Copyright © 2011 Actelion Pharmaceuticals Ltd SERAPHIN: RESULTS FROM A LANDMARK STUDY.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Moderator Harrison (Hap) Farber, MD Professor of Medicine Director Pulmonary Hypertension Center Boston University/Boston Medical Center Boston, Massachusetts.
Advertisements

Bosentan for inoperable chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) and post- pulmonary endarterectomy pulmonary hypertension A pre-defined subgroup.
The use of ERA after SERAPHIN, COMPASS-2 and AMBITION
Valsartan Antihypertensive Long-Term Use Evaluation Results
CONSENSUS: Cooperative North Scandinavian Enalapril Survival Study Purpose To determine whether the ACE inhibitor enalapril reduces mortality in patients.
Purpose To determine whether metoprolol controlled/extended release
TROPHY TRial Of Preventing HYpertension. High-normal BP increases CV risk Vasan RS et al. N Engl J Med. 2001;345: Incidence of CV events in women.
Prescribing Information is available at the end of this presentation NHS Surrey Lipid Guidelines Dr Adam Jacques Ashford & St.
TNT: Study Design Treating to New Targets 2 5 years 10,001 Patients Clinically evident CHD LDL-C 130  250 mg/dL following up to 8-week washout and 8-week.
חזק בהגנה לבבית Valsartan in Heart Failure
Welcome Ask The Experts March 24-27, 2007 New Orleans, LA.
analysis from the SHIFT study
FREEDOMS II TRIAL.
May 23rd, 2012 Hot topics from the Heart Failure Congress in Belgrade.
ATLAS Clinical Trial Commentary Dr Eric Topol Chairman and Professor, Department of Cardiology Director of the Joseph J Jacobs Center for Thrombosis and.
CHARM-Alternative: Candesartan in Heart failure: Assessment of Reduction in Mortality and morbidity - Alternative Purpose To determine whether the angiotensin.
CHARM-Preserved: Candesartan in Heart failure: Assessment of Reduction in Mortality and morbidity - Preserved Purpose To determine whether the angiotensin.
Effect of ivabradine on recurrent hospitalization for worsening heart failure: findings from SHIFT S ystolic H eart failure treatment with the I f inhibitor.
BEAUTI f UL: morBidity-mortality EvAlUaTion of the I f inhibitor ivabradine in patients with coronary disease and left ventricULar dysfunction Purpose.
VBWG CHARISMA Clopidogrel for High Atherothrombotic Risk and Ischemic Stabilization, Management, and Avoidance trial.
1 The Study of Trandolapril- verapamil And insulin Resistance STAR determined whether glycaemic control was maintained to a greater degree by an RAS inhibitor/non-DHP.
0902CZR01NL537SS0901 RENAAL Altering the Course of Renal Disease in Hypertensive Patients with Type 2 Diabetes and Nephropathy with the A II Antagonist.
Tadalafil for the Treatment of Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension: A Double-blind 52-week Uncontrolled Extension Study Ronald J. Oudiz, MD, FACC; Bruce H.
2008 Post Conference Update: CHEST. Epidemiology.
Effect of ivabradine on recurrent hospitalization for worsening heart failure: findings from SHIFT S ystolic H eart failure treatment with the I f inhibitor.
S ystolic H eart failure treatment with the I f inhibitor ivabradine T rial Main results Swedberg K, et al. Lancet. 2010;376(9744):
RALES: Randomized Aldactone Evaluation Study Purpose To determine whether the aldosterone antagonist spironolactone reduces mortality in patients with.
S ystolic H eart failure treatment with the I f inhibitor ivabradine T rial Efficacy and safety of ivabradine in patients with severe chronic systolic.
Phase III Trial of Pazopanib in Locally Advanced and/or Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Sternberg CN et al. ASCO 2009; Abstract (Oral Presentation)
The Prospective Pravastatin Pooling Project L I P I D CARECARE PPP Project Investigators Am J Cardiol 1995; 76:899–905.
WOSCOPS: West Of Scotland Coronary Prevention Study Purpose To determine whether pravastatin reduces combined incidence of nonfatal MI and death due to.
AIRE: Acute Infarction Ramipril Efficacy study Purpose To determine whether the ACE inhibitor ramipril reduces mortality in patients with evidence of heart.
BEST: Beta-blocker Evaluation Survival Trial Purpose To determine whether the β-blocker bucindolol reduces morbidity and mortality in patients with advanced.
