AE Senior Thesis 2007 Bloomindales Department Store Chevy Chase, MD.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Procurement and Tendering Presentation to [NAME OF CLIENT] [YOUR NAME] [DATE]
Advertisements

Penn State Hershey Medical Center Children’s Hospital Hershey, Pennsylvania Matthew Vandersall Structural Option AE Senior Thesis Dr. Richard Behr.
Construction Management
West Virginia University Alumni Center Gregory Smithmyer | Mechanical Option | Penn State University | April 15, 2009 | Advisor: Dr. Srebric.
C AMPUS S QUARE H ARRISBURG, P ENNSYLVANIA A NDREW M ARTIN | C ONSTRUCTION M ANAGEMENT | A PRIL 12, 2010.
Kyle Goodyear BAE in Construction Management Pennsylvania State University Senior Thesis Presentation April 12, 2010.
Integration of Mechanical System Redesign Geothermal Heat Pump Redesign Wesley S. Lawson Architectural Engineering Mechanical Option Pennsylvania State.
Bowie State University Fine and Performing Arts Center Zachary Lippert Faculty Advisor: Dr. Stephen Treado.
Daniel Bellay Lancaster County Bible Church Structural Option Lancaster County Bible Church.
The Edward St. John Student Center Zachary Haupt Faculty Advisor: Dr. William Bahnfleth 11 April 2011.
Daniel Suter Construction Management AE Senior Thesis Presentation The Pennsylvania State University Unknown Data Center Somewhere, USA
Bethesda Triangle Brian Groark Construction Management Faculty Consultant: Dr. Messner.
360 State Street New Haven  CT  Structural | Sabrina Duk | T. Boothby.
Fisk Corporate Headquarters Houston, Texas Penn State AE Senior Capstone Project Stephen Blanchard – Construction Management Option Advisor: Dr. John Messner.
Presentation Outline Introduction System Optimization Analysis Acoustical Breadth Conclusion Acknowledgements Questions Thesis Final Presentation Army.
Adam Trumbour 2010 AE|CM Introduction Building Overview Thesis Overview Breadth Analysis 1: CHPS Study Breadth Analysis 2: Green Roof Breadth Analysis.
Kennedy Krieger Institute Outpatient Medical Center Baltimore, Marylan d Katie Sennett Construction Management Dr. Messner Spring 2008.
University Medical Center of Princeton David Bodnar Construction Management 2010 Senior Thesis.
KNX – the benefits. Schneider Electric 2 - IS&C – Aug Content ●Basic arguments ●Added value for: ●Investors ●Wholesalers ●Installers and System.
Charles Miller Construction Option Spring Dr. Riley WestEnd25.
Fairfax High School Renovation and Addition Washington, DC M ICHAEL F UNK Construction Management.
Energy Curriculum Advanced Transportation Technology and Energy Initiative.
The Health Care Center Dauphin County, PA Ken Lorenz Penn State University Architectural Engineering Construction Management April 17, 2007.
Wilsdorf Hall Materials Science Engineering & Nanotechnology Building University of Virginia Leaha Martynuska Construction Management Option Senior Thesis.
Architectural Engineering Construction Management Senior Thesis April 11 th, 2011 Consultant: Dr. Riley Architectural Engineering Spring 2011 – Senior.
The Towers at the City College of New York Robin Scaramastro - Structural Option - Advisor: Dr. Memari Senior Thesis Final Presentation – Spring 2007.
Bronx School for Law Government & Justice Yulien Wong Mechanical Option 2006 Senior Thesis Bronx, New York.
Waynesburg Central High School Waynesburg, Pennsylvania Robert Owen Brennan The Pennsylvania State University Construction Management.
DEREK BAUER CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT AE SENIOR THESIS 2008 PENN STATE UNIVERSITY AE SENIOR THESIS PRESENTATION APRIL 15, 2008 OFFICE/RETAIL BUILDING WASHINGTON,
