Director’s Review Dec 1999 Tracker Integration and Installation W. E. Cooper 6 December 1999.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Optical Manufacturing Solutions 1 Probe Assembly.
Advertisements

Click on this image to open the full PDF document.
Assembly Instructions Additional documents needed for Assembly: GA Drawings on all Units Header Platform GA Drawings Motor Deck Platform GA Drawing Packing.
1.  Preparation of larger parts in a Clean room Class (ISO7)  Preparation of smaller parts in a “baldaquin” annex  Assembly in a clean-room Class.
DoE Review June 6-7, 2000 Current Detector Configuration June 6, 2000  Solenoid, Central Preshower installed in central bore  A-layer MDTs installed.
G.Barber Tracker Planning & Mechanical Preparation June Tracker Planning & Mechanical Preparation An outline of (known) outstanding work to be carried.
1 MC Assembly via Test Cell Crane FPA Stage 3 Peer Review August 12, 2005 T. Brown.
PXL insertion 1.PXL Insertion Steps after PXL installation system is aligned 2.PXL removal steps 3.Some design details 2/3/20131 Table of contents:
AMS-02 tracker mechanics status of assembly and integration at UniGe Outer planes: - Tests of evaporator (cooling loop) integration - Tools to develop.
AMS-02 tracker mechanics status of assembly and integration Inner tracker integration completion: - Assembly and cabling - Temperature and magnetic field.
MICE RFCC Module Update Allan DeMello Lawrence Berkeley National Lab MICE CM26 at Riverside California March 26, 2010.
Don Lynch 9/15/05 HBD Safety Review 1 Mechanical Design And Installation Hadron Blind Detector (HBD) Don Lynch.
EA meeting, Wednesday 6 Dec 2006 TT installation, Jeroen van Tilburg 1 TT installation Installation of the TT station.
Pixel Leaf Spring Review, Dec 19, Leaf Spring Review Agenda Leaf spring conditions Mockup testing Planning for the work at P5 Discussion Demonstration.
1 Cryostat assembly, integration and commissioning procedures M.Olcese Version: 07 May 2008.
Integration GlueX Detector Integration Mission: To ensure systems meet or exceed physics driven goals To ensure that detectors are designed in a sensible.
MICE RFCC Module Update Allan DeMello Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory MAP Winter Collaboration Meeting at JLab, Virginia February 28, 2011.
Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility Page 1 IPR October Independent Project Review of 12 GeV Upgrade Jefferson Lab October 18-20,
MQXF Cold-mass Assembly and Cryostating H. Prin, D. Duarte Ramos, P. Ferracin, P. Fessia 4 th Joint HiLumi LHC-LARP Annual Meeting November 17-21, 2014.
Pixel Support Tube Requirements and Interfaces M.Olcese PST CDR: CERN Oct. 17th 2001.
Ron Madaras, LBL U.S. Pixel Meeting, SCIPP, July 9-10, 2003 Patch Panel 1 (PP1) Brief Review Cost and Effort Estimate.
1 Belle II IR 2 Shuji Tanaka KEK Joint Belle II & superB Background meeting 2012//Feb/ 8-9th 1.
1 BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES Abstract Magnet and Girder Integration Lewis Doom, NSLS-II Project National Synchrotron Light Source II (NSLS-II) will.
LARP Prototype Assembly Steps Towards Q1 and Q3 Production Dan Cheng MQXF Design Review December 10-12, 2014 CERN H. Felice, R. Hafalia, D. Horler, T.
09/03/2010 ADO-PO section meeting Beam Pipe Extraction/Insertion R. Vuillermet.
M. Gilchriese Module Assembly and Attachment at LBNL M. Gilchriese for F. Goozen April 2000.
Tracker Summary Alan Bross MICE CM October 10, 2007.
Ronald Lipton PMG June Layer 0 Status 48 modules, 96 SVX4 readout chips 6-fold symmetry 8 module types different in sensor and analog cable length.
ATLAS SCT End-Cap C Integration 1.Introduction: to the SCT within ATLAS 2.End-Cap C Reception at CERN 3.Final Assembly 4.Integration with the TRT 5.Combined.
Spectrometer Solenoid Fabrication Status and Schedule Steve Virostek Lawrence Berkeley National Lab MICE RAL October 20, 2008.
Hall D Integration Status GlueX Collaboration Meeting Indiana University, Ravi Anumagalla.
MICE RFCC Module Update Allan DeMello Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory MICE CM29 at RAL, UK February 17, 2011.
FVTX Review, November 17th, FVTX Mechanical Status: WBS 1.6 Walter Sondheim - LANL Mechanical Project Engineer; VTX & FVTX.
