M. Gilchriese - November 12, 1998 Status Report on Outer Support Frame W. Miller Hytec, Inc E. Anderssen, D. Bintinger, M. Gilchriese LBNL.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Stave Vacuum Tool Tim WP4 Face to Face Liverpool, 13/11/14.
Advertisements

M. Gilchriese SQP Clearance June 8, M. Gilchriese 2 Overview A1-2 inners have been mounted on backbone An A1-2 outer has been mounted on the backbone.
ATLAS Frame PRR 1 W.O. Miller Feb US ATLAS Pixel Detector Global Supports PRR W.O. Miller, R. Smith, W.K. Miller, R. Baer HYTEC G. Gilchriese, E.
ATLAS Pixel Detector February 2003 N. Hartman LBNL 1 Pixel Support Tube PRR: Assembly, Production, Schedule February 2003.
Vertex Detector Cable Considerations Bill Cooper Fermilab VXD.
The Intermediate Silicon Layers detector OUTLINE ISL inside CDFII Why the ISL? Conceptual Design Ladders and Spaceframe Rasnik Online Alignment System.
Drafting Rear Elevations. Start with outer frame when drafting standard flat. Heights are generally in multiples of 2’-0”. Outer Frame.
Outer Stave Prototype Update E. Anderssen, M. Cepeda, M. Garcia-Sciveres, M. Gilchriese, N. Hartman, J. Silber LBNL W. Miller, W. Shih Allcomp, Inc ATLAS.
VG1 i T i March 9, 2006 W. O. Miller ATLAS Silicon Tracker Upgrade Recent Study Topics Full length model with wafers, hybrids and cable as dead weight.
M. Gilchriese Mechanics Labor and Disk Sectors US Pixel Meeting November 2001.
ATLAS Pixel Detector September 2002 A. Das LBNL 1 Pixel Support Tube Rails: Design and Prototyping September, Review.
Pixel Upgrade Local Supports Based on Thermally Conducting Carbon Foam E. Anderssen, M. Cepeda, S. Dardin, M. Garcia-Sciveres, M. Gilchriese, N. Hartman,
Global Supports Update W.O. Miller October 2001 US ATLAS Pixel Detector Global Supports Status W.O. Miller, R. Smith, W.K. Miller, G. Hayman, R. Baer HYTEC.
INFN-LNF / D. Orecchini – S. Tomassini – 06/24-25/2015 CLAS12 – RICH MECHANICS REVIEW SLIDE 1 RICH MODULE INTEGRATION IN CLAS_12 – LAST LAYOUT RICH MODULE.
Carbon-Epoxy Composite Base Plates for the PHOBOS Spectrometer Arms J.Michalowski, M.Stodulski The H.Niewodniczanski Institute of Nuclear Physics, Krakow.
M. Gilchriese Update on Pixel Prototype Mechanics/Cooling Structures at LBNL February 1, 2008 M. Cepeda, S. Dardin, M. Garcia-Sciveres, M. Gilchriese and.
M. Gilchriese Status Report Sectors, Rings, Frame December 2002.
18 November 2010 Immanuel Gfall (HEPHY Vienna) SVD IR Mechanics 7 th B2GM.
Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter1:48 scale READ ALL THE INSTRUCTIONS AND INSPECT THE PARTS SHEETS FIRST. Score fold lines and cut out the parts. High Gain Antenna.
W.O. Miller i T i VG 1 Example Barrel Structures- Disk Primary FEA of Disk Frame Supports FEA of Disk Frame Supports –Structure 2m long with two end plates.
Material calculation of petal core variants Sergio Díez Cornell with input from many people CERN AUW, 3 rd Nov 2014.
SLHC Pixel Layout Studies S. Dardin, M. Garcia-Sciveres, M. Gilchriese, N. Hartman LBNL November 4, 2008.
November 16, 2001 C. Newsom BTeV Pixel Modeling, Prototyping and Testing C. Newsom University of Iowa.
ATLAS Pixel Detector July 2001 Cooling Services Connections N. Hartman LBNL Cooling Connections Status Report October 11, 2001 N. Hartman, E. Anderssen,
ALCPG11-Peterson1 Development of a Low-Material TPC Endplate for ILD Dan Peterson Laboratory for Elementary-Particle Physics, Cornell University.
1 Advanced Endplate - mechanics: Development of a Low-Material TPC Endplate for ILD Dan Peterson Laboratory for Elementary-Particle Physics, Cornell University.
ATLAS LBNL Pixel Support Study 1 W.O. Miller HYTEC ATLAS Pixel Detector Support Structure Status and Future Developments February 19, 1999 W. Miller HYTEC.
M. Gilchriese Disk Geometry January 18, M. Gilchriese 2 ATLAS Coordinate System.
1 US Pixel Mechanics Role Global support structureIntermediate support structureLocal support structure Stave SectorDisk Barrel x (9-11) x5 x (22,40,56)
U.S. Deliverables Cost and Schedule Summary M. G. D. Gilchriese U.S. ATLAS Review Revised Version November 29, 2000.
Global Supports CDR 1 W.O. Miller July 2001 US ATLAS Pixel Detector Disk Ring/Frame Status Review W.O. Miller, R. Smith, W.K. Miller, R. Baer HYTEC G.
VG1 i T i March 9, 2006 W. O. Miller ATLAS Silicon Tracker Upgrade Upgrade Stave Study Topics Current Analysis Tasks –Stave Stiffness, ability to resist.