New Middle School Geneva, Il Greg Kemerer AE Senior Thesis 2006 – CM Option.
Government Office Center Mid-Atlantic U.S. Penn State AE Senior Thesis Project Alexander Ward | Construction Management James Faust | CM Advisor.
The Greening of the Rooftop Module 5 Why Roof Green?
Presentation Outline Project Background Project Overview Industry Research: AIA 2030 Challenge and It’s Significance in Renovations Breadth #1: Redesign.
APPELL LIFE SCIENCES York College of Pennsylvania Joshua Martz | Dr. Srebric | April 11, 2011 Image Courtesy of RLPS, Ltd.
Craig Owsiany Architectural Engineering – Construction Management STEM Building Hagerstown Community College Hagerstown, Maryland Science Technology.
151 First Side William J. Buchko introduction overview proposal structural depth acoustics breadth cm breadth conclusions 151 First Side Pittsburgh, PA.
University of Delaware Center for the Arts Newark, DE Karen Schulte Mechanical Option Spring 2006.
Greenbriar East Elementary School Fairfax, Virginia Michelle L. Siano Mechanical Option Spring 2005 Senior Thesis.
Eastern USA University Academic Center Alexander AltemoseIStructural Option.
Arts & Humanities Instructional Building Noah J. Ashbaugh Construction Management 2006.
Thesis Research Proposal Aimee Bashore Franklin & Marshall College Row Lancaster, PA.
Malory J. Faust ∙ Mechanical Option ∙ Senior Thesis 2007.
Brandon mckee ae senior thesis 2007 construction management penn state university ambridge area high school Ambridge Area High School ambridge, pennsylvania.
BUILDING: LOCATION: SIZE: OCCUPANT: ARCHITECT: ENGINEERS: St. Francis Friary Hanceville, Alabama 59,900 square feet, 2 floors above grade Archdiocese.
Hamot Women’s Hospital Erie, PA Michael Galleher Mechanical Option l AE-Senior Thesis l April 12, 2011 l Advisor Dr. Jelena Srebric.
ANTONIO DESANTIS VERNE STRUCTURAL OPTION ADVISOR: PROF. PARFITT APRIL 14, 2008 BRIDGESIDE POINT II PITTSBURGH, PA “BUILDING SYSTEM OPTIMIZATION” THE DEPARTMENT.
Bellefonte Area High School Mark Demianovich Construction Management 2007.
Presented By: By: By: Web Address: Topic Number: Topic Number: Date: Date:
Hunter Woron Spring 2012 Structural Professor Parfitt.
White House Summit on Sustainable Buildings January 24, 2006 William Fisk* Sr. Scientist, Department Head Indoor Environment Department Lawrence Berkeley.
NOLAN JAMES AMOS Dr. William Bahnfleth, Faculty Consultant architectural engineering senior thesis mechanical option PHOENIXVILLE EARLY LEARNING CENTER.
Manoa Elementary School Amanda Cronauer Faculty Advisor: Dr. William Bahnfleth 14 April 2010.
Daniel Suter Construction Management AE Senior Thesis Presentation The Pennsylvania State University Unknown Data Center Somewhere, USA
North Hall | American University| Washington D.C.
The Principles of Green Remodeling
Ventana. Mark Mey 912 “F” Street N. W
Mountain State Blue Cross Blue Shield Headquarters
Abington Memorial Hospital Abington, Pennsylvania
SCHOOL OF FOREST RESOURCES BUILDING
David Anderson Mechanical Option
Redifer Commons Addition & Renovation Project
Wrangle Hill Elementary School New Castle, DE
Acterna Headquarters John M Sekel, EIT Germantown, Maryland
Daniel Suter Unknown Data Center Somewhere, USA
Biobehavioral Health Building, University Park, PA
LONGWOOD AT OAKMONT HEALTHCARE CENTER
Justin Pennycoff AE Senior Thesis 2008 Construction Management
Lehigh Valley Heritage Center
Project Background Type of building: Mixed-use residential building
RiverView Condominiums II Chicago, IL
Presentation transcript:

AE Senior Thesis 2007 Bloomindales Department Store Chevy Chase, MD

Presentation Agenda Project Overview Project Overview Research:Building Respect Research:Building Respect Project Redesign Breadth # 1: Precast Panel Alternatives Breadth # 1: Precast Panel Alternatives Breadth # 2: Implementing UVGI systems Breadth # 2: Implementing UVGI systems Conclusions & Recommendations Conclusions & Recommendations Acknowledgements Acknowledgements

Presentation Agenda Project Overview Project Overview Research:Building Respect Research:Building Respect Project Redesign Breadth # 1: Precast Panel Alternatives Breadth # 1: Precast Panel Alternatives Breadth # 2: Implementing UVGI systems Breadth # 2: Implementing UVGI systems Conclusions & Recommendations Conclusions & Recommendations Acknowledgements Acknowledgements

Project Overview Location: Chevy Chase, MD Construction Managers – Buch Construction – Above grade Building Size: 3 story w/ Penthouse - 180,000 sq. ft. Construction Schedule: November August 2007 Delivery Method: Design-Bid-Build Function: Retail Department Store Cost: $18.86 Million

Presentation Agenda Project Overview Project Overview Research:Building Respect Research:Building Respect Project Redesign Breadth # 1: Precast Panel AlternativesBreadth # 1: Precast Panel Alternatives Breadth # 2: Implementing UVGI systems Breadth # 2: Implementing UVGI systems Conclusions Conclusions

Research Background Many projects have either neighboring projects, or share a site with another Construction Management firm Many projects have either neighboring projects, or share a site with another Construction Management firm Bloomingdales has multiple contractors sharing the site Bloomingdales has multiple contractors sharing the site Utilization of the CM during redesign phases Utilization of the CM during redesign phases Mid-construction redesign was completed without the aid of Buch Mid-construction redesign was completed without the aid of Buch Survey Utilization Satisfaction or displeasure within project team interaction Satisfaction or displeasure within project team interaction Experience of Construction Industry professionals Experience of Construction Industry professionals

Building Respect – Close Proximity Sites Objective Identify common inefficiencies Identify common inefficiencies Lack of forward communication Lack of forward communication Mutual respect between projects teams Mutual respect between projects teams Identify the current relationshipsIdentify the current relationships Establish method of practice for the ideal relationship Establish method of practice for the ideal relationship

Building Respect – Close Proximity Sites The current relationships of; The current relationships of; Team members Team members Between parties Between parties Past project success and failures Past project success and failures Applying industry experience to this project Applying industry experience to this project

Project Redesign - Acceleration Objective Identify common inefficiencies and lack of communication between projects teams, owner and CM during the Redesign process Identify common inefficiencies and lack of communication between projects teams, owner and CM during the Redesign process Ideal interaction between all partiesIdeal interaction between all parties Redesign; cost, time, project quality, and efficiency can be VERedesign; cost, time, project quality, and efficiency can be VE

Project Redesign - Acceleration Existing Situation Existing Situation Designers only redesignDesigners only redesign No involvement from BuchNo involvement from Buch Lack of communicationLack of communication Desired Situation Desired Situation Assistance from BuchAssistance from Buch Meetings and increased communication to Buch from Federated and DesignersMeetings and increased communication to Buch from Federated and Designers Buch Involvement Benefits Buch Involvement Benefits Decreased scheduling timeDecreased scheduling time Cost savingsCost savings

Conclusions & Recommendations: Partnering – method to improve quality, and reduce confrontations between parties, thereby allowing open and non-adversarial contracting environment Working toward common goals in a trusting environment with open communication is critical during VE and Redesign Federated must require monthly/weekly meetings to address issues and create an atmosphere for forward communication, more so than what was done An establishment of relationships between the home offices of both general contractors will aid greatly in coordination

Presentation Agenda Project Overview Project Overview Research:Building Respect Research:Building Respect Project Redesign Breadth # 1: Precast Panel Alternatives Breadth # 1: Precast Panel Alternatives Breadth # 2: Implementing UVGI systems Breadth # 2: Implementing UVGI systems Conclusions & Recommendations Conclusions & Recommendations Acknowledgements Acknowledgements

Breadth # 1 - Precast Panel Alternatives Objectives Analyze energy efficient alternatives for the construction of the facade Analyze energy efficient alternatives for the construction of the facade Choose the most economical material for use on the building façade Choose the most economical material for use on the building façadeConsiderations Calculate energy efficiency between the systems Calculate energy efficiency between the systemsanalyzed Resulting structural load Resulting structural load Practicality of alternate system Practicality of alternate system

Breadth # 1 - Precast Panel Alternatives Exterior Insulating Finishing Systems 3 layers - Insulation board - Base coat (wire mesh and adhesive) - Plaster finish coat Variety of textures, colors, finishes Light weight cladding

Breadth # 1 - Precast Panel Alternatives EIFS Quality Issues - Water Entry - Impact Damage - Maintenance

Breadth # 1 - Precast Panel Alternatives Minimizing Water Entry Architectural & contractor design input Architectural & contractor design input Quality sealant contractors Quality sealant contractors Quality inspectors Quality inspectors Immediate crack repair Immediate crack repair Overlap reinforcement at corners, Overlap reinforcement at corners,openings Moisture draining EIFS Moisture draining EIFS

