Newer methods for tree building

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Parsimony Small Parsimony and Search Algorithms Genome 559: Introduction to Statistical and Computational Genomics Elhanan Borenstein.
Advertisements

Terminal node (terminal) (=interior branch) Outgroups.
Wellcome Trust Workshop Working with Pathogen Genomes Module 6 Phylogeny.
1 Dan Graur Methods of Tree Reconstruction. 2 3.
 Aim in building a phylogenetic tree is to use a knowledge of the characters of organisms to build a tree that reflects the relationships between them.
1 General Phylogenetics Points that will be covered in this presentation Tree TerminologyTree Terminology General Points About Phylogenetic TreesGeneral.
Phylogenetics - Distance-Based Methods CIS 667 March 11, 2204.
BIO2093 – Phylogenetics Darren Soanes Phylogeny I.
Phylogenetic reconstruction
Phylogenetic trees Level 3 Molecular Evolution and Bioinformatics Jim Provan Page and Holmes: Chapter 2.
Molecular Evolution Revised 29/12/06
Tree Reconstruction.
“Inferring Phylogenies” Joseph Felsenstein Excellent reference
BIOE 109 Summer 2009 Lecture 4- Part II Phylogenetic Inference.
. Phylogeny II : Parsimony, ML, SEMPHY. Phylogenetic Tree u Topology: bifurcating Leaves - 1…N Internal nodes N+1…2N-2 leaf branch internal node.
CISC667, F05, Lec14, Liao1 CISC 667 Intro to Bioinformatics (Fall 2005) Phylogenetic Trees (I) Maximum Parsimony.
Phylogeny Reconstruction II. The edges of tree can be freely rotated without changing the relationships among the terminal nodes. Trees are like mobiles.
BME 130 – Genomes Lecture 26 Molecular phylogenies I.
Probabilistic Approaches to Phylogeny Wouter Van Gool & Thomas Jellema.
. Comput. Genomics, Lecture 5b Character Based Methods for Reconstructing Phylogenetic Trees: Maximum Parsimony Based on presentations by Dan Geiger, Shlomo.
Probabilistic methods for phylogenetic trees (Part 2)
Phylogeny Tree Reconstruction
Classification and Phylogenies Taxonomic categories and taxa Inferring phylogenies –The similarity vs. shared derived character states –Homoplasy –Maximum.
Characterizing the Phylogenetic Tree-Search Problem Daniel Money And Simon Whelan ~Anusha Sura.
Multiple Sequence Alignments and Phylogeny.  Within a protein sequence, some regions will be more conserved than others. As more conserved,
Maximum parsimony Kai Müller.
Phylogenetic analyses Kirsi Kostamo. The aim: To construct a visual representation (a tree) to describe the assumed evolution occurring between and among.
Phylogeny Estimation: Traditional and Bayesian Approaches Molecular Evolution, 2003
Phylogenetic Analysis. 2 Introduction Intension –Using powerful algorithms to reconstruct the evolutionary history of all know organisms. Phylogenetic.
Terminology of phylogenetic trees
Molecular phylogenetics
Phylogenetics Alexei Drummond. CS Friday quiz: How many rooted binary trees having 20 labeled terminal nodes are there? (A) (B)
1 Dan Graur Molecular Phylogenetics Molecular phylogenetic approaches: 1. distance-matrix (based on distance measures) 2. character-state.
Phylogenetic Analysis. General comments on phylogenetics Phylogenetics is the branch of biology that deals with evolutionary relatedness Uses some measure.
Phylogenetic trees School B&I TCD Bioinformatics May 2010.
Phylogenetics and Coalescence Lab 9 October 24, 2012.
Bioinformatics 2011 Molecular Evolution Revised 29/12/06.
Parsimony-Based Approaches to Inferring Phylogenetic Trees BMI/CS 576 Colin Dewey Fall 2010.
Phylogeny GENE why is coalescent theory important for understanding phylogenetics (species trees)? coalescent theory lets us test our assumptions.
Introduction to Phylogenetic Trees
Announcements Urban Forestry project starts this week. Go through protocol. We'll be sending you off on your own. Please act responsibly. Peer review of.
A brief introduction to phylogenetics
Lecture 2: Principles of Phylogenetics
Bayes estimators for phylogenetic reconstruction Ruriko Yoshida.
Introduction to Phylogenetics
Bayes estimators for phylogenetic reconstruction Ruriko Yoshida.
More statistical stuff CS 394C Feb 6, Today Review of material from Jan 31 Calculating pattern probabilities Why maximum parsimony and UPGMA are.
Understanding Trees. Pre-test Which mammal is the pig more closely related to, cow or camel? Which mammal here is the most primitive? Fig. 4.8b.
Doug Raiford Lesson 9.  3 Approaches  Distance  Parsimony  Maximum Likelihood  Have already seen a distance method 12/18/20152Phylogenetics Part.
Ben Stöver WS 2012/2013 Ancestral state reconstruction Molecular Phylogenetics – exercise.
How do we infer phylogeny?
Phylogenetic Trees - Parsimony Tutorial #13
Ayesha M.Khan Spring Phylogenetic Basics 2 One central field in biology is to infer the relation between species. Do they possess a common ancestor?
1 CAP5510 – Bioinformatics Phylogeny Tamer Kahveci CISE Department University of Florida.
Systematics and Phylogenetics Ch. 23.1, 23.2, 23.4, 23.5, and 23.7.
Maximum Parsimony Phenetic (distance based) methods are fast and often accurate but discard data and are not based on explicit character states at each.
Application of Phylogenetic Networks in Evolutionary Studies Daniel H. Huson and David Bryant Presented by Peggy Wang.
What is phylogenetic analysis and why should we perform it? Phylogenetic analysis has two major components: (1) Phylogeny inference or “tree building”
Tree Terminologies. Phylogenetic Tree - phylogenetic relationships are normally displayed in a tree-like diagram (phylogenetic tree/cladogram) - a cladogram.
Introduction to Bioinformatics Resources for DNA Barcoding
Evolutionary genomics can now be applied beyond ‘model’ organisms
Phylogenetic basis of systematics
Phylogenetic Inference
Methods of molecular phylogeny
Endeavour to reconstruct the characters of each hypothetical ancestor.
Systematics: Tree of Life
Systematics: Tree of Life
BNFO 602 Phylogenetics – maximum likelihood
BNFO 602 Phylogenetics Usman Roshan.
The Most General Markov Substitution Model on an Unrooted Tree
Presentation transcript:

Newer methods for tree building Parsimony analysis Maximum likelihood Bayesian inference For all 3: Build an unrooted tree on one of these three criteria, ignore synapomorphy and symplesiomorphy, and pull root out on tree using outgroup All computationally intense

Newer methods for tree building Search Criteria Parsimony Analysis = build unrooted tree with the fewest character state changes Maximum likelihood = given rules about how DNA sequences change over time, a tree can be found that reflects the most likely sequence of events Bayesian inference = generates a posterior distribution for a parameter, composed of a phylogenetic tree and a model of evolution, based on the prior for that parameter and the likelihood of the data

Pretty hard to do by hand…

Rooted vs. unrooted trees A B C D e f A C e f g B D Basal node obvious vs. basal node unknown Rooted trees are way more fun! Just need to know which node is basal (oldest) Imagine pulling strings

Rooted vs. unrooted trees Basal node obvious, basal node unknown

Number of unrooted trees for 4 taxa = 3 C A B B D C D A C D B

Number of unrooted trees for 4 taxa = 3 Number of rooted trees for 4 taxa = 15 C A B B D Practice rooting C D A C D B

Unrooted Tree of Herpes Viruses

Number of trees increases with number of taxa 4 taxa  3 unrooted trees 8 taxa  10,395 unrooted trees 10 taxa  2,027,025 unrooted trees 22 taxa  3 x 1023 (almost a mole) 50 taxa  3 x 1074 (More trees than the number of atoms in the universe) “Exhaustive searches” of tree topologies are nearly impossible with modern data sets Algorithms attempt to find best tree anyway Barry Hall, Phylogenetic Trees Made Easy

Estimating confidence in trees: Character conflict is common in data. We want to know if it is overwhelming the signal in the data. We may not have collected enough data to estimate relationships confidently.

Estimating confidence in trees: Bootstrap support If low, mentally collapse the node into a polytomy

Breaking the Bifurcation Rule: Hard polytomies and Soft polytomies Cichlids

Venereal syphilis http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmedhealth/PMH0002303

Non-venereal Trepanomatoses 1950 50-100 million people

Non-venereal Trepanomatoses 1950

Endemic Trepanomatoses 1950 50-100 million 1970 1990 = 2.5 million