Semi-active Management of Structures Subjected to High Frequency Ground Excitation C.M. Ewing, R.P. Dhakal, J.G. Chase and J.B. Mander 19 th ACMSM, Christchurch,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 LESSLOSS Sub Project 7 Techniques and Methods for Vulnerability Reduction Barcelona 18 th May 07 – Lisbon 24 th May 07 LESSLOSS Dissemination Meeting.
Advertisements

Seismic Performance Assessment and Rehabilitation of Existing Buildings SPEAR International Workshop Joint Research Centre, Ispra, 4 th -5 th April 2005.
Robustness assessment for multiple column loss scenarios
Chapter 3 Mechanical Properties of Materials
MEEG 5113 Modal Analysis Set 3.
Kjell Simonsson 1 Vibrations in linear 1-degree of freedom systems; I. undamped systems (last updated )
Analysis and Design of Blast Resistant Underground Shelters Supervisor: Prof. T.K. Datta Abhinav Agrawal.
Ch 3.8: Mechanical & Electrical Vibrations
Performance-based Evaluation of the Seismic Response of Bridges with Foundations Designed to Uplift Marios Panagiotou Assistant Professor, University of.
Konstantinos Agrafiotis
ANALYSES OF STABILITY OF CAISSON BREAKWATERS ON RUBBLE FOUNDATION EXPOSED TO IMPULSIVE WAVE LOADS Burcharth, Andersen & Lykke Andersen ICCE 2008, Hamburg,
Lesson 1 - Oscillations Harmonic Motion Circular Motion
Instrumented Moment Frame Steel Buildings Models Erol Kalkan, PhD California Geological Survey PEER-GMSM First Work Shop, Berkeley Oct
Dynamics Free vibration: Eigen frequencies
Simulations and measurements of the pre-isolator test set-up WG5 Meeting F. Ramos, A. Gaddi, H. Gerwig, N. Siegrist November 9, 2010.
1 HOMEWORK 1 1.Derive equation of motion of SDOF using energy method 2.Find amplitude A and tanΦ for given x 0, v 0 3.Find natural frequency of cantilever,
December 3-4, 2007Earthquake Readiness Workshop Seismic Design Considerations Mike Sheehan.
GW Rodgers, C Denmead, N Leach, JG Chase & John B Mander
The characteristics of earthquake ground motions which have the greatest importance for buildings are the 1.) Duration: How long the shaking lasts. Shaking.
CABLE-STAYED BRIDGE SEISMIC ANALYSIS USING ARTIFICIAL ACCELEROGRAMS
Hybrid Experimental Analysis of Semi-active Rocking Wall Systems K.J. Mulligan, M. Fougere, J.B. Mander, J.G. Chase, G. Danton, R.B Elliott Departments.
Static Pushover Analysis
조상원 * : 박사과정, 한국과학기술원 건설환경공학과 조상원 * : 박사과정, 한국과학기술원 건설환경공학과 정형조 : 교수, 세종대학교 토목환경공학과 정형조 : 교수, 세종대학교 토목환경공학과 박선규 : 교수, 성균관대학교 토목공학과 박선규 : 교수, 성균관대학교 토목공학과.
Bentley RM Bridge Seismic Design and Analysis
February 7, John Anderson, GE/CEE 479/679 Earthquake Engineering GE / CEE - 479/679 Topic 6. Single Degree of Freedom Oscillator Feb 7, 2008 John.
NUS July 12-14, 2005 Analysis and Design for Robustness of Offshore Structures NUS – Keppel Short Course 1 Resistance to Accidental Explosions General.
Off-Diagonal 2-4 Damping Technology using Semi-Active Resetable Devices Geoffrey W Rodgers, Kerry J Mulligan, J Geoffrey Chase, John B Mander, Bruce L.
Feb 18, /34 Mechanical Engineering at Virginia Tech What to bring and what to study One 8.5 X 11 formula sheet, one side only, no examples. Save.
1. 2 CE-312 Engineering Geology and Seismology Instructor: Dr Amjad Naseer Lecture#15 Department of Civil Engineering N-W.F.P University of Engineering.
Periodic Motion. Definition of Terms Periodic Motion: Motion that repeats itself in a regular pattern. Periodic Motion: Motion that repeats itself in.
Non-linear & Buckling analysis with GSA
Lesson 13 Mechanical Shock 第 13 课 机械冲击. Contents Introduction The Free Falling Package Mechanical Shock Theory Shock Duration Shock Amplification and.
Structural Dynamics & Vibration Control Lab. 1 Kang-Min Choi, Ph.D. Candidate, KAIST, Korea Jung-Hyun Hong, Graduate Student, KAIST, Korea Ji-Seong Jo,
CP Physics Chapter 12 Waves. Hooke’s Law F spring = kx During the periodic motion At equilibrium, velocity reaches a maximum (b) At maximum displacement,
Building Fun You will have 30 minutes to build the strongest structures you can with only the materials you are provided with. Explain to the class the.
Hooke’s Law F s = - k x F s is the spring force k is the spring constant It is a measure of the stiffness of the spring A large k indicates a stiff spring.