OVERALL SURVIVAL Adapted from Scandinavian Simvastatin Survival Study Group Lancet 1994;344: % of patients alive Simvastatin (n=2221)
Vorapaxar for Secondary Prevention in Patients with Prior Myocardial Infarction Benjamin M. Scirica, MD, MPH On behalf of the TRA 2°P-TIMI 50 Steering.
Efficacy and Safety of Maraviroc in Treatment- Experienced (TE) Patients Infected with R5 HIV-1: 96-week Combined Analysis of the MOTIVATE 1 & 2 Studies.
Marius M Hoeper Therapeutic goals and algorithms.
A Randomized Trial of Dabigatran versus Warfarin in the Treatment of Acute Venous Thromboembolism Schulman S et al. Proc ASH 2011;Abstract 205.
HOPE: Heart Outcomes Prevention Evaluation study Purpose To evaluate whether the long-acting ACE inhibitor ramipril and/or vitamin E reduce the incidence.
CIBIS II Cardiac Insufficiency Bisoprolol Study
OBV/PTV/r + DSV + RBV OBV/PTV/r + DSV + placebo Randomisation* Partial blind years Chronic HCV infection Genotype 1 Treatment-naïve HCV RNA > 10,000.
COMET: Carvedilol Or Metoprolol European Trial Purpose To compare the effects of carvedilol (a β 1 -, β 2 - and α 1 -receptor blocker) and short-acting.
INPULSIS® trial design and baseline characteristics
Heart rate in heart failure: Heart rate in heart failure: risk marker or risk factor? A subanalysis of the SHIFT trial on behalf of the Investigators M.
ELITE - II Study Design  60 yrs; NYHA II - IV; EF  40 % ACEI naive or  7 days in 3 months prior to entry Standard Rx ( ± Dig / Diuretics ), ß - blocker.
Hsia J et al. J Am Coll Cardiol 2011;57: Baseline Characteristics by Treatment Group and Attained LDL-C Hsia J et al. J Am Coll Cardiol 2011;57:
4S: Scandinavian Simvastatin Survival Study
OFEV ® (nintedanib) TOMORROW trial results Last updated These slides are provided by Boehringer Ingelheim for medical to medical education only.
CV-1 Trial 709 The ISEL Study (IRESSA ® Survival Evaluation in Lung Cancer) Summary of Data as of December 16, 2004 Kevin Carroll, MSc Summary of Data.
PULMONARY ARTERY DENERVATION FOR TREATMENT OF PULMONARY ARTERIAL HYPERTENSION: RESULTS FROM A CONTROLLED BEFORE AND AFTER STUDY—PADN 2 STUDY Shao-Liang.
Effects of Memantine on behavioural symptoms in Alzheimer’s disease patients: an analysis of the Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI) data of two randomised,
Rosuvastatin 10 mg n=2514 Placebo n= to 4 weeks Randomization 6weeks3 monthly Closing date 20 May 2007 Eligibility Optimal HF treatment instituted.
Long-Term Tolerability of Ticagrelor for Secondary Prevention: Insights from PEGASUS-TIMI 54 Trial Marc P. Bonaca, MD, MPH on behalf of the PEGASUS-TIMI.
Long-Term Tolerability of Ticagrelor for Secondary Prevention: Insights from PEGASUS-TIMI 54 Trial Marc P. Bonaca, MD, MPH on behalf of the PEGASUS-TIMI.
COPERNICUS: Carvedilol Prospective Randomized Cumulative Survival trial Purpose To assess the effect of carvedilol, a β 1 -, β 2 - and α 1 -receptor blocker,
Ten Year Outcome of Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery Versus Medical Therapy in Patients with Ischemic Cardiomyopathy Results of the Surgical Treatment.
CHEST 2013; 144(3): R3 김유진 / Prof. 장나은. Introduction 2  Cardiovascular diseases  common, serious comorbid conditions in patients with COPD cardiac.
LUX-Lung 3 clinical trial
HOPE: Heart Outcomes Prevention Evaluation study
ΝΕΑ ΔΕΔΟΜΕΝΑ ΣΤΗ ΘΕΡΑΠΕΥΤΙΚΗ ΑΝΤΙΜΕΤΩΠΙΣΗ Της ΠΝΕΥΜΟΝΙΚΗς ΑΡΤΗΡΙΑΚΗς ΥΠΕΡΤΑΣΗς ΣΤΕΛΙΟΣ ΟΡΦΑΝΟΣ Β’ ΚΛΙΝΙΚΗ ΕΝΤΑΤΙΚΗΣ ΘΕΡΑΠΕΙΑΣ & ΔΙΑΚΛΙΝΙΚΟ ΙΑΤΡΕΙΟ ΠΝΕΥΜΟΝΙΚΗΣ.
Exploring Early Combination Therapy in PAH
Evolving Science of PAH Treatment
Long-term results from the EARLY study of bosentan in WHO functional class II pulmonary arterial hypertension patients  Gérald Simonneau, Nazzareno Galiè,
CIBIS II: Cardiac Insufficiency Bisoprolol Study II
Macitentan in Pulmonary Hypertension Due To Left Ventricular Dysfunction: MELODY-1 Jean-Luc Vachièry, Marion Delcroix, Hikmet Al-Hiti, Michela Efficace,
Screening, Lipid Stabilization, and Placebo Run-in
PEARLS OF WISDOM WITH COMBINATION THERAPY IN PAH
Systolic Heart failure treatment with the If inhibitor ivabradine Trial Effect of ivabradine on recurrent hospitalization for worsening heart failure:
The efficacy and safety of omalizumab in pediatric allergic asthma
New Models of Care in Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis
Presentation transcript:

