F066-B08-059 © 2008 The MITRE Corporation. All rights reserved. MITRE-CAASD’s systemwideModeler State and Near-Term Plans Pete Kuzminski 10 December 2008.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 PHARE Operational Scenarios J-P. Nicolaon, Operational Task Force Chairman EUROCONTROL Experimental Centre.
Advertisements

UNIVERSITY of GLASGOW A Comprehensive Approach to ATM Incorporating Autonomous Aircraft ATM Research Group University of Glasgow.
October 31, Metron Aviation, Inc. Dan Rosman Assessing System Impacts: Miles-in-Trail and Ground Delays.
Vastly Distributed System ATCSCC CDM net TFM hub TRACONs TRACON(s) Towers ARTCC ARTCC(s) Towers Airports Industry AOC(s) GA International.
FAA/Eurocontrol TIM 9 on Performance Metrics – INTEGRA Rod Gingell 16 May 2002.
Page 1 CARE/ASAS Activity 3: ASM workshop Brétigny, 19 December 2001 Autonomous Aircraft OSED CARE-ASAS Activity 3: ASM Autonomous Aircraft OSED.
Air Traffic Analysis, Inc Using WITI for Airport Arrival Performance Analysis A report on work-in-progress December 2010.
Modeling Airport Capacity
Air Traffic Management
Heather Bell GMFIR Vancouver November 9, 2010 NAV CANADA.
Airport Planning. errata Traditional forecasting techniques are still in play, but are considered archaic. US airlines are focused on international travel.
Understanding Role of FDP Across NAS Operational Domains
The Next Generation Air Transportation System “The Near Term and Beyond” Presented by Charles Leader, Director Joint Planning and Development Office.
LMI Airline Responses to NAS Capacity Constraints Peter Kostiuk Logistics Management Institute National Airspace System Resource.
MIT Lincoln Laboratory Evans benefits ARAM1 jee 6/4/2015 Assessment of Aviation Delay Reduction Benefits for Nowcasts and Short Term Forecasts James Evans.
F066-B © 2010 The MITRE Corporation. All rights reserved. Modeling NextGen with systemwideModeler Pete Kuzminski Stéphane Mondoloni, PhD January.
Airspace Concept Evaluation System- State of Development
© 2005 The MITRE Corporation. All Rights Reserved. 1 What The Future Holds… New Airframes & Materials UAVs Traffic Growth New Business Models TRACON Complexity.
Book: The Global Airline Industry By: Peter Belobaba Flight Crew Activities During a Typical Flight Sections – Presented by: Nahid Boustani.
1 Arrival Scenario 1 November, Scenario Overview Sharing of Flight and Status data via AWIMSharing of Flight and Status data via AWIM –Parking.
Gate-to-Gate Project: Implementing Sequencing, Merging, and Spacing Captain Bob Hilb September 11, 2006.
Date: 18 February 2008 Federal Aviation Administration Collaborative Decision Making at the FAA/ATO A look at how CDM is applied in the U.S.
Federal Aviation Administration FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY (Public availability to be determined under 5USC 552) Data Communications Program DCL Benefits Modeling.
NAS Acquisition Programs
Exploring Control Strategies in ATC: Implications for Complexity Metrics Jonathan Histon & Prof. R. John Hansman JUP Meeting, June 21-22, 2001.
1 AvMet Applications, Inc Alexander Bell Dr., Ste. 130 Reston, VA Weather-Aware Post Event Analysis Mike Robinson AvMet Applications, Inc.
Federal Aviation Administration Valuation of NextGen Capacity Benefits A Consumer Surplus Approach to the Monetization of NASPAC Results For: INNOVATIONS.
1/14 Development and Evaluation of Prototype Flight Deck Systems for Distributed Air-Ground Traffic Management ASAS Thematic Network - Workshop 3 Toulouse,
. Center TRACON Automation System (CTAS) Traffic Management Advisor (TMA) Transportation authorities around the globe are working to keep air traffic moving.
AIR TRAFFIC CONTROL Presented by S.SUMESWAR PATRO Regd no:
Review Continuous Descent Operations Manual Roosevelt Pena (Dom Rep)
Study Continuous Climb Operations
Federal Aviation Administration Date: July 2011 Terminal Arrival Efficiency Rate (TAER) 101 Metric Explanation.
1 September 28th, 2005 NASA ASAS R&D A IRSPACE S YSTEMS P ROGRAM Michael H. Durham Kenneth M. Jones Thomas J. Graff.
Chapter 6 Section A. STAR Standard Terminal Arrival Route –Depart the enroute structure –Navigate to destination –Terminate with an instrument approach.
Federal Aviation Administration ATO Future Schedule Generation Performance Analysis and Strategy January 27, 2010.
1 1st ANNUAL WORKSHOP NAS-WIDE SIMULATION IN SUPPORT OF NEXTGEN: REQUIREMENTS AND CAPABILITIES Lance Sherry Center for Air Transportation Systems Research.
