ESWT # Rover operations concept

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 SMOS IOCP Key-Point 0 09 Dec ESAC SMOS Commissioning activities In Orbit Commissioning Activities : System Reviews F.Bermudo / CNES.
Advertisements

Configuration Management
Overview of the Data Archive Plan by Luc Joudrier & Dave Heather
ESA UNCLASSIFIED – For Official Use ExoMars ESWT#7 9 Dec ESWT # Rover science preparations (RSM, LS) Status, problems, and how we will solve.
Lecture # 2 : Process Models
Michel Denis, ExoMars Ground Segment Manager, HSO-OPM
All rights reserved © Altec ExoMars 2018 Rover Operations Control Centre Decision making process, Communications and Planning.
Instrument Adron-RM for ExoMars 2018
All rights reserved © Altec ExoMars 2018 Rover Operations Control Centre Plans for rover operations training at ROCC M. Cinato.
DoD Information Technology Security Certification and Accreditation Process (DITSCAP) Phase III – Validation Thomas Howard Chris Pierce.
Turin. ALTEC. ExoMars Progress Report ExoMars Science Working Team
GLAST LAT ProjectManager’s Face to Face - ISOC, 17 March GLAST Large Area Telescope WBS 4.1.B Instrument Science Operations Center Manager’s Face.
GLAST LAT ProjectISOC Peer Review - March 2, 2004 Document: LAT-PR Section 2.1 Requirements 1 Gamma-ray Large Area Space Telescope GLAST Large.
09 May 2014page 1 ROCC to PPL ICD Initial Definition ExoMars Rover Operations Control Center ROCC.
1 ExoMars Programmatic situation December 2014 Rolf de Groot Head of Robotic Exploration Coordination Office ESWT#7 meeting, 9-10 December 2014, Altec,
ESA UNCLASSIFIED – For Official Use Deterministic Communication with SpaceWire Martin Suess CCSDS Spring Meeting /03/2015.
The Software Product Life Cycle. Views of the Software Product Life Cycle  Management  Software engineering  Engineering design  Architectural design.
XMM-Newton EPIC OCB, 6-Nov-2007 EPIC OCB, 6-Nov XMM-Newton Future Instrument Operations Mallorca, 6 th -7 th November 2007 M. Casale, J.R. Muñoz.
LSU 10/09/2007System Design1 Project Management Unit #2.
The Pursuit for Efficient S/C Design The Stanford Small Sat Challenge: –Learn system engineering processes –Design, build, test, and fly a CubeSat project.
RSOC System Testing Status - 1 RSOC System Test Concept –Covered in RO-EST-PL-5013 –Status to be presented at key system reviews (GSRR) Connectivity Tests.
All rights reserved © Altec ExoMars 2018 Rover Operations Control Centre Available Tools for planning and Data Processing I. Musso.
Design of a Science Operations Centre for the ExoMars 2016 Trace Gas Orbiter Mission A. Cardesin Moinelo, D. Frew, L. Metcalfe, P. Martin, N. Manaud, A.
Status of ESA’s Mars Activities MEPAG meeting Washington DC, May 2014
Presentation EddiCam consortium, FF, Madrid 13/06/2002 Eddington programmatic status Fully approved by SPC as part of ESA’s science program as project.
All rights reserved © Altec ExoMars 2018 Rover Operations Control Centre ROCC to Pasteur Payload ICDs E. Ferrentino.
SGS: Activities and Requests Helen Middleton. Hermean Environment Working Group Meeting | SGS Team | Key Largo | 16/05/2013 | Slide 2 Contents 1.ESAC.
ExoMars LSEC 2018 Landing Site Engineering Constraints LSSWS# December 2014 L. Lorenzoni and ExoMars Project.
CAPACITY Operational Atmospheric Chemistry Monitoring Missions CAPACITY Final Meeting - WP Ground Segment synthesis Final Meeting ESTEC02/06/05.
DOC-TAS-EN-002 ALTEC Auditorium - Torino - Italy December 9-10, 2014 Bruno MUSETTI ESWT#7 – ESWT#7.
ASTEP Life in the AtacamaCarnegie Mellon Limits of Life in the Atacama: Investigation of Life in the Atacama Desert of Chile Communication System Design.
.1 RESEARCH & TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT CENTER SYSTEM AND INFORMATION SCIENCES JHU/MIT Proprietary Titan MESSENGER Autonomy Experiment.
