Past Recollection Recorded. Basic Structure of a Simple Legal Rule A particular functional legal outcome results If certain facts (elements) are true.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Your Honor, I would just like to let you know that… Learning Goal: The student will understand what an objection is, how and why they are used, and what.
Advertisements

Rule 801: The Basic Definition of Hearsay. Start with a fact of consequence Add an observer.
Rules of Evidence and Objections
CVLS Hearsay Refresher Who Cares About Hearsay? A Four-Step Hearsay Formula Hearsay Exceptions Questions.
The Substance of Faith An Evidence and Foundational Christian Curriculum Part 4a.
Problem 1. Problem 1 - Is it relevant? Charles: “I would not have voted ‘Yes.’” Charles: “Alice told me that she would not have voted ‘Yes.’” Document:
Medicine, mistakes and manslaughter: a criminal combination? Dr Oliver Quick University of Bristol.
2:05 sec Today you will be learning about how to conduct and participate in a mock trial. You will become familiar with some basic courtroom procedures.
2:05 sec Today you will be learning about how to conduct and participate in a mock trial. You will become familiar with some basic courtroom procedures.
Hearsay and Its Exceptions
Jail Call Analysis 4 th Amdt – Waiver because of Consent (Banargent, Scheinman, Poyck) 4 th Amdt. – Society not ready to recognize prisoner’s expectation.
Jackie Borcherding Assistant District Attorney Williamson County.
PRIOR INCONSISTENT STATEMENTS FRE 801(d) Non Hearsay by definition Rule 801(d)(1) Prior Statement by Witness is not hearsay If declarant testifies and.
CHAP. 3 : INTRODUCTION TO THE HEARSAY RULE P. JANICKE 2011.
The Roles of Judge and Jury Court controls legal rulings in the trial Court controls legal rulings in the trial Jury decides factual issues Jury decides.
Hearsay Exceptions Present Sense Impression, Excited Utterance, State of Mind, Diagnostic Statements.
Criminal Evidence 7th Edition
The “True” Exceptions and Dan the Dreadful Declarant.
Hearsay Rule Lecture 6, 2014.
Hearsay Exceptions Steven Magnone.
TRIAL INFORMATION Steps, vocabulary.
Crawford v. Washington US Supreme Court, March 2004 Implications for Elder Abuse Investigations Adapted from material presented June 30, 2004 by Sean Morgan.
CHAPTER X HEARSAY EVIDENCE. Hearsay Evidence Evidence of a statement that was made other than by the witness while testifying that is offered to prove.
WITNESS CREDIBILITY DREAM OR NIGHTMARE? Presented By: Earnest S. Atkins Investigator In Charge Virginia Department of Professional & Occupational Regulation.
Motion for Summary Judgment The Keys to Success. How does this work?  Summary judgments are governed by Rule 166(a) of the Texas Rules of Civil Procedure.
AJ 104 Chapter 5 Witnesses. 5 Issues Related to a Trial Witness 1. Who is competent to testify 2. How the credibility of a witness is attacked 3. What.
Trial advocacy workshop
OBJECTIONS IN COURT. WHAT ARE THEY? An attorney can object any time she or he thinks the opposing attorney is violating the rules of evidence. The attorney.
Crawford v. Washington US Supreme Court, March 2004 Implications for Elder Abuse Prosecutions Adapted from material presented June 30, 2004 by Sean Morgan.
