SHMS Optics Studies Tanja Horn JLab JLab Hall C meeting 18 January 2008.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Robert Michaels HAMC Hall A Analysis Workshop 09 C HAMC = Hall A Monte Carlo ROOT / C++ Design Somewhat like SAMC & genercone For HRS only. Uses LeRose.
Advertisements

Measuring the Neutron and 3 He Spin Structure at Low Q 2 Vincent Sulkosky College of William and Mary, Williamsburg VA Experimental Overview The.
Measuring the Neutron and 3 He Spin Structure at Low Q 2 Vincent Sulkosky for the JLab Hall A Collaboration College of William and Mary, Williamsburg VA.
Optics and magnetic field calculation for the Hall D Tagger Guangliang Yang Glasgow University.
Hall C SHMS Fringe Field Analysis Michael Moore Hall C Winter Meeting
E : HRS Cross Section Analyses Vincent Sulkosky Massachusetts Institute of Technology GMp Collaboration Meeting September 24 th, 2012.
Jin Huang & Vincent Sulkosky Massachusetts Institute of Technology Boson 2010 Workshop Sept 20, JLab.
Measurements of F 2 and R=σ L /σ T on Deuterium and Nuclei in the Nucleon Resonance Region Ya Li November 3, 2009 Jlab E02-109/E (Jan05)
Pair Spectrometer Design Optimization Pair Spectrometer Design Optimization A. Somov, Jefferson Lab GlueX Collaboration Meeting September
Yury CHESNOKOV Crystal Collimation workshop, March 7, 2005 CALIBRATION of CMS CALORIMETERS with LHC PROTON BEAM DEFLECTED BY CRYSTAL CALIBRATION of CMS.
Hall D Photon Beam Simulation and Rates Part 1: photon beam line Part 2: tagger Richard Jones, University of Connecticut Hall D Beam Line and Tagger Review.
Upcoming Review of the Hall D Photon Beam and Tagger Richard Jones, University of Connecticut, for the GlueX collaboration GlueX Collaboration Meeting.
The Tagger Microscope Richard Jones, University of Connecticut Hall D Tagger - Photon Beamline ReviewJan , 2005, Newport News presented by GlueX.
T. Horn, SHMS Optics Update SHMS Optics Update Tanja Horn Hall C Users Meeting 31 January 2009.
Bogdan Wojtsekhowski, Jefferson Lab Experimental search for A’ for APEX collaboration 1.
LBNE R&D Briefing May 12, 2014 LBNE R&D Briefing May 12, 2014 LArIAT and LBNE Jim Stewart LArIAT EPAG Chair BNL LBNE LARIAT-EPAG J. Stewart BNL T. Junk.
March A. Chancé, J. Payet DAPNIA/SACM / Beta-beam ECFA/BENE Workshop The Decay Ring -First Design- A. Chancé, J.Payet CEA/DSM/DAPNIA/SACM.
Spectroscopic Investigation of P-shell Λ hypernuclei by the (e,e'K + ) Reaction - Analysis Update of the Jlab Experiment E Chunhua Chen Hampton.
Measurements of F 2 and R=σ L /σ T on Deuteron and Nuclei in the Nucleon Resonance Region Ya Li January 31, 2009 Jlab E02-109/E (Jan05)
Status of the Beamline Simulation A.Somov Jefferson Lab Collaboration Meeting, May 11, 2010.
HKS Analysis Status Report HKS Analysis Status Report Liguang Tang (Hampton/JLAB) Hall C User Meeting, Jan. 15, 2011 HKS has data taken in 2005 (E01-011)
SHMS Optics and Background Studies Tanja Horn Hall C Summer Meeting 5 August 2008.
Polarized 3 He Target for 12 GeV Experiments J. P. Chen, August 15, 2012, JLab  Experiments and requirements  Target performance from previous experiments.
Spectrometer Optics John J. LeRose. The Basics Charged particles moving through static magnetic fields.  Magnetic Rigidity Local radius of curvature.
Vincent Sulkosky Massachusetts Institute of Technology Spokespeople: J.-P. Chen, A. Deur, F. Garibaldi Hall A Collaboration Meeting December 10 th, 2012.
E Analysis update Adjust of the Splitter-HKS Side Yuncheng Han May 09, 2012 Hampton University JLab hypernuclear collaboration meeting.
Measurement of F 2 and R=σ L /σ T in Nuclei at Low Q 2 Phase I Ya Li Hampton University January 18, 2008.
APEX Septum Analysis G.M. Urciuoli. Comparison between PREX septum field (from SNAKE input), and APEX septum field (from TOSCA simulations). Y axis.
Update on the Hall C Monte Carlo simulation for 12 GeV Mark Jones.
Latifa Elouadrhiri Jefferson Lab Hall B 12 GeV Upgrade Drift Chamber Review Jefferson Lab March 6- 8, 2007 CLAS12 Drift Chambers Simulation and Event Reconstruction.
October 2005 Qweak Collaboration Meeting Detailed Design of Shield House and Collimators wrt Backgrounds Yongguang Liang Just getting started – will probably.