Copyright © 2011 Actelion Pharmaceuticals Ltd SERAPHIN: RESULTS FROM A LANDMARK STUDY

SERAPHIN: Creating a robust morbidity and/or mortality primary endpoint Committee for adjudication of events Measurable definition of PAH worsening (6-MWD & FC) Inclusion of a 3 rd criterion for PAH worsening (need for new treatment(s) for PAH) Complexity & robustness Dana Point 1 SERAPHIN 2 1.McLaughlin VV, et al. J Am Coll Cardiol 2009; 54:S SERAPHIN Study Protocol AC TTCW Secondary endpoint – time driven One criteria to define PAH worsening Morbidity/mortality as primary endpoint – event driven Morbidity/mortality as primary endpoint – event driven

SERAPHIN: A landmark study in PAH DrugStudyDurationPrimary endpointNo. of patients Bosentan Study-351 1,2 12 wks6-MWD32 BREATHE wks6-MWD213 EARLY 4 26 wksPVR, 6-MWD185 Ambrisentan ARIES-1 5,6 12 wks6-MWD202 ARIES-2 5,7 12 wks6-MWD192 SildenafilSUPER wks6-MWD277 Tadalafil PHIRST 9 16 wks6-MWD405 MacitentanSERAPHIN wks* Time to first morbidity/mortality event 742 *Mean study drug exposure 1. Channick RN, et al. Lancet Badesch D, et al. Curr Ther Res Rubin LJ, et al. N Engl J Med Galiè N, et al. Lancet Galiè N, et al. Circulation Oudiz R, et al. Chest Oudiz RJ, et al. J Am Coll Cardiol Galiè N, et al. N Engl J Med Galiè N, et al. Circulation NCT

