Seeing Where We are Going: Why Evaluating the Revised BIH Model Is Important and BIH MCAH MIS Update David Dodds, PhD, MPH Nichole Sturmfels, MPH BIH Statewide.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Integrating the NASP Practice Model Into Presentations: Resource Slides Referencing the NASP Practice Model in professional development presentations helps.
Advertisements

One Science = Early Childhood Pathway for Healthy Child Development Sentinel Outcomes ALL CHILDREN ARE BORN HEALTHY measured by: rate of infant mortality.
Intro. Website Purposes  Provide templates and resources for developing early childhood interagency agreements and collaborative procedures among multiple.
Paula Braveman, MD, MPH Reggie Caldwell, LCSW
An Evaluation Model to promote linkages between community-based public health practice and academia.
California Child Welfare Co-Investment Partnership Children’s Conference Monterey, California May 29, 2008.
Linking Actions for Unmet Needs in Children’s Health
Healthy Start Interconception Care Learning Community (ICC LC) Using Quality Improvement for Better Preconception Care Preconception Care Summit June 14,
Healthy Child Development Suggestions for Submitting a Strong Proposal.
Terrell W. Zollinger, DrPH Evaluation Consultant Healthy Women, Healthy Hoosiers Conference October 7, 2011.
Perinatal services in Medi-Cal Managed Care: strategies to better serve our members 11/5/14 Perinatal Services Coordinator Annual Meeting Maternal, Child.
David Brenna, Senior Policy Analyst. State Comprehensive Plan Goals Goal 1: Americans understand that mental health is essential to overall health Goal.
MomsFirst A Helping Hand for Your Pregnancy… and Your Baby Cleveland Department of Public Health 75 Erieview Plaza Cleveland Oh,
Community Planning Training 1-1. Community Plan Implementation Training 1- Community Planning Training 1-3.
FROM THEORY TO COMMUNITY PRACTICE The Life Course Approach Carol Brady, MA Executive Director Northeast Florida Healthy Start Coalition, Inc. Every Woman.
School’s Cool in Childcare Settings
African Americans and HIV: CA Office of AIDS Response Michelle Roland, MD Chief, Office of AIDS California Department of Public Health.
California Department of Public Health Office of AIDS Strategic Response for African Americans & HIV/AIDS Reggie Caldwell, LCSW United States Conference.
Common Core 3.0 Content Overview Stakeholder Feedback Seeking Your Input to Improve Child Welfare Training! For audio: call enter access.
Common Core 3.0 Executive Summary Stakeholder Feedback Seeking Your Input to Improve Child Welfare Training! For audio: call enter access.
Helping Families Receive the Best Start in Life.  Check In  AOK History  AOK Communities  Conceptual Framework  Advancing Collaborative Leadership.
Community Care and Wellness for Seniors
Los Angeles County Evaluation System Accomplishments and Next Steps toward Outcomes and Performance Measurement of Treatment Services in LA County 2008.
Children’s Mental Health: An Urgent Priority for Illinois.
Claire Brindis, Dr. P.H. University of California, San Francisco American Public Health Association- Annual Meeting November 10, 2004 Adolescent Health:
Utilizing Quality Improvement Methods to Address Low Birth Weight Births in Pierce County Tutrecia Giles, Lea Johnson, and Susan Pfeifer Description of.
School’s Cool in Kindergarten for the Kindergarten Teacher School’s Cool Makes a Difference!
Padmini Parthasarathy, MPH Cheri Pies, MSW, DrPH Family, Maternal and Child Health Programs Contra Costa Health Services The Contra Costa Life Course Initiative:
Lisa Pion-Berlin, PhD President and Chief Executive Officer Parents Anonymous ® Inc. Leah Davis, California State Parent Team Achieving Shared Leadership®
Perspectives on Impact Evaluation Cairo, Egypt March 29 – April 2, 2009 Presented by: Wayne M. Harding. Ed.M., Ph.D., Director of Projects, Social Science.
Measuring and Improving Practice and Results Practice and Results 2006 CSR Baseline Results Measuring and Improving Practice and Results Practice and Results.
Ingham Healthy Families. History: Why Healthy Families America? Michigan Home Visiting Initiative Exploration & Planning Tool (Fall 2013)  Ingham County.
1 Promoting Evidence-Informed Practice: The BASSC Perspective Michael J. Austin, PhD, MSW, MSPH BASSC Staff Director Mack Professor of Nonprofit Management.
National MEDICAL HOME Autism Initiative Poster Presentation for DEC Conference 2005 Linda Tuchman Ginsberg, PhD
INDIANA MEDICAID PERINATAL UPDATES Presumptive Eligibility Notification of Pregnancy Prenatal Care Coordination July 7, 2010 Glenna Asmus Nall, Quality.
