VANDERBILT EVIDENCE-BASED PRACTICE CENTER Katherine E. Hartmann, MD, PhD Lucius E. Burch Chair, Obstetrics and Gynecology Deputy Director, Institute for.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Evidence-based Dental Practice Developing guidelines or clinical recommendations Slide #1 This lecture follows the previous online lecture on evidence.
Advertisements

CHILD HEALTH NURSING.
Fundamentals of Quality Health Research FH Health Research Intelligence Group.
PRESENTATION ON SAFETY ISSUES RELEVANT TO HOME BIRTHS AND THE PROFESSIONALS WHO PROVIDE MATERNITY CARE SEPTEMBER 20, 2012 The Maryland Chapter of the American.
EVIDENCE BASED MEDICINE for Beginners
Evidence-Based Medicine Week 3 - Prognosis Department of Medicine - Residency Training Program Tuesdays, 9:00 a.m. - 11:30 a.m., UW Health Sciences Library.
1 Teaching Cultural Competency: A Review of the Literature Sunita Mutha MD 1,2, Carol Allen MA 1, Cynthia Salinas MD 3, Arnab Mukherjea MPH 4 1 The Network.
Evidenced Based Practice; Systematic Reviews; Critiquing Research
METHODS OF CLOSURE FOR GASTROSCHISIS AND OMPHALOCELE
Archiving electronic data: example from the NPEU Peter Brocklehurst National Perinatal Epidemiology Unit Oxford.
Premature Labor Assessment Toolkit (PLAT)
Systematic Reviews and the American Academy of Pediatrics Virginia A. Moyer, MD, MPH Professor of Pediatrics Baylor College of Medicine.
Chapter 7. Getting Closer: Grading the Literature and Evaluating the Strength of the Evidence.
Cara Pessel, MD et al American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 2013.
Guidance for Industry Establishing Pregnancy Registries Pregnancy Registry Working Group Pregnancy Labeling Taskforce March, 2000 Evelyn M. Rodriguez M.D.,
By Dr. Ahmed Mostafa Assist. Prof. of anesthesia & I.C.U. Evidence-based medicine.
Cohort Studies Hanna E. Bloomfield, MD, MPH Professor of Medicine Associate Chief of Staff, Research Minneapolis VA Medical Center.
METHODOLOGY AND FIRST TWO YEARS OF EXPERIENCE WITH PURLS: A NEW TERTIARY LITERATURE REVIEW SYSTEM Kate Rowland, MD Umang Sharma, MD University of Chicago.
Studying treatment of suicidal ideation & attempts: Designs, Statistical Analysis, and Methodological Considerations Jill M. Harkavy-Friedman, Ph.D.
Developing Research Proposal Systematic Review Mohammed TA, Omar Ph.D. PT Rehabilitation Health Science.
Heidi Beck & Eva Yuen NUTN 514 February 11, 2008.
Criteria and Standard.
Their contribution to knowledge Morag Heirs. Research Fellow Centre for Reviews and Dissemination University of York PhD student (NIHR funded) Health.
Diane Paul, PhD, CCC-SLP Director, Clinical Issues In Speech-Language Pathology American Speech-Language-Hearing Association
Evidence-based Checkup for Patient Education Web Sites Suzanne Austin Boren, MHA Center for Health Care Quality University of Missouri
1 Knowledge Transfer Experiences in Obstetrics: A Systematic Review of Evidence-based Strategies to effectively change behaviors Nils Chaillet, Ph.D :
Overview of operational research in MSF Myriam Henkens, MD, MPH International Medical Coordinator MSF London 1st of June, 2006.
SMFM Clinical Practice Guidelines
دکتر خلیلی 1. Lucid the way to “ Research” And Follow an “ Evidence Based Medicine”
Systematic Reviews.
Susan Tolivaisa Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Evaluating Emerging Technologies: Is the Future Now?
Introduction to MAST Kristian Kidholm Odense University Hospital, Denmark.
Moving towards measurable outcomes in maternal and child health
Evidence-Based Public Health Nancy Allee, MLS, MPH University of Michigan November 6, 2004.
Challenges in Evidence Synthesis for Gynecologic Care Katherine E. Hartmann, MD, PhD Vanderbilt Evidence-based Practice Center September 20, 2011.
Evidence Review Group: Past to Present James M. Perrin, MD Professor of Pediatrics, Harvard Medical School MGH Center for Child and Adolescent Health Policy.
Periodontal Health and Birth Outcomes Secretary’s Advisory Committee on Infant Mortality – SACIM November 30, 2006 M. Ann Drum, DDS, MPH, Director Department.
Determining Acceptable Waiting Times for the Surgical Treatment of Solid Organ Malignancies - A Systematic Review CIHR Grant: Toward Canadian Benchmarks.
Cultural Competency in an Osteopathic Curriculum Presented by: Mary Pat Wohlford-Wessels, Ph.D. Vice President for Institutional Research and Effectiveness.
Evidence-Based Medicine Presentation [Insert your name here] [Insert your designation here] [Insert your institutional affiliation here] Department of.
Clinical Writing for Interventional Cardiologists.
Evidence-Based Medicine: What does it really mean? Sports Medicine Rounds November 7, 2007.
Systematic Review Module 3: Study Eligibility Criteria Melissa McPheeters, PhD, MPH Associate Director Vanderbilt University Evidence-based Practice Center.
Conducting a Sound Systematic Review: Balancing Resources with Quality Control Eric B. Bass, MD, MPH Johns Hopkins University Evidence-based Practice Center.
Selecting Evidence for Comparative Effectiveness Reviews Melissa McPheeters, PhD., MPH Associate Director, Vanderbilt University Evidence-based Practice.
Wipanee Phupakdi, MD September 15, Overview  Define EBM  Learn steps in EBM process  Identify parts of a well-built clinical question  Discuss.
When to Select Observational Studies Interactive Case Study Quiz: Dan Jonas, MD, MPH Meera Viswanathan, PhD Karen Crotty, PhD, MPH RTI-UNC Evidence-based.
Incorporating Preconception Health into MCH Services
Type Your Title Here Author’s First Name Last Name, degree,…. Mentor’s First Name Last Name, degree Dept. Name here, NYU Lutheran Medical Center, Brooklyn,
When To Select Observational Studies Interactive Quiz Prepared for: The Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) Training Modules for Systematic.
Sifting through the evidence Sarah Fradsham. Types of Evidence Primary Literature Observational studies Case Report Case Series Case Control Study Cohort.
EBM --- Journal Reading Presenter :呂宥達 Date : 2005/10/27.
Finding, Evaluating, and Presenting Evidence Sharon E. Lock, PhD, ARNP NUR 603 Spring, 2001.
Lecture 2: Evidence Level and Types of Research. Do you recommend flossing to your patients? Of course YES! Because: I have been taught to. I read textbooks.
European Patients’ Academy on Therapeutic Innovation Ethical and practical challenges of organising clinical trials in small populations.
Overview of Palliative Care Suzann Bonzo, MD. The Greatest Barrier  The greatest barrier to end of life care is Clinicians  Due to the lack of confidence.
Focus on health and care of mothers and infants ChiMat conference, 2009 Professor Mary Renfrew Mother and Infant Research Unit.
Copyright © 2010, 2006, 2002 by Mosby, Inc., an affiliate of Elsevier Inc. Chapter 10 Evidence-Based Practice Sharon E. Lock.
Evidence-Based Mental Health PSYC 377. Structure of the Presentation 1. Describe EBP issues 2. Categorize EBP issues 3. Assess the quality of ‘evidence’
M O N T E N E G R O Negotiating Team for the Accession of Montenegro to the European Union Working Group for Chapter 28 – Consumer and Health Protection.
Ghada Aboheimed, Msc. Review the principles of an evidence based approach to clinical practice. Appreciate the value of EBM Describe the 5 steps of evidence.
Developing a guideline
Screening for Congenital Anomalies in Rural and Urban Mongolia
Evidence-Based Practice I: Definition – What is it?
Evidence-Based Medicine
Chapter 7 The Hierarchy of Evidence
Level of Evidence Lecture 4.
UK trends in selected aspects of paediatric cardiac surgery case mix between 2000 and 2009/2010. UK trends in selected aspects of paediatric cardiac surgery.
Evidence-Based Public Health
Surgical re-excision versus observation for histologically dysplastic nevi: a systematic review of associated clinical outcomes K.T. Vuong1, J. Walker2,
Presentation transcript:

