N. Boku, S. Yamamoto, K. Shirao, T. Doi, A. Sawaki, W. Koizumi, H. Saito, K. Yamaguchi, A. Kimura, A. Ohtsu Gastrointestinal Oncology Study Group of Japan.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
FOLFOXIRI plus bevacizumab (bev) vs FOLFIRI plus bev
Advertisements

516 (32723) Phase III trial comparing AC (x4)taxane (x4) with taxane (x8) as adjuvant therapy for node-positive breast cancer: Results of N-SAS-BC02.
I I. B.- T R E A T M E N T P L A N: DOCETAXEL 75 mg/m2 40 mg/m2 THORACIC RT (66 Gys: 180 cGy/d) CISPLATIN 40 mg/m2 Days E V A L U A.
Facon T et al. Proc ASH 2013;Abstract 2.
1 N9841: A Randomized Phase III Equivalence Trial of Irinotecan (CPT-11) versus FOLFOX4 in Patients with Advanced Colorectal Carcinoma Previously Treated.
Upper Gastrointestinal Overview : Practical Implications of the Newest Data Esophageal and Gastric Cancers Johanna Bendell, MD Sarah Cannon Research.
Presented by Martin H. Cohen, M.D. at the 27 July 2004 meeting of the Oncologic Drugs Advisory Committee.
Phase III Study Comparing Gemcitabine plus Cetuximab versus Gemcitabine in Patients with Locally Advanced or Metastatic Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma Southwest.
Eastern cooperative oncology group E1496: ECOG and CALGB Cyclophosphamide/Fludarabine (CF) with or without Maintenance Rituximab (MR) in Advanced Indolent.
Randomized phase III study of S-1 alone versus S-1 + cisplatin in the treatment of advanced gastric cancer ( The SPIRITS trial ) SPIRITS: S-1 plus cisplatin.
EN.8 - A PHASE III STUDY OF STANDARD THERAPY VERSUS RIDAFOROLIMUS IN WOMEN WITH RECURRENT OR METASTATIC ENDOMETRIAL CANCER WHO HAVE PREVIOUS HAD CHEMOTHERAPY.
A randomized phase III study of gemcitabine in combination with radiation therapy versus gemcitabine alone in patients with localized unresectable pancreatic.
Phase III study of first-line XELOX plus bevacizumab (BEV) for 6 cycles followed by XELOX plus BEV or single agent (s/a) BEV as maintenance therapy in.
Intergroup trial CALGB 80101
RANDOMIZED PHASE II TRIAL COMPARING FOLFIRINOX (5FU/LEUCOVORIN, IRINOTECAN AND OXALIPLATIN) VS GEMCITABINE AS FIRST-LINE TREATMENT FOR METASTATIC PANCREATIC.
Phase III studies of Xeloda® in colorectal cancer (CRC)
A Phase III trial of 5-FU/l-leucovorin/ irinotecan (FOLFIRI) versus irinotecan/S-1 (IRIS) as second-line chemotherapy for metastatic colorectal cancer.
Capecitabine versus Bolus 5-FU/Leucovorin as Adjuvant Therapy for Colon Cancer: X-ACT Trial Results James Cassidy, MD Colorectal Cancer Update Think Tank.
1 A Randomized, Multi-Center Phase III Trial of Irinotecan in Combination with Three Different Methods of Administration of Fluoropyrimidine with Celecoxib.
1 SNDA Gemzar plus Carboplatin Treatment of Late Relapsing Ovarian Cancer.
Results of Docetaxel Plus Oxaliplatin (DOCOX) +/- Cetuximab in Patients with Metastatic Gastric and/or Gastroesophageal Junction Adenocarcinoma: Results.
Poster #382 XELOX-1/NO16966, a randomized phase III trial of first-line XELOX vs. FOLFOX-4 for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (MCRC): Updated.
Phase III Trial of Pazopanib in Locally Advanced and/or Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Sternberg CN et al. ASCO 2009; Abstract (Oral Presentation)
This house believes that FOLFIRINOX is the best treatment for patients with metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma Pro Marc YCHOU Montpellier.
