Need For The Project Jennifer Doolittle, Ph.D. April 23, 2009.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Northeast Regional Program in Charles City Questions & Answers.
Advertisements

Extended School Year (ESY)
Rhode Island State Systemic Improvement Plan (SSIP) Stakeholder Input November 6, 2014.
IDEA AND ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS WITH DISABILITIES Office of General Counsel Division of Educational Equity August 15, 2012.
Charter School Institute A REVIEW: ENROLLMENT PROCEDURES Matt Hudson, ES Director.
Presentation for LEAD Conference Donna Parker, SPDG Project Manager September 21, 2010.
Analysis and Next Steps. Summary Nevada’s final score of ranks 24 out of the 36 states that applied Among the ten grant recipients,
Designing and Implementing An Effective Schoolwide Program
How to Develop a Project Evaluation Plan Pat Gonzalez Office of Special Education Programs
State Practices in Personnel Recruitment and Retention Phoebe Gillespie, Ph.D. Director National Center to improve Recruitment and Retention of Qualified.
Overview of the SPDG Competition Jennifer Doolittle, Ph.D. 1.
2011 SIGnetwork Regional Meetings Professional Development: the heart of the matter.
Specific Learning Disability: Accurate, Defensible, & Compliant Identification Mississippi Department of Education.
Update on Work of Great Prairie AEA Behavioral Team November, 2008.
Title II, Part A(3) Competitive Grant Program for Improving Teacher Quality Technical Assistance March 17, 2011 Webinar and Meeting.
Targeted Assistance Programs: Requirements and Implementation Spring Title I Statewide Conference May 15, 2014.
Mathematics and Science Education U.S. Department of Education.
Bilingual Students and the Law n Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 n Title VII of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act - The Bilingual Education.
HECSE Quality Indicators for Leadership Preparation.
Predominantly Black Institutions Program CFDA: A FY 2015 PREAPPLICATION WEBINAR Washington, DC July 14, :00 AM. – 12:00 PM, EDT July 14, 2015.
“Working to ensure children, birth to 5, are prepared for success in school and life.” Wake County SmartStart Logic Model Training May 2013.
Guidance for Completing Interim Report I Evaluation Webinar Series 3 Dec 2013.
ANNUAL AND FINAL PERFORMANCE REPORTS 524B FORM REPORTING PERIOD BUDGET EXPENDITURES INDIRECT COST RATE PERFORMANCE MEASURES.
2011 SIGnetwork Regional Meetings Professional Development: the heart of the matter.
Why Do State and Federal Programs Require a Needs Assessment?
Educable Mental Retardation as a Disability: Accurate, Defensible, & Compliant Identification Mississippi Department of Education.
Using Individual Project and Program Evaluations to Improve the Part D Programs Dr. Herbert M. Baum.
IDEA EQUITABLE SERVICES: SERVING PARENTALLY PLACED PRIVATE SCHOOL STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES Jennifer S. Mauskapf, Esq. Brustein &
The New IDEA: Major Changes Presentation to the Charter Schools Summit November 7, 2006 Nancy Reder, Esq. Deputy Executive Director NASDSE.
Project Design Jennifer Doolittle, Ph.D. April 23, 2009.
The Significance Section Jennifer Doolittle, Ph.D. April 23, 2009.
ESEA, TAP, and Charter handouts-- 3 per page with notes and cover of one page.
Project Design Jennifer Coffey OSEP May 4,
Leveraging Federal Resources: Teacher Quality, Research, and Program Improvement Peggi Zelinko Office of Innovation and Improvement (OII) Robert Ochsendorf.
Welcome! PROGRAM MEETING July 23, 2012 OSEP Personnel Development Program 1.
Special Education Teacher Preparation Program Improvement Grants (325T) Bonnie D. Jones, Ed. D. Education Program Specialist Office of Special Education.
APRIL 2, 2012 EDUCATOR PREPARATION POLICY & PRACTICE UPDATE.
Special Education Plan Feedback Sessions. Agenda Welcome and Introductions Department of Student Services Purpose Why are we updating the Special Education.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Tom Torlakson, State Superintendent of Public Instruction Updates and Current Issues ISES Meeting December 2011.
Need For The Project Shedeh Hajghassemali June 8,
Tuesday, April 12 th 2011 SPDG Performance Measure Discussion.
BUILDING BLOCKS TO EVALUATE MEASURABLE PROGRAM OUTCOMES AKA: PROGRAM MONITORING.
Program Information for Applicants School Leadership Program U.S. Department of Education 2005.
Overview of the FY 2011 SPDG Competition Jennifer Coffey, Ph.D. State Personnel Development Grants Program Lead 1.
Department of Exceptional Student Education The School District of Palm Beach County.
Title II, Part A(3) Competitive Grant Program for Improving Teacher Quality Technical Assistance March 26, 2009 Webinar.
Need For The Project SPDG Competition FY The NEED FOR THE PROJECT is the foundation of the SPDG application  Scoring criteria: the range of points.
U.S. Department of Education Office of Special Education Programs Building the Legacy: IDEA 2004 Highly Qualified Teachers (HQT)
Selection Criteria and Invitational Priorities School Leadership Program U.S. Department of Education 2005.
Project Design SPDG Competition FY C. QUALITY OF PROJECT DESIGN (0-20 points)  Describe the extent to which the goals, objectives, and outcomes.
No Child Left Behind Application Title VI, Part B, Subpart 2 Virginia Department of Education March 2011.
PGES Updates Second Read of PGES KBE meeting April 1 st. Link to materials located herehere Highlights of Changes: Section 1(Definitions):
Pre-Applicant Training| SC Public Charter School District| Beckie Davis Serving Students with Special Needs.
Grant Activities, Needs Assessments And other SPDG application Issues to Consider.
County Vocational School District Partnership Grant, Cohort 3 Technical Assistance Workshop January 6, 2017.
Time for Change: Examining Utah Data Relating to Student Performance
Holli G. Bayonas, Ph.D & Eric S. Howard, M.A.
Excellent Educators for All Initiative
Improving Student Outcomes for Schools At- Risk Presentation Template
Department of Exceptional Student Education
What States are Doing That Meet the 1% Cap
Improving Student Outcomes for Schools At- Risk Presentation Template
Serving Students with Special Needs
Grace Zamora Durán, Ed.D. April 19, 2010
Need For The Project Jennifer Coffey April 19, 2010.
Jennifer Coffey OSEP April 19, 2010
SLIVER SECOND ROUND SCORING RUBRIC
Background and Significance
Measuring Child and Family Outcomes Conference August 2008
ESSA accountability & Report Card Proposed regulations
Presentation transcript:

Need For The Project Jennifer Doolittle, Ph.D. April 23, 2009

The NEED FOR THE PROJECT is the foundation of the SPDG application  Scoring criteria — the range of points awarded is 0 — 19  The needs identified should be the underlying basis for justifying OSEP funding your project.  These needs should relate to the other components of the SPDG (e.g., significance, project design, resources, management plan and evaluation).

First Rule: Address only those needs that are relevant to the SPDG application  DO NOT include a global summary of the entire universe of a state's needs. –This will cloud the identification of relevant issues, and –make it difficult for the reviewers to identify what you are applying for in your SPDG application.  DO highlight the uniqueness of your State.

2 nd Rule: Use data to support the needs you have identified  Use SPP/APR data  619 data  State certification data  PBS State Evaluation Data  NAEP

The Need for Project should provide information about the following areas:  Specific gaps in services –Nature and magnitude of the gaps in services  Specific weaknesses in services –Nature and magnitude of the weaknesses in services

Provide information about… (cont.)  Infrastructure: both existing and any projected additions to/ changes in infrastructure resulting from the SPDG grant activities  Opportunities identified that are existing and to what extent they will be addressed by the proposed SPDG project

Specific gaps or weaknesses in services  Some gaps/weaknesses in services related to state personnel development that are commonly addressed are: –Lack of a PD delivery system –Shortages of specific personnel such as Speech/Language, OT, PT etc.. –Desire to increase minority representation in specific personnel areas

Gaps cont.  Recruitment and retention of hard to fill positions such as special education teachers who serve students identified as emotionally disturbed  In-service needs related to meeting the HQ requirements for special education staff  Need for specialized training to meet the evolving needs of a specific disability population. Ex: ABA training for Autism

Gaps cont.  Need for updated training in specific areas to Improve the outcomes for students with disabilities in content areas  Need to redesign the provision of professional development to address rural geographic issues  Para-professional needs  And more!

Nature and magnitude of the gaps or weaknesses in services  It is critical that you indicate how serious of a need this is, remembering Rule # 2 that you support the magnitude of the need with data.  The need may be specific to a low incidence group, but the magnitude of need for that group may be very significant.

Example: ABA personnel training  Example: While the percentage of students with Autism account for only 4 % of the state's special education population the incidence of identification of students with Autism has increased 250% over the past three years. (State would provide data supporting this statement).

Example cont.  Of those students identified with Autism approximately 45% of their IEPs require services involving ABA staff or ABA related activities. Currently we have been able to identify only 10 ABA certified staff in the state. In addition, surveys of 820 special education professional staff serving students with Autism have identified a need for training related to ABA in their top 3 priorities

Existing infrastructure and any projected changes in infrastructure resulting from the grant activities  It is helpful to provide your state's demographics and service delivery models to provide context for what you are proposing in your grant but be concise. –Reviewers just need to know those aspects of infrastructure that relate to what you are proposing.

Example: State demographics and service delivery model(s)  There are 501 school districts and 123 Charter Schools in our state that serve as LEAs for the provision of FAPE for students with disabilities. The total enrollment of students with disabilities (age 3-21) in the state is 310,692, which comprises 14% of the total student enrollment.  Of the total 624 LEAs, 123 serve students designated as rural with total school district enrollments of less than (X) students.

Example cont.  Our current professional development delivery model is provided through a 3-tier system. The first tier (provide a brief description of your system)...  The turnover rate for special education teachers in these designated rural LEAS is the highest in the state (provide data).  Our proposal of a distance learning model delivery system of professional development to improve our infrastructure is based on …

Opportunities that exist and to what extent they will be addressed by the proposed project  Provide concise information that is applicable to the needs you are addressing in the SPDG.

Example  In our state's attempts to address the needs of retention of special education teachers in our small rural school districts, we have recently initiated a pilot, with an IHE, of a distance learning model delivery system of professional development.  The initial results of that pilot are....( provide data regarding this opportunity).

In Summary  The NEED FOR PROJECT section should address those needs that are relevant to the SPDG application.  Use data to support the needs you have identified.  Be concise.  Ensure that design flows from need.