs Serving Young Children with Disabilities Lynne Kahn and Christina Kasprzak ECO/NECTAC at FPG/UNC June 2,
Parent Participation in the Development of Child and Family Outcomes
Using Family Survey Data for Program Improvement
Measuring Outcomes for Programs Serving Young Children with Disabilities Lynne Kahn and Christina Kasprzak ECO/NECTAC at FPG/UNC June 2,
Parent Participation in the Development of Child and Family Outcomes
Using Family Survey Data for Program Improvement
The Norwalk Story: How one community is using the Ages and Stages Questionnaires (ASQ®) to build a system for developmental screening for young children.
Presentation transcript:

Family Outcomes Montana’s Method of Partnering with Families

State’s Process in Collecting Data for Family Outcomes Stakeholder input –Parents –Providers –Others organizations involved with disabilities Types of surveys Providers Surveys NCSEAM ECO Center Methods of conducting surveys Mailing Directly delivered surveys Telephone Person to person interview

Decisions Consumer Surveys –Seven different regional Part C agencies ECO Center’s three questions and rating scale –To what extent has intervention helped your family know and understand your rights? –To what extent has intervention helped your family effectively communicate your child's needs? –To what extent has intervention helped your family to help your child develop and learn?

ECO’s Rating Scale To what extent has intervention helped your family know and understand your rights? Intervention has NOT helped us know about our family’s right Intervention has done a few things to help us know about our rights Intervention has provided good help so that we know our family’s rights Intervention has done an excellent job of helping us know about our family’s rights

Increase In Return Determination Letters –Compliance Indicators (1,7,8,9,10,11, & 13) –Performance Indicators (2,3,4,5,6,& 14) Response Rate –At least 50%

Ensuring Representation Across the State All providers conducted survey –Seven providers Rural Urban Race and ethics Providers processes and methods reviewed and approved by Developmental Disability Program (DDP) Submitting Data –Instructions –Uniformed Form

Parents Partnership in Family Outcomes Stakeholder group –ICC (Family Support Advisory Council) six parents –Parents employed with provider agencies

Success of the Partnership Why a high return rate from families? What made it possible? What it means to families to have a successful partnership?