Recommendations and a Plan for Preventing Preterm Birth Secretary’s Advisory Committee on Infant Mortality (SACIM) August 10, 2015.
Katie A. Learning Collaborative For Audio, please call: Participant code: Please mute your phone Building Child Welfare and Mental.
Foundations and Best Practices in Early Childhood Education: History, Theories and Approaches to Learning, 2 nd Edition © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc.
Crosswalk of Public Health Accreditation and the Public Health Code of Ethics Highlighted items relate to the Water Supply case studied discussed in the.
From Output to Outcome: Quantifying Care Management Kelly A. Bruno, MSW and Danielle T. Cameron, MPH National Health Foundation Background Objectives Methods.
Padmini Parthasarathy, MPH Cheri Pies, MSW, DrPH Family, Maternal and Child Health Programs, Contra Costa Health Services Applying the Life Course Perspective.
COMMUNITY-BASED MENTAL HEALTH RESEARCH TO PROMOTE SOCIAL JUSTICE & CHILDREN’S HEALTH November 20, 2008 Jessica Goodkind, PhD University of New Mexico Department.
Statewide Health Improvement Program (SHIP) Minnesota Department of Health Cara McNulty, MS SHIP Manager
Your Presenters Melissa Connelly, Director, Regional Training Academy Coordination Project, CalSWEC Sylvia Deporto, Deputy Director, Family & Children’s.
Addressing Maternal Depression Healthy Start Interconception Care Learning Collaborative Kimberly Deavers, MPH U.S. Department of Health & Human Services.
The National Connection for Local Public Health Plain Talk in Local Health Departments Tasha Toby, MPH National Association of County and City Health Officials.
Evaluation of the Indiana ECCS Initiative. State Context Previous Early Childhood System Initiatives –Step Ahead –Building Bright Beginnings SPRANS Grant.
1 Leadership Symposium on Evidence-Based Practice in Child Welfare Services June 28, 2007 Davis, CA Inter-Agency and University Research Collaboration:
MnCHOICES Olmstead Planning Committee June 21, 2012 Alex Bartolic Kristi Grunewald 2.
 Council Overview  Past Priorities and Recommendations  Current Priorities ◦ Promoting Equity in State Policies and Programs ◦ Adverse Birth Outcomes.
1 Strategic Plan Review. 2 Process Planning and Evaluation Committee will be discussing 2 directions per meeting. October meeting- Finance and Governance.
Slide 1 Oregon Smoke Free Mothers and Babies Project Lesa Dixon-Gray, MSW, MPH Office of Family Health (503)
Prepared by: Forging a Comprehensive Initiative to Improve Birth Outcomes and Reduce Infant Mortality in [State] Adapted from AMCHP Birth Outcomes Compendium.
Prepared by: Program Inventory / Assessment: Summary of Findings Adapted from AMCHP Birth Outcomes Compendium Tools.
Newborn Home Visiting program-Shelter Based Initiative
Regional Nutrition Education and Obesity Prevention Centers of Excellence-Western Region at Colorado State University SNAP & EFNEP: Regional Nutrition.
WORKSHOP SESSION: PLANNING COMPREHENSIVELY TO PREVENT VIOLENCE San Francisco November 18, 2011 Junious Williams, CEO Urban Strategies Council
Outcome-based Planning and Evaluation Gloria Latimer, Ed.S, Director of Community Programs Jason Vahling, M.P.H., Community Program Specialist.
Georgia Comprehensive Cancer Control Program 3/10/2015 Program Monitoring and Evaluation Activities Short-Term Outcomes Long-Term Outcomes Intermediate.
Excellence for Each Student Utah State Board of Education Strategic Plan.
Comprehensive Youth Services Assessment and Plan February 21, 2014.
Resource Review for Teaching Resource Review for Teaching Victoria M. Rizzo, LCSW-R, PhD Jessica Seidman, LMSW Columbia University School of Social Work.
Keeping our Commitments to Collaborative Children’s Services.
 As of July 1, 2014, 61 operational courts: › 28 Adult Drug Courts  5 Hybrid Drug/OWI Courts › 14 OWI Courts › 9 Veterans Treatment Courts › 4 Mental.
Barbara May RN, MPH Director, Prevention Programs Southern New Jersey Perinatal Cooperative PRESENTER Influencing State Health Policy Influencing State.
1 This project was supported by the Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA) of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) under.
Clinical Practice evaluations and Performance Review
Panhandle Partnership for Health and Human Services
NAMI California Conference Presentation on June 1, 2018 Monterey, CA
Blueprint Outlines practical, consumer-focused, state and local strategies for improving eating and physical activity that will lead to healthier lives.
Presentation transcript:

Seeing Where We are Going: Why Evaluating the Revised BIH Model Is Important and BIH MCAH MIS Update David Dodds, PhD, MPH Nichole Sturmfels, MPH BIH Statewide Meeting—March 15, 2011

What is the foundation for the BIH program evaluation? Why is evaluation important? What are the roles of BIH staff in evaluation? What are the plans for data collection and the BIH MCAH MIS? Key Questions BIH Statewide Meeting—March 15, 2011

Tools for Evaluation BIH MCAH MIS Client Data Book Conceptual Framework BIH Statewide Meeting—March 15, 2011

DRAFT To improve African American infant and maternal health in California and decrease Black:White health disparities and social inequities for women and infants BIH Activities Ultimate Goal INDIVIDUAL Increased health knowledge Increased healthy behaviors Increased empowerment through improved life skills and coping skills Increased receipt of quality medical, social & mental health services Decreased unplanned pregnancy Increased social support both for & among the women Decreased stress by mobilizing resources and services Improved parenting Increased bonding between mother & infant Improved infants’ developmental milestones COMMUNITY Increased community and provider knowledge & cultural competence Increased community partnerships & linkages among service agencies Decreased stressors in the community through community & provider/agency action Improved understanding among community and providers of influence of social inequities on health INDIVIDUAL Services provided to African-American women, infants, and their families & partners include: Referrals to medical, social & mental health services Health education Social and group support Identifying resources Self-advocacy COMMUNITY Promote community and provider engagement and advocacy Educate community and providers about influence of social inequities on health GUIDING PRINCIPLES 1. Comprehensive and integrated: Address multiple risk factors and use multiple strategies 2. Multi-level: Address individual, community, service systems and societal levels, with empowerment focus 3. Collaborative: Partner with community providers and agencies with similar activities 4. Community-driven: Developed, implemented and evaluated by local communities 5. Evidence-based: Developed from proven or promising strategies; impact is measurable 6. Culturally competent: Designed & implemented in a culturally-competent manner 7. Staff training and professional development: Conducted to ensure the BIH activities are provided effectively Problem Poor birth outcomes Social isolation Lack of health knowledge Lack of access to quality health care Poverty Racism Environmental stressors Maximizing impact of the program (numbers served & effect size) Lack of cultural awareness and skills among providers Conceptual Framework Intermediate Outcomes

Outcomes Measured in the BIH Revised Model are Based on Scientific Literature BIH Statewide Meeting—March 15, 2011 Psychosocial Outcomes Health Behavior Outcomes Infant and Maternal Health Outcomes Social support Mastery/Self-efficacy Self-esteem Stress management & coping Tobacco, alcohol & drug use Physical activity Healthy eating (nutrition) Multivitamin use Family Planning Maternal weight gain Low birth weight Preterm birth Mode of delivery Infant mortality

Why are intermediate outcomes important? Intermediate outcomes are on the critical pathway toward the ultimate goal of improving African American infant and maternal health in California and decreasing Black:White disparities. Measuring these outcomes is important for quantifying the good work being done at sites—the previous BIH model did not adequately measure these outcomes. BIH Statewide Meeting—March 15, 2011

Transactional Model of Stress and Coping* Key Concepts Evaluation of stressors Coping efforts: Information Seeking Optimism Social Support Positive Psychology *Lazarus, Folkman, and Moskowitz BIH Curriculum Topics and Activities Understanding and handling stress Relaxation techniques Gratitude circle Strengths and virtues Data Book Tool for Measuring Outcomes Assessment Scale C in Prenatal and Postpartum Assessments 1 and 3 BRIEF RESILIENCE SCALE: Resilience refers to one's ability to bounce back or recover from stress Example: Scientific Concepts in the BIH Curriculum and Data Book BIH Statewide Meeting—March 15, 2011

Why is evaluation important? To measure program progress toward the ultimate goals of BIH. To document the effectiveness of the revised program model. –Provide the best possible intervention for clients within program resources. –Demonstrate the program’s usefulness to federal agencies, state legislators, county superintendents, and other policy makers. –Improve accountability for program funding. BIH Statewide Meeting—March 15, 2011

What is the BIH Staff role in the evaluation? Program Fidelity –Ensure that all BIH sites are conducting the same standardized model. –Clearly document any modifications to the curriculum or case management process. Data Quality –Collect all data in client data book. –Ensure quality of data collection (paper data book) –Ensure quality of data entry (BIH MCAH MIS) Program Feedback –Group Sessions: Complete Facilitator Feedback & Summary after every session –Case Management: Complete FHA Feedback Form monthly BIH Statewide Meeting—March 15, 2011

BIH MCAH MIS – Timeline 2009 BIH Data and Evaluation Sub-Committee – 6 initial conference calls with 22 participants (BIH, MCAH, UCSF) Report at June 2009 Statewide BIH Meeting concluded: “The current BIH MIS will need to be extensively revised or a new MIS adopted in order to improve usability and to measure outcomes of the redesigned BIH program.” BIH Statewide Meeting—March 15, 2011

