VANDERBILT EVIDENCE-BASED PRACTICE CENTER Katherine E. Hartmann, MD, PhD Lucius E. Burch Chair, Obstetrics and Gynecology Deputy Director, Institute for Medicine and Public Health Director, Vanderbilt Evidence-based Practice Center Evidence Limited to Inform Decisions about Maternal-Fetal Surgery
VANDERBILT EVIDENCE-BASED PRACTICE CENTER Technical Brief Intent Summarizing the state of the field including: Content of the research Access to fetal surgery Training of providers Ethical aspects Coverage of procedures Ongoing studies
VANDERBILT EVIDENCE-BASED PRACTICE CENTER Selection of target conditions Cardiac malformations Congenital diaphragmatic hernia Myelomeningocele Obstructive uropathy Sacrococcygeal teratoma Thoracic lesions (Congenital Pulmonary Airway Malformations) Twin-twin transfusion syndrome
VANDERBILT EVIDENCE-BASED PRACTICE CENTER Review Team & Expert Panel Selection Fetal sonographers/echocardiographers Maternal-fetal medicine specialists Perinatal geneticists Pediatric surgeons “Fetal” surgeons Neonatologists Biomedical ethicists Generalists prenatal care providers Familiarity with perinatal hospice
VANDERBILT EVIDENCE-BASED PRACTICE CENTER State of the Evidence Methods PubMed, MEDLINE (no date limits) English, ≥ 2 cases, condition of interest, fetal intervention, training information, outcomes including quality of life (for mother or fetus) Included RCT, cohorts with comparison, case-control, and case series
VANDERBILT EVIDENCE-BASED PRACTICE CENTER State of the Evidence Review Methods Dual review of abstracts Dual review of articles Extraction of descriptive data into standardized forms: – study design and setting – fetal and maternal inclusion criteria – training of providers – outcomes measured – length of follow up
VANDERBILT EVIDENCE-BASED PRACTICE CENTER Disposition of the Literature Abstracts: 1382 Articles: 620 Relevant studies: 166 Study designs RCTS: 3 Cohort studies: 47 Case series: 116 Studies from US: 74
VANDERBILT EVIDENCE-BASED PRACTICE CENTER Cardiac Malformations Studies (n=9) Pulmonary atresia with intact ventricular septum—2 case series Aortic stenosis—8 case series Hypoplastic left heart syndrome and intact atrial septum—3 case series State of the Science 90 pregnancies in literature 1 study provided infant outcomes beyond hospital stay Maternal inclusion criteria poorly reported No data on long term survival or neurologic outcomes
VANDERBILT EVIDENCE-BASED PRACTICE CENTER Congenital Diaphragmatic Hernia Studies (n=21) 1 RCT 3 prospective cohorts 5 retrospective cohorts 2 prospective case series 10 retrospective case series State of the Science Fetal inclusion criteria well- reported; 9 of 21 reported maternal criteria Few measured outcomes beyond hospital stay (8/21) Longest reported infant follow up: months Long term maternal outcomes addressed in 2 studies
VANDERBILT EVIDENCE-BASED PRACTICE CENTER Cardiac Diaphragmatic hernia Myelomening- ocele Obstructive uropathy Sacrococcygeal teratoma Thoracic lesions Twin-twin transfusion Total Literature (n=9)(n=21)(n=11)(n=25)(n=5)(n=11)(n=84)(n=166) U.S European Asian Other Overview
VANDERBILT EVIDENCE-BASED PRACTICE CENTER Cardiac Diaphragmatic hernia Myelomening- ocele Obstructive uropathy Sacrococcygeal teratoma Thoracic lesions Twin-twin transfusion Total Literature Study Type Case series Retro. cohort Prospective cohort Randomized clinical trial Overview
VANDERBILT EVIDENCE-BASED PRACTICE CENTER Cardiac Diaphragmatic hernia Myelomening- ocele Obstructive uropathy Sacrococcygeal teratoma Thoracic lesions Twin-twin transfusions Total Literature Last infant assessment Birth ≤ 6 mos > 6 to ≤ 12 mos > 12 mos Unknown Overview
VANDERBILT EVIDENCE-BASED PRACTICE CENTER Child Developmental Status Any Maternal Outcomes Cardiac malformations 0/9 4/9 CDH 7/21 11/21 Myelomeningocele 3/11 4/11 Obstructive uropathy 5/25 2/25 Sacrococcygeal teratoma 0 3/5 Thoracic lesions 2/11 1/11 Twin-twin transfusion syndrome 13/844/84 Outcomes reported
VANDERBILT EVIDENCE-BASED PRACTICE CENTER Challenges for the field include: Rare conditions with no method to consolidate new cases Cases accrue slowly - innovations change the benefit equation Clinical and research classifications of fetal anomalies vary Spontaneous regression/stabilization occurs Prognosis cannot be determined with high accuracy Changes in the spectrum of disease reduces comparability to prior natural history studies of anticipated outcomes Intervention techniques change rapidly Higher SES patients are over-represented Regionalization of care needs consideration No formal plan for certified training programs exists
VANDERBILT EVIDENCE-BASED PRACTICE CENTER Strategies to Reduce Evidence Gaps Continue to develop consensus operational definitions Enhance attention to common data elements Use valid and reliable tools for outcomes Support platforms for cooperative data sharing Use analyses to help define equipoise for trials Develop new methods for funding and cost sharing Establish a consistent set of ethical standards for research in the field
VANDERBILT EVIDENCE-BASED PRACTICE CENTER Challenges for Technical Brief Process Content of the research: organizing classification, defining families, resisting urge to cross into outcomes Access to fetal surgery: identifying pool of experts - able to establish via direct communication with those who publish Training of providers: identifying sites - able to establish Ethical aspects: balancing priorities for the report Coverage: identifying accurate, available sources Ongoing studies: documenting trials more achievable than other studies
VANDERBILT EVIDENCE-BASED PRACTICE CENTER Technical Brief Conclusions Limited RCT evidence Literature dominated by case series (70% of studies) Lack of clearly described maternal inclusion criteria and long term follow-up for infant or mother Limited outcomes reported: Literature not typical level of quality of studies or aggregate strength of evidence sufficient to guide care