Courtroom Testimony. Preparation Before Court Review notes and reports beforehand Have a legal knowledge of the case Bring notes with you to court Bring.
Chapter 20 Writing Reports, Preparing for and Presenting Cases in Court.
Unit 3 Seminar! K. Austin Zimmer Any question from Unit 2! Please make sure you have completed your Unit 1 & 2 Papers!
+ Rules & Types of Evidence. + Rules of Evidence During a trial, either the Crown or the defence may object to questions asked by the opposing attorney.
Basic Evidence and Trial Procedure. Opening Statement  Preview the evidence “The evidence will show”  Introduce theme  Briefly describe the issues,
Mon. Nov. 26. Work Product “Privilege” A witness, X, who is friendly to the D was interviewed by P’s attorney and a statement was drawn up Is there any.
CHAP. 3 : INTRODUCTION TO THE HEARSAY RULE P. JANICKE 2008.
Types of Evidence From Arraignment to Verdict. Self-Incrimination The Canada Evidence Act - regulates rules of evidence (1893). Applies to federal jurisdictions.
THE TRIAL IN CANADIAN COURTS – Part 3 RULES AND TYPES OF EVIDENCE LAW 12 MUNDY
Evidence in Court Holy Trinity Law Audrius Stonkus.
Police Reports Admissible or Not?. The MYTH “A police officer’s regular practice in the business of policing is to observe crime and report it. Thus,
The Criminal Trial Process Section 11 (d) of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms states that each person charged with an offence is to be ‘presumed innocent.
 You must consider – is it worth doing?  Many times it is not worth it to impeach on collateral matters  Must be structured and simple  Why you impeach.
United States v. Safavian United States District Court District of Columbia November 29, 2010 Jonathan Weiner.
ARKANSAS LEGAL AID OCTOBER 17, 2013 BY MICHAEL JOHNSON AND PAULA CASEY EXHIBITS.
EVIDENCE ACT Law of evidence lay rules for the production of evidence in the court of law.
HEARSAY EXCEPTIONS THAT ARE LESS RELIABLE: RULE 804: DECLARATIONS BY PERSONS WHO ARE NOW UNAVAILABLE Prof. Janicke 2011.
Legal Studies * Mr. Marinello ARRESTS AND WARRANTS.
Mock Trial Team Strategies and Formalities. Opening Statements 3 minutes Objective – Acquaint court with the case and outline what you are going to prove.
HEARSAY! BY MICHAEL JOHNSON. COMMON LAW DEFINITION “ An out-of-court statement offered to prove the truth of the matter asserted”
Evidence What is it and How to Admit it in Trial.
CHAP. 3 : INTRODUCTION TO THE HEARSAY RULE
Start Figure 7.10 Trial by Jury, p. 183 End.
50 Minutes Session 23 Curriculum Vitae Preparation and Maintenance.
Session 23 Curriculum Vitae Preparation and Maintenance 50 Minutes
Impeachment 证人弹劾.
WHAT IS EVIDENCE TESTIMONY OF WITNESSES DOCUMENTS
Hearsay Hector Brolo Evidence, Law 16 Spring 2017.
CHAP. 3 : INTRODUCTION TO THE HEARSAY RULE
CHAP. 3 : INTRODUCTION TO THE HEARSAY RULE
OBJECTIONS.
How Witnesses are Examined
CHAP. 3 : INTRODUCTION TO THE HEARSAY RULE
Start Figure 7.10 Trial by Jury, p. 183 End.
CHAP. 3 : INTRODUCTION TO THE HEARSAY RULE
THE TRIAL IN CANADIAN COURTS – Part 3
CHAP. 3 : INTRODUCTION TO THE HEARSAY RULE
Mock Trial Objections Part II.
CHAP. 3 : INTRODUCTION TO THE HEARSAY RULE
Alison Chandler Hearsay Exceptions Continued Unavailability Former testimony Dying Declarations Declarations against.
Hearsay Exceptions - Rules 803 and 804
Presentation transcript:

