U-238/Th-234 Tracer Studies of Sediment Resuspension and Horizontal Transport in Nearshore Lake Michigan J. Val Klump 1, James T. Waples 1, Kent A. Orlandini.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Introduction of Version 2.0b Significant changes to sediment model –Box volumes are no longer static. –Net sedimentation is constrained by box geometry.
Advertisements

Presenter: Frederick Yaw Logah (RS) CSIR-Water Research Institute, Accra-Ghana 15th July, 2014.
Digital Imaging and Remote Sensing Laboratory ALGE Modeling and Data Needs Dr. Anthony Vodacek Nina Raqueno Yan Li Center for Imaging Science Rochester.
Sedimentary Structures Chapter 4. Physical sedimentary structures  Physical (inorganic) structures are sedimentary features formed by physical processes.
Environmental Modeling Chapter 6: Fate and Transport of Pollutants in Rivers and Streams Copyright © 2006 by DBS.
1 Biogeochemical Cycling of Cu Associated with Particulate Matter in Lake Superior Jaebong Jeong Environmental Engineering Michigan Technological University.
Ankur R Desai, UW-Madison AGU Fall 2007 B41F-03 Impact on Upper Midwest Regional Carbon Balance.
Abstract As part of the VERTIGO project (VERtical Transport In the Global Ocean) we used Thorium-234 ( 234 Th) as a natural proxy for particle export.
Sediment Movement after Dam Removal
Submarine Groundwater Discharge into the ocean off Mangueira Lagoon via 222 Rn and Ra isotopes: Preliminary findings and perspectives Isaac R. Santos;
Conclusions of small-scale geomorphology Off road vehicles have lasting affects on desert environment Channels in walkway plots are bimodal and follow.
Particulate scavenging and lateral transport processes in the Kaoping River-Sea System based on 210 Po and 210 Pb distributions and disequilibrium Hung.
Temporal and Spatial Variability of Physical and Bio-optical Properties on the New York Bight Inner Continental Shelf G. C. Chang, T. D. Dickey Ocean Physics.
CLASS PLAN RIVER BEHAVIOR FLOW GAUGING MANNING’S EQUATION BANKFULL DISCHARGE DISCUSS MCPHEE.
Mixing & Turbulence Mixing leads to a homogenization of water mass properties Mixing occurs on all scales in ocean molecular scales (10’s of mm) basin.
SIMDEUM: water demand in distribution network modelling Mirjam Blokker 20 November 2009 – ColloquiumTU Delft.
Principles of Mass Balance
Mixing & Turbulence Mixing leads to a homogenization of water mass properties Mixing occurs on all scales in ocean –molecular scales (10’s of  m) –basin.
The History of 234 Th in Aquatic Ecosystems Dr. Claudia Benitez-Nelson University of South Carolina.
Cross-shelf exchange in the Beaufort Sea E. Sternberg-Bousserez 1, H. Thomas 1, P. van Beek 2 1 Department of Oceanography, Dalhousie University, Halifax,
Satellite Data Assimilation into a Suspended Particulate Matter Transport Model.
A Study of the Spatial Distribution of Suspended Sediments and their Settling Behaviour in the Dartmouth Lake System By: Lori Wrye Supervisor: Dr. Paul.
Biogeochemical Research At Lake Baikal Beat Müller, Lawrence Och EAWAG Federal Institute of Science and Technology of the Environment, Kastanienbaum, Switzerland.
Courtney K. Harris Virginia Institute of Marine Sciences In collaboration with Katja Fennel and Robin Wilson (Dalhousie), Rob Hetland (TAMU), Kevin Xu.
Inputs to shelf seas- an overview Materials are introduced into coastal and shelf seas primarily through: rivers, atmosphere, groundwaters, ice processes.
Ch.13, Sec.2 – Stream Erosion & Deposition
OHHI Beach Modeling Group Meeting March 23, 2006 GLERL, Ann Arbor, MI Project Summary Project Title: Predicting Pathogen Fate in the Great Lakes Coastal.
Basic Hydrology Water Quality: Sediment production and transport.
Sediment Yield and Channel Processes. Definitions Suspend Sediment – sediment (orgranic or inorganic) which remains in suspension in water for a considerable.
1 1. Buoy update - progress 2. Plume dilution - basics OMSAP 6/29/09 Mike Mickelson, MWRA.
Context Events Situation Limits Strategy Glider Observation of Suspended Particle Dynamics in the Gulf of Lions Gaël MANY 1, François Bourrin 1, Romaric.
