BSR TeMo/Up-TeMo Gunnar Lindberg NORDREGIO ESPON Seminar “Territories Acting for Economic Growth: Using territorial evidence to meet challenges towards.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Belarus Denmark Estonia Finland Germany Latvia Lithuania Norway Poland Russia Sweden INTERREG III B General Introduction BSR INTERREG III B Joint Secretariat.

Advertisements

1 The Europe 2020 Strategy and the Challenge of an Integrated Territorial Approach Philip McCann University of Groningen Special Adviser to the European.

The Operational P The Operational Programme adopted by the European Commission The ESPON 2013 Programme EUROPEAN UNION Part-financed by the European Regional.

Info Day on New Calls and Partner Café Brussels 18 May 2010 Expectations towards the ESPON Programme from the Spanish Presidency perspective.

Workshop 3 – Territorial integration in cross-border and transnational functional regions ITAN – Black Sea case study, first results Pierre BECKOUCHE ESPON.

Role and potential small and medium-sized urban areas Latvia’s case

ESPON Seminar Evidence-based Cohesion Policy: Territorial Dimension November 2011, Krakow, Poland Best Development Conditions in European Metropolises:

ESPON 2013 Programme Info Day on New Calls and Partner Café ESPON 2013 Programme: Progress and Prospects.

ESPON 2.1.5: Territorial Impacts of European Fisheries Policy Second Interim Report Prepared for the Luxembourg Seminar May 2005 Ove Langeland, Norwegian.

Workshop 1.B Inner areas in Europe ESPON Seminar “Territories Acting for Economic Growth: Using territorial evidence to meet challenges towards 2020” Inspire.

Inner areas in Europe from an accessibility point of view

SPATIAL SCENARIOS AND ORIENTATIONS IN RELATION TO THE ESDP AND EU COHESION POLICY ( ) Roberto Camagni e Roberta Capello Politecnico di Milano ESPON.

ESPON Seminar 4-5 December 2014 in Rome Aims of the Seminar.

ESPON Seminar 4-5 December 2014 in Rome Latest News: The ESPON 2020 Cooperation Programme – and last activities of ESPON 2013.

Workshop 2.B Regional Resilience and Poverty ESPON Seminar “Territories Acting for Economic Growth: Using territorial evidence to meet challenges towards.

Workshop 2.C European Macro Regions ESPON Seminar “Territories Acting for Economic Growth: Using territorial evidence to meet challenges towards 2020”

Workshop 1.A Building and using Integrated Territorial Strategies ESPON Seminar “Territories Acting for Economic Growth: Using territorial evidence to.

European Macro-Regions Andrea Gramillano t33 ESPON Seminar “Territories Acting for Economic Growth: Using territorial evidence to meet challenges towards.

4-5 December 2013 Vilnius, Lithuania ESPON BSR TeMo Gunnar Lindberg, Nordregio ESPON Internal Seminar 2013 “Territorial Evidence for Cohesion Policy

Plenary session 5: The usefulness of the ESPON Scientific Platform for policy makers European Territorial Monitoring System Oriol Biosca, MCRIT SL

Smart specialisation, integrated strategies and territorial cohesion: tension or synergies 27 September Brussels ESPON 2013 Programme: The territorial.

Part-financed by the European Union The new Baltic Sea Region Programme Susanne Scherrer, Director of the Joint Secretariat Rostock/Riga.

ESPON The Role of Small and Medium Sized Towns.

Workshop 3 – Territorial integration in cross-border and transnational functional regions North Sea STAR Lynne McGowan, University of Liverpool ESPON Internal.

Working Party on Regional Statistics and Rural Development 1-2 October 2012, EUROSTAT - Luxembourg Latest ESPON Results and Tools Related to European Territorial.

ESPON Seminar 15 November 2006 in Espoo, Finland Review of the ESPON 2006 and lessons learned for the ESPON 2013 Programme Thiemo W. Eser, ESPON Managing.