LMINET2: An Enhanced LMINET Dou Long, Shahab Hasan December 10, 2008.
Presented to: NAS-Wide Simulation & NextGen workshop By: Kimberly Noonan, Joseph Post Date: December 10th, 2008 Federal Aviation Administration The Modernized.
FAA System-Wide Information Management Program Overview for SWIM-SUIT Public Lauch Donald Ward Program Manager FAA SWIM Program April 2007.
Presented to: NAS-Wide Simulation Workshop By: Kimberly Noonan, FAA NextGen and Ops Planning Date: January 28, 2010 Federal Aviation Administration NextGen.
Performance Based Navigation (PBN) Canadian Implementation Presentation to Air Transport Association of Canada 9 November 2010.
1 ATM System Wide Modeling Capabilities in Fast-Time Simulation 1 st Annual Workshop – NAS-Wide Simulation in Support of NextGen Dec. 10th – George Mason.
Draft High Level Operational Concept V0.4 Mode of Operation for the Single European Sky Deployable from /11/04.
NAS-WIDE Simulation Workshop December 10, 2008 Interagency Portfolio & Systems Analysis Division Yuri Gawdiak.
M I T I n t e r n a t i o n a l C e n t e r f o r A i r T r a n s p o r t a t i o n Interactive Electronic Flight Strips Nathan A. Doble R. John Hansman.
F E D E R A L A V I A T I O N A D M I N I S T R A T I O N A I R T R A F F I C O R G A N I Z A T I O N 1 Federal Aviation Administration System Airport.
Harris.com Alex Murray | DCIS Benefits Lead DCIT Brief Data Comm Benefits & Metrics Alignment with DC Program, NIWG, & NAC.
Ames Research Center 1 FACET: Future Air Traffic Management Concepts Evaluation Tool Banavar Sridhar Shon Grabbe First Annual Workshop NAS-Wide Simulation.
F066-B Public Release No.: © 2010 The MITRE Corporation. All rights reserved. Demand Generation for System-wide Simulation Glenn Foster MITRE.
1 Departure Scenario 1 November 14, Scenario Overview Entry of Flight Data into AWIM SystemEntry of Flight Data into AWIM System –Embry Riddle.
© 2015 The MITRE Corporation. All rights reserved. Friends and Partners of Aviation Weather Claudia McKnight ATM-Weather Integration Gap Analysis CAASD.
Presented to:GMU System-Wide Modeling Workshop By: Joseph Post, ATO NextGen & Ops Planning Date: 10 December 2008 Federal Aviation Administration FAA System-Wide.
Federal Aviation Administration 1 Collaborative Decision Making Module 5 “The Collaborative Environment”
Using Simulation in NextGen Benefits Quantification
Joint Planning & Development Office Evaluations & Analysis Preliminary Scenario Analyses Strategy Assessment to Provide a Basis for Prioritizing Investments.
NY/NJ/PHL Metropolitan Area Airspace Redesign Project and Implementation Update Presentation to: Congressional Staffers By: Steve Kelley, Airspace Redesign.
NY/NJ/PHL Metropolitan Area Airspace Redesign Record of Decision (ROD) Announcement Congressional Briefing Name: Steve Kelley Date: September 5, 2007 Federal.
Terminal Airspace Traffic Complexity Fedja Netjasov University of Belgrade Faculty of Traffic and Transport Engineering Division of Airports and Air Traffic.
1 Surface CDM Sub-team Concept of Operations Briefing Marshall Mowery (FAA CDM Lead) Dan Allen, FedEx Express (Industry CDM Lead) Carl Calcasola, ATM PBI.
1 EMERGENCE OF REGIONAL JETS AND THE IMPLICATIONS ON AIR TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT MIT International Center for Air Transportation Aleksandra Mozdzanowska, R.
F066-B © 2003 The MITRE Corporation. All Rights Reserved. Predictability and Uncertainty in Air Traffic Flow Management Len Wojcik, Josh Pepper,
Estimating the En route Efficiency Benefits Pool Dan Howell, Michael Bennett, James Bonn, CNA Corporation Dave Knorr, FAA AOZ-40 June 23, 2003.
F042-B © The MITRE Corporation This is the copyright work of The MITRE Corporation and was produced for the U.S. Government under Contract Number.
RSPA/Volpe Center Arrival/Departure Capacity Tradeoff Optimization: a Case Study at the St. Louis Lambert International Airport (STL) Dr. Eugene P. Gilbo.
Presented to:Nextor NAS-Wide Modeling Workshop By: Joseph Post, NextGen Systems Analysis Date: January Federal Aviation Administration NextGen.
Federal Aviation Administration Integrated Arrival/Departure Flow Service “ Big Airspace” Presented to: TFM Research Board Presented by: Cynthia Morris.
Work Package 3 Data Management
Traffic Management and FUA integration
Operational Context and Use Case Focus Group
Presentation transcript:

F066-B © 2008 The MITRE Corporation. All rights reserved. MITRE-CAASD’s systemwideModeler State and Near-Term Plans Pete Kuzminski 10 December 2008

© 2008 The MITRE Corporation. All rights reserved. F066-B systemwideModeler Background Files Scenario Generation 4-D Trajectory Modeling Post Processing systemwideModeler Resources ETMS Query Flight Info GRASP Itinerary File Transits File Itinerary File Equipment Airspace Airports Fixes ARTCCs Operators Sectors Sector Schedule TRACONs Convert to.itin format ATO-P Demand File Generate Background Files GADS TSSIM Airport TRACON CorridorSector Airframe GDP MIT DB Load Input Load Output Load Value Added Tables Performance Metric Analysis Add flight info, VFR, & adjust Taxi Times Adaptation Link Flights Itinerary File (revised) Trajectories File Airframes File (revised) Visualization Annualization CRCT TM ASQP Airframes File Itinerary File (adjusted) System-wide Analysis Framework

© 2008 The MITRE Corporation. All rights reserved. F066-B Analysis and Visualization Tools

© 2008 The MITRE Corporation. All rights reserved. F066-B Recent Applications Benefits assessment –Data Communications Segment 1 –NextGen Implementation Plan Problem identification –Future Airport Capacity Task (FACT) –Future Airspace Capacity and Efficiency Study (FACES) 4

© 2008 The MITRE Corporation. All rights reserved. F066-B Model Purpose 5 To estimate the aggregate and network effects of changes to the NAS Delay and load are primary metrics of interest By phase of flight By element, e.g., airport, sector, system Because output is as-flown trajectories, other effects could be interpreted, e.g., fuel burn Demand: volume, fleet mix Capacity: airport, TRACON, sector, fixes and airways Structure: airspace and routes Traffic management Time- vs. distance-based First-come first-served vs. other priority policies

© 2008 The MITRE Corporation. All rights reserved. F066-B systemwideModeler Latest in NASPAC/DPAT/MLM lineage –Designed and first released in Flights Transits Trajectories Background Airports Sectors etc. Resources (including capacities) Output Flight events Resource events Simulation engine Written in SLX, a PC-based simulation language Active, disciplined CAASD development effort ~30k lines of code Scenario runs in 5-15 minutes

© 2008 The MITRE Corporation. All rights reserved. F066-B Model Approach 77 Flights plans Resources plans constraints Start with initial 4D trajectories (from external trajectory model) Change plans to respect constraints Characterize “use” by flights Monitor flight plans/progress Regulate resource “condition”, e.g., occupancy Issue constraints to individual flights Flights’ only response to constraints is to delay passage of points. (Cancellations, re-routing, and altitude changes are responses being researched.) A resource only constrains a flight once it enters a planning horizon.

© 2008 The MITRE Corporation. All rights reserved. F066-B Airport Tactical Separation frontier of feasible throughput hourly arrivals hourly departures Sensitive to: runway layout and use standard procedures separation rules and minima variability and buffers fleet mix aircraft performance   Arrivals Departures t-x t ready time  Arrivals Spacing enforced to maintain arrival priority rate Departures Spacing enforced to maintain feasible throughput over user-specified period... Capacities scheduled by: weather winds ceiling configuration selection rules 8

© 2008 The MITRE Corporation. All rights reserved. F066-B Airport Demand Management 9 dpts arrs AAAAAAAAAAA DDDDDDDD AAR ADR Airport Demand Manager Anticipates demand Picks operating points Publishes rates Merging and Spacing Spreads delay Enforcement Mechanisms Ground/Departure Gateways or Anticipate landing/takeoff times AAR/ADR Delay pushback Arrival Gateway Delays arrival TRACON entry

© 2008 The MITRE Corporation. All rights reserved. F066-B Sector Occupancy Limited           A B Capacities typically MAP value or some transformation –May change on schedule Airspace assigned to sectors may also change on schedule Sector entries are delayed Uses several “services” available to resources –Avoids cycling –Relieves resource developers of several burdens –Allows developers to focus on characterizing use and anticipating conditions

© 2008 The MITRE Corporation. All rights reserved. F066-B Sector Workload Limited As flight approaches sector, its nature and activity in the sector is evaluated Commercial flight? GA? Military? Equipage? Previous/next sectors? Transitioning altitude? Requires spacing for arrival airport? Involved in aircraft-aircraft conflict? Modeled workload distributed over transit of flight Handoff and coordination tasks Monitoring and spacing Conflict detection and resolution Delay absorption flight workload t EntryExit    sector workload t delayed entry threshold Flight’s entry delayed until addition of modeled workload to sector’s anticipated workload acceptable 15-minute moving sum of workload is governed t EntryExit When resource informed of changes to plan, it updates workload as appropriate For example, delayed exit causes additional work change notification

© 2008 The MITRE Corporation. All rights reserved. F066-B Other Resources Arrival and departure TRACON Miles-in-trail restrictions Ground Delay Programs/Ground Stops Airframes 12

© 2008 The MITRE Corporation. All rights reserved. F066-B Near-Term Work Improved ground gateway More strategic traffic management for en route congestion Departure fix congestion Dynamic assignment of airframes and cancellations Arrival TRACON –Better representation of routes –Reduced acceptance in presence of load and delay –Reduced variability of final approach fix delivery Demand scenario generation –To address variability in demand and airport configurations –To improve realism in airframe utilization, routes, fleet mix/equipage Re-routing to avoid weather and congestion 13