1© Nokia Siemens Networks Workshop on Socio-Economic Issues of NGI / Kilkki / 28.6.2007 Next Generation Internet and Quality of Experience Kalevi Kilkki.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Network Resource Broker for IPTV in Cloud Computing Lei Liang, Dan He University of Surrey, UK OGF 27, G2C Workshop 15 Oct 2009 Banff,
Advertisements

All rights reserved © 2006, Alcatel Grid Standardization & ETSI (May 2006) B. Berde, Alcatel R & I.
New content-centric and user-centric network architectures based on multidisciplinary research convergence Dr. Federico Alvarez Universidad Politécnica.
Personalized Presentation in Web-Based Information Systems Institute of Informatics and Software Engineering Faculty of Informatics and Information Technologies.
ITU Workshop on “Quality of Service and Quality of Experience of Multimedia Services in Emerging Networks” (Istanbul, Turkey, 9-11 February 2015) Overview.
Towards a Framework for QoE Sergio Beker and Frédéric Guyard Orange Labs, Sophia-Antipolis, France.
Version : 11 December 2008 Workshop on “Monitoring Quality of Service and Quality of Experience of Multimedia Services in Broadband/Internet Networks”
Council International Study Programs Internet Site Design March 12, 2001.
OASIS Reference Model for Service Oriented Architecture 1.0
Quality of Service in IN-home digital networks Alina Albu 22 July 2003.
EE442—Multimedia Networking Jane Dong California State University, Los Angeles.
Quality of Service in IN-home digital networks Alina Albu 23 October 2003.
Internet Protocol Television
REQUIREMENTS FOR MULTIMEDIA PROCESSING MULTIMEDIA SYSTEMS IREK DEFEE.
Security Models for Trusting Network Appliances From : IEEE ( 2002 ) Author : Colin English, Paddy Nixon Sotirios Terzis, Andrew McGettrick Helen Lowe.
Steering Group. Past work Ideas From Visits Strategies –what are strategies –how do they relate to interactional properties Discreet states & transition.
1 IS112 – Chapter 1 Notes Computer Organization and Programming Professor Catherine Dwyer Fall 2005.
Electronic Commerce Semester 1 Term 1 Lecture 2. Forces Fuelling E-Commerce Interest in e-commerce is being fuelled by: –Economic forces –Customer interaction.
SE 555 Software Requirements & Specification 1 SE 555 Software Requirements & Specification Prototyping.
Receiver-driven Layered Multicast Paper by- Steven McCanne, Van Jacobson and Martin Vetterli – ACM SIGCOMM 1996 Presented By – Manoj Sivakumar.
Doc.: IEEE /1159r1 Submission Sept 2013 Guoqing Li (Intel)Slide 1 Video Performance Requirements and Simulation Parameters Date: Authors:
Track B: Sales, Marketing & Business Development Workshop B-2: Customer Service: It’s About More Than Just Answering the Phone.
Process: A Generic View
Submission doc.: IEEE 11-14/0026r1 January 2014 Yong Liu, et al.Slide 1 Thoughts on HEW PAR Date: Authors:
COnvergence of fixed and Mobile BrOadband access/aggregation networks Work programme topic: ICT Future Networks Type of project: Large scale integrating.
1 © NOKIA Antreon.ppt Sensible design principles for new networks and services IRoNet Seminar 17th February 2005 Kalevi Kilkki Principal Scientist, Nokia.
Margaret J. Cox King’s College London
Computing Department A Utility-based QoS Model for Emerging Multimedia Applications Mu Mu, Andreas Mauthe Computing Department, Lancaster University Lancaster,
End user-perceived quality estimation in accordance with the correlation between QoS/QoE on Internet of Services dr. Rasa Bruzgiene, dr. Lina Narbutaite,
Introduction to Multimedia Networking (2) Advanced Multimedia University of Palestine University of Palestine Eng. Wisam Zaqoot Eng. Wisam Zaqoot October.
Writing with Multimedia Tracking the Evolution of Language.
Intelligent and Adaptive Middleware to Improve User-Perceived QoS in Multimedia Applications Pedro M. Ruiz, Juan A. Botia, Antonio Gomez-Skarmeta University.
AIMS’99 Workshop AIMS’99 ATM-IP-Multimedia Services for the next Millennium Heinz Brüggemann Project Supervisor