ACFA-7; Taipei, Nov 2004 H.Weerts status Si licon D etector Status H.Weerts Fermilab/Michigan State Univ. (Progress on Si-tracker layout)
M. Gilchriese Overview of Production Plan for Pixel Global Support and Disk Support Rings M. G. D. Gilchriese Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory February.
ATLAS Pixel Detector February 2002 Cooling Services Connections N. Hartman LBNL Cooling Connections Status Report: LBNL Effort February, 2002 N. Hartman,
U.S. Deliverables Cost and Schedule Summary M. G. D. Gilchriese Revised Version December 18, 2000.
Global Supports CDR 1 W.O. Miller July 2001 US ATLAS Pixel Detector Global Supports CDR W.O. Miller, R. Smith, W.K. Miller, G. Hayman HYTEC G. Gilchriese,
M. Gilchriese U.S. Pixel Mechanics Overview M. G. D. Gilchriese Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory April 2000.
M. Gilchriese Disk Sector Production Pixel Local Supports Production Readiness Review.
1 Outer Barrel, Phase 2 Mech Review 26 Aug 2013, indico: Antti Onnela, CERN Tracker Phase 2 Mechanics Review, 26 August 2013 Status of the Outer.
M. Gilchriese - November 14, Module Decision - To Do List By pixel meetings associated with February 22-26, 1999 ATLAS week Beyond making and testing.
ATLAS 1 Beam Pipe Support Structure (BPSS) Services Interface and Assembly Final Design Review, April 2003 E. Anderssen, N. Hartman, A Smith, LBNL S. Coelli,
1 Jim Thomas - LBL A proposal to close the Grid Leak “it will never die” Yuri Fysiak, Jim Thomas & Gene VanBuren Eric Anderssen, Howard Wieman & Jon Wirth.
1 Monophase Measurements on Prototype Pixel Structures D. Bintinger, M. Gilchriese, J. Taylor and J. Wirth and contributions from D. Cragg, E. Perrin and.
Simon Kwan - FermilabCMS Tracker Upgrade Workshop – June 3, Update on the Phase 1 FPIX Half Disk Design Simon Kwan Fermilab on behalf of the USCMS.
Pixel Upgrade Carbon Foam and Outer Stave Update E. Anderssen, M. Cepeda, M. Garcia-Sciveres, M. Gilchriese, T. Johnson, J. Silber Lawrence Berkelely National.
Local Supports to IDR Discussion ATLAS Upgrade Week November 2014.
M. Gilchriese - December 2000 Disk Sector Status E. Anderssen, M. Gilchriese, F. Goozen, N. Hartman, T. Johnson, F. McCormack, J. Wirth and D. Uken Lawrence.
December 1999 Frame and Assembly Planning Status E. Anderssen, D. Bintinger, M. Gilchriese and F. Goozen LBNL W. Miller Hytec, Inc.
Walter Sondheim 6/9/20081 DOE – Review of VTX upgrade detector for PHENIX Mechanics: Walter Sondheim - LANL.
M. Gilchriese Work Plan W. Miller iTi M. Cepeda, S. Dardin, M. Gilchriese, C. Haber, R. Post LBNL February 6, 2007.
M. Gilchriese - September 2000 Pixel Insertable Layouts September 2000.
A hollow stave Ian Wilmut – August LBL stave At the March UG week LBL showed a prototype asymmetric stave. This prompted consideration of the strip.
M. Gilchriese Towards Fabrication of a Mechanical Prototype Stave.
Upgrade PO M. Tyndel, MIWG Review plans p1 Nov 1 st, CERN Module integration Review – Decision process  Information will be gathered for each concept.
1.2 m Stave with Co-cured Facings Using Low Areal Density Fiber G. Viehhauser (Oxford) C. Haber (LBNL) T. Hurteau, W. Emmet (Yale) R. Rurns, D. Lynn (BNL)
Redesign of LumiCal mechanical structure W.Daniluk, E.Kielar, J.Kotula, K.Oliwa, Wojciech Wierba, L.Zawiejski Institute of Nuclear Physics PAN Cracow,
D. Peterson, for discussion of LC-TPC LP, interface of Endplate and Field cage, Discussion of the LP endplate and field cage geometry A version.
ATLAS Pixel Detector December 2001 Cooling Services Connections N. Hartman LBNL Cooling Connections Status Report: LBNL Effort December, 2001 N. Hartman,
1 ILD inner region integration meeting M. Joré – Introduction ILD inner region integration meeting Welcome words Charge of the meeting The current concept.
B [OT - Mechanics & Cooling] Stefan Gruenendahl February 2, 2016 S.Grünendahl, 2016 February 2 Director's Review -- OT: Mechanics &
M. Gilchriese - February 2001 Disk Sector Status E. Anderssen, M. Gilchriese, F. Goozen, N. Hartman, T. Johnson, F. McCormack, J. Taylor, T. Weber, J.
M. Gilchriese Upgrade Stave Mechanics(Only) Status September 16, 2006.
1 IST development status  Seattle  Composite Design.
EC: 7 DISK concept Preliminary considerations
- STT LAYOUT - SECTOR F SECTOR A SECTOR B SECTOR E SECTOR D SECTOR C
Development of a low material endplate for LP1 and ILD
T2K Upgrade First look at TPC contraints (WAGASCI Constraints)
WP9 ITS Mechanics and Cooling
WG4 – Progress report R. Santoro and A. Tauro.
Presentation transcript:

M. Gilchriese - November 12, 1998 Status Report on Outer Support Frame W. Miller Hytec, Inc E. Anderssen, D. Bintinger, M. Gilchriese LBNL

M. Gilchriese - November 12, Outer Support Frame Design presented in TDR was flat panel in barrel region and spaceframe(for maximum access) in disk region. Alternative is flat panel construction throughout. Preliminary cost comparison made(for disk region) indicates that spaceframe is significantly more expensive => flat panel preferred. However, some issues –Radial clearance in disk region –Tradeoff between material and stiffness

M. Gilchriese - November 12, Disk Region Radial Clearance Reminder.. –Disk services inside frame –Barrel services outside frame Tight spot at disk 3 Compare spaceframe, flat panel options Look here

M. Gilchriese - November 12, Disk Sector Services(At Disk 3) Cables/fibers from 3 disks By design, services fit within radius of 223 mm End View Top View

M. Gilchriese - November 12, TDR Spaceframe Clearance is 13 mm in radius Spaceframe envelope

M. Gilchriese - November 12, Flat Panel(8 Sides) Clearance is only 7mm if outer radius of 245 mm is kept. Not enough. Clearance increases to 12mm if outer radius can be 250mm and barrel services routed in flat regions. Probably OK but would need more study of barrel service routing. R L =0.36% with 3% foam

M. Gilchriese - November 12, Flat Panel(10 Sides) Clearance is mm for outer radius of 245 mm. Essentially same as spaceframe. Openness ~64% Radiation length- 3% foam disk region 0.38% central region 0.36%

M. Gilchriese - November 12, Barrel Services - Spaceframe vs 10 Sided Flat Panel SpaceframeFlat Panel - no rearrangement

M. Gilchriese - November 12, Flat Panel(10 sides) - Barrel Services Packed R  mm R  mm

M. Gilchriese - November 12, Flat Panel(10 sided) - Closeup Barrel service routing is preliminary - need more work But looks OK with flat panel, in fact better for cooling tubes

M. Gilchriese - November 12, Conclusion Clearance of flat panel(10 sides) is same as spaceframe. Currently believe access with flat panel is OK but this remains to be shown by studies with full scale model. In any case, considerable tooling will be needed to insert disks with services into any frame. Proposal:accept flat panel concept and move on to more detailed design and prototypes. Although model is spaceframe, since clearance is about same => still useful. Need to add support cone model and later barrel services.

M. Gilchriese - November 12, Selection of Core Material Skins are assumed to be 0.3mm of XN50 or M55J fiber with Cyanate-Ester Resin. X0 assumed=250mm => 0.12% per skin or 0.24% total. Glue joint to core assumed to be 100 microns with X0=250mm or 0.08% Options for core –Graphite-fiber honeycomb(1/4 inch vented honeycomb) –Carbon foam of density 3 - 6% Simple comparison(10 mm thick) Minimum Shear Moduli(N/mm 2 ) X0(mm)Order Cost($) AvailabilityL-dir W-dir Graphite/fiber0.15%15-30K 4 months Foam(3%)0.11%few $100s 1 month Foam(6%)0.21%few $100s 1 month Joints are not designed but rough guess is that they add 0.02% % openness not fixed but 1st cut is 64%; total material would be about %(TDR value was 0.36%) for 3-6% foam for 10 sided disk frame. Clearly, the primary issue is relative shear strength of two and impact on stiffness; construction approach slightly different for each.

M. Gilchriese - November 12, Proposed Prototype Program Accept flat panel Provisionally accept foam but do detailed comparison calculation with graphite-fiber by end of January Fabricate small specimens for tests of properties(including after cutting) –Order foam(lead time for 10 mm not known yet) –Order skins(lead time for thin with cyanate ester could be >2 months) –Realistic timescale for these prototypes under study but not less than 3 months After specimen tests, build small panels with joints and test joints –joints need to be evaluated using FEA comparison to measurements Scope of partial prototype to be decided at February ATLAS week –Two panels joined is minimum –Half of barrel region or complete disk region would be desirable but –Need estimate of cost before deciding => get bids before February ATLAS week.