Upper ocean currents, Coriolis force, and Ekman Transport Gaspard-Gustave de Coriolis Walfrid Ekman.
Fig. 4. A framework configured to calculate a P budget. Shelf ( 1000 m )
A methodology to estimate the residence time in estuaries Frank Braunschweig (Instituto Superior Técnico, Sala 363, Nucleo Central, Taguspark, P ,
Case study: 137 Cs as tracer for sedimentation processes in an Italian coastal area Roberta Delfanti, ENEA - La Spezia, Italy IAEA Regional Training Course.
Fluvial Processes. I. The Hydrologic Cycle 1)Precipitation.
Watershed Monitoring and Modeling in Switzer, Chollas, and Paleta Creek Watersheds Kenneth Schiff Southern California Coastal Water Research Project
Modellierung von Sedimenttransporten im Wattenmeer - Gerold Brink-Spalink - Forschergruppe BioGeoChemie des Watts TP 4 Gerold Brink-Spalink Jörg-Olaf Wolff.
The Littoral Sedimentation and Optics Model (LSOM)
Sediment trap data. Constraining the seasonal particle flux in the eastern North Atlantic with Thorium isotopes M. Roy-Barman (1), R. El Hayek (1), I.
We know Earth is 4.6 Billion years old
The Buoyant Plume Lift-off Zone as a Test of Coastal Sediment Transport Models David A. Jay, Philip M. Orton and Douglas J. Wilson OGI School of Science.
Deposition-Sedimentation the processes that release eroded materials causing sediments to settle into a new location. A. Cause of Deposition: 1. A Decrease.
J.M. Abril Department of Applied Physics (I); University of Seville (Spain) IAEA Regional Training Course on Sediment Core Dating Techniques. RAF7/008.
Resuspension as a Source of Turbidity in a Water Supply Reservoir Emmet M. Owens, Rakesh K. Gelda, Steven W. Effler Upstate Freshwater Institute, Syracuse.
 These two agents: erosion and deposition are the most important agents that affect weathered materials.  Erosion involves the physical removal of weathered.
Kaijun Su a, Jinzhou Du a, *, Mark Baskaran b and Jing Zhang a State Key Laboratory of Estuarine and Coastal Research, East China Normal University, Shanghai.
Catherine Jeandel, Marseille 2004: Geochemistry in KEOPS Chlorophyll (mg m -3 ) Among the objectives of KEOPS - Identification of the mechanisms of natural.
Everything Goes Somewhere: Tracking the Movement of Dredged Sediments in Port and Coastal Environments Using Dual Signature Sediment Tracers Kevin Black.
How Streams Transport Material 13.2 Stream Erosion & Deposition.
210 Po Enrichment Relative to 210 Pb in the Planktons Collected from the Northern South China Sea and the Luzon Strait P. Wang and Y. Chung Institute of.
Copper Source Loading Estimates (Process Profiles) Physical & Chemical Characterization of Wear Debris (Clemson University) Water Quality Monitoring (ACCWP)
Radiometric dating and sediment accumulation rates Dating principles – covered in Isotope Geochemistry (Faure) Two radiocarbon approaches: Average slopes.
Sediment burial DEFINITION OF SEDIMENT C BURIAL: Deposition of C below the zone of bioturbation, oxygen, and resuspension where it is effectively sequestered.
/ Vidy Bay hydrodynamics under different meteorological conditions
FISHERIES POSTER SESSION
Transport and Reaction: An Overview
What is the Hjulstrom Curve?
Ch4 - Multiphase Interactions
Elizabeth River PCB TMDL Study: Numerical Modeling Approach
James River PCB TMDL Study: Numerical Modeling Approach
Particulate and Dissolved 210Po and 210Pb in Water Columns from the
Stream Velocity.
Andreas Münchow, College of Marine Studies, University of Delaware
SETTLING COLUMN ANALYSIS FOR FLOCCULATING PARTICLES (Type II settling)
BIODEEP WP 2 Chemical and physical analyses of DHAB´s.
Bill Martin Linda Kalnejais Mike Bothner
The California Current System: Comparison of Geostrophic Currents, ADCP Currents and Satellite Altimetry LCDR David Neander, NOAA OC3570, Summer 2001.
Examining the role of land use and precipitation on the water quality of Lake Tana, Ethiopia Brian S. Kim.
Victoria Schoenwald Undergraduate Program
Presentation transcript:

U-238/Th-234 Tracer Studies of Sediment Resuspension and Horizontal Transport in Nearshore Lake Michigan J. Val Klump 1, James T. Waples 1, Kent A. Orlandini 2, David N. Edgington 1, Kim Weckerly 1, Don Szmania 1, & Richard A. MacKenzie 1 With the collaboration of : Brian Eadie 3, John Robbins 3, Barry Lesht 2, Dave Schwab 3 1 University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee 2 Argonne National Laboratory 3 NOAA GLERL

Th-U disequilibria: application to studies of particle dynamics Basin scale distribution and particle transport: Q: can we track particle movement on a time scale of weeks ? how much mass is available ?? how long do particles remain in the water column ?? can we estimate the direction & rate of horizontal advection ??

1 2 n-1 mean flow Cross-margin transport during a “plume event” n+1 Zone of final deposition shore open lake Plume = new sediment inputs = particle transport Org C < 0.5% Cs-137 = 0 Pb-210 = 0 Org C > 5 % Cs-137 ~ 5 pCi/g Pb-210 ~ 20 pCi/g

Seasonal changes in spatial distributions U 234 Th excess 234 Th derived from water column half life = 24.1 days rapid particle scavenging, deposition, & resuspension T res = I water col. J sediment = [ 234 Th ] part z water  I sed = fCi m -2 fCi m -2 d -1 = days

vehicle sampling sample filtering Sampler mk1

4 5 6 pump Sampling sequence 1 2 3

mass – pool of resuspendible sed depth alongshore

as move from west to east: Inventories  Particle residence times  T res = I water /J sed = I water / I sed

“downstream” enrichment of Th-234 Inventories  Particle residence times 

f = I [ 234 Th ex ] / I [ 238 U] sediment suspended part.dissolved 1 = secular equil w/ 238 U

“Two Box” transport model:  x = distance A1A1A1A1 A2A2A2A2

1. Estimate transport times: I supported = V  U-238 = A  z  U-238 U-238 = 100 fCi L -1 z = 20 meters V 1 (source) ~ 1800 km 2  0.02 ~ 3600 km 3 V 2 (sink) ~ 425 km 2  0.02 ~ 8.5 km 3 V 1 /V 2 = A 1 /A 2 ~ 4.2 May 99: f 1 = 0.88 f 2 = 1.17  t ~ 38 days Aug 99: f 1 = 0.79 f 2 = 1.46  t ~ 23 days ? transport velocity ~ 100 to 150 km  30 days ~ 3 – 5 km/day

2. Estimate of source area: if dist. ~ 100 km & velocity ~ 4 km d -1 (B. Lesht)  25 days ~ one ½ life for f 1 = 0.85 f 2 = 1.45  V 1 /V 2  6 i.e. the longer it takes the greater the source area D. Schwab & D Beletsky

3. Estimate of mass transport required: for 234 Th ex of 50%, i.e. f = 1.5 area of temporary sink ~ 500 km 2 z = 20 meters  excess Th-234 ~ 0.5 Curies ~ 1 x dpm if [Th-234] susp part ~ 35 pCi g -1 ~ 80 dpm g -1  a rapid transport “event”  13 x 10 3 MT ( w/o decay )  25 x 10 3 MT ( one ½ life ) i.e. the longer it takes the more you need  ~ 1% of total susp. particulates in the plume  “half lives” to transport amt ~ total annual deposition ? ~ several years ?? [~ 4-8 yrs]

Sediments in the Lake = the ultimate sink via burial Where are they being buried ? How quickly do materials move from source to sink ? ~ years to decades Chart of sediment thickness

Special thanks to: Dave Lovalvo, the R/V Neeskay NSF-CoOP NOAA COP