2 Systems Architecture, Fifth Edition Chapter Goals Describe the activities of information systems professionals Describe the technical knowledge of computer.
System Management for Virtualization and Automation in a Dynamic Data Center SVM’08 Munich Karsten Beins, Sen. Director Infrastructure Technology.
SCSC 311 Information Systems: hardware and software.
Chapter 5: Summary r principles behind data link layer services: m error detection, correction m multiple access protocols m link layer addressing, ARP.
TEAMWORK WORKSHOP ICOM5047 Design Project in Computer Engineering J. Fernando Vega-Riveros, Ph.D. Associate Professor – ECE Dpt.
Computing Fundamentals Module Lesson 19 — Using Technology to Solve Problems Computer Literacy BASICS.
IP Networking & MEDIACOM 2004 Workshop April 2001 Geneva Characterising End to End Quality of Service in TIPHON Systems Characterising End to End.
Object-Oriented Software Engineering Practical Software Development using UML and Java Chapter 1: Software and Software Engineering.
Computational Challenges in E-Commerce By Joan Feigenbaum, David C.Parkes, and David M.Pennock Presented by Wu Jingyuan.
LOGO Evaluating Quality-in-Use Using Bayesian Networks M.A. Moraga 1, M.F. Bertoa 2, M.C. Morcillo 2, C. Calero 1, A. Vallecillo 2 1 Universidad de Castilla-La.
Software Engineering Principles Principles form the basis of methods, techniques, methodologies and tools Principles form the basis of methods, techniques,
Object-Oriented Software Engineering Practical Software Development using UML and Java Chapter 1: Software and Software Engineering.
1 Presented by Jari Korhonen Centre for Quantifiable Quality of Service in Communication Systems (Q2S) Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU)
Combining Theory and Systems Building Experiences and Challenges Sotirios Terzis University of Strathclyde.
GSC /04/2003 SOURCE:TSACC TITLE:End to end Quality of Service AGENDA ITEM: DECISIONX DISCUSSION INFORMATION End to End Quality of Service.
Rational Unified Process Fundamentals Module 7: Process for e-Business Development Rational Unified Process Fundamentals Module 7: Process for e-Business.
Computing Fundamentals Module Lesson 6 — Using Technology to Solve Problems Computer Literacy BASICS.
Measuring How Good Your Search Engine Is. *. Information System Evaluation l Before 1993 evaluations were done using a few small, well-known corpora of.
E VALUATING YOUR E - LEARNING COURSE LTU Workshop 11 March 2008.
AIMS’99 Workshop Heidelberg, May 1999 Assessing Audio Visual Quality P905 - AQUAVIT Assessment of Quality for audio-visual signals over Internet.
Winter 2011SEG Chapter 11 Chapter 1 (Part 1) Review from previous courses Subject 1: The Software Development Process.
Oman College of Management and Technology Course – MM Topic 7 Production and Distribution of Multimedia Titles CS/MIS Department.
Search Engine Optimization © HiTech Institute. All rights reserved. Slide 1 Click to edit Master title style What is Business Analysis Body of Knowledge?
Doc.: IEEE /223r0 Submission July 2000 Taylor Salman, Opnet TechnologiesSlide 1 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area.
Submission doc.: IEEE /1158r0 September 2013 William Carney (SONY)Slide 1 Video Traffic and Applications for HEW Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /1162r1 Submission Sept 2013 Guoqing Li (Intel)Slide 1 Video Application Categories and Characteristics Date: Authors: NameAffiliationsAddressPhone .
© 2016 TM Forum | 1 Virtual CPE Platform in the Home.
WATRA/ARTP REGIONAL WORKSHOP
Introduction to Machine Learning, its potential usage in network area,
Chapter 1 Computer Technology: Your Need to Know
What is a CAT? What is a CAT?.
2 ATIS 5G OVERVIEW ATIS launched its 5G Ad Hoc in 2015 to advance regulatory imperatives, deliver an evolutionary path, address co-existence of technologies,
1st Draft for Defining IoT (1)
The Systems Engineering Context
Mobile Computing.
Distribution, sale, marketing
Presentation transcript:

1© Nokia Siemens Networks Workshop on Socio-Economic Issues of NGI / Kilkki / Next Generation Internet and Quality of Experience Kalevi Kilkki EuroFGI IA.7.6 Workshop on Socio-Economic Issues of NGI Santander, Spain June 2007

2© Nokia Siemens Networks Workshop on Socio-Economic Issues of NGI / Kilkki / Content What is Quality of Experience? How could we analyze it?

3© Nokia Siemens Networks Workshop on Socio-Economic Issues of NGI / Kilkki / Historical perspective: Papers in IEEE database QoS vs. QoE Quality of Service or QoS Quality of Experience or QoE Terms in abstract Relative share of QoS papers with the keyword 1 = average share of QoS papers over all networking papers Too many QoS papers is bad for any networking technology because the scope of QoS is too narrow

4© Nokia Siemens Networks Workshop on Socio-Economic Issues of NGI / Kilkki / Very brief literature study about Quality of Experience Quotations from QoE papers Liu Li-yuan, et al, 2006 “The function of quality of experience (QoE) evaluation includes two aspects: to monitor the experience of user on-line, then to control and justify the service based on the QoE to ensure that the quality of service can highly meet the requirements of the user.” Lopez, et al, 2006 “Quality of experience (QoE) has been defined as an extension of the traditional quality of service (QoS) in the sense that QoE provides information regarding the delivered services from an end-user point of view.” Some more references in extra slides

5© Nokia Siemens Networks Workshop on Socio-Economic Issues of NGI / Kilkki / What does QoE mean? Definition = meaning (not purpose) It is questionable to define QoE as an extension of something (QoS), or through a specific goal (optimization of service). Wikipedia In business terminology QoE is also known as "Quality of User Experience," and is a subjective measure of a customer's experiences with a vendor. QoE as regards telecommunications networks is a purely subjective measure from the user’s perspective of the overall value of the service provided. Obviously some confusion about the genuine meaning of QoE Let us take a somewhat broader view

6© Nokia Siemens Networks Workshop on Socio-Economic Issues of NGI / Kilkki / The big picture: Ecosystem modeling Communications ecosystem is immensely complex To manage the complexity, it can be divided into three areas Human behavior Business analysis Technical performance Ultimate goal is to give credible estimates about benefits obtained by persons, user and customer behavior, and business opportunity (€) Application Service provider User Network operator Network Customer Device Device vendor Content owner Group member Person € €

7© Nokia Siemens Networks Workshop on Socio-Economic Issues of NGI / Kilkki / Modeling human behavior Person with different roles Person when thinking about fundamental needs and overall satisfaction User when using applications or services Customer when selecting and buying products and services Group member when interacting with others Quality of Experience is related to all roles User Customer Person Application Group member Network QoS QoE MOS Mean Opinion Score Vendor / Provider Marketing

8© Nokia Siemens Networks Workshop on Socio-Economic Issues of NGI / Kilkki / Dictionary approach Dictionary Experience: the totality of a person's perceptions, feelings, and memories Quality: the basic character or nature of something  QoE: the basic nature of a person's perceptions, feelings, and memories – far-reaching definition, hard to apply in a concrete analysis Still, we may keep QoE as the most generic concept, and then define additional terms for each role From modeling viewpoint that is the most reasonable approach Person QoE

9© Nokia Siemens Networks Workshop on Socio-Economic Issues of NGI / Kilkki / What are the sub-concepts? Quality of User Experience (QUE) Quality of Customer Experience (QCE) Quality of Group Experience (QGE)? Quality of xxx Experience (Q?E) Google hits Quality of Experience Quality of User Experience Quality of Customer Experience Quality of Group Experience 9 Quality of Service Mean Opinion Score User Customer Person Group member QoS QoE MOS Application Network QUE QCE QGE ?

10© Nokia Siemens Networks Workshop on Socio-Economic Issues of NGI / Kilkki / An approach to model QUE Application User behavior User experience Motivation Perceived value User Pricing Service provider Person 36 €/month current cost per session (time * effort + money) 50 QUE measure

11© Nokia Siemens Networks Workshop on Socio-Economic Issues of NGI / Kilkki / End-user model – improving quality Application User behavior User experience Motivation Perceived value User Pricing Service provider Person +19 € +10 sessions +30% The value of service is deemed 30% higher because of improved display properties

12© Nokia Siemens Networks Workshop on Socio-Economic Issues of NGI / Kilkki / End-user model – improving usability Application User behavior User experience Motivation Perceived value User Pricing Service provider Person +12 € +16 sessions -0.2 €/session Service is easier to use (30 s/session)  cost of session is decreased by 0.2 €

13© Nokia Siemens Networks Workshop on Socio-Economic Issues of NGI / Kilkki / End-user model – improving network Application User behavior User experience Motivation Perceived value User Pricing Service provider Person +4 € +6 sessions success rate +12% Service availability is improved from 80% to 90% Network

14© Nokia Siemens Networks Workshop on Socio-Economic Issues of NGI / Kilkki / Summary Quality of Experience Key concept when we try to understand what the Next Generation Internet is able to provide to end-users (to us!) Covers all relevant aspects that define how satisfied a person is with a service Shall be divided into sub- concepts (because analysis must be modular in any case) The ultimate objective is to assess how users and customers behave with new service e.g. provided by Next Generation Internet – A lot work is needed to accomplish this task User Customer Person Group member QoS QoE MOS Application Network QUE QCE QGE ?

