The Center for Space Research Programs CSRP Technology Readiness Level.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Willie J. Fitzpatrick, PhD Chief, Aviation Division
Advertisements

Technology Module: Technology Readiness Levels (TRLs) Space Systems Engineering, version 1.0 SOURCE INFORMATION: The material contained in this lecture.
Technology readiness levels in a nutshell
What Is A Technical Readiness Level and How Is It Used?
Technology Readiness (TR)
Technology Readiness Level Calculator NDIA Systems Engineering Conference October 20, 2003 William L. Nolte, P.E., CQE Sensors Directorate Air Force Research.
Jack Taylor Office of the Deputy Assistant Secretary of

Robbie Hood, Alexander MacDonald, Robert Atlas, Frank Marks, Steve Koch, Jim McFadden, Robert Rogers, Joseph Cione, Michael Black, Eric Uhlhorn, Christopher.
Engineer Research and Development Center Cold Regions Research and Engineering Laboratory “We solve problems to make the world safer and better.” Serving.
Measuring Technology Maturity Actual system “flight proven” through successful mission operations Actual system completed and “flight qualified” through.
Creating Standards for the Small Satellite Industry Presented by Linda Herrell For Milind Pimprikar*, John Hines** and Andrew Quintero*** *CANEUS **NASA.
Fusion Development Path: A Roll-Back Approach Based on Conceptual Power Plant Studies Farrokh Najmabadi UC San Diego Fusion Power Associates Annual Meeting.
About Us Vision: A national center for new imaging detectors. Mission: To design, develop, and implement new advanced sensor technologies in collaboration.
Office of Small and Medium Enterprises (OSME) | Bureau des petites et moyennes entreprises (BPME) To Kickstart InnovationEncourager l'innovation Programme.
1 Distribution A. Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. Headquarters U.S. Air Force I n t e g r i t y - S e r v i c e - E x c e l l e.
What are MRLs ? Alfred W. Clark Dawnbreaker, Inc.
PEO/SYSCOM Conference Implementing Technical Performance Measurement Mike Ferraro General Engineer Nov 2002.
LSU 01/18/2005Project Life Cycle1 The Project Life Cycle Project Management Unit, Lecture 2.
Technology Applicability for Prediction & Recognition of Piracy Efforts NATO ASI September 2011 Salamanca, Spain.
Finding a way or making one. Labor’s headquarter is in Rome Labor.
12/12/2013 Cluster Workshop on Cybersecurity 1 Michele Bezzi (SAP) Kazim Hussain (ATOS) SecCord & CYSPA Projects.
I Forum Technologii Kosmicznych i Satelitarnych „JAK ZWIĘKSZYĆ UDZIAŁ POLSKI WE FLAGOWYCH PROGRAMACH UNII EUROPEJSKIEJ: COPERNICUS, GALILEO, H2020?” „HOW.
Technology Input Formats and Background Appendix B.
Liviu LAZAR IS - Staff Officer NIAG Guyonne Le Fournis
Space-Based Network Centric Operations Research. Secure Autonomous Integrated Controller for Distributed Sensor Webs Objective Develop architectures and.
An evaluation of fusion energy R&D gaps using Technology Readiness Levels M. S. Tillack and the ARIES Team International High Heat Flux Components Workshop.
* Backup materials can be found at
Andrew Faulkner1 Technology Readiness Levels 4 th SKADS Workshop, Lisbon Technology Readiness Levels TRLs Andrew Faulkner.
1 1 “Secure the High Ground” Jeff Craver Project Manager Space and Missile Defense Technical Center Jeff Craver Project Manager.
Space Engineering 2 © Dr. X Wu, Space Engineering 2 Lecture 1.
Ocean Observatories Initiative OOI Cyberinfrastructure Architecture Overview Michael Meisinger September 29, 2009.
Ajh January 2007 CCSDS “Books” Adrian J. Hooke CMC Meeting, Colorado Springs 26 January 2007.
Page 1 of 11 Progress developing an evaluation methodology for fusion R&D ARIES Project Meeting March 4, 2008 M. S. Tillack.
1 MRL Assist Tool Website Access the MRL Assist Tool at
EUCISE 2020 EUCISE 2020 has received funding from the European Union’s seventh framework programme under grant agreement no: Participating Countries:
SE&I Pre-Proposal Meeting GSFC - JPL Systems Engineering Management Colleen McGraw.
From the Lab to Market ! The Basics! Presentation by Joe Graben, MBA Director – Business & Innovation Assistance Center University of Southern Mississippi.
Critical Design Review (CDR)
Cross fertilisation Technology readiness level From Space and Aeronautic to ITS ? 11/06/2014Topos proposal done by JPhM1.
1 1 Title of Proposal Programme/Topic Number: SSH Type of Proposal; Collaborative Project (Small) Proposal Number: Programme/Topic Number: SSH
045-05/rs PERSISTENT SURVEILLANCE FOR PIPELINE PROTECTION AND THREAT INTERDICTION Technical Readiness Level For Control of Plasma Power Flux Distribution.
MB6025-MB7226 TECHNOLOGY COMMERCIALIZATION
Assessment of Fusion Development Path: Initial Results of the ARIES “Pathways” Program Farrokh Najmabadi UC San Diego ANS 18 th Topical Meeting on the.
SAS_08_Legacy_Safety_Hill Assurance and Recertification of Safety Critical Software In Legacy Systems Janie Hill NASA Kennedy Space Center, Florida
Click to edit Master title style Click to edit Master subtitle style A Small Business Paradigm For Sustainable Technology Insertion Pacific Defense Solutions,
Horizon 2020 – 2016 Transport Call
Cross-Domain Semantic Interoperability ~ Via Common Upper Ontologies ~ Presentation to: Expedition Workshop #53 15 Aug 2006 James Schoening
Energy.gov/sunshot Solar Manufacturing Technology 2 (SolarMat 2) informational webinar Introduction & Concept papers Feb. 18, 2014.
OUTCOMES OBJECTIVES FUNCTIONS ACTIONS TERRITORIES LOCATIONS MARKET SEGMENTS TIME LINESCHALLENGE IMPACT RESOURCESACTIVITIESCHANNELS RELATIONS PARTNERS CUSTOMERS.
Dr. Thomas D. Fiorino November 2002
Technology Readiness Assessment (TRA)
PROPOSED MRL/EMRL DEFINITIONS AND USE
Lesson Objectives Assess the major requirements management activities during the acquisition process from Milestone B to Initial Operational Capability.
National Defense Industrial Association
Shift2Rail Info Day Call for Proposals 2017
Enabling Team Supervisory Control for Teams of Unmanned Vehicles
Research Methods Dr. X.
Milestone A to Milestone B Requirements Management Activities
NASA Hypersonic Research
Concept Idea Title Summary of the effort to include:
Science and Technology
Systems Engineering Management
The Application of Technology Readiness Levels in Planning the Fusion Energy Sciences Program M. S. Tillack ARIES Project Meeting 4–5 September2008.
About Us Vision: A national center for new imaging detectors.
Entrepreneurship & Regional Connections
US/Japan Workshop on Fusion Power Plant Studies
TRL tables: power conversion and lifetime
What Is A Technical Readiness Level and How Is It Used?
G. Technology Readiness Levels (TRL*)
Presentation transcript:

The Center for Space Research Programs CSRP Technology Readiness Level

TRL Definitions: DOD Interim Guidance Level 1Basic principles observed and reported Level 2Technology concept and/or application formulated Level 3Analytical and experimental critical function and/or characteristic proof of concept Level 4Component and/or breadboard validation in laboratory environment Level 5Component and/or breadboard validation in relevant environment Level 6System/subsystem model or prototype demonstration in a relevant environment (Ground or Space) Level 7System prototype demonstration in an operational (space) environment Level 8Actual system completed and (flight) qualified through test and demonstration (Ground and Space) Level 9Actual system (flight) proven through successful mission operations DoD definitions are closely derived from NASA (Mankins ’95) (NASA terms are in parentheses)

TRL Descriptions Hardware & Software Level1Lowest level of technology readiness. Research begins to be translated into applied research and development. Examples might include paper studies of a technology's basic properties. Level2Invention begins. Once basic principles are observed, practical applications can be invented. Applications are speculative and there may be no proof or detailed analysis to support the assumptions. Examples are limited to analytic studies. Level3Active research and development is initiated. This includes analytical studies and laboratory studies to physically validate analytical predictions of separate elements of the technology. Examples include components that are not yet integrated or representative. Level4Basic technological components are integrated to establish that they will work together. This is relatively "low fidelity" compared to the eventual system. Examples include integration of "ad hoc" hardware in the laboratory. Level5Fidelity of breadboard technology increases significantly. The basic technological components are integrated with reasonably realistic supporting elements so it can be tested in a simulated environment. Examples include "high fidelity" laboratory integration of components. Level6Representative model or prototype system, which is well beyond that of TRL5, is tested in a relevant environment. Represents a major step up in a technology's demonstrated readiness. Examples include testing a prototype in a high fidelity laboratory environment or in simulated operational environment. Level7Prototype near or at planned operational system. Represents a major step up from TRL6, requiring demonstration of an actual system prototype in an operational environment, such as in aircraft, vehicle, or space. Examples include testing the prototype in a test bed aircraft. Level8Technology proven to work in its final form and under expected conditions. In most cases, this TRL represents the end of true system development. Examples include developmental test and evaluation of the system in its intended weapon system to determine if it meets specifications. Level9Actual application of the technology in its final form and under mission conditions, such as those encountered in operational test and evaluation. Examples include using the system under operational mission conditions.