0 The Co-Evolution of Land Use and Transport: Theory and Application to London David Levinson University of Minnesota Imperial College, London February.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 Introduction to Transportation Systems. 2 PART I: CONTEXT, CONCEPTS AND CHARACTERIZATI ON.
Advertisements

David J. Sailor1 and Hongli Fan2 1. Portland State University
Chapter 5 Urban Growth. Purpose This chapter explores the determinants of growth in urban income and employment.
Distributing the Benefits and Burdens of Growth: Metropolitan Equity in the Portland Region.
Twin Cities Case Study: Northstar Corridor. ●By 2030, region expected to grow by nearly 1 million, with 91% to 95% of new growth forecast to be located.
Norman Washington Garrick CE 2710 Spring 2014 Lecture 07
Classic Urban Models.
Modal Split Analysis.
Chapter 4 1 Chapter 4. Modeling Transportation Demand and Supply 1.List the four steps of transportation demand analysis 2.List the four steps of travel.
Lec 3, Ch. 2 Transp Systems & Organization Understand the nation’s transportation system is the result of independent actions (through reading) Understand.
Urban Transport Modeling (based on these two sources) A Transportation Modeling Primer May, 1995 Edward A. Beimborn Center for Urban Transportation Studies.
Associating David Levinson Questions How do people find jobs? Does land use pattern matter? How should JH Balance be measured? Jobs Housing Balance does.
Luci2 Urban Simulation Model John R. Ottensmann Center for Urban Policy and the Environment Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis.
Lec 15 LU, Part 1: Basics and simple LU models (ch6.1 & 2 (A), ch (C1) Get a general idea of urban planning theories (from rading p (A)
Modeling Urban Land-use with Cellular Automata Geog 232: Geo-Simulation Sunhui(Sunny) Sim February 7 th, 2005.
Alain Bertaud Urbanist Module 2: Spatial Analysis and Urban Land Planning The Spatial Structure of Cities: International Examples of the Interaction of.
THE URBAN SYSTEM CENTRAL PLACE THEORY and RELATED CONCEPTS.
Alain Bertaud Urbanist The Spatial Structure of Cities: Practical Decisions Facing Urban Planners Module 2: Spatial Analysis and Urban Land Planning.
Lowry Model Pam Perlich URBPL 5/6020 University of Utah.
1 Road network vulnerability Important links and areas, exposed users Erik Jenelius Dept. of Transport and Economics Royal Institute of Technology (KTH)
Bus Rapid Transit: Chicago’s New Route to Opportunity Josh Ellis, BRT Project Manager Metropolitan Planning Council.
Accessibility David Levinson. Why Do Cities Form? Why does the Twin Cities exist? Why are the Twin Cities larger than Duluth or Fargo? Why is Chicago.
Abstract This paper develops a positive theory of network connectivity, seeking to explain the micro- foundations of alternative network topologies as.
1 Module 8 STATION AREA PLANNING. 2 Module 8 Station Area Planning Key Concepts and Definitions Station Area Planning Process 1.Define the Station Area.
TRB Transportation Planning Applications Conference Houston, Texas May 2009 Ann Arbor Transportation Plan Update-- Connecting the Land Use & Transportation.
Urban Transport Modeling (based on these two sources) A Transportation Modeling Primer May, 1995 Edward A. Beimborn Center for Urban Transportation Studies.
Lecture 4 Transport Network and Flows. Mobility, Space and Place Transport is the vector by which movement and mobility is facilitated. It represents.
Employment Location Choice 3 Current Issues. Overview Requires space (i.e. real estate market) Models specified for sector preferences Some exceptions.
1 The vulnerability of road networks under area-covering disruptions Erik Jenelius Lars-Göran Mattsson Div. of Transport and Location Analysis Dept. of.
Modeling in the “Real World” John Britting Wasatch Front Regional Council April 19, 2005.
Travel Demand Forecasting: Trip Distribution CE331 Transportation Engineering.
1 INTERNATIONAL URBAN DEVELOPMENT WORKSHOP 12 and 13 NOVEMBER 2008 Pretoria, South Africa revised December 2008 Gauteng urban spatial structure Evolution.
1 More PT with less money – Budget cuts as an opportunity Workshop EMTA – Vienna, October 11th 2013 David van der Spek – Stadsregio Amsterdam.
Transportation Planning, Transportation Demand Analysis Land Use-Transportation Interaction Transportation Planning Framework Transportation Demand Analysis.
Classic Urban Models.
RPS Land Use and Transportation Modeling Results Presentation to RPS TAC & MPO TAC Brian Gregor Transportation Planning Analysis Unit May 17, 2006.
A review of M. Zonoozi, P. Dassanayake, “User Mobility and Characterization of Mobility Patterns”, IEEE J. on Sel. Areas in Comm., vol 15, no. 7, Sept.
Montreal, th October, th International EMME Users’ Conference The modelling of 2 different cases of the trip distribution in EMME in the.
David B. Roden, Senior Consulting Manager Analysis of Transportation Projects in Northern Virginia TRB Transportation Planning Applications Conference.
A Graph-based Friend Recommendation System Using Genetic Algorithm
Overview Freight Modeling Overview Tianjia Tang, PE., Ph.D FHWA, Office of Freight Management and Operations Phone:
Architecture David Levinson. East Asian Grids Kyoto Nara Chang-an Ideal Chinese Plan.
Centre for Advanced Spatial Analysis (CASA), UCL, 1-19 Torrington Place, London WC1E 6BT, UK web Talk.
Considering land use as a transport policy tool: A London perspective Isabel Dedring, Transport for London IMPACTS Vienna, March 2006.
Incorporating Traffic Operations into Demand Forecasting Model Daniel Ghile, Stephen Gardner 22 nd international EMME Users’ Conference, Portland September.
The Evolution of Transportation Networks NetSci 2006 David Levinson.
Presented to Time of Day Subcommittee May 9, 2011 Time of Day Modeling in FSUTMS.
Colby Brown, Citilabs Dennis Farmer, Metropolitan Council
Residential Location David Levinson. Push and Pull Pull - advantages of locating near specific things Push - disadvantages of locating near specific things.
Urbanization Key Issue #4: Why do suburbs have distinctive problems?
Lec 27: Ch3.(T&LD): Traffic Analysis – Directional distribution of site traffic Notice the difference in the trip distribution process between urban transportation.
Models of Urban Structure
Generated Trips and their Implications for Transport Modelling using EMME/2 Marwan AL-Azzawi Senior Transport Planner PDC Consultants, UK Also at Napier.
Shaping our Future Transportation Transportation trends Influencing trends through land use decisions Alternative futures: Base Case and Scenario Complementary.
Urban Planning Group Implementation of a Model of Dynamic Activity- Travel Rescheduling Decisions: An Agent-Based Micro-Simulation Framework Theo Arentze,
STAMFORD CAPACITY AND LIMITS TO GROWTH STUDY SOUTH KESTEVEN DISTRICT COUNCIL FINAL REPORT PRESENTATION PRESENTERS: UNA McGAUGHRIN JESSE HONEY 14 TH DECEMBER.
Urban Land-Use Theories
West of England Joint Transport Study
Urban Land Values and Urban Form
1st November, 2016 Transport Modelling – Developing a better understanding of Short Lived Events Marcel Pooke – Operational Modelling & Visualisation Manager.
Marron Institute of Urban Management,
Modelling Sustainable Urban Transport
Chapter 13: Urban Patterns
Chapter 4. Modeling Transportation Demand and Supply
Urban Models How and why does land use organize a city?
Chapter 8 The Urban Labor Market.
2009 Minnesota MPO Conference August 11, 2009
Regional accessibility indicators: developments and perspectives
CENTRAL PLACE THEORY -Walter Christaller,1933
Travel demand forecasting tools and spatial change
Presentation transcript:

0 The Co-Evolution of Land Use and Transport: Theory and Application to London David Levinson University of Minnesota Imperial College, London February 21, 2007 With Bhanu Yerra, Feng Xie, Shanjiang Zhu, Ahmed El-Geneidy

1 General Points Transportation and Land use are interdependent shapers of urban form –Concentration of commercial activities (suburbanization of residences) and prosperity of public transport at the first half of 20th century. –Decentralization of both commercial and residential activities accompanied by expanding automobile/highway system in second half of 20th century.

2 Organization of Talk Movie: (go to SIMS) Orderliness in London SIGNAL - A Simulation Model of Co- evolution Twin Cities & Next steps

3 The Sequence of Development? This extension of the railway system by means of feeder lines means that in many ways the early development of the system can be viewed, not in terms of booms and slumps, but in rational steps. By the end of 1833, three of the five English provincial towns with a population of more than 100,000 had railway links with London under construction; by the end of 1836 only Portsmouth remained among English towns of over 50,000 population without a line authorized; and by the end of 1837 most towns of more than 20,000 inhabitants were on or close to the route of an authorized railway. - M.C. Reed

4 Orderliness Hypothesis H: Places will be connected to the network roughly in order of their population density (density is used to control for area). The places that have the highest population per unit area (or population density) will get the network first. Tested in London

5 Background 1836 London and Greenwich Railway 1846 Royal Commission on Railway Termini 1854 Metropolitan Railway chartered 1863 Metropolitan Railway opens 1884 “Circle” closed 1890 City and South London Railway (first tube) Railways not permitted to be developers except Metropolitan Railway --> Metro-Land Greenbelt

6 Surface Rail & Population

7 Underground & Population

8 Boroughs without Underground Service

9 City of London

10 Leads and Lags Transport Leads Land Use Transport Follows Land Use Developed Area(B) Development densifies in urban area after construction of new transport infrastructure (A) Constructing new (higher speed) mode in existing urbanized area (e.g. London Transport in early years) Undeveloped Area(C) Constructing new (higher speed) mode in greenfields, to promote development Still waiting …