11/18 Simple Harmonic Motion  HW “Simple Harmonic Motion” Due Thursday 11/21  Exam 4 Thursday 12/5 Simple Harmonic Motion Angular Acceleration and Torque.
A PPLIED M ECHANICS Lecture 03 Slovak University of Technology Faculty of Material Science and Technology in Trnava.
PAT328, Section 3, March 2001MAR120, Lecture 4, March 2001S14-1MAR120, Section 14, December 2001 SECTION 14 STRUCTURAL DYNAMICS.
Hyung-Jo Jung Sejong University, Korea Hyung-Jo Jung Sejong University, Korea Kang-Min Choi Korea Advanced Inst. of Science and Tech. Kang-Min Choi Korea.
Chapter 1 - Vibrations Harmonic Motion/ Circular Motion Simple Harmonic Oscillators –Linear, Mass-Spring Systems –Initial Conditions Energy of Simple Harmonic.
Geoffrey W Rodgers, John B Mander, J Geoffrey Chase, Kerry J Mulligan,
Presented by: Sasithorn THAMMARAK (st109957)
Structural Dynamics & Vibration Control Lab., KAIST 1 Structural Vibration Control Using Semiactive Tuned Mass Damper Han-Rok Ji, Graduate Student, KAIST,
Semi-Active Tuned Mass Damper Systems K.J. Mulligan, M. Miguelgorry, V. Novello, J.G. Chase, G. Rodgers, & B. Horn, J.B. Mander, A. Carr & B.L. Deam.
Response of MDOF structures to ground motion 1. If damping is well-behaving, or can be approximated using equivalent viscous damping, we can decouple.
Simple Harmonic Motion
MODULE 08 MULTIDEGREE OF FREEDOM SYSTEMS. 2 Structure vibrating in a given mode can be considered as the Single Degree of Freedom (SDOF) system. Structure.
Speaker : Yunjeong Son Master’s Course, Hongik University
Ground Vibrations and Air Blasts: Causes, Effects and Abatement.
Roll No. 14, 23, 25, 29, 43. EARTHQUAKE An earthquake (also known as a quake, tremor or temblor) is the result of a sudden release of energy in the Earth.
Bird Strike on Jet Fan. Introduction Modelling of Bird Strike using EUROPLEXUS Full Lagrangian Approach Bird modelled by SPH elements (porous gelatine.
Vibrations and Waves Chapter 11. Most object oscillate (vibrate) because solids are elastic and they will vibrate when given an impulse Tuning forks,
Robust Analysis of a Hybrid System Controlled by a  -Synthesis Method Kyu-Sik Park, Post Doctoral Researcher, UIUC, USA Hyung-Jo Jung, Assistant Professor,
BASICS OF DYNAMICS AND ASEISMIC DESIGN
VibrationsandWaves. Ch. 14 examines wave motion and the oscillating, vibrating motion that creates them. This oscillating motion is known as periodic.
Chapter 14 Vibrations and Waves. Hooke’s Law F s = - k x F s is the spring force k is the spring constant It is a measure of the stiffness of the spring.
Base Isolation. Conventional Construction Practice assumes Fixed Base Structures The Dynamic Characteristics of Fixed Base Structures are determined by.
Bassam A. Izzuddin* and Bassam A. Burgan†
Seismic analysis of Bridges Part II
A possible mechanism of dynamic earthquake triggering
Eduardo Ismael Hernández UPAEP University, MEXICO
ANDRÉS ALONSO-RODRIGUEZ Universidad de Valparaíso, Chile
Seismic Moment Dr. Syed Mohamed Ibrahim M.Tech., Ph.D.,
Assessment of Base-isolated CAP1400 Nuclear Island Design
Earthquake resistant buildings
ME321 Kinematics and Dynamics of Machines
STRUCTURAL DYNAMICS SEYE NIGUSSIE. Introduction WHAT IS STRUCTURAL DYNAMICS ?  Dynamics concerned with the study of force and motion which are time dependent.
Shipping Support Post Analysis
CALTRANS SEISMIC DESIGN CRITERIA Version 1.7 November 2012
Presentation transcript:

Semi-active Management of Structures Subjected to High Frequency Ground Excitation C.M. Ewing, R.P. Dhakal, J.G. Chase and J.B. Mander 19 th ACMSM, Christchurch, New Zealand, 2006

The Scene Structures can be highly vulnerable to a variety of environmental loads These days, man-made events can also have significant impact on the life, serviceability and safety of structures, and must be accounted for in new designs –i.e. blast loads However, what do you do about already existing and potentially vulnerable structures? –In particular, how do you manage to protect the structure without overloading shear or other demands? –Particularly true for relatively older structures Semi-active methods offer the adaptability to reduce response energy without increasing demands on the structure, but add complexity Passive methods offer simplicity and ease of design, but are not adaptable or as effective.