PMG Meeting February 2000 A Split Central Silicon Tracker W. E. Cooper on Behalf of the D0 Silicon Group 3 February 2000.
Spectrometer Solenoid Schedule MICE Schedule Review May 23 rd 2011 Roy Preece (STFC RAL, LBNL)
Kurt Krempetz (Director's Review - Dec. 7, 99) 1 Mechanical Infrastructure Kurt Krempetz Introduction Existing Systems New Systems Schedule Manpower Conclusions.
RICH1 Gas Enclosure Installation. Experimental Area Meeting at CERN on 21st June 2006 Bill Cameron (Imperial College London) on behalf of the RICH1 team.
G.Barber Mice Tracker Integration Harbin Jan Mice Tracker Integration Installation requirements & Procedure.
NEDM Collaboration Meeting 5/2008 Preliminary Engineering Report nEDM Central Detector John C. Ramsey Los Alamos National Laboratory.
Walter Sondheim 6/9/20081 DOE – Review of VTX upgrade detector for PHENIX Mechanics: Walter Sondheim - LANL.
Tracker 1. Status 2. Expected delivery date of system to RAL 3. Required support infrastructure needed for setup and initial debug. Things like vacuum,
LARP Collaboration Meeting Racetrack Coil Fabrication
Field Period Assembly Wayne Reiersen SC Project Review PPPL May 2006.
1 FPA Stage 2 Peer Review May 12, 2006 T. Brown. 2 FPA Stage 2 Status Summary of Stage 2 activities Review current design status Review schedule details.
Additional muon stations for the Upgrade of the Elevator Regions in the ATLAS Muon Spectrometer. Installation scenario, status on the installation tools.
TB Peter Glässel, Heidelberg1 Preparing TPC Installation.
Installation of the T600 at Fermilab CSN2, September 22,
DON LYNCH NOVEMBER 6, AGENDA November 4, BABAR Magnet Update Global Design Concept – Update Outer HCal Structural Analysis (2 nd pass) sPHENIX.
SPHENIX MECHANICAL D. Lynch September 11, AGENDA Global Design Concept – Updated Global Assembly Concept – Updated Inner HCal Installation concept.
MQXFB design, assembly plans & tooling at CERN J.C Perez On behalf of MQXF collaboration team MQXF Workshop on Structure, Alignment and Electrical QA.
Chiho Wang ATLAS TRT Duke University CERN, Sep Barrel integration status.
SPHENIX MECHANICAL D. Lynch August 21, /15/2014sPHENIX Mechanical Design.
SuperB Integration SuperB Experimental hall. Related topics of Slac D&D activities.
USCMS Pixel PMG, Nov 29, Mechanics Status Disks, ½ Service Cylinders Installation USCMS FPIX FNAL PMG Joe Howell Bruno Gobbi Nov. 29, 2006.
MICE Coupling Coil Fabrication Steps to Complete Allan DeMello Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory Coupling Coil Working Group January 28, 2014 January.
3 rd ESAC Review, 27 th February to 1 st March 2013, CEA Saclay Fresca2 Dipole Structure Assembly J.C Perez on behalf of Fresca2 collaboration team.
Cryomodule Interconnect Installation Issues A Comparison of XFEL to LCLSII Karen Fant 7/29/2015.
Sébastien MICHALMarch Sébastien MICHALMarch 2009 EES 1 GROOVE EES 1 laid on table to be milled EES 1 laid on table to be milled –Move horizontally.
K.Long/G.Barber Mice Tracker Mechanical Status CM20 Feb 08 1 Mice Tracker Mechanical Status Contents:- Tracker 1 Status Tracker 2 Status Further Hardware.
BM&N STS ladders assembly in VLHEP
- STT LAYOUT - SECTOR F SECTOR A SECTOR B SECTOR E SECTOR D SECTOR C
Vertex Detector Mechanical R&D Design Questions and Issues
Integration issues at IHEP
IMP Cryomodule Assembly and Alignment
CMS Gantry for Detector Lowering
On the accuracy of port assembly at Wendelstein 7-X
GLAST Large Area Telescope:
Cryomodule Assembly Plan
as a prototype for Super c-tau factory
SNS PPU Cryomodule Space Frame
Presentation transcript:

Director’s Review Dec 1999 Tracker Integration and Installation W. E. Cooper 6 December 1999

Director’s Review Dec 1999 Introduction  A tracker integration and installation group has been formed within the past month.  Manpower for design work on tracker integration and installation has been assumed to come primarily from the Central Fiber Tracker (CFT) and the Silicon Microstrip Tracker (SMT) groups, and the existing mechanical support staff.  The need to address issues specific to completion of the individual detectors has limited the effort available to address integration and installation issues.  A concerted effort by the new tracker integration and installation group has begun.