1Bachelot T et al. Proc SABCS 2010;Abstract S1-6.
CheckMate 025: A randomized, open-label, phase III study of nivolumab versus everolimus in advanced renal cell carcinoma Padmanee Sharma, Bernard Escudier,
Phase III trial of chemotherapy with or without irinotecan in the front-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer in elderly patients. FFCD
Randomized Phase III Trial Comparing FOLFIRINOX (F: 5FU/Leucovorin [LV], Irinotecan [I], and Oxaliplatin [O]) versus Gemcitabine (G) as First-Line Treatment.
T Andre, E Quinaux, C Louvet, E Gamelin, O Bouche, E Achille, P Piedbois, N Tubiana-Mathieu, M Buyse and A de Gramont. Updated results at 6 year of the.
BASED ON PROTOCOL VERSION 1 SEPTEMBER 2012 A new study evaluating an investigational drug to treat patients with HER2-positive metastatic gastroesophageal.
Phase I/II Trial of Docetaxel plus Oxaliplatin and 5-Fluorouracil (D-FOX) in Patients with Untreated, Advanced Gastric or Gastroesophageal Cancer Jaffer.
E2100 A Randomized Phase III Trial of Paclitaxel versus Paclitaxel plus Bevacizumab as First- Line Therapy for Locally Recurrent or Metastatic Breast Cancer.
Bevacizumab continuation versus no continuation after first-line chemo-bevacizumab therapy in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: a randomized.
MAX: International multi-centre randomised phase II/III study of capecitabine (Cap), bevacizumab (Bev) and mitomycin C (MMC) as first-line treatment for.
0 Adjuvant FOLFIRI +/- Cetuximab in Patients with Resected Stage III Colon Cancer NCCTG Intergroup Phase III Trial N0147 Jocelin Huang, Daniel J Sargent,
KRAS status and efficacy in the first- line treatment of patients with mCRC treated with FOLFOX with or without cetuximab: The OPUS experience Carsten.
AVADO TRIAL David Miles Mount Vernon Cancer Centre, Middlesex, United Kingdom A randomized, double-blind study of bevacizumab in combination with docetaxel.
Cmab might have therapeutic benefit in Japanese patients with KRAS p.G13D mutant colorectal cancer. Limitations of this study are its retrospective design.
ECCO ESMO 2011 GI Cancer Updates TAS102 and BSC vs. Placebo and BSC Reviewer: Dr. Scott Berry Date posted: October 2011.
The Combination of Bevacizumab (Bev) with capecitabine/irinotecan (CapIri/Bev) or capecitabine/oxaliplatin (CapOx/Bev) is highly active in advanced colorectal.
OCEANS: A Randomized, Double- Blinded, Placebo-Controlled Phase III Trial of Chemotherapy with or without Bevacizumab (BEV) in Patients with Platinum-
Preliminary Results from a Phase II study of FOLFIRI and Bevacizumab as First Line Treatment for Metastatic Colorectal Cancer (Abstract #3579) S. Kopetz,
Cetuximab plus FOLFIRI in the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer: the influence of KRAS and BRAF biomarkers on outcome: updated data from the CRYSTAL.
Kang Y et al. Proc ASCO 2010;Abstract LBA4007.
Phase II trial of irinotecan/docetaxel for advanced pancreatic cancer with randomization between irinotecan/docetaxel and irinotecan/docetaxel plus C225,
Phase II trial of chemotherapy with high-dose FOLFIRI plus bevacizumab in the front-line treatment of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC)
Phase II trial of irinotecan/docetaxel for advanced pancreatic cancer with randomization between irinotecan/docetaxel and irinotecan/docetaxel plus C225,