Characteristics of BIGM Typical BIGM Large amplitude (~100 g) Short duration (<0.05 sec) May cause sudden collapse. Impulsive nature. Post-BIGM response is also important. Horizontal 50 m Typical Seismic excitation

Characteristics of BIGM High frequency (~200 Hz) May excite high frequency vibration Modes during major shock duration. Typical BIGM Typical Seismic excitation Horizontal 50 m

If t 1 /T < critical ( ), - The maximum response of a linear structure depends on t 1 /T. Impulse Shock Spectra

T = 1 sec If t 1 /T < critical ( ), –The maximum response factor is proportional to the total energy applied, regardless of the impulse shape. Impulse-Response Relationship

A Simple Structure & Damage Loads are impulsive Excite higher order modes Plastic first peak response is not unusual Plastic deformation on return or second peak response may also occur After initial pulse the response is transient free response from a large initial value Main forms of damage: –Residual deformation –Low cycle fatigue Blast load based on pressure wave and face area 630kN live 450kN live 1000kg/story E = 27GPa

General Dynamic Response Fundamental global mode Higher order global mode Fundamental local modes Frequency increases Acceleration increases Displacement decreases

More Detailed Model Basic Elements: Multiple elements per column to capture higher order responses [Lu et al, 2001] Mass discretised over all elements in column Blast load discretised to each storey based on pressure wave and face area Simple frame used to characterise basic solutions available for something more complex than a SDOF analysis Non-linear finite elements (elastic-plastic with 3% post yield stiffness) Fundamental Period = 1 sec Main structure model captures all fundamental dynamics required for this scenario P

Typical Load Short duration impulse (< T 1 /5) Any shape will give the same result, as the basic input is an applied momentum Provides an initial displacement P blast = 350kPa pressure wave Triangular shaped pulse of duration  t = 0.05 seconds or 5% of fundamental structural period

Typical Uncontrolled Response A first large peak that is plastic Second and third peaks may also have permanent deformation Free vibration response after initial pulse (not linear) Residual deformation Permanent deflection may be larger or even negative depending on size of the load

Possible Solutions Passive = Tendons –Restrict first peak motion = initial damage –Add slightly to base shear demand on foundation –Match overturning moment diagram [Pekcan et al, 2000] –Tendon yields by design during initial peak Semi-Active = Resetable devices using 2-4 control law –Do not increase base shear –Reduce free vibration response = subsequent damage Therefore, in combination these devices are designed to reduce different occurrences of damage in the response However, can devices hooked to story’s manage damage for this case characterized by higher column mode response? Paper also considers device on 2 nd story and from ground to 2 nd story Resetable device 1 st floor Tendon in shape of moment diagram

Becoming A Proven Technology End Cap Cylinder Piston Seal More later in conference from Mulligan et al, Rodgers et al and Anaya et al on resetable devices and semi-active applications/experiments

Semi-Active Customised Hysteresis Only the control law does not increase base-shear Viscous Damper 1-4 Resetable 1-3 Resetable 2-4 Resetable Resist all motion Reset at peaks Resist motion away from 0 From 0  Peak Resist motion toward 0 From Peak  0 Resist all velocity

The Very Basic Ideas Valve a) Valves CylinderPiston b) CylinderPiston Independent two chamber design allows broader range of control laws

Specific Results Device on first floor and tendon versus uncontrolled First peak and free vibration reduced ~40-50% 1 st story response Time Displacement

Device Stiffness is Critical Results normalised to uncontrolled response Device stiffness in terms of column stiffness k % of column stiffness = good result in free vibration per [Rodgers et al, 2006] Response Energy 2-norm 1 st Peak 2nd Peak

Conclusions Blast can be completely represented by the applied momentum rather than shape, pressure or other typically unknown values Simple robust system shows potential in this proof of concept study on an emerging problem of importance for structural designers Complexity added is minimal Results show that significant improvements that could be critical to safety and survivability can be obtained Minimal extra demand on foundations makes it particularly suitable for retrofit of existing (relatively older) structures