VANDERBILT EVIDENCE-BASED PRACTICE CENTER Katherine E. Hartmann, MD, PhD Lucius E. Burch Chair, Obstetrics and Gynecology Deputy Director, Institute for Medicine and Public Health Director, Vanderbilt Evidence-based Practice Center Evidence Limited to Inform Decisions about Maternal-Fetal Surgery

VANDERBILT EVIDENCE-BASED PRACTICE CENTER Technical Brief Intent Summarizing the state of the field including:  Content of the research  Access to fetal surgery  Training of providers  Ethical aspects  Coverage of procedures  Ongoing studies

VANDERBILT EVIDENCE-BASED PRACTICE CENTER Selection of target conditions  Cardiac malformations  Congenital diaphragmatic hernia  Myelomeningocele  Obstructive uropathy  Sacrococcygeal teratoma  Thoracic lesions (Congenital Pulmonary Airway Malformations)  Twin-twin transfusion syndrome

VANDERBILT EVIDENCE-BASED PRACTICE CENTER Review Team & Expert Panel Selection  Fetal sonographers/echocardiographers  Maternal-fetal medicine specialists  Perinatal geneticists  Pediatric surgeons  “Fetal” surgeons  Neonatologists  Biomedical ethicists  Generalists prenatal care providers  Familiarity with perinatal hospice