Niall C. Tebbutt International randomised phase III study of capecitabine, bevacizumab, and mitomycin C in first-line treatment of metastatic colorectal.
CV-1 Trial 709 The ISEL Study (IRESSA ® Survival Evaluation in Lung Cancer) Summary of Data as of December 16, 2004 Kevin Carroll, MSc Summary of Data.
Gemcitabine With or Without Cisplatin in Patients with Advanced or Metastatic Biliary Tract Cancer (ABC): Results of a Multicentre, Randomized Phase III.
CB-1 Background of Pancreatic Cancer & NCIC CTG PA.3 Study Design Malcolm Moore, MD Professor of Medicine and Pharmacology Princess Margaret Hospital Chair,
Low Dose Decitabine Versus Best Supportive Care in Elderly Patients with Intermediate or High Risk MDS Not Eligible for Intensive Chemotherapy: Final Results.
S1207: Phase III Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Clinical Trial Evaluating the Use of Adjuvant Endocrine Therapy +/- One Year of Everolimus in Patients.
A Phase II Study of Sorafenib Combining with Docetaxel and Cisplatin in the Treatment of Metastatic or Advanced Unresectable Gastric and Gastroesophageal.
1 A Randomized, Multi-Center Phase III Trial of Irinotecan in Combination with Three Different Methods of Administration of Fluoropyrimidine with Celecoxib.
Phase III Study of First-Line XELOX Plus Bevacizumab (BEV) for 6 Cycles Followed by XELOX Plus BEV or Single Agent (s/a) BEV as Maintenance Therapy in.
Journal Club Dr. Eyad Al-Saeed Radiation Oncology 12 January, 2008.
A Phase III, Open-Label, Randomized, Multicenter Study of Eribulin Mesylate versus Capecitabine in Patients with Locally Advanced or Metastatic Breast.
Phase I/II study of oral fluoropyrimidine S-1 plus oral Leucovorin as first-line treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer T. Yoshino 1, W. Koizumi 2,
Erlotinib plus Gemcitabine Compared with Gemcitabine Alone in Patients with Advanced Pancreatic Cancer: A Phase III Trial of the National Cancer Institute.
2 years versus 1 year of adjuvant trastuzumab for HER2-positive breast cancer (HERA): an open-label, randomised controlled trial Aron Goldhirsch, Richard.
Y-K Kang, A Ohtsu, E Van Cutsem, SY Rha, A Sawaki SR Park, H-Y Lim, J Wu, B Langer, MA Shah on behalf of AVAGAST investigators AVAGAST: a randomized, double-blind.
RANDOMIZED PHASE II STUDY OF NABPACLITAXEL, IN RECURRENT ADVANCED OR METASTATIC CERVICAL CANCER MITO CER-NAB Enrica Mazzoni, MD Medical Oncology & Breast.
Alessandra Gennari, MD PhD
PHASE I/II STUDY OF PEGYLATED LIPOSOMAL DOXORUCIN (PLD) AND GEMCITABINE (GEM) IN RECURRENT PLATIN RESISTANT OVARIAN CANCER (OC). A Study of the VWOG.
CREATE-X: Adjuvant Capecitabine in HER2-Negative Breast Cancer
Capecitabine versus 5-fluorouracil-based (neo-)adjuvant chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced rectal cancer: safety results of a randomized phase III.
Randomized phase III study of irinotecan (IRI) versus weekly paclitaxel (wPTX) for advanced gastric cancer (AGC) refractory to combination chemotherapy.
LV5FU2-cisplatin followed by gemcitabine or the reverse sequence in metastatic pancreatic cancer: Preliminary results of a randomized phase III trial (FFCD.
RTOG 9704: A Phase III Study of Adjuvant Pre and Post Chemoradiation 5-FU vs. Gemcitabine for Resected Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma A U.S. GI INTERGROUP.
Presentation transcript:

N. Boku, S. Yamamoto, K. Shirao, T. Doi, A. Sawaki, W. Koizumi, H. Saito, K. Yamaguchi, A. Kimura, A. Ohtsu Gastrointestinal Oncology Study Group of Japan Clinical Oncology Group R andomized phase III study of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) alone versus combination of irinotecan and cisplatin (CP) versus S-1 alone in advanced gastric cancer (JCOG9912)

Background For advanced gastric cancer, there is no established standard chemotherapy. In our previous phase III study (JCOG9205), combination chemotherapy of 5-FU+CDDP did not show a survival benefit over 5-FU alone. (Ohtsu, J Clin Oncol 2003) Phase II studies of S-1 (oral fluoropyrimidine) alone and combination chemotherapy of CPT-11+CDDP showed promising activity and acceptable toxicities. (Sakata, Eur J Cancer 1998; Koizumi, Oncology 2000; Boku, J Clin Oncol 1999)

Primary endpoint : Overall survival Secondary endpoints : Time to treatment failure (TTF) Non-hospitalized survival (NHS) Adverse Events (NCI-CTC ver.2) Response rate (RECIST, central review) Compared to 5-FU continuous infusion (5-FUci) ・ Superiority of CPT-11+CDDP ・ Non-inferiority of S-1 Objectives

Inclusion Criteria 1) Histologically confirmed unresectable or recurrent gastric adenocarcinoma 2) Adequate oral intake 3) Age: > 20, < 75 4) PS (ECOG) : 0, 1, 2 5) Preserved organ functions 6) No history of chemotherapy or radiation therapy except adjuvant chemotherapy completed 6 months before 7) Measurable lesion is not mandatory small metastatic disease detected by laparotomy is allowed 8) No severe peritoneal dissemination such as impaired bowel passage, ascites beyond pelvic cavity, wall deformity detected by barium enema 9) Written informed consent

S-1 40 mg/m 2, po, bid, days 1-28 q 6 weeks Stratified by (minimization) ・ Institution ・ PS 0/1/2 ・ Unresectable/ Recurrence with adjuvant Cx/ Recurrence without adjuvant Cx 5-FUci CPT-11 + CDDP S-1 Randomization 800 mg/m 2 /day, ci, days 1-5 q 4 weeks CPT mg/m 2, div, days 1&15 CDDP 80 mg/m 2, div, day 1 q 4 weeks Present Phase III Study (JCOG9912) Continued until disease progression, unacceptable toxicities, patient’s refusal BSA < mg/body/day 1.25 < BSA < mg/body/day 1.5 < BSA 120 mg/body/day

Statistical Considerations Study design Assumed 6-M, 1-Y survival rates of 5-FUci: 50-55%, 25-30% Expected superiority of CPT-11+CDDP: +10% Margin of non-inferiority of S-1: -5% (HR< 1.16) One-sided alpha 0.05, power 0.7 -multiplicity adjusted by modified Bonferroni (Holm’s method) Sample size: 450 (150/arm), planned accrual: 4 years -amended to 690 (230/arm) to achieve power= 0.8 (Mar. 2005) One interim analysis at accrual of 300 patients (Mar. 2004) using O’Brien & Fleming type alpha spending function Actual accrual 704 patients between Nov – Jan Final analysis (Feb. 2007) on intention-to-treat (ITT) basis

Background (Patient) Adjuvant Cx - / + Unresectable / Recurrent 0 / 1 / 2PS M / F Gender median (range)Age No. of patients 233/1 188/46 151/80/3 175/59 64 (39-75) 234* S-1 235/1 190/46 151/81/4 180/56 63 (32-75) 236 CPT-11+CDDP 233/1 189/45 152/79/3 176/58 63 (24-75) FUci * One patient was ineligible; adenosquamous cell carcinoma.

Background (Tumor) Target lesion - / + intestinal / diffuse Histological type ** 0 / 1,2 / 3,4,5 Macroscopic type * No. of patients Peritoneal metastasis 165/69 59/ /124 *** 5/68/ S-1 102/101/31 55/ /134 5/73/ CPT-11+CDDP 160/76 100/105/31 59/ /121 5/63/ FUci 147/87 103/90/41 No. of metastatic sites 0,1 / 2 / >3 - / + * Japanese Classification of Gastric Carcinoma ** Lauren classification, no data available in 2 pts ** 1 pt with adenosquamous type included

No. of patients Incidences(%) of Gr.>3 Adverse Events within 6 months (1) S-1CPT-11+CDDP5-FUci Treatment related death* Leukocytes Neutrophils Hemoglobin Platelets Infection without neutropenia Infection with Gr.3 or 4 neutropenia Febrile neutropenia * Judged by Data and Safety Monitoring Committee