15© Nokia Siemens Networks Workshop on Socio-Economic Issues of NGI / Kilkki / Comments or questions?

16© Nokia Siemens Networks Workshop on Socio-Economic Issues of NGI / Kilkki / Abstract Quality of Service (QoS) was the Term ten years ago. Particularly QoS was the answer to the question why should telecom operators and providers rely on ATM rather than on best effort Internet. Obviously, a network with QoS was able to provide better service than a network without QoS. However, this QoS viewpoint was pretty technical, while end-users are not usually at all bothered about technical performance. What they really care about is the experience they are able to obtain, and Internet provided, even without any QoS mechanisms, a lot of new experiences, like web-browsing, and search engines. Thus if and when we want to make realistic analysis what network technologies and services will succeed, we must consider very seriously what are the real issues that define the real behavior of end-users. Quality of Experience (QoE, sometimes QoX) is a key term in this task. QoE is a subjective measure from the user's perspective of the overall value of the service provided. QoS is just one, often minor ingredient of Quality of Experience analysis. Other essential issues include the expectations of the end-users, the content of the service, the importance of service for the end-user, the characteristics of the device, and the price of the service. The challenging task of QoE research is to create a framework that is able combine these diverse aspects under a common umbrella in a way that we are able to somehow predict the behavior of end users when new services are offered to them. The talk will discuss about how this task can be carried out. Kalevi Kilkki Principal Scientist Nokia Siemens Networks kalevi.kilkki(at)nsn.com Selected publications available at

17© Nokia Siemens Networks Workshop on Socio-Economic Issues of NGI / Kilkki / Quality of Experience in some papers (IEEE) Heddaya, A.S., An economically scalable Internet, Computer, Vol. 35, Issue 9, Sept. 2002, p. 93 – 95 For example, downloading a two-hour movie to a home entertainment system or PC for later viewing can yield high QoE for the movie-viewing experience, even if the available bandwidth is of low quality in terms of packet loss, packet delay, and bandwidth variation. Pereira, F., A Triple User Characterization Model for Video Adaptation and Quality of Experience Evaluation, 7th Workshop on Multimedia Signal Processing, Oct The notion of 'quality of service' has to evolve to something more encompassing like 'quality of experience' where user satisfaction considers not only the sensorial and perceptual dimensions but also the important emotional dimension. Liu Li-yuan; Zhou Wen-an; Song Jun-de, The Research of Quality of Experience Evaluation Method in Pervasive Computing Environment. 1st International Symposium on Pervasive Computing and Applications, 3-5 Aug. 2006, p The function of quality of experience (QoE) evaluation includes two aspects: to monitor the experience of user on-line, then to control and justify the service based on the QoE to ensure that the quality of service can highly meet the requirements of the user. Zapater, M.N. et al., A Proposed Approach for Quality of Experience Assurance of IPTV, 1st Int. Conf. on the Digital Society, Jan There is a need to ensure quality on an end-to-end basis and at a higher abstraction layer by combining QoS and QoE in one integrated framework. Lopez, D.; Gonzalez, F.; Bellido, L.; Alonso, A., Adaptive multimedia streaming over IP based on customer oriented metrics, International Symposium on Computer Networks, June 2006, p Quality of experience (QoE) has been defined as an extension of the traditional quality of service (QoS) in the sense that QoE provides information regarding the delivered services from an end-user point of view. Siller, M.; Woods, J.C., QoS arbitration for improving the QoE in multimedia transmission, Int. Conf. on Visual Information Engineering, 7-9 July 2003 p This contribution presents a Quality of Experience (QoE) framework. It evaluates QoE using QoS metrics, network feedback, and dynamic user requirements. and proposes a definition for QoE. In (3) QoE is considered as all the perception elements of the network and performance relative to expectations of the users/ subscribers. Patrick, A.S. et al, A QoE sensitive architecture for advanced collaborative environments, First International Conference on Quality of Service in Heterogeneous Wired/Wireless Networks, 2004, p Quality of Experience can be defined as the characteristics of the sensations, perceptions, and opinions of people as they interact with their environments.