VANDERBILT EVIDENCE-BASED PRACTICE CENTER State of the Evidence Methods  PubMed, MEDLINE (no date limits)  English, ≥ 2 cases, condition of interest, fetal intervention, training information, outcomes including quality of life (for mother or fetus)  Included RCT, cohorts with comparison, case-control, and case series

VANDERBILT EVIDENCE-BASED PRACTICE CENTER State of the Evidence Review Methods  Dual review of abstracts  Dual review of articles  Extraction of descriptive data into standardized forms: – study design and setting – fetal and maternal inclusion criteria – training of providers – outcomes measured – length of follow up

VANDERBILT EVIDENCE-BASED PRACTICE CENTER Disposition of the Literature  Abstracts: 1382  Articles: 620  Relevant studies: 166  Study designs RCTS: 3 Cohort studies: 47 Case series: 116  Studies from US: 74

VANDERBILT EVIDENCE-BASED PRACTICE CENTER Cardiac Malformations Studies (n=9) Pulmonary atresia with intact ventricular septum—2 case series Aortic stenosis—8 case series Hypoplastic left heart syndrome and intact atrial septum—3 case series State of the Science 90 pregnancies in literature 1 study provided infant outcomes beyond hospital stay Maternal inclusion criteria poorly reported No data on long term survival or neurologic outcomes

VANDERBILT EVIDENCE-BASED PRACTICE CENTER Congenital Diaphragmatic Hernia Studies (n=21) 1 RCT 3 prospective cohorts 5 retrospective cohorts 2 prospective case series 10 retrospective case series State of the Science Fetal inclusion criteria well- reported; 9 of 21 reported maternal criteria Few measured outcomes beyond hospital stay (8/21) Longest reported infant follow up: months Long term maternal outcomes addressed in 2 studies

VANDERBILT EVIDENCE-BASED PRACTICE CENTER Cardiac Diaphragmatic hernia Myelomening- ocele Obstructive uropathy Sacrococcygeal teratoma Thoracic lesions Twin-twin transfusion Total Literature (n=9)(n=21)(n=11)(n=25)(n=5)(n=11)(n=84)(n=166) U.S European Asian Other Overview

VANDERBILT EVIDENCE-BASED PRACTICE CENTER Cardiac Diaphragmatic hernia Myelomening- ocele Obstructive uropathy Sacrococcygeal teratoma Thoracic lesions Twin-twin transfusion Total Literature Study Type Case series Retro. cohort Prospective cohort Randomized clinical trial Overview

VANDERBILT EVIDENCE-BASED PRACTICE CENTER Cardiac Diaphragmatic hernia Myelomening- ocele Obstructive uropathy Sacrococcygeal teratoma Thoracic lesions Twin-twin transfusions Total Literature Last infant assessment Birth ≤ 6 mos > 6 to ≤ 12 mos > 12 mos Unknown Overview

VANDERBILT EVIDENCE-BASED PRACTICE CENTER Child Developmental Status Any Maternal Outcomes Cardiac malformations 0/9 4/9 CDH 7/21 11/21 Myelomeningocele 3/11 4/11 Obstructive uropathy 5/25 2/25 Sacrococcygeal teratoma 0 3/5 Thoracic lesions 2/11 1/11 Twin-twin transfusion syndrome 13/844/84 Outcomes reported

VANDERBILT EVIDENCE-BASED PRACTICE CENTER Challenges for the field include: Rare conditions with no method to consolidate new cases Cases accrue slowly - innovations change the benefit equation Clinical and research classifications of fetal anomalies vary Spontaneous regression/stabilization occurs Prognosis cannot be determined with high accuracy Changes in the spectrum of disease reduces comparability to prior natural history studies of anticipated outcomes Intervention techniques change rapidly Higher SES patients are over-represented Regionalization of care needs consideration No formal plan for certified training programs exists

VANDERBILT EVIDENCE-BASED PRACTICE CENTER Strategies to Reduce Evidence Gaps Continue to develop consensus operational definitions Enhance attention to common data elements Use valid and reliable tools for outcomes Support platforms for cooperative data sharing Use analyses to help define equipoise for trials Develop new methods for funding and cost sharing Establish a consistent set of ethical standards for research in the field

VANDERBILT EVIDENCE-BASED PRACTICE CENTER Challenges for Technical Brief Process  Content of the research: organizing classification, defining families, resisting urge to cross into outcomes  Access to fetal surgery: identifying pool of experts - able to establish via direct communication with those who publish  Training of providers: identifying sites - able to establish  Ethical aspects: balancing priorities for the report  Coverage: identifying accurate, available sources  Ongoing studies: documenting trials more achievable than other studies

VANDERBILT EVIDENCE-BASED PRACTICE CENTER Technical Brief Conclusions Limited RCT evidence Literature dominated by case series (70% of studies) Lack of clearly described maternal inclusion criteria and long term follow-up for infant or mother Limited outcomes reported: Literature not typical level of quality of studies or aggregate strength of evidence sufficient to guide care