GlueX Two Magnet Tagger G. Yang University of Glasgow Part 1, 3 D Tosca analysis. Part 2, Preliminary Drawings. Part 3, Proposed Assembly Procedures (i)
Lecture 9: Inelastic Scattering and Excited States 2/10/2003 Inelastic scattering refers to the process in which energy is transferred to the target,
Proton Charge Form Factor Measurement E. Cisbani INFN Rome – Sanità Group and Italian National Institute of Health 113/Oct/2011E. Cisbani / Proton FF.
Geant4 Simulation of the Beam Line for the HARP Experiment M.Gostkin, A.Jemtchougov, E.Rogalev (JINR, Dubna)
SHMS Spectrometer Update Hall C 2008 Users Meeting Paul Brindza January 18, 2008.
Status Report particle identification with the RICH detector Claudia Höhne - GSI Darmstadt, Germany general overview focus on ring radius/ Cherenkov angle.
Optics, Tracking, and TOF Status/Update/Roadmap Xin Qian KRL Caltech.
Magnetized hadronic calorimeter and muon veto for the K +   +  experiment L. DiLella, May 25, 2004 Purpose:  Provide pion – muon separation (muon veto)
E97-110: Small Angle GDH Experimental Status Report E97-110: Small Angle GDH Experimental Status Report Vincent Sulkosky Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
SBS Magnet, Optics, and Spin Transport John J. LeRose with help from David Hamilton and others Technical Review of the Super BigBite Spectrometer January.
Hall C - 12 GeV pCDR Max. Central Momentum 11 GeV/c 9 GeV/c Min. Scattering Angle 5.5 deg 10 deg Momentum Resolution.15% -.2% Solid Angle 2.1 msr 4.4 msr.
Ibrahim H. Albayrak, Hampton University Group Meeting Experiment Rosen07: Measurement of R =  L /  T on Deuterium in the Nucleon Resonance Region. 
Vincent Sulkosky Massachusetts Institute of Technology Spokespeople: J.-P. Chen, A. Deur, F. Garibaldi Hall A Collaboration Meeting June 13 th, 2013 E97-110:
BENE MECC detector Pasquale Migliozzi INFN – Napoli.
MEIC Detector and IR Integration Vasiliy Morozov, Charles Hyde, Pawel Nadel-Turonski MEIC Detector and IR Design Mini-Workshop, October 31, 2011.
Experiment Rosen07: Measurement of R =  L /  T on Deuterium in the Nucleon Resonance Region.  Physics  Data Analysis  Cross Section calculation 
Beam collimation in the transfer line from 8 GeV linac to the Main Injector A. Drozhdin The beam transfer line from 8 GeV Linac to the Main Injector is.
Interaction Region Design and Detector Integration V.S. Morozov for EIC Study Group at JLAB 2 nd Mini-Workshop on MEIC Interaction Region Design JLab,
Detector / Interaction Region Integration Vasiliy Morozov, Charles Hyde, Pawel Nadel-Turonski Joint CASA/Accelerator and Nuclear Physics MEIC/ELIC Meeting.
Jin Huang Brookhaven National Lab ● Optics General ● Test Run Calibration ● Comment on Full Runs Trying to collect materials from three years ago. May.
Envisioned PbWO4 detector Wide-Angle Compton Scattering at JLab-12 GeV with a neutral-particle detector With much input from B. Wojtsekhowski and P. Kroll.
Vahe Mamyan, Hall-C collaboration meeting, January Data Analysis of F2 and R in Deuterium and Nuclei  Physics  Experiment Setup  HMS Detectors.
Mitglied der Helmholtz-Gemeinschaft Hit Reconstruction for the Luminosity Monitor March 3 rd 2009 | T. Randriamalala, J. Ritman and T. Stockmanns.
Min Huang g2p/GEp Collaboration Meeting April 18, 2011.
MAIN DUMP LINE: BEAM LOSS SIMULATIONS WITH THE TDR PARAMETERS Y. Nosochkov E. Marin, G. White (SLAC) LCWS14 Workshop, Belgrade, October 7, 2014.
Status of the magnet studies in the ARCS (FLUKA)
Benchmarking MAD, SAD and PLACET Characterization and performance of the CLIC Beam Delivery System with MAD, SAD and PLACET T. Asaka† and J. Resta López‡
Target Effect, Beam correction and T0 Adjustment
Analysis of 14/20 mrad Extraction Line Energy Chicane
Large Booster and Collider Ring
SBS Magnet, Optics, and Spin Transport
Ion-Side Small Angle Detection Forward, Far-Forward, & Ultra-Forward
CNGS Proton beam line: news since NBI2002 OUTLINE 1. Overview
Special Considerations for SIDIS
Wei Luo Lanzhou University 2011 Hall C User Meeting January 14, 2011
Beam Loss Simulations LHC
Hall “12 GeV” May 27, 2003 NAPP 2003: J.J. LeRose.
Hall C Users Meeting 31 January 2009
EIC Accelerator Collaboration Meeting
Presentation transcript:

SHMS Optics Studies Tanja Horn JLab JLab Hall C meeting 18 January 2008

SHMS experiment requirements Hall C 12 GeV experiments can be categorized according to their requirements for understanding the SHMS acceptance –L/T separations (e.g. F π, factorization) require pt-to-pt systematic of 0.4% in a momentum region of -15% to +10% –Asymmetry measurements ok with % systematic ExperimentTargetSHMS angles (deg) Fpi12, P128-cm (~23) R=σ L /σ T 15-cm5.5 x>115-cm g2, (A1N)40-cm , ( ) G Ep 30-cm PV LD 2 40-cm13.5 L/T separations

Context The purpose of the collimator is to define a geometrical acceptance in which the spectrometer optical properties are sufficiently well understood Acceptance depends on dp/p (δ) and target length –Characterized through event loss: Acceptance=1-loss Geometric effects (apertures) – well understood Efficiency of the optical transport – more difficult to model Sieve slit allows for studies of the variation of optical properties over the full solid angle acceptance of the spectrometer –Populate a region simultaneously with many particle trajectories

SHMS horizontal acceptance Acceptance limited by well known magnet sizes and magnet gradients Losses before the dipole are dominated by the aperture of Q1 The figure shows the δ dependence of the acceptance after the quadrupoles –Events in the red region fall outside of at least one of the nominal detector apertures –The green lines denote the acceptance determined by the nominal detector configuration -10% < δ < +22%

SHMS collimator placement Design will be octagonal shape Dimensions depend on location in z Q1Q2Q3HBD Possible sieve collimator locations y x Sieve collimator in front of HB: standard optics calibration may be complicated –Aperture defining slits: best location in front of HB Sieve collimator in front of Q1: optics modeling straightforward, but have to assume that perturbations due to HB are small

Collimated SHMS acceptance Slit at 110 cm (HB)Slit at 267 cm (Q1) Acceptance excludes losses before the dipole and detector geometry The yellow and blue bands indicate the maximum δ range for L/T separations at positive δ

Collimator reduces uncertainties due to optics Event loss at Q1 due to geometric effects Acceptance at dipole entrance depends on aperture and δ –Events at negative δ are focused more +10% < δ < +15% Collimator can eliminate events that would be lost inside the dipole –Reduces model dependent systematic uncertainty Q1Q1 Q2Q2 Q3Q3 D

Collimated SHMS acceptance corrected for loss at the dipole entrance Acceptance shows losses inside the dipole and exit Understanding of losses inside the dipole could be improved through optics studies using actual data or precise mapping of the fields Slit at 110 cm (HB)Slit at 267 cm (Q1)

SHMS Collimator Summary Small collimator could be used for L/T separations –good understanding of acceptance function In general, size of the collimator depends on the target length –Effective target length for all L/T separations is <3cm –May need a special small collimator for extended targets typically used in asymmetry measurements –Large collimator also possible if rates more important than systematics Shape: octagonal, material: heavymet –thickness: same as for HMS (6.3cm), but still under study –dimensions in x and y depend on location in z – both locations in front of HB and Q1 would be possible Mechanical design: currently fixed, but moving design may also be feasible

SHMS sieve slit design Size of sieve holes: 3 mrad –For comparison: HMS sieve holes diameter is 0.504cm (3 mrad) Further studies of the focal plane patterns will determine the optimal design for optics reconstruction Z=110cmZ=267cm Sieve slit is used to understand the optics properties the spectrometer Figures show simulations of possible sieve hole configurations

SHMS Optics: plans Implement real magnets in the Monte Carlo –Current SHMS Monte Carlo uses ideal magnets HB field map differences – effect on optics –Initial check by J. LeRose using SNAKE –Final studies will be done using COSY after real magnets are implemented

Study of SHMS detector sizes Nominal target length and angle set by approved experiments –40cm target, 40deg Scattering chamber can accommodate 50cm targets DetectorZ (cm) Xsize (cm) Ysize (cm) Atm. Cer-310 to DC DC C 4 F 10 Cer+70 to Calorimeter+280 to Values are given for the back of the detectors Beam envelope at selected detector locations

SHMS further studies SHMS horizontal bender prototype tests for radiative heating studies –Performed prototype tests in summer 2006 Analysis is complete Improvement of MC requires more data –Additional measurement near end of G Ep with improved sensitivity less than 100 mK Detector hut shielding –Initial estimate from PDG: 1-2m concrete –More detailed simulation for SHMS structure review in March 2008 SHMS 18° vertical bend Q1Q2Q3HBD

SHMS information updates Documentation about SHMS R&D and upgrade in Hall C 12 GeV database – User: 12gev Password: xxxxxxxx for Updates to the 12 GeV web site currently are currently located here: Nominal SHMS parameters Links to: –Experiment requirements –Document database –SHMS Optics studies Other 12 GeV links: –Monte Carlo –Spectrometer Layout