Supernova/Acceleration Probe (SNAP) Mission/Science Operations Irene Bibyk Tim Rykowski Bob Schweiss June 28, 2001.
All rights reserved © Altec ExoMars 2018 Rover Operations Control Centre Planned Organization of ROCC Operations I. Musso.
IMARS History and Phase II Overview Presented to MEPAG 13 May 2014 L. May, NASA HQ NOTE ADDED BY JPL WEBMASTER: This content has not been approved or adopted.
Oct.10, 2007EAMA7 The next-generation Infrared astronomy mission SPICA Outline of SPICA Scientific Research Concept (SciReC) SPICA 研究コンセプト概要 17 th May.
ESA UNCLASSIFIED – For Official Use ExoMars Pasteur Payload Status ExoMars Project Team Albert Haldemann ExoMars Payload and AIV Manager.
All rights reserved © Altec ExoMars 2018 Rover Operations Control Centre Science instruments data pipeline G. Martucci.
PHILAE Science Team, Venice Philae On-Comet Science Objectives prepared by HBO Document name = Scientific Objectives of the PHILAE Mission (RO-LAN-LI-1000),
Solar Probe Plus A NASA Mission to Touch the Sun March 2015 Instrument Suite Name Presenter's Name.
Aquarius Mission Simulation A realistic simulation is essential for mission readiness preparations This requires the ability to produce realistic data,
Goals for this Meeting: Day 1 Day 2 Update the community on progress in the exploration of Mars, including NASA and the European Space Agency (missions.
Process Asad Ur Rehman Chief Technology Officer Feditec Enterprise.
Science investigations in the framework of expedition to Europa
Carnegie Mellon Rover Concept of Operation Life in the Atacama 2004 Science & Technology Workshop David Wettergreen The Robotics Institute Carnegie Mellon.
SRR and PDR Charter & Review Team Linda Pacini (GSFC) Review Chair.
Requirements to WSO Ground Segment Lavochkin Association & ROSCOSMOS 30/06/2006.
Robotics and Autonomy Test Facility - Hardware Verification needs Elie Allouis HRAF Workshop – 28/02/2012.
Background  EM16 SGS+TEC met with FD 1 year ago  Both sides agreed that there was a “performance gap:  SGS prepared a TN with 2 main options to bridge.
ESA UNCLASSIFIED – For Official Use HSO-OP - Solar and Planetary Missions Division Solar Orbiter Instrument Operations, Data Handling and FDIR Ignacio.
MEPAG: Action Items, Forward Planning Jack Mustard, MEPAG Chair MRO HiRISE / U. Arizona / JPL / NASA NOTE ADDED BY JPL WEBMASTER: This document was prepared.
Science Methods & Approach Life in the Atacama 2004 Science & Technology Workshop Nathalie A. Cabrol NASA Ames.
Remote Operations Methods & Plan Life in the Atacama 2004 Science & Technology Workshop Nathalie A. Cabrol NASA Ames.
ESA UNCLASSIFIED – For Official Use FISO COLLOQUIUM, 18 June 2014 B. HUFENBACH ESA’S SPACE EXPLORATION STRATEGY.
Status of Sentinel-3 activities at EUMETSAT SIT-31 Agenda Item # 13 ESA/ESRIN, Frascati, Italy 19 th -20 th April 2016 Committee on Earth Observation Satellites.
Mission Planning Life in the Atacama 2004 Science & Technology Workshop Paul Tompkins Carnegie Mellon.
The road to the first E2E tests
RSOC Overview at SWT #26, 11/12 June 2009
ROCC Operations and The PSA RSP Archive Concept Review 28 September 2017 Tanya Lim Archive Scientist.
PDS4 Data From The Rover RSP Archive Concept Review 28 September 2017
Pre-landing Orbiter Observations
I&T&C Organization Chart
Detlef Koschny Research and Scientific Support Department ESA/ESTEC
OSIRIS Full Team Meeting
GLAST Large Area Telescope:
ExoMars RSP Science Archive Concept Review [an informal non-corporate Workshop] 28 September 2017 Leo Metcalfe Science Operations Development Manager.
ECSS-E-ST-50-15C Adoption Notice
The RSP Archive System RSP Archive Concept Review 28 September 2017
Current SOC-Ground System Integration Schedule (Jan )
<Your Team # > Your Team Name Here
Presentation transcript:

ESWT #7 2018 Rover operations concept by Luc Joudrier (ESA) / P. Franceschetti (TAS-I) ExoMars ESWT#7 9 Dec 2014

ROCC & EXM Ground Segment Architecture Who does what? 2018 Rover ESA EDL & Surface ESA ExoMars 2016 EDM ExoMars 2016 Orbiter (TGO) Cruise, EDL 2016 EDM Surface NRO NASA EDL & Surface 2018 Lander ROSCOSMOS ESA UHF link during EDL MEX MOC (TBC) NASA Ground Station (TBD) ESA Ground Stations Russian Ground Station) ESOC NASA ESA ROSCOSMOS ESA Relay Coord.Office (ERCO) ExoMars 2016 Orbiter & EDM MOC 2018 ROCC UHF Radio Telescope For 2016 EDM EDL ALTEC ESOC ESOC TBD 2018 SPOCC Science Ground Segment ExoMars 2016 Orbiter SOC ESA Mission Data Archive Russian Mission Data Archive ROSCOSMOS Engineering activities ESAC ESA Mission Data Archive sci ops 2016 EDM Surface NRO MOC MaROS ESAC 2016 EDM PIs NOMAD CASSIS ACS FREND NASA NASA Russian Mission Data Archive IKI ExoMars ESWT#7 9 Dec 2014

Rover Operations Concept ROCC is integrating the Science Operations Centre (SOC) and is fully responsible to all the commands sent to the Rover and its instruments. The commands are generated as a result of the planning process. Strategic Planning Prepare the coming plans (e.g. where to go next). Refine the coming sols plans . Tactical Planning Refine the (up to two sols) Activity Plans for upload to the Rover including alternative activities. Scientists at ROCC and supported remotely by their home base. Timely provide the scientific assessments of the data supporting the strategic and tactical planning -> ROCC to PPL ICDs discussion Fundamental: Assessments and data are shared within the ROCC (ref to Rules of the Road) Scientific Archives are prepared at ROCC and sent regularly to ESAC-PSA. Discussion about ROCC to PPL ICDs contributing to ROCC to ESAC ICD More details in Sol#2 ExoMars Project <9 Dec 2014> < ESWT#7 >

Rover Module operations per phase   ExoMars Rover Operating Scenarios Transition Pre-Launch through Interplanetary Trip Scenario Surface Operations Scenario DMC Release through Touch–Down Scenario Rover Module commanded to execute at least 3 checkouts: During the SC commissioning Half way to Mars Before the DM separation from the CM Rover Module powered off Rover Module powered on starting from PLTE Surface Mission execution ExoMars ESWT#7 9 Dec 2014

Rover Command & Control Pre-Launch Phase: ROCC is responsible for the ExoMars Rover Module activities and will provide direct support to 2018 ESOC/MOC. ESOC/MOC route the data to/from ROCC Inputs and support from Science teams necessary to evaluate PPL Instruments behaviour LEOP: limited operations: execution of the Rover Module checkout as part of the Spacecraft Composite IOCR. ROCC is responsible for providing direct support to 2018 ESOC/MOC whenever deemed necessary. Inputs and support from Science teams necessary to support PPL checkout and to evaluate PPL Instruments behaviour Cruise Phase: The Rover Module will mainly be in OFF status with the exception of the periodic checkouts (at least 2), the On-Board SW uploading and the Rover Battery charging. ROCC is responsible for the ExoMars Rover Module activities and will provide direct support to 2018 ESOC/MOC No real time operations ExoMars ESWT#7 9 Dec 2014

Rover Command & Control DMC Phase: The Rover Module is OFF until the beginning of the PLTE Phase (after the touchdown) when the Rover is powered on, executes a checkout and leaves the landing platform Until Rover egress completion, 2018 ESOC/MOC is responsible for the joint (Rover + Surface Platform) operations After the handover between 2018 ESOC/MOC and ROCC, ROCC is responsible for commanding & controlling the Rover Module Inputs and support from Science teams necessary to evaluate PPL Instruments behaviour for the checkout Based on the current planning, the checkout of the PPL instruments is going to be split into two parts: the first executed soon after the Rover is powered-on and limited to the instruments supporting the egress preparation activities (e.g. PanCam) The second executed once the Rover is on the Martian soil Inputs and support from Science teams necessary to evaluate PPL Instruments behaviour are requested ExoMars ESWT#7 9 Dec 2014

Rover Command & Control Surface Phase: Rover Surface Operations Phase is a combination of the operations involving both the mobility of Rover and the analyses of selected Martian surface and sub-surface targets This mission phase is under control of ROCC. This mission phase will be performed during Mars daylight; night-time activities will be limited to support possible communications with the ESA TGO Data Relay Orbiter and, possibly, some data compression. The Rover engineering and scientific supporting teams will be organised on working shifts, which could be different because of their roles and responsibilities, suitable to always assure the full support to the surface activities. Indeed, along the evolution of the surface mission proper tailoring will be pursued to increase the efficiency in supporting the Mars tasks and to enhance the promptness of the Earth reply. The supporting teams are responsible for rover surface activity planning, for data assessment, trend analyses, recovery procedures definition etc. etc. The ground activities will require tight cooperation between engineering and science personnel to assure the accomplishment of all the mission goals. Scientific data will be transferred to Earth following proper rules (critical data first) through ESA TGO Data Relay Orbiter that will get the data sent by the Rover ExoMars ESWT#7 9 Dec 2014