Stomatitis Nausea Diarrhea Anorexia Fatigue AST ALT Bilirubin Creatinine Hyponatremia Incidences(%) of Gr.>3 Adverse Events within 6 months (2) No. of patients S-1CPT-11+CDDP5-FUci

Progression-free Survival and Response rate Response rate - in pts with target lesion - 5-FUci CPT-11 +CDDPS-1 CR+PR n RR9%38%28% CR and PR were confirmed by central review M 234 < %C.I M M 236 HR Median n P-value † 1224 (months) 0 50 (%) 100 †: one-sided log-rank test (superiority) S-1 5-FUci CPT-11+CDDP PFS

< M234S P-value † %C.I. -2.3M2345-FUci M236CPT-11+CDDP HRMediann †: one-sided log-rank test (superiority) Time to Treatment Failure 1224 (months)0 50 (%) 100

Reasons for Treatment Failure Other Death Refusal not related to toxicity Refusal related to toxicity Toxicities Disease progression Continuing at final analysis No. of patients S CPT-11+CDDP FUci 234

(months)0 50 (%) 100 Overall Survival P-value † † %C.I %10.8M2345-FUci %11.4M234S %12.3M236CPT-11+CDDP HR1-yrMSTn †: one-sided log-rank test (superiority) non-inferiority <0.001 ‡: multiplicity adjusted by Holm’s method Significance level ‡

M234S %C.I. -7.2M2345-FUci M236CPT-11+CDDP HRMediann P-value † †: one-sided log-rank test (superiority) Non-hospitalized Survival (months)0 50 (%) 100 = overall survival time – hospitalized days

* type unknown were excluded from the analysis Subset Analysis for Overall Survival - Hazard Ratio to 5-FUci and 95% Confidence Interval - Hazard ratio Age <65 (n=372) >65 (n=332) PS 0 (n=454) 1,2 (n=250) Unresectable (n=567) Recurrent (n=137) Intestinal (n=323)* Diffuse (n=379) (-) (n=173) Target lesion (+) (n=531) No. of met sites 0,1 (n=305) >2 (n=399) Peritoneal mets (-) (n=472) (+) (n=232) All randomized (n=704) CPT-11+CDDPS-1

Subset Analysis of Overall Survival P-value † S-1 5-FUci (months) 0 50 (%) n P-value † 10.5M 9.0M 12.1M MST 3.8M 2.2M 4.8M PFS - Target Lesion (+) -- Target Lesion (-) M M M55 MSTn †: one-sided log-rank test (superiority) S-1 5-FUci CPT-11+CDDP 0 50 (%) (months)

Summary and Conclusion S-1 showed a significant non-inferiority to 5-FUci in survival mild toxicities favorable results of RR, TTF, NHS and PFS longer survival than 5-FUci in almost all subsets CPT-11+CDDP did not show superiority to 5-FUci in survival substantial toxicities causing treatment failure favorable results of RR, TTF, NHS and PFS longer survival than 5-FUci in the subset of TL (+) poor results in TL (-) and peritoneal mets (+) S-1 should be considered for the standard chemotherapy of unresectable or recurrent gastric cancer.

Acknowledgement We would like to express sincere thanks to all participating patients, Data and Safety Monitoring Committee, Audit Committee of JCOG, and JCOG Data Center Support This study was mainly supported by the Grant-in-Aid for Cancer Research (11S-3, 14S-3, 17S-3, 11S-4, 14S-4, 17S-5) from the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare of Japan, and in part by the contract of periodical safety reports for S-1 to TAIHO PHARMACEUTICAL CO., LTD and for CPT-11 to Yakult Honsha Co., Ltd.

Investigators Y. Komatsu Y. Tsuji S. Saito A. Murakami T. Yoshioka H. Saito K. Amagai Y. Hamamoto K. Yamaguchi H. Endo T. Doi T. Denda A. Nakamura K. Shirao K. Kaneko K. Chin W. Koizumi S. Ohkawa Y. Hara K. Tanaka K. Hotta N. Boku H. Kawai H. Kojima H. Iwase S. Matsumoto H. Takiuchi T. Tamura H. Nishisaki M. Taniguchi J. Nasu A. Tsuji E. Baba M. Yoshida