Past Recollection Recorded

Basic Structure of a Simple Legal Rule A particular functional legal outcome results If certain facts (elements) are true

6 Elements of Past Recollection Recorded

6 Elements 1.Memorandum or record 2.About something which W once knew 3.About something which W now has insufficient knowledge either a.To testify fully or b.To testify accurately 4.Which W either a.Made or b.Adopted 5.While fresh in W’s memory 6.Which accurately reflects W’s knowledge

Legal Outcome If Elements Met

Legal Outcome If Elements Met 1.It can be admitted into evidence 2.It can be read to the jury 3.It cannot be passed to the jury a.Unless the opponent wants it given to the jury

Do Problem 35A

Establish Each Element (Start With #2) 1.Memorandum or record 2.About something which W once knew 3.About something which W now has insufficient knowledge either a.To testify fully or b.To testify accurately 4.Which W either a.Made or b.Adopted 5.While fresh in W’s memory 6.Which accurately reflects W’s knowledge

Business Records

Basic Structure of a Slightly More Complex Legal Rule A particular functional legal outcome results If certain facts (elements) are true Unless certain other (exception) facts are true

7 Elements and 1 Exception Exception:

7 Elements and 1 Exception 1.Memorandum or record in any form 2.About essentially anything 3.Made at or near the time 4.Made by a.Person with personal knowledge, or b.Person who got information from source with personal knowledge and either 1)Source had business duty to report, or 2)Source’s statement not barred by hearsay 5.Kept in the ordinary course of business 6.By business that ordinarily keeps such records 7.Shown by qualified witness (e.g. custodian) Exception: Unless there are indications of untrustworthiness

3 Easy Problem Areas & 1 Hard One What is a “business”? What is a record? How do you lay foundation? What are permissible sources for the information?

Permissible Sources of Information The Record [Everything that she wrote] Exhibit 1

Brings Writer to Court The Record [Everything that she wrote] Exhibit 1 The same things that I wrote in Exhibit 1. Basically Subject to the same objections as if Writer testified in court. But normally, writer could not testify unless she had personal knowledge

Brings Writer to Court The Record [Everything she wrote] Exhibit 1 We let record in if Writer received information from source with personal knowledge Writer had personal knowledge. Source had business duty to report. Source’s statement is not barred by hearsay. or and

Record (Written by Writer) Says That People at Table 2 Ate Ham. Writer saw them eat it. Writer is the cashier and was told by the waiter (who saw it). Writer was told by the defendant. Writer was told by someone who was still stressed about being served a non-kosher meal.

Do Problem 36

Public Records 803(8)

What Are the 3 Types of Public Records Admissible Under 803(8)? Activities of the Office Matters Observed Factual Findings

The record is about the activities of the office. Activities of Office: 1 Element

Matters Observed: 3 Elements & 1 Exception Factual Findings: 3 Elements & 1 Exception Factual Findings: 2 Elements & 2 Exceptions Identify elements. Invent a hypothetical and lay the foundation for it

Matters Observed: 3 Elements & 1 Exception Exception:

Matters Observed: 3 Elements & 1 Exception 1.Report is about a matter that was observed, and 2.The observer had a legal duty to observe the matter, and 3.The observer had a legal duty to report what he or she observed. Exception: Report is not admissible if The case is a criminal case, and The observer was a law enforcement official.

Factual Findings: 3 Elements & 1 Exception Exception:

Factual Findings: 3 Elements & 1 Exception 1.The case must be either a.A civil case, or b.A criminal case in which the report is offered against the government; and 2.Report contains factual findings (i.e., conclusions about a factual dispute) 3.Those findings must result from a legally authorized investigation Exception: Not admissible if sources or circumstances indicate it is untrustworthy

Factual Findings: 2 Elements & 2 Exceptions 1.Report contains factual findings (i.e., conclusions about a factual dispute) 2.Those findings must result from a legally authorized investigation Exceptions: 1.Report is not admissible if sources or circumstances indicate that it is untrustworthy. 2.The report can’t be offered by the government in a criminal case.

Factual Findings: 2 Elements & 2 Exceptions Exceptions: 1. 2.

An Example On 3/1/00, I Sam Smith (an EEOC Investigator) went to ER’s plant. I spoke to Fred Foreman who said that Elmer EE was fired because he hit a supervisor. I then spoke to Elmer who said he never hit anyone and that he was fired after complaining about racial slurs. Based on the interviews, I find probable cause to believe that ER fired Elmer because of his complaints about racial slurs. Sam Observations Findings Activities

Do Problem 37

Do Problem 38

I started working at the plant right after Elmer was fired. In the lunchroom, I often talked to other employees about Elmer. They consistently told me he was the worst welder they ever met. Most of them told me about the time, just before he was fired, when he left his torch on and almost burned down the plant.

Any Questions About Ancient Documents – 803(16) Family History – 803(19) Reputation re Boundaries or General History – 803(20) Prior Convictions – 803(22)