Director’s Review Dec 1999 Tracker Region

Director’s Review Dec 1999 Basic Tracker Installation Sequence at D0  Install CFT, make all readout and purge gas connections, and begin check-out  Install central silicon, connect cables, cooling, dry gas, monitoring, and interlocks and begin check-out  Install H-disks, connect cables, cooling, dry gas, monitoring, and interlocks and begin check-out  Perform full system checks

Director’s Review Dec 1999 Tracker Installation Considerations  Safety u Procedures must be developed and documented. u JHA’s must be written. u Personnel must receive the appropriate training to properly perform their work. u ORC’s must be obtained before each critical operation is initiated.  Steps at D0 before CFT arrival u Preliminary surveys are completed. u The CFT gas system and associated lines are installed and tested. u Half of the VLPC readout cassettes are installed and tested.  CFT readout bundles u Bundles to the platform are installed after the CFT is in place. All CFT bundles on a given face of the Central Calorimeter must be in place before silicon cables are installed on that face.

Director’s Review Dec 1999 Tracker Installation Considerations  Steps at D0 before silicon arrival u The silicon cables and readout electronics are installed and checked from adapter boards on the face of the central calorimeter onward towards the platform. u The silicon cooling system is installed. u The silicon dry gas system and associated lines are installed and tested.  Silicon steps at Lab C and Lab 3 u The central silicon support cylinder is pre- aligned with the CFT at Lab 3. A reproducible connection is provided. u Central silicon modules are cabled, checked, and pre-aligned within the support cylinder at Lab C. u Reproducible H-disk mounts are pre- aligned with the CFT at Lab 3. u All silicon modules are fully tested.

Director’s Review Dec 1999 Tracker Region Before and After CFT Installation

Director’s Review Dec 1999 CFT Move and Installation at D0  CFT Move u The CFT remains on its nesting cart during the move to D0. A sheet metal enclosure and vinyl sheeting surround it.  CFT Installation at D0 u Installation relies upon techniques developed for installation of the solenoid magnet. u An installation I-beam is lifted by crane and placed through the CFT. u Fixturing spanning between the 3 and 9 o’clock support points is attached to each end of the CFT. u Carriages are placed between the fixturing and the I-beam and temporarily fastened to the beam.

Director’s Review Dec 1999 CFT Installation Fixturing

Director’s Review Dec 1999 CFT Installation Fixturing

Director’s Review Dec 1999 Clearances When the Solenoid Was Installed

Director’s Review Dec 1999 CFT Mechanical Installation u The I-beam, with the CFT as a counterweight, is lifted by crane, placed through the solenoid, and then supported from structures built up from the D0 center beam. u Hydraulic jacks under each end of the I- beam allow vertical positioning. u The CFT is rolled into position and lowered onto shim packs between brackets extending from the solenoid and brackets extending from the barrel 6 to 7 CFT connecting ring. u Purge gas lines for the CFT are connected and purging is initiated.

Director’s Review Dec 1999 CFT Installation  CFT alignment u A survey crew or survey equipment will be needed during the following alignment operations u Shim packs are adjusted to provide equal bearing on the four support locations and proper vertical and azimuthal alignment. The I-beam and its jacks serve as a lifting fixture for this operation. u After the 3 and 9 o’clock mounts have been adjusted, 6 o’clock mounts, which position only horizontally, are adjusted. Position along the beam line is locked at only one end.  The carriage and I-beam are removed.  Both ends of the CFT are cabled with clear readout bundles.

Director’s Review Dec 1999 CFT Installation  Checks associated with installation u Check-out with light pulsers commences as clear readout bundles are connected. u Check-out with cosmic rays commences when significant portions have been connected.

