Chapter 5 Tax Research McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2014 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
5-2 Objectives Understand and apply the six steps of the tax research process Identify primary sources of tax law Utilize secondary sources of tax law to locate primary authorities
5-3 The Tax Research Process Step 1: Understand the client’s transaction and get the facts Step 2: Identify the tax issues, problems, or opportunities suggested by the facts and formulate specific research questions Step 3: Locate relevant tax law authority Step 4: Analyze relevant authority and answer the research questions Step 5: Repeat steps 1 through 4 as many times as necessary Step 6: Document your research and communicate your conclusions
5-4 The Tax Research Process Graphically
5-5 Step 1: Get the Facts Researcher must understand client’s motivation, economic objectives, desired outcome, and identified risks Get the “who, what, when, where, why, and how” of the transaction or proposed transaction
5-6 Step 2: Identify the Issues Given the facts, researcher must identify the related tax issues and formulate specific research questions Issues may be quite broad Example: Is a loss deductible? Research questions should be as precise as possible Example: Can the loss be recognized? What is the character of the recognized loss? Given the character, to what extent can the loss be deducted in the year of sale?
5-7 Step 3: Locate Authority Primary authorities Internal Revenue Code of 1986 Treasury Regulations IRS guidance Revenue Rulings Revenue Procedures Items representing authority only for taxpayer to whom issued Private letter rulings Technical advice memoranda
5-8 Step 3 continued Additional primary authorities Judicial decisions – Trial courts U.S. Tax Court U.S. District Court U.S. Court of Federal Claims Judicial decisions – Appellate courts 13 U.S. Circuit Courts of Appeals U.S. Supreme Court
5-9 Step 3 continued Secondary authorities Textbooks Professional journals Commercial tax services Code-arranged services, such as RIA’s United States Tax Reporter, and CCH’s Standard Federal Tax Reporter Topically arranged services, such as RIA’s Federal Tax Coordinator 2d, CCH’s Federal Tax Service, Law of Federal Income Tax (Mertens), and BNA’s Tax Management Portfolios
5-10 Strategies for Locating Relevant Authority For simpler questions, it may be possible to go directly to the Code, via its topical index, and find the relevant Code section This strategy may not be sufficient, if more than one Code section seems to apply, or the Code seems too general for the researcher’s specific questions Secondary authorities are often valuable in leading to researcher to relevant primary authorities, and may be written in less technical language
5-11 Using Commercial Tax Services to Locate Primary Authorities Using the topical index Search a variety of terms related to research questions, to find relevant references Using the table of contents Scan for chapters of the service to locate relevant areas of discussion Keyword searching in an electronic service Combine words and phrases for a targeted search of all or any portion of the database
5-12 Using Commercial Tax Services to Locate Primary Authorities Once a starting point has been located, examine related material referenced in the service Read related Code sections, Treasury regulations, rulings and judicial decisions Use cross-references (hyperlinks) within the service to explore further
5-13 Using Commercial Tax Services to Locate Primary Authorities When relying on judicial authorities or IRS rulings, use the Citator to check the validity of the opinion Indicates any appeal of a judicial decision Lists subsequent decisions and rulings that have cited the decision, with a brief indication of the nature of the subsequent reference
5-14 Step 4: Analyze Authority Authorities requiring a factual judgment Compare the authority to the client’s fact pattern If facts are complete and accurate, authority can provide a definitive answer to the research question Authorities requiring an evaluative judgment Subjective judgment requiring that a conclusion be inferred from a set of facts – often a ‘facts and circumstances’ test With evaluative judgments, different observers may draw different conclusions from the same set of facts An unqualified answer is not possible in this situation, and the IRS may challenge the researcher’s conclusion
5-15 Step 5: Repeat Steps 1 through 4 Authorities identified during the research process may indicate the need to gather additional facts, not previously considered Additional facts may suggest additional research questions The researcher must repeat the process as many times as needed to thoroughly address the tax consequences of the client’s transaction
5-16 Step 6: Communicate Your Conclusions Document research conclusions, via a research memo that includes Statement of the facts Statement of research issue(s) Analysis of relevant authorities Explanation of conclusions Details of advice given to client Communicate conclusions to the client, often via letter May be less technical than the research memo, depending on the client’s tax knowledge
5-17 Conclusion Tax research is a critical skill for tax practitioners – even the most experienced professionals cannot know the answers to all tax questions! Tax research can support tax planning, as well as be part of the tax compliance process Tax research skills must be developed through experience
5-18