Headform tests Data INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATION OF MOTOR VEHICLE MANUFACTURERS 1111 11 January 06 Pedestrian Safety GRSP Informal Group January 06.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Page 1 INF GR / PS / 5 th Meeting INF GR / PS JapanOttawa, Canad, Sep Page 1 INF GR / PS / 58 Contents of Headform Test Procedure 1.Vehicle.
Advertisements

INF GR / PS / 3 1 st meeting of the Informal Group on Pedestrian Safety September 4, OICA offices, Rue de Berri 4, Paris.
Pedestrian Safety GTR Leg Impact Testing 42 nd Session of GRSP December 2007 Transmitted by the expert from USA Informal Document No. GRSP (42 nd.
Analysis of Pedestrian Accident Situation and Portion Addressed by this GTR 8 th GRSP Ad Hoc Meeting Brussels, Belgium July 11 – 14, 2005 INF / GR / PS.
INF GR / PS / 70 1 Current Status in Korea for Pedestrian Safety Rule-making Researches Ministry of Construction and Transportation Republic of.
2014 KNCAP Updated Status Korea Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport Submitted by the expert from Republic of Korea Informal document GRSP
December 2008 Geneva Proposed amendments to the UNECE Regulation No. 29 on truck cab safety Russian Federation Transmitted by the expert from the Russian.
Status report GRSP IWG ECRS 53rd GRSP Geneva May 2013 Informal document GRSP (53 nd GRSP, May 2013, agenda item 19)
European Commission Enterprise and Industry New EU Regulation for the approval of 2-3 wheel vehicles and UNECE Regulations on sound level Working party.
France consideration on maximum noise in Global Technical Regulation on Quiet Road Transport Vehicles ECE-TRANS-WP29-GRB-58 Informal document GRB
Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism Survey on Safety of New Mobility Vehicles Submitted by the expert from Japan Informal document.
Transposition of GTR No.13 “Hydrogen and fuel cell vehicles” into UN Regulation - Explanatory material - 20/September/2013 The European Commission and.
Lower/Upper Bumper Reference Line Data on existing vehicles INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATION OF MOTOR VEHICLE MANUFACTURERS.
Wet Grip for C3 tyres Minimum Type Approval Level
STATUS OF CRS IN BUSES AND COACHES 44TH GRSP (9-12 DECEMBER) Informal document No. GRSP (44th GRSP, December 2008, agenda item 19(b))
Title: Australia’s Proposal for the Development of Pole Side Impact GTR Presenter’s Name: Allan Jonas Economy: Australia 33rd APEC Transportation Working.
Drought Planning and management in Spain Teodoro Estrela Deputy Water Director on Water Planning and Sustainable Water Use.
Draft Proposal ECE-R 100 protection against electric shock
RESULTS Latin NCAP GRSP – December, 2011 Geneva Phase II Informal document GRSP (50th GRSP, 6–9 December 2011, agenda item 14)
Evolution of UNECE R29 OICA proposal
11 January 06Pedestrian Safety GRSP Informal Group - January 06 Lower/Upper Bumper Reference Line Data on existing vehicles INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATION.
Sustaining growth in the new Europe – View of the European Motor Trades and Repairs Jürgen Creutzig, President, European Council for Motor Trades and Repairs.
Title: How to Make Integrated safety Standards In Korea Presenter’s Name: Seongkyun Cho Economy: Republic of KOREA.
IHRA Side Impact Working Group Status Report GRSP, December 2002
GTR proposal for Roadload determination JAPAN June 2015 WLTP-11-13e.
Netherlands’ presentation for Informal Group on Frontal Impact of GRSP 6 Oct UNECE Reg.94 - Past, Present & Future Presentation by the expert from.
INF GR / PS / /1/14-15GRSP Informal PS Meeting Japan Vehicle Category 3rd GRSP Informal PS Meeting 2003/1/14-15, IDIADA, Spain.
General motors is a global company which manufactures cars all around the world.
JP Research Summary: JASIC Flex Injury Estimate GTR09 PH2 Informal Working Group 17 Sept GTR
December 2015 Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism Transmitted by the expert from JapanGRSP Rev.1 (58th GRSP, 8-11 December 2015,
European Enhanced Vehicle-safety Committee Developing an European Interior Headform Test Procedure T. Langner on behalf of EEVC WG 13 19th International.
Emergency Stopping Signal 80th GRRF session Submitted by the experts from IMMA Informal document GRRF th GRRF, September 2015, Agenda item.
Driver behaviour in presence of child and adult pedestrians By S.J. Thompson, E.J. Fraser and C.I. Howarth Ergonomics, 1985, vol.28, No. 10,
GTR & Page 1 Technical Specification and PADI Procedures for Assembly, Disassembly and Inspection Presented by the pedestrian safety.
Pedestrian Safety Effects of Bumper Test Area Determination Using the Old vs. the New Method Presented by the experts of OICA Informal document GRSP
Pedestrian Safety Research in Japan 59th GRSP 9 th -13 th May 2016 MLIT / NTSEL Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism National Traffic.
Pedestrian Safety Request For Clarification Of Test Procedures 49 th Session of UNECE GRSP, Geneva, 16 – 20 May 2011 Informal document GRSP (49th.
Introduction plan for implementing
Reporting on new technologies and the way forward
Transmitted by the expert from CLEPA Informal document GRSP-57-25
Lane Change Test for ACSF
Federal Motor Transport Authority
Symbols, Controls & Tell-Tales
Technical Feasibility
AUTOMOBILE PARTS.
OICA Proposal: Decision on Deployed Testing of DPPS
Dynamics Force Problems Day #1.
Industry Homework from AEB 02
Submitted by the expert from Republic of Korea
Dynamic criteria Biorid
Chair: Jin Seop Park, Republic of Korea Secretary: Thomas Kinsky, OICA
Approval of replacement pollution devices within R49
Traffic Safety.
The new EU type-approval framework for motor vehicles
Chair: Jin Seop Park, Republic of Korea Secretary: Irina Dausse, OICA
Overview of Test Procedures, etc
UN QRTV GTR Informal Working Group 6th session – Baltimore, USA, May 2018 Regulation (EU) No 540/2014: commonalities and differences with UN R
Japan has no objection to “alternative 2a”
Japan Automobile Standards Internationalization Center (JASIC)
Japan’s position and proposal on draft of -gtr 2
Chair: Jin Seop Park, Republic of Korea Secretary: Thomas Kinsky, OICA
Summary of Compliance Test Procedure for Pedestrian Protection (Korea)
Global Technical Regulation on Electric Vehicle Safety
Expected life-saving effect of introducing the GTR Head Protection Regulation in Japan (only GR INF PS161: applies to Bonnet/Wing) Ministry of Land, Infrastructure.
(Task 27 of the IWG Task List)
Informal document GRSP-56-36
General Safety Regulation 5: AEBS – Proportion of M1 vehicles likely to pass the vehicle to pedestrian test of proposed draft regulation June 2019.
Japan Opinion for TF-BTA Proposals
Comment for IHRA or GTR regarding Legform Test
IWG-DPPS Investigation of Test Condition in Overshoot Duration
Presentation transcript:

Headform tests Data INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATION OF MOTOR VEHICLE MANUFACTURERS January 06 Pedestrian Safety GRSP Informal Group January 06

Zone B Zone A Car 1: Designed and approved to EU Directive 2003/102/EC Phase 1 No adult test area Impactor child/small adult 3.5 kg Impact angle 50° to the horizontal Impact speed 35 km/h Test results (HPC)

Zone B Zone A Car 2: Sports car NOT approved to EU Directive 2003/102/EC Phase 1 70 impact points tested 20% safety margin

Zone B Zone A Acrobat Document Car 3: Designed and approved to EU Directive 2003/102/EC Phase 1 No adult test area on bonnet Impactor child/small adult 3.5 kg Impact angle 50° to the horizontal Impact speed 35 km/h. 20% safety margin

Car 4

Zone B Zone A Acrobat Document 39 vehicles tested in total EuroNCAP test conditions different from EU Phase 1, but interpolation indicates that for child headform: Vehicle 1:about 67% (2/3) of the area would meet HPC 1000 about 33% (1/3) of the area: HPC 1000 to 2000 Vehicle 2:about 10% of the area would meet HPC 1000 about 50% of the area: HPC 1000 to 2000 about 40% of the area: HPC above 2000 EuroNCAP Phases 10 to 11+ (see INF GR/PS/45)

Remarks and conclusions: 1.Only brand new models, specifically designed to meet the requirements can pass 2.Existing models cannot be made compliant 3.Even the best vehicles need the HIC 1700 exemption for compliance 4.Because of high scatter of the test results, manufacturers need safety margin, usually 20% below legal limit 5.Meeting the GTR requirements in the framework of vehicle type approval is clearly a significant challenge zdzzd