1. Galiè N, et al. Eur Heart J 2009; 30: Actelion data on file. *Estimated from Galiè N, et al. (2009) Meta-analysis of RCTs in PAH 3 † Treatment exposure up to April 2012 Exposure to macitentan (SERAPHIN) compared with all other PAH drugs combined Treatment exposure (patient weeks) Macitentan in SERAPHIN ≈ 71,000 †2 All PAH studies 47,000* 1 20,00040,00060, ,000

The SERAPHIN study: Objectives and endpoints Objective: To study long-term efficacy and safety of macitentan in PAH using an event-driven trial design Primary endpoint –Time to the first morbidity and/or mortality event up to end of double-blind treatment Secondary endpoints –6-minute walk distance (6-MWD) at month 6 –WHO functional class (FC) at month 6 –Time to death due to PAH or hospitalisation for PAH –All-cause mortality –Safety and tolerability Pulido T et al. NEJM 2013; 369:809-18

Macitentan 10 mg o.d. Macitentan 3 mg o.d. Placebo Time (months) Treatment period Randomisation EOT (discontinuation of study drug) EOS (285 confirmed morbidity/mortality events) 742 patients were randomised 1:1:1 between May 2008 and December 2009 Screening 28 days weeks 99.5 weeks 85.3 weeks Mean exposure SERAPHIN A long-term, event-driven RCT in PAH EOS: end of study EOT: end of treatment

Robust nature of the primary endpoint = only clinically relevant events are captured Morbidity/mortality as primary endpoint is considered more clinically relevant as it reflects the true progression of PAH SERAPHIN morbidity and/or mortality primary endpoint OR Other worsening of PAH All events adjudicated by a blinded clinical events committee OR Time to 1st morbidity and/or mortality event All-cause death Atrial septostomy Lung transplantation Initiation of i.v. or s.c. prostanoids Other worsening of PAH Pulido T et al. NEJM 2013; 369:809-18

SERAPHIN primary endpoint: Other worsening of PAH AND A decrease in 6-MWD of at least 15%, confirmed by 2 tests on different days Worsening of PAH symptoms, which must include either: An increase in FC, or Appearance or worsening of symptoms of RHF Worsening of PAH symptoms, which must include either: An increase in FC, or Appearance or worsening of symptoms of RHF Need for new PAH treatment(s): Oral or inhaled prostanoids Oral PDE-5 inhibitors ERA after study discontinuation Intravenous diuretics Need for new PAH treatment(s): Oral or inhaled prostanoids Oral PDE-5 inhibitors ERA after study discontinuation Intravenous diuretics Other worsening of PAH All events adjudicated by a blinded clinical events committee Pulido T et al. NEJM 2013; 369:809-18

Demographics and baseline characteristics All patients n = 742 Placebo n = 250 Macitentan 3 mg n = 250 Macitentan 10 mg n = 242 Female sex, % Age, years, mean ± SD 45.6 ± ± ± ± 15.0 Time from diagnosis, years, mean ± SD 2.7 ± ± ± ± MWD, m, mean ± SD 360 ± ± ± ± 93 WHO FC, %* I/II III/IV Background PAH therapy, % PDE-5 inhibitors Oral/inhaled prostanoids All patients, n = 739; placebo, n = 249; macitentan 3 mg, n = 248; macitentan 10 mg, n = 242 Pulido T et al. NEJM 2013; 369:809-18

Patient demographics: PAH aetiology Actelion data on file. *Simple shunt at least 1 year post-surgical repair Total number of patients: 742

Risk reduction of primary endpoint event vs placebo Primary endpoint: Morbidity and/or mortality up to end of treatment Time from treatment start (months) Patients without the event (%) Macitentan 10 mg Macitentan 3 mg Placebo Patients at risk Treatment difference3 mg10 mg Hazard ratio (HR) Log-rank p-value0.0108< Macitentan 10 mg: 45% Macitentan 3 mg: 30% Pulido T et al. NEJM 2013; 369:809-18