BIH MCAH MIS – Timeline 2010 MCAH reviewed three options for developing a new MIS: –Revise an existing MCAH program databases (e.g., BIH MIS, AFLP Lodestar). –Purchase and customize off-the-shelf database. –Design a new database at MCAH. Decision: Design a new database at MCAH. MCAH managers worked on budget and IT issues. MCAH MIS programming team and EPI team worked on new MIS. BIH Statewide Meeting—March 15, 2011

BIH MCAH MIS – Timeline 2011 (Working Plan Subject to Change) Winter 2010/2011: Data base structure –Programmers build database where Data Book information will be stored. Spring 2011: Beta testing and training –Beta testing by MCAH, Branagh Information Group, and some BIH users –Training by Branagh Information Group Summer 2011: MIS Release 1 –Data collection and some standard reports Winter 2011/2012: MIS Release 2 –Case management and more standard reports TBD 2013: MIS Release 3 BIH Statewide Meeting—March 15, 2011

BIH MCAH MIS - Features Release 1—Data Entry –Centralized, secure database hosted on a state server –Users will login through an internet browser –Data entry screens are modeled after Data Book forms –7 standard reports Release 2—Case Management –Additional standard reports and user functionality Release 3—Analysis –All standard reports complete (approximately 30) –Ad hoc queries for any information in the database –Data export to Excel BIH Statewide Meeting—March 15, 2011

Data Entry Site BIH Clients Statewide (ALL) Alameda Berkeley Contra Costa Fresno Family Health Advocate (FHA) All FHA Danielle Katie Jane Jackie Choose site Choose data entry mode Choose FHA Planned Navigation BIH Statewide Meeting—March 15, 2011

BIH Clients All clients Dnielle Katie Jane Jackie First Name PNA1PNA2PNA3Birth Outcome PPA 1 Danielle Vicky Sara Jackie Kim FHA all enrolled clients view: form status Choose all enrolled clients All clients All enrolled clients Danielle Vicky Sara Jackie Kim Navigate to specific client form: White/empty = no data entered into form Yellow = form data entered but not validated Red = form data has not passed validation Green = form data validated and saved (finalized) BIH Statewide Meeting—March 15, 2011

BIH MCAH MIS Screenshot BIH Statewide Meeting—March 15, 2011

BIH MCAH MIS Screenshot BIH Statewide Meeting—March 15, 2011

Computing Requirements for BIH MCAH MIS Policy Alert # 2010/11-01 (Effective May 1, 2011) System requirement details: –High-speed internet connection (DSL, etc.) –Silverlight (Free Microsoft operating system update) –.NET (Free Microsoft operating system update) –Internet explorer 7.0+ –2GHz+ CPU, 2GB + RAM, 1024 x 768 or better display May need your local IT to allow software updates Branagh Information Group tech support: BIH Statewide Meeting—March 15, 2011

Data submission to MCAH before the BIH MCAH MIS is online Policy Alert 2010/11-02—Group 1 sites –Forms completed on or before February 28 th, 2011 Client Recruitment Prenatal Assessment 1—Sections 1 & 2 Postpartum Assessment 1 (for postpartum entry)— Sections 1 & 2 Group Sessions: Facilitator Summary & Feedback Policy Alert 2010/11-03—Group 2 sites –Forms completed on or before February 28 th, 2011 –Prenatal Supplemental Form BIH Statewide Meeting—March 15, 2011

BIH MIS – Use and Plans How to use the BIH MIS now: –For clients under the “old” model, use Greenbook and BIH MIS –When implementing the new model, use the hard copy Data Book and eventually the new BIH MCAH MIS –If your client is transitioning from old to new Close out the client using the Greenbook and BIH MIS Enroll the client again using the Data Book BIH MIS will eventually be phased out. BIH Statewide Meeting—March 15, 2011

Summary The evaluation will measure progress towards the ultimate goals of the BIH program. –LHJs, MCAH, and UCSF each have a role in the BIH Program evaluation. The conceptual framework, Data Book, and BIH MCAH MIS are all tools for evaluation. –These tools were developed with input from LHJs. –These tools are based on scientific literature. All LHJs prepare for the BIH MCAH MIS by ensuring compliance with system requirements. All LHJs submit some initial data to CDPH/MCAH for data entry. BIH Statewide Meeting—March 15, 2011

Questions? For questions about the Data Book, submitting data to MCAH, and the BIH MCAH MIS, contact: Nichole Sturmfels For Help Desk support for the BIH MIS or BIH MCAH MIS, contact: Branagh Information Group BIH Statewide Meeting—March 15, 2011