CAIU 15 October 14, 2014.  Introductions ◦ Name, District, School(s), Years as a coach  Announcements ◦ Schedule of network meetings for this year ◦

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Delaware Performance Appraisal System II for Specialists August 2013 Training Module I Introduction to DPAS II Training for Specialists.
Advertisements

North Carolina Educator Evaluation System. Future-Ready Students For the 21st Century The guiding mission of the North Carolina State Board of Education.
Minnesota’s Professional Development Plan to Prepare for the 2014 GED Test Amy Vickers, Minneapolis Adult Education Astrid Liden, Minnesota Department.
Update: January 24, 2012 SIS Meeting.  Effective Teacher: An effective teacher consistently uses educational practices that foster the intellectual,
PSESD Teacher Principal Evaluation Project Regional Implementation Grants October 25, pm.
PAT/PPS Evaluation Workgroup Appendix I Portland Public Schools and the Portland Association of Teachers agree to form a committee to update.
Alaska Educator Evaluation Overview Yukon Koyukuk School District.
Tom Corbett, Governor ▪ Carolyn C. Dumaresq, Acting Secretary of Educationwww.education.state.pa.us Measuring Educator Effectiveness June 26,
Measuring Educator Effectiveness Pennsylvania’s Educator Effectiveness Project Specialist Effectiveness October 15, 2013.
Educator Effectiveness ACT 82 Overview 1. ACT 82 Within Act 82, new requirements for Educator Effectiveness have been defined for teachers, principals,
Arkansas Teacher Excellence and Support System: Guide to Evidence & Artifacts.
Local Mentor Plan South Brunswick Schools September 2005 South Brunswick Schools September 2005.
Measuring Principal Effectiveness Tom Corbett, Governor ▪ Carolyn C. Dumaresq, Acting Secretary of Education Measuring Principal.
Differentiated Supervision
© 2013, KDE and KASA. All rights reserved. TEACHER PROFESSIONAL GROWTH AND EFFECTIVENESS SYSTEM What the year holds.
Measuring Educator Effectiveness Pennsylvania’s Educator Effectiveness Project Specialist Effectiveness October 15, 2013.
Evaluating the school librarian using the Danielson Model
Session Materials  Wiki
Welcome – Please sign-in and sit with your Mentor Professional Growth Planning Process.
An Overview of the New HCPSS Teacher Evaluation Process School-based Professional Learning Module Spring 2013 This presentation contains copyrighted material.
Principals’ Council Meetings May  Given feedback from multiple stakeholders and after much deliberation, PDE has made the determination to classify.
Goals of This Session Provide background for program review development Describe document make-up.
Washington State Teacher and Principal Evaluation 1.
1 Orientation to Teacher Evaluation /15/2015.
DIY!!! EE4NJ A Homegrown Teacher Evaluation System Bruce ‘B.C.’ Preston Director of Curriculum & Instruction for Shore Regional High School, Monmouth Beach,
CLASS Keys Orientation Douglas County School System August /17/20151.
Student Learning Objectives: Setting Goals for Student Growth Countywide Professional Development Day Thursday, April 25, 2013 This presentation contains.
Including Student Growth in Educator Evaluation Day 3 Monitoring and Adjusting February,
TEACHER DEVELOPMENT, EVALUATION, AND PEER SUPPORT Overview Session for MPS Staff March 10, 2014.
Evaluation Team Progress Collaboration Grant 252.
Working Portfolios For Non Classroom Teachers. Agenda Determine Working Portfolio rubric Understand the performance levels and scoring Brainstorm possible.
The Delaware Performance Appraisal System II (DPAS II) for Teachers Training Module I Introduction to DPAS II Training for Teachers.
NC Teacher Evaluation Process
Materials for today’s session  Shared website – Wiki   Wireless.
Teacher Evaluation System Administrator Training June 5 & 6, 2012.
Staying on Message in Changing Times Oklahoma Statewide System of Support (SSOS) January 7, 2011 Dr. Cindy Koss, Assistant State Superintendent Oklahoma.
Oregon Framework for Teacher and Administrator Evaluation and Support UPDATE Presented by the Oregon Department of Education November 19, 2012.
Session Materials  Wiki
Charlotte Danielson’s 2011 Framework for Teaching: Part 2 Laurie Gregory, Director of Curriculum April 8, 2013.
Lincoln Intermediate Unit 12 August 11, 2014 Differentiated Supervision: The Danielson Framework.
BACK TO SCHOOL Welcome Back! Evaluation Task Force Findings.
Artifact Brainstorming Domains 1 and 4 Department of Professional & Organizational Development Howard County Public School System, 2014.
 Development of a model evaluation instrument based on professional performance standards (Danielson Framework for Teaching)  Develop multiple measures.
In-Service September 19, 2012 Teacher Evaluation System.
Niskayuna CSD Middle School Review Vicki Wyld- Iroquois MS Luke Rakoczy- Van Antwerp MS.
Ohio Department of Education March 2011 Ohio Educator Evaluation Systems.
Tom Corbett, Governor ▪ Carolyn C. Dumaresq, Acting Secretary of Educationwww.education.state.pa.us Measuring Educator Effectiveness Educator Effectiveness:
BISD Update Teacher & Principal Evaluation Update Board of Directors October 27,
Jeffrey Freund. Jeff Freund: Education and Work History Class of 2000 Class of 2004 Elementary Education Middle Level Mathematics.
NYC DOE – Office of Teacher Effectiveness F. Prioritize Areas for Feedback 1.
+ SOUTH DAKOTA PRINCIPAL EFFECTIVENESS MODEL PROCESS OVERVIEW PE WEBINAR I 10/29/2015.
PIIC/PLN UPDATES AIU3 Coaches’ Workshop September 11, 2014.
SCDE Expanded ADEPT Advisory Team Meeting April 23, 2015.
DANIELSON MODEL SAI 2016 Mentor Meeting. Danielson Model  Framework with rubrics  Define specific types of behaviors expected to be observed  A common.
Implementing the Professional Growth Process Session 3 Observing Teaching and Professional Conversations American International School-Riyadh Saturday,
A lens to ensure each student successfully completes their educational program in Prince Rupert with a sense of hope, purpose, and control.
Teacher Licensure PI-34 Wisconsin’s New Process. New License Stages  Initial Educator 5 year, non-renewable  Professional Educator 5 year renewable.
DECEMBER 7, 2015 Educator Effectiveness: Charter School Webinar.
Deer River Independent School District August 26, 2013 Teacher Training for Teacher Practice and Student Engagement Minnesota Teacher Evaluation Example.
Educator Effectiveness Digging into Domain 4. Educator Effectiveness in PA  PDE has been working since 2010 to develop an educator effectiveness model.
In-Service September 19, 2012 Teacher Evaluation System.
MSBSD Educator Evaluation
AdvancED Accreditation External Review October 23-26, 2016
Educator Effectiveness
Educator Effectiveness Regional Workshop: Round 2
Baldwin FLEXIBLE CLERICAL AND PROFESSIONAL LEARNING and DIFFERENTIATED SUPERVISION.
Introduction to Core Professionalism
HEYWORTH COMMUNITY SCHOOL DISTRICT TEACHER EVALUATION PROCESS
Welcome to a New Year at CIT!
Presentation transcript:

CAIU 15 October 14, 2014

 Introductions ◦ Name, District, School(s), Years as a coach  Announcements ◦ Schedule of network meetings for this year ◦ Upcoming trainings of interest ◦ Update coach survey ◦ Schedule onsite visit  Danielson Framework and Coaching  Small Group Coaching (PLO session share)  Lunch on Your Own  Breakout Sessions

PIIC PLO September 29 – October 1, 2014

 Review the Danielson Rubric for Teachers  Locate and view the guiding documents for instructional coaches on pdesas.org  Understand how the examples were developed  Take a guided tour of the documents  Examine the guiding documents for coaches  Discuss possible uses of the guiding documents

9 June 26,2014

Observation and Practice Planning and Preparation Educational Environment Delivery of Service Professional Development Student Performance/School Performance Profile (SPP) Student Performance/School Performance Profile (SPP) Non Teaching Professional Employee Effectiveness System in Act 82 of June 26, 2014

 Phase 1: PDE Stakeholder Group ( ) ◦ PIIC directors, mentors, instructional coaches, and PDE ◦ Initial vision of the documents outlined ◦ Sample statements drafted  Phase 2: PIIC PLO (January 2014) ◦ Preliminary examples ◦ Input from participants at PLO resulted in a draft  Phase 3: Workgroups (Spring 2014) ◦ PIIC directors, mentors, instructional coaches, RMCs ◦ Refined the draft documents ◦ Submitted to PDE  Phase 4: Approval by PDE (June 2014) ◦ Documents posted on pdesas

 Examine each of the four domains: 1.Identify any possible areas of confusion that may lead to further professional development for coaches or administrators. 2.Highlight differences between levels of performance 3.Consider additional examples of the work you do in your school(s) that would align with each component 4.Brainstorm types of artifacts that might be gathered as evidence of performance

 Domain 1: Planning and Preparation ◦ Review the Danielson Framework for Teachers  Read the supporting document for ICs  What might be unclear to coaches?  What might be unclear to administrators? ◦ What other examples might you use when meeting with your administrator? ◦ What evidence or documentation might you gather for your own evaluation?

 In your expert group, follow the same process to examine the documents ◦ 2 – Environment ◦ 3 – Instruction/Service Delivery ◦ 4 – Professional Responsibilities  Share with whole group

 Self-assessment tool and goal-setting for coaches  Guide evidence-gathering in the evaluation process  Communication tool between the coach and the administrator  Evaluation of coaches