Director’s Review Dec 1999 Central Silicon Transport to D0  Shipping container u A padded shipping container is used to transport the central silicon tracker and the beam pipe from Lab C. Internal framing is likely to be needed. u The silicon, low mass cables, and beam pipe are bagged as a unit within the shipping container. A dry nitrogen atmosphere is provided.  Low mass cables u The cables have already been connected to HDI’s and anchored to the support cylinder. u The 360 cables per end emerge in 18 bundles of 20 cables each. u The bundle length beyond the end of the support cylinder is about 78”. The total cable weight extending beyond each end is about 15 pounds. u Bundles are coiled into separate bags of perhaps 9 bundles each.

Director’s Review Dec 1999 Central Silicon Transport to D0  Cooling manifolds u Manifolds extend to the ends of the support cylinder, which holds them. They have been connected to modules and used during Lab C testing.  Beam pipe u The 97” beryllium beam pipe will have previously been installed through the silicon. u It is supported by the end flanges of the silicon support cylinder. Its transverse motion is limited by internal dividers within the support cylinder. u The beam pipe has been baked-out, leak checked, back-filled with nitrogen, and sealed.

Director’s Review Dec 1999 Central Silicon Installation

Director’s Review Dec 1999 Central Silicon Installation at D0  Transport at D0 u A frame will be provided to lift the silicon support cylinder by its end flanges and support the bundles of low mass cables. The support cylinder, in turn, holds the beam pipe.  Preparation of installation fixturing u A 4 mm thick carbon-fiber cradle, extending approximately  45 o from 6 o’clock, is installed through barrel 1 of the CFT. It rests on the CFT barrel 1 end rings and on an external stand built up from the D0 center beam. u A plastic sheet is placed upon the cradle to aid in moving the silicon tracker.

Director’s Review Dec 1999 Central Silicon Installation  Mechanical Installation u The silicon tracker is lifted from its shipping container and placed upon the installation cradle. u Low mass cable bundles are transferred from the lifting frame to the plastic sheet on the installation cradle as silicon installation progresses. u The plastic sheet on the installation cradle is drawn through the CFT carrying the central silicon and beam pipe with it. u The weight of low mass cable bundles is transferred to brackets on the CC face once the silicon support cylinder nears its final longitudinal position. u Upper half rings are pinned and screwed between the end flanges of the silicon support cylinder and the end rings of CFT barrel 1. The installation cradle is used as a lifting fixture during this operation.

Director’s Review Dec 1999 Central Silicon Installation u The installation cradle is lowered and removed. (Radial clearance ~ 3 mm). u Lower half rings are pinned and screwed between the end flanges of the silicon support cylinder and the end rings of CFT barrel 1.

Director’s Review Dec 1999 Central Silicon Installation  Connection of services u Silicon cooling connections are made at each end of the support cylinder. Lines are anchored from the inner surface of CFT barrel 3, the solenoid, and the CC face. Thermal insulation is added. Leak checking of the cooling system commences. u Dry gas lines to the central silicon region are connected and anchored from the inner surface of CFT barrel 3, the solenoid, and the CC face. Purging is initiated with dry air. u Lines for dewpoint and cooling system temperature, flow, and pressure sensors are connected, anchored, and checked. Sensors are inter-calibrated. u The monitoring and interlock system is checked. u When these checks have been completed, flow of coolant, with the coolant temperature limited so that it is above the dewpoint, is begun.

Director’s Review Dec 1999 Silicon Installation  Beam pipe u A dry nitrogen purge is established through the beam pipe as soon as the pipe is in its installed position. The purge must be properly vented.  Low mass cables u Low mass cables are dressed along the inner surface of CFT barrel 3 and anchored to the surface. u Connecting of low mass cables to adapter boards is begun on one face of the CC and progresses to the other. u The cables are dressed and anchored to the CC face as they are installed. u HDI’s are individually powered and checked as their cables are connected.  F-disk radiation monitors u Cables for radiation monitors on the F- disks are connected, anchored, and checked.

Director’s Review Dec 1999 Central Silicon Installation  Central silicon check u Temporary dry gas enclosures are installed in the H-disk region. u Monitoring and interlocks are checked again. u The coolant temperature is lowered to a temperature conservatively above the observed dewpoint of the central silicon region. u The full central silicon system is powered and checked before H-disks are installed.