Science decisions and trades As a high level summary, the main objective of the rover is to acquire a sample and analyse it (and do this several times !). Survey instruments are all contributing to decide where is the right location to drill. The Science activities on the ground must focus on the following questions: From the current place of the rover, where is the most suitable site at a reasonable distance? Trade various options and establish the longer term plan (this site and then this next etc…) to be revised as part of the continuous strategic planning activities. Detailed analysis of the selected landing site will provide the initial inputs, complemented with all other measurements. At the site, what are the local features that must be studied to allow selections of the drill site among possible candidates? Trade various candidates and number of measurements with the survey instruments. What is the best drilling location and depth ? What is the best ALD instruments measurement parameters and sequence to analyse the sample? More details in Sol#2 about the Tools provided by ROCC and by Science Teams ExoMars Project <9 Dec 2014> < ESWT#7 >

Engineering Support Support to the main scientific decisions and trades: Localisation of the rover Note that visual localisation is well progressing with Scisys under Airbus DS contract. VisLoc will implement the same algorithms that have been tested in the Atacama desert experiment SEEKER and SAFER. Mobility assessment to the various desired targets Drilling assessment of the various desired locations. Energy assessment of the desired plan More details in Sol#2 about the Tools provided by ROCC ExoMars Project <9 Dec 2014> < ESWT#7 >

Questions ? ExoMars Project <9 Dec 2014> < ESWT#7 >

ADDITIONAL SLIDES ExoMars Project <9 Dec 2014> < ESWT#7 >

Measurement Cycle Implementation Assumptions The development of the Measurement Cycle is mainly based on the two ESA normative documents: Reference Surface Mission and PPL E-IRD Every day, ROCC has to uplink the Activity Plans covering the following two sols of operations: in case of Decision Point, all the telemetry data necessary to prepare the Activity Plan shall be available at ROCC. In the other cases, the Activity Plan is prepared based on assessment of previously received telemetry data and the related data trend analysis Nine Decision Points are ruling the Measurement Cycle operational sequence Driving requirement: Drill is retracted at sunset to prevent freezing of the rod. Drill is re-positioned at next sunrise at the previous sol depth to start again the drilling activity RSM OPTIMISATION SCOPE ExoMars ESWT#7 9 Dec 2014

Measurement Cycle Implementation Assumptions Differences introduced by TASI wrt the ESA Reference Surface Mission document Drilling region characterization split over two sols because of the long duration of the operations RLS calibration not executed in sol 4 (the sol previous the one in which RLS is operated) because of timing constraints MOMA LD-MS operated in a dedicated sol because of thermal constraints (agreed after a joint discussion but not yet implemented in the ESA RSM) The drilling sequence has been implemented considering loose soil down to 140 cm (instead of 130 cm) to squeeze as much as possible the drilling sequence in a reasonable time Ma_Miss operations modified trying to make the duration of the activities compliant to the maximum allowed Rover working time (10 hours) RSM OPTIMISATION SCOPE ExoMars ESWT#7 9 Dec 2014

Vertical Survey Implementation Assumptions The development of the Vertical Survey is mainly based on the two ESA normative documents: Reference Surface Mission and PPL E-IRD Every day, ROCC has to uplink the Activity Plans covering the following two sols of operations: in case of Decision Point, all the telemetry data necessary to prepare the Activity Plan shall be available at ROCC. In the other cases, the Activity Plan is prepared based on assessment of previously received telemetry data and the related data trend analysis Ten Decision Points are ruling the Vertical Survey operational sequence Driving requirement: Drill is retracted at sunset to prevent freezing of the rod Drill is re-positioned at next sunrise at the previous sol depth to start again the drilling activity The ESA Reference Surface Mission document does not report the specific operations composing the Vertical Survey. The detailed step sequence has been built based on the commonalities with the Measurement Cycle activities RSM OPTIMISATION SCOPE 9-10/12/ 2014 Ref.:

ExoMars Rover_ Ground Segment Architecture COVERED BY SLIDE #1 Located at ALTEC, Turin, Italy 9-10/12/ 2014 Ref.:

ExoMars Rover Communications Architecture Cruise Phase Comms Architecture Should be covered by Michel Denis’ Presentation 9-10/12/ 2014 Ref.:

ExoMars Rover Communications Architecture PLTE & Surface Phases Comms Architecture Should be covered by Michel Denis’ Presentation