11 Qualitative Model Rail first inter-city: connects outside -> in Underground first connects termini, then other points in developed area, and finally connects to new suburbs: inside -> out Has a decentralizing effect for residences, lowering population density in center, increasing it in suburbs. Other factors; entrepreneurs, construction costs, South vs. North (income, rail embeddedness, geology, competition, south already more local than north (London in south of England)

12 SIGNAL Simulator of Integrated Growth of Network and Land use –Simulate the co-evolution of land use and road networks. –Implement a bottom-up process that incorporates independent route choices of travelers, location decisions of businesses (jobs) and residents (workers), as well as investment decisions of autonomous roads. –Kept as simple as possible to capture salient components, while enabling us to display and analyze the emergent patterns of land use and network on a large scale.

13 Model Framework

14 Travel Demand Models 1.Trip Generation 2.Trip Distribution 4. Traffic Assignment Calibrated Stochastic User Equilibrium (SUE) 3. Mode Choice Single mode is assumed

15 Road Investment Models 1. Revenue Model 2. Cost Model 3. Investment Model a b

16 SONG (fixed Land Use) Base Case: Uniform Initial Speeds and Land use (U/U) (left) Spatial distribution of uniform speed for the initial network; (right) Spatial distribution of speed for the network at equilibrium reached after 8 iterations.

17 Uniform initial speeds and random initial land use (U/R) Spatial distribution of speed for experiment U/R after reaching equilibrium;

18 Random initial speeds and random initial land use (R/R) (left) Spatial distribution of initial speed for experiment R/R (random initial speeds and random initial land use); (right) Spatial distribution of speeds for the network after reaching equilibrium; The color and thickness of the link shows its relative speed or flow.

19 Uniform initial speeds and bell-shaped initial land use (U/B) Spatial distribution of final speeds for experiment U/B (uniform initial speeds and bell shaped land use)

20 Access and Land use Models Assumptions –Residence and employment are the only types of activities, and their totals are kept equal and constant. –Accessibility to population and to employment are the only factors that affect location decisions. –People want to live near jobs, but far from other people to maximize available space and to avoid potential competitors for jobs, while employment wants to be accessible both to other employment and to people (who are their suppliers of labor and customers).

21 Access & Land use Models 1. Accessibility 2. Potential 3. Redistribution

22 Measures Gini Equivalent radius (r) Where E j = employment of zone j d j = distance of zone j to the center of a region

23 Numerical Example A hypothetical metropolitan area where: –both the population and employment are distributed over a two-dimensional grid, stretching 10 km in both dimensions, divided into a 20X20 grid lattice of land use cells (400 zones). –A total of 400,000 people are living in the city, which is equivalent to an average of 1,000 residents in each zone. Total employment equals 400,000 as well (and each resident holds a job). –Two-way roads connect the centroids of each pair of adjacent zones, thus forming a 20X20 grid of road network as well, comprising 400 nodes and 1520 links.

24 Experiments and Hypotheses Experiments Hypotheses Initially flat land uses become more concentrated, and initially concentrated become less so. The degree to which land uses are concentrated is reinforced when road networks are allowed to vary rather than remain constant.

25 Result: activity density Evolution of employment without network dynamics Evolution of employment with network dynamics

26 Results: Gini 0 more equitable 1 less equitable

27 Results: Equivalent Radius

28 Sensitivity

29 Sensitivity

30 Summary A simple co-evolution model of transportation and land use which incorporates independent route choices of travelers, location decisions of businesses (jobs) and residents (workers), as well as investment decisions of autonomous roads. Experimental results show that the degree of both employment and population concentration is reinforced when road networks are allowed to vary rather than remain constant. Contemporary integrated transportation and land use models that neglect road dynamics could underestimate the concentration of land uses.

31 Next Steps Application to Twin Cities Estimation & Calibration of Models (Markov Chain, Cellular Automata, MCCA, SIGNAL) using detailed empirical dataset.

32

33

34

35

36

37

38

39

40 Future Models … Modeling –Explicitly consider co-evolution –Dynamic transportation network instead of static network –Dynamic land use rather than fixed land use –Variable rather than static demand –Bottom-up process (Cellular Automata/Agent-Based) instead of top-down (Allocation, Equilibrium, Optimization)

41 Thank You More available at: Rational.ce.umn.edu

42 Orderliness

43 Random initial speeds and bell-shaped initial land use (R/B) (top) Spatial distribution of initial speed for experiments R/B (random initial speeds and bell shaped land use); (bottom) Spatial distribution of speeds for the network after reaching equilibrium

44 Gravity model parameter variations with uniform network and land use (U/U) Spatial distribution of relative speeds at equilibrium for (top) w = 0.02 (less sensitive to travel cost); (bottom) w = 0.8 (more sensitive to travel cost).

45 Variation of average traffic flow (left) speed (right) with w for 10X10, 11X11 and 15X15 networks.

46 Slice of a bell-shaped downtown land use pattern