ESPON Internal Seminar November 2011 – Kraków, Poland SIESTA – Spatial Indicators for a ‘Europe 2020’ Territorial Analysis.

ESPON 2020 Cooperation Programme EU Stakeholder consultation 27 March 2013 ESPON renewal, refocus and upgrade: Mission, Priority Axes, Specific Objectives,

ESPON 2.1.5: Territorial Impacts of European Fisheries Policy Third Interim Report Prepared for the Salzburg Seminar March 2006 Ove Langeland, Norwegian.

Espoo, ESPON project Identification of Spatially Relevant Aspects of the Information Society TPG.

Workshop 2 – Integrated development in cities, rural and specific regions TiPSE – Territorial Dimensions of Poverty and Social Exclusion Petri Kahila ESPON.

Baltic Sea - & Nordic and Northern Peripheries Region Dense web of co- operative relationships and interlocking institutions with various memberships,

ESPON / Social Preparatory Study on Social Aspects of EU Territorial Development Status: Interim Report Erich Dallhammer (ÖIR)

1.What are the main territorial trends or observations from your project - for Europe, its regions and cities - in relation to “territorial imbalances,

BEST METROPOLISES Best development conditions in European metropolises: Paris, Berlin and Warsaw Transport, job accessibility and daily mobility Piotr.

Indicators on Territorial Cohesion – The ESPON INTERCO project 1 Open Days | European Week of Regions and Cities Regional and Local Economies in a Changing.

ESPON INFO DAY 10 February 2011 in Bruxelles ESPON 2013 Programme: Progress and Prospects.

ESPON Open Seminar 2014 “Opportunities and threats for territorial cohesion: Blue Growth and Urban Poverty” Workshop 1 – Smart development Territorial.

ESPON UK Network Workshop TARGETING ANALYSIS ON MIGRATION AND ECONOMY Cliff Hague (UK ESPON Contact Point)

ESPON 2.1.5: Territorial Impacts of European Fisheries Policy Final Revised Report Prepared for the Espoo Seminar November 2006 Ove Langeland, Norwegian.

4-5 December 2013 Vilnius, Lithuania ESPON BSR TeMo Gunnar Lindberg, Nordregio ESPON Internal Seminar 2013 “Territorial Evidence for Cohesion Policy

Territorial and urban aspects of migration and refugee inflow Sandra Di Biaggio ESPON Seminar A world without borders.

© BBR Bonn 2003 Hamburg, May 2007Wilfried Görmar, BBR The “Territorial Agenda” for the European Union – Effects on the Baltic Sea Region Baltic Sea.

UBC Environment and Sustainable Development Secretariat,/Sakari Saarinen / Project Coordinator / NEW BRIDGES Kick-off 4-5 March 2009 New Bridges – Strengthening.

EUROPEAN REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT FUND Stakeholder Workshop Brussels – 5 February 2014 INTERREG EUROPE Nicolas Singer | Senior Project Officer INTERREG IVC.

Progress of Roadmap Action 1 ESPON Seminar, Paphos 5-6 December2012 Jacek Zaucha University of Gdańsk, Institute for Development Dariusz Swiątek Polish.

ESPON Seminar November 2006 Espoo Chair: Phaedon Enotiades, MC, Cyprus Rapporteur: Janne Antikainen, Ministry of the Interior Workshop 1 – Polycentricity.

Future outlook and next steps for ESPON The ESPON 2013 Programme OPEN DAYS Bruxelles, 10 October 2007.

Workshop 4 – Global competitiveness of regions based on strong local economies DeTeC: Detecting territorial potentials and challenges Lukas Smas, Nordregio,

Parallel Workshop Session: Workshop 1.2 Demographic Change Petri Kahila, TIPSE ESPON Internal Seminar 2012 “Territorial Development Opportunities in Europe.