Morbidity and/or mortality in patients on background PAH therapy Macitentan 10 mg: 38% Patients without the event (%) Time from treatment start (months) Macitentan 10 mg Macitentan 3 mg Placebo Patients at risk Treatment difference3 mg10 mg Hazard ratio (HR) Log-rank p-value Risk reduction of primary endpoint event vs placebo Macitentan 3 mg: 17% Pulido T et al. NEJM 2013; 369:809-18

Morbidity and/or mortality in patients not on background PAH therapy Macitentan 10 mg: 55% Time from treatment start (months) Patients without the event (%) Macitentan 10 mg Macitentan 3 mg Placebo Patients at risk Treatment difference3 mg10 mg Hazard ratio (HR) Log-rank p-value Risk reduction of primary endpoint event vs placebo Macitentan 3 mg: 47% Pulido T et al. NEJM 2013; 369:809-18

Secondary endpoint: Death due to PAH and/or hospitalisation for PAH Patients without the event (%) Time from treatment start (months) Patients at risk Macitentan 10 mg Macitentan 3 mg Placebo Macitentan 3 mg: 33% Treatment difference3 mg10 mg Hazard ratio (HR) Log-rank p-value0.0146< Risk reduction of death due to PAH or hospitalisation for PAH event vs placebo Macitentan 10 mg: 50% Pulido T et al. NEJM 2013; 369:809-18

Secondary endpoint: Change from baseline to month 6 in WHO FC p = 0.04 p = Patients on macitentan 3 mg had a 54% greater chance to improve FC status Patients on macitentan 10 mg had a 74% greater chance to improve FC status Pulido T et al. NEJM 2013; 369:809-18

Treatment-emergent adverse events Adverse event, n (%) Placebo n = 249 Macitentan 3mg n = 250 Macitentan 10mg n = 242 Patients with ≥ 1 AE240 (96.4)240 (96.0)229 (94.6) PAH87 (34.9)75 (30.0)53 (21.9) Peripheral oedema45 (18.1)40 (16.0)44 (18.2) Upper respiratory tract infection33 (13.3)50 (20.0)37 (15.3) Right ventricular failure56 (22.5)37 (14.8)32 (13.2) Headache22 (8.8)33 (13.2)33 (13.6) Nasopharyngitis26 (10.4)37 (14.8)34 (14.0) Dizziness27 (10.8)24 (9.6)26 (10.7) Cough30 (12)20 (8.0)21 (8.7) Bronchitis14 (5.6)20 (8.0)28 (11.6) Anaemia8 (3.2)22 (8.8)32 (13.2) Dyspnoea22 (8.8)26 (10.4)28 (7.4) Pulido T et al. NEJM 2013; 369:809-18

Adverse events and laboratory abnormalities previously associated with ERAs Placebo n = 249 Macitentan 3 mg n = 250 Macitentan 10 mg n = 242 Mean treatment duration, weeks, mean ± SD 85 ± ± ± 52 ALT or AST > 3 x ULN, % (n/N) 4.5 (11/244)3.6 (9/247)3.4 (8/236) ALT or AST > 3 x ULN and bilirubin > 2 x ULN, % (n/N) 1.7 (4/237)2.1 (5/241)1.7 (4/230) Haemoglobin ≤ 8 g/dl, % (n/N) 0.4 (1/237)1.7 (4/241)4.3 (10/230) Peripheral oedema, % (n/N)18.1 (45/249)16.0 (40/250)18.2 (44/242) Up to 28 days after study drug discontinuation Pulido T et al. NEJM 2013; 369:809-18

Summary I Macitentan 10 mg significantly reduced the risk of morbidity and/or mortality events up to 45% vs placebo Treatment effect with macitentan 10 mg was consistent in patients on or not on background PAH therapy Macitentan also significantly improved clinically important secondary endpoints including 6-MWD, WHO FC and PAH-related death or hospitalisation

Summary II Rates of transaminase elevations and oedema were similar in placebo and macitentan groups A greater decrease in haemoglobin levels was observed in the active treatment groups –This laboratory abnormality has been reported in other clinical trials investigating ERAs The most common adverse events, not associated with PAH and reported at a higher incidence than placebo, were headache, nasopharyngitis and anaemia