Director’s Review Dec 1999 H-disks Installed, ECS Moved onto Centerbeam

Director’s Review Dec 1999 H-disk Installation  Preparations for H-disk installation u Power is removed from the central silicon. u The coolant temperature is raised until it is conservatively above the ambient dewpoint. u Coolant flow is halted. u The temporary dry gas enclosures are removed from the H-disk region.  H-disk installation u H-disks are individually installed with the aid of a handheld installation fixture. u Kinematic mount halves are joined to their mates previously installed on the inner surface of CFT barrel 3. u H-disk cables, cooling lines, and dry gas purge lines are connected, anchored, and checked. u Coolant flow is resumed once all H-disks have been installed and connected. u Each H-disk is powered and checked.

Director’s Review Dec 1999 Silicon Installation  Completion of installation u Cables for radiation monitors on the H- disks are connected, anchored, and checked. u Dry gas enclosures are completed. u Sensors, monitors, and interlocks are rechecked.  Cooldown to operating temperature and final check-out begin.

Director’s Review Dec 1999 Beam Pipe Connected, EC’s Closed

Director’s Review Dec 1999 CFT Alignment Prior to Installation  Survey balls mounted on the barrel 6 to 7 connecting rings at each end of the CFT provide a reference system.  Individual barrels are aligned relative to each other during “nesting” and their positions are measured relative to the survey balls.  The survey balls provide the primary reference thereafter.  The alignment process relies heavily upon the Lab 3 LK coordinate measuring machine (CMM).  Custom touch probe extensions may be needed for some alignment processes.

Director’s Review Dec 1999 Central Silicon to CFT Alignment  Work at Lab 3 u The silicon support cylinder (without silicon) is aligned within CFT barrel 1 in Lab 3 after all CFT barrels have been nested. u The work relies heavily upon the Lab 3 LK CMM. u The reference system for module installation is established by balls at the ends of the support cylinder u Silicon modules and cables are not present, but weights are used to simulate the deflections they would produce. u Transverse alignment tolerance between the silicon support cylinder and the CFT =  50  m. u Reproducibility of alignment is set by pinning.

Director’s Review Dec 1999 Silicon Module Installation in the Support Cylinder  Module installation and alignment in Lab C u The silicon support cylinder is returned to Lab C and positioned on the LK CMM for module installation. u Weights to simulate those of cables and modules are installed in the support cylinder. Weights are removed as modules are installed. u Module installation progresses from z = 0 outward. u Separable, adjustable kinematic mounts at 3, 6, and 9 o’clock are connected as modules are installed. u The kinematic mounts are adjusted to align each module with respect to the support cylinder to  10  m. Alignment is performed with the aid of the Lab C LK CMM.

Director’s Review Dec 1999 Silicon Module Installation at Lab C  Connections, checks, and services u Cooling lines and temporary cables are connected as modules are installed. u An initial readout check is made as each module installed with cooling limited to the ambient dewpoint. u The cover of the support cylinder is installed after all modules are in place. u Final readout cables are installed, connected, and anchored. u Individual modules are checked again as final cables are installed. u When all cables are in place, module alignment is re-measured and adjusted. u A temporary dry gas enclosure is installed and modules are checked at operating temperature.

Director’s Review Dec 1999 H-disk Alignment  H-disk mounts and Lab 3 work u Mounts rely upon three balls in slots to establish reproducibility. A single screw holds each separable mount assembly together. u Reproducibility of the separable mounts is  3  m. u Leaf springs constrain in two directions and allow motion in the third. u Mounts are brought into CFT barrel 3 using an installation plate and a six axis adjustment system. u The Lab 3 CMM provides positioning information. u The mounts are epoxied into place. Then they are disconnected so that one mount half can remain on CFT barrel 3 and the other can be removed along with the installation plate.

Director’s Review Dec 1999 H-disk Alignment  H-disk installation at D0 u Final installation at D0 is performed with the aid of a hand-held lifting plate. u Each disk is lifted into position and fastened with individual screws at 3, 6, and 9 o’clock. u Then the lifting plate is removed and a fourth screw, which aids in z-positioning only, is added at 12 o’clock.

Director’s Review Dec 1999 Manpower for Tracker Integration and Installation  Manpower remains to be identified by name. Effort listed is based upon resource needs of the D0 schedule.

Director’s Review Dec 1999 Tech Effort for Tracker Integration and Installation

Director’s Review Dec 1999 Conclusions  A group responsible for tracker integration and installation has been formed.  Much progress has been made to understand the steps for installing the CFT and silicon.  Manpower remains to be identified in detail.