INTERCO Workshop Investigating storylines on territorial cohesion MC meeting Liege ESPON Seminar , Liege ESPON Seminar ,

ESPON Open Seminar 14 June 2012, Aalborg Hy Dao, Pauline Plagnat Cantoreggi, Vanessa Rousseaux University of Geneva INTERCO Indicators of Territorial Cohesion.

Progress by the ESPON 2013 Programme in relation to the First Action Plan (Actions 4.1 and 4.2 plus) Meeting of General Directors on Territorial Cohesion.

Mapping European Territorial Structures and Dynamics – new ESPON tools for policymakers WORKING PARTY MEETING GEOGRAPHICAL INFORMATION SYSTEMS FOR STATISTICS.

Interact Event Let’s practice capitalisation!

Blue development and economic resilience

Wrap-up of Workshop 2 - Innovation and Competitiveness

ESPON Internal Seminar 2013

Plenary session Monitoring and Benchmarking the European Territory

Tailor made reports with the latest news from

Inclusive development

From policy debates to territorial indicators

ESPON, the European Spatial Planning Observatory Network

Launching new forms of territorial cooperation

Info Day on New Calls and Partner Café

ESPON Workshop 15 May 2013, Bruxelles Stepping into the sea.

ESPON POLICY OBJECTIVES

The approved ESPON 2013 Programme

University of Liverpool

ESPON Working Party “GIS for Statistics” EUROSTAT, 3 March 2008

Presentation transcript:

BSR TeMo/Up-TeMo Gunnar Lindberg NORDREGIO ESPON Seminar “Territories Acting for Economic Growth: Using territorial evidence to meet challenges towards 2020” Inspire policy making by territorial evidence

Nordregio (Lead Partner) (also in Up-TeMo) University of Gdansk (also in Up-TeMo) Aalto University (also in Up-TeMo) RRG (also in Up-TeMo) Institute of Geography and Spatial Organization Polish Academy of Sciences BGI Consulting Ltd. Geomedia LLC Project Partners

“Need to strengthen a policy oriented territorial analysis Policymakers, stakeholders and practitioners involvement during analysis definition, development and validation” - Graziella Guaragno, Workshop 1.A (yesterday)

What we have built Stakeholder driven, policy centered, indicator based, and analytically advanced, monitoring of territorial dev. in the BRS region

Added value of TeMo Regional policy context It is operational at NUTS 3/LAU2. Parts of Russia included, and to some extent Belarus We show (one way) to analyse territorial cohesion

Indicators… the “never ending story”

(1.) The Gini Concentration Ratio (2.) The Atkinson index (3.) The 80/20 ratio (4.) Sigma-convergence (5.) Beta-convergence (6.) The east/west ratio (7.) The south/north ratio (8.) The urban/rural ratio (9.) The non-border/border ratio (10.) The coast/inland ratio Analytical “toolbox” / Complex indicators ”Distribution” ”Convergence” ”Targeted/Territorial”

Application of the System Testing of the monitoring system: to establish the functionality of the system by pushing its analytical capacity in a selection of “real life situations”. Investigative areas (topics): ability to handle cross-cutting issues (territorial cohesion); functionality within a pronounced thematic focus (migration); functionality to depict a particular geographic scope (border regions); overall benchmarking ability (BSR benchmarked against the Alpine Space and the North Sea transnational regions).

The Principal Divides (1): East-West Between more and less affluent countries. The sharpest divide today can be found within the socio-economic spheres of development. In terms of for instance poverty or health, the BSR displays a substantial variation.

Between rural and urban areas: with very few exceptions the rural areas generally occupy the bottom positions regarding most aspects of socio-economic development. The financial crisis also appears to have affected rural migration harder than any other type of regions. And, Some of the most pronounced disparities in GDP/capita can be found between urban/rural areas – rather than between countries. The Principal Divides (3): Urban–Rural

Migration: trends

Benchmarking

Comparison with EU territory

Looking forward! “Upholding” TeMo Updating indicators Adding an “urban” dimension Further understanding of stakeholder needs

Thank you!