Breadth # 1 - Precast Panel Alternatives Minimizing Impact Damage Heavy mesh usage in high impact areas Heavy mesh usage in high impact areas Base coat with higher resin levels Base coat with higher resin levels Limiting material to possibility of impact Limiting material to possibility of impactMaintenance Use mild detergent for cleaning Use mild detergent for cleaning Acrylic finishes reduce dirt pick up, help maintain system colorfastness Acrylic finishes reduce dirt pick up, help maintain system colorfastness

Breadth # 1 - Precast Panel Alternatives Heating Power Required Cooling Power Required Energy Saved Precast Panels 770 kWh60 kWhN/A 2” EIFS621 kWh47 kWh162 kWh 4” EIFS532 kWh40 kWh258 kWh

Conclusions & Recommendations: Incorporating a 4” EIFS is recommended to increase the energy efficiency and reduce structural loading and material cost Today very few commercial systems fail when a quality control system is in place, and an experienced contractor is handling the construction. Aesthetically EIFS does not vary greatly from the panel system and may be easily approved by the architect and owner, as the system specification can be easily varied

Presentation Agenda Project Overview Project Overview Research:Building Respect Research:Building Respect Project Redesign Breadth # 1: Precast Panel Alternatives Breadth # 1: Precast Panel Alternatives Breadth # 2: Implementing UVGI systems Breadth # 2: Implementing UVGI systems Conclusions & Recommendations Conclusions & Recommendations Acknowledgements Acknowledgements

Breadth # 2 - Utilizing UVGI Systems Objectives Analyze the added energy efficiency and building quality that UVGI provides Analyze the added energy efficiency and building quality that UVGI providesConsiderations Indoor air quality improvements Indoor air quality improvements Reduction of causes for ‘Sick Building Syndrome’ Reduction of causes for ‘Sick Building Syndrome’ Practicality adding UVGI systems Practicality adding UVGI systems

Breadth # 2 - Utilizing UVGI Systems Sick Building Syndrome Headaches, asthma, allergy like symptoms Headaches, asthma, allergy like symptoms Cost estimates range to billions due to absenteeism, loss of productivity Cost estimates range to billions due to absenteeism, loss of productivity Damp air ducts, outdoor air, adhesives, airborne particles Damp air ducts, outdoor air, adhesives, airborne particles

Breadth # 2 - Utilizing UVGI Systems Ultraviolet Germicidal Irradiation High exposure to concentrated UV rays High exposure to concentrated UV rays Eliminates Bird Flu, TB, Influenza, Anthrax, etc Eliminates Bird Flu, TB, Influenza, Anthrax, etc Reduces the causes for ‘Sick Building Syndrome’ Reduces the causes for ‘Sick Building Syndrome’ Cause less sick leave Cause less sick leave Increases productivity Increases productivity

Breadth # 2 - Utilizing UVGI Systems Technical Considerations

Conclusions & Recommendations: Though the implementation of UVGI yields a substantial initial investment it will pay for itself in reduced absenteeism, increased productivity, and indoor environment quality 30% to 40% energy savings from cooling coils operating efficiently to their original specs, due to no biofilm growth

Presentation Agenda Project Overview Project Overview Research:Building Respect Research:Building Respect Project Redesign Breadth # 1: Precast Panel Alternatives Breadth # 1: Precast Panel Alternatives Breadth # 2: Implementing UVGI systems Breadth # 2: Implementing UVGI systems Conclusions & Recommendations Conclusions & Recommendations Acknowledgements Acknowledgements

Conclusions & Recommendations: Implement partnering to improve quality, and reduce confrontations between parties, thereby allowing open and non-adversarial contracting environment Working toward common goals in a trusting environment with open communication is critical during VE and Redesign Incorporating a 4” EIFS is recommended to increase the energy efficiency and reduce structural loading and material cost Implementing UVGI systems to reduced absenteeism, increased productivity, and indoor environment quality

Presentation Agenda Project Overview Project Overview Research:Building Respect Research:Building Respect Project Redesign Breadth # 1: Precast Panel Alternatives Breadth # 1: Precast Panel Alternatives Breadth # 2: Implementing UVGI systems Breadth # 2: Implementing UVGI systems Conclusions & Recommendations Conclusions & Recommendations Acknowledgements Acknowledgements

Acknowledgments Mr. Mey Mr. Slough Mr. O’Donnell Mr. Fox The Penn State AE Faculty and the industry professionals Family and Friends

Questions?