R OCKY M OUNTAIN P OWER C OMPANY DSM OPT-OUT PROPOSAL Utah Industrial Energy Consumers (UIEC) November 3, 2009.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Quick, But Not Risky Ken Nickolai. START HERE Much of your discussion will be about money. Think both about money that will be spent… And money that.
Advertisements

1 Conservation Program Cost-Effectiveness Tests Presentation to the: Florida Public Service Commission Workshop on Energy Efficiency Initiatives November.
Energy Conservation Energy Management.
Natural Gas Aggregation and Marketing Programs Brooke E. Leslie, Senior Counsel, NiSource Inc. January 14, 2014.
Introduction Build and impact metric data provided by the SGIG recipients convey the type and extent of technology deployment, as well as its effect on.
BG&E’s PeakRewards SM Demand Response Program Successful Approaches for Engaging Customers August 20, 2014.
The Power to Make a Difference PPL Electric Utilities April 2010.
NJ SmartStart Buildings New Jersey Higher Education Partnership for Sustainability (HEPS) January 20, 2012 Presenter: BPU President Robert Hanna.
1 NARUC/FERC Collaborative on Demand Response Pepco and Delmarva Power Blueprint for the Future Filings J. Mack Wathen July 15, 2007.
Previous Efforts in the Electricity Sector to Improve Energy Efficiency On Supply Side  Maximum use of natural gas.  Increase of generation efficiency.
University of Pittsburgh School of Law 2013 Energy Law and Policy Institute Eric Matheson Energy Advisor to PAPUC Commissioner James H. Cawley August 2,
FIRM TRANSPORTATION GAS SUPPLIER PRESENTATIONS CUSTOMER INFORMATION LIST.
Electrical Engineering Fundamentals for Non-EEs; © B. Rauf
1 EERMC Public Meeting on Combined Heat and Power September 17, 2013.
Electrical Billing and Rates MAE406 Energy Conservation in Industry Stephen Terry.
State Incentives for Energy Efficiency Commercial and Industrial New Jersey Board of Public Utilities Office of Clean Energy Mona L. Mosser Bureau of Energy.
Let’s Talk Energy Savings: The City of Norwalk partners with Conservation & Load Management (C&LM) Mayor Alex Knopp November 18, 2004.
RETAIL RATE REVISIONS August 1, 2015 Presented By:
Small Renewable Net Metering - An Investor Owned Utility Perspective John R. Grimwade Senior Director Strategic Planning & Development Presentation to.
Triennial Plan 2: Legal Framework. About Us  Efficiency Maine is an independent trust – Accounts and administrative responsibilities transferred from.
Rachel Weaver Program Manager Maryland Energy Administration
GREATER LAWRENCE SANITARY DISTRICT ENERGY EFFICIENCY PROGRAM.
OPPD’s Sustainability Efforts Denise Kuehn. Omaha Public Power District Public Utility –336,000 Customers –2,200 Peak –Generation (2,550 MW) –Transmission.
Highlights of Commission Activities Little Rock ASHRAE Monthly Meeting October 12, 2011 Presented By: John P. Bethel.
Example of Revenue Decoupling Utah Committee of Consumer Services Witness: David Dismukes Docket No T01 CCS Exhibit 1.1 Allowed Revenue per Customer.
MEC: Customer Profitability Models Topic DSM – DR, Advanced EE and Dispatch Ability Jesse Langston, OG&E Oct 20 th 2013.
Energy Efficiency Program Costs Project No Rulemaking to Amend Energy Efficiency Rule June 30, 2010.
Energy Efficiency Programs for Your AG Business Randy Vagnini Connecticut Light & Power & Yankee Gas.
Technical Conference on Net Metering Load Research Study November 5, 2014.
FERC Assessment of Demand Response & Advanced Metering 2006 APPA Business & Financial Conference September 18, 2006 – Session 11 (PMA) Presented by: Larry.
Why is WPL filing a rate case?  Last Base Case Rates were set January, 2007  Cost of our utility investments must be reflected in prices our customers.
KEEA Energy Efficiency Conference 2011 September 20, 2011.
Page 1 Schedule Experimental Energy Reduction (EER) updated 2005 Note: This program is available to qualified participants within the EntergyArkansas,
POTENTIAL AND STRATEGIES FOR DEMAND SIDE MANAGEMENT Dr. Ajay Mathur Director General, Bureau of Energy Efficiency.
Net Metering Technical Conference Docket No PacifiCorp Avoided Costs October 21, 2008 Presented by Becky Wilson Executive Staff Director Utah.
Provident Energy Management Inc. Electrical Deregulation Presentation for DEL Property Management Inc. Proud Members: Continental Automated Building Association,
1 Presentation to: SWEDE Conference Austin, TX May 2, 2013 Tom Weaver, PE Historical Voltage Range VVO Range “A” Service “A”
Municipal Electric Aggregation Electric Aggregation Advisory Committee August 22, 2012.
Management and Organisation of Electricity Use Electrical System Optimisation Belgrade November 2003.
M ICHIGAN P UBLIC S ERVICE C OMMISSION Energy Optimization Plans 2011 Biennial Review Pre-Filing Update Rob Ozar, Manager Energy Optimization Section March.
An overview of Demand Side Management (DSM) Implementation in RSA Morore Mashao ESKOM - DSM.
2009 IPC Energy Benchmarking Survey Initial Results Survey of 2008 operations.
Demand Response: What It Is and Why It’s Important 2007 APPA National Conference San Antonio, Texas June 26, :00 a.m. to Noon Glenn M. Wilson Director.
State of Utah/Rocky Mountain Power DSM Technical Conference November 3, 2009.
1 Demand Response A 28 Year History of Demand Response Programs for the Electric Cooperatives of Arkansas by Forest Kessinger Manager, Rates and Forecasting.
Energy Services Harsha Holalu Ramakrishna Energy Extension Specialist Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering.
Advanced Metering Rule Christine Wright Public Utility Commission of Texas June 6, 2007 Retail Market Workshop COMET WG Meeting.
Residential and Small Commercial/Industrial Standard Offer Program Billy G. Berny American Electric Power 13th Symposium on Improving Building Systems.
2015 Fall PR-MR & Marketing Meeting October 16, 2015 Fairo Mitchell Energy Policy Director, Public Utility Division Oklahoma Corporation Commission.
California Solar Initiative Dian M. Grueneich, Commissioner California Public Utilities Commission March 30, 2006.
Electricity pricing Tariffs.
Energy Efficiency Update Before the Senate Energy, Utilities & Communications Committee Part 2 May 17, 2011 – State Capitol Robin Smutny-Jones Assistant.
1 Potomac Electric Power Company Case 9155 & Delmarva Power & Light Case 9156 EmPOWER MARYLAND DRAFT NON-RESIDENTIAL ENERGY EFFICIENCY AND.
Hawaiienergy.com Graceson Ghen. hawaiienergy.com  Hawaii’s energy conservation and efficiency program  Administered by Leidos Engineering, LLC under.
San Diego Gas & Electric February 24 th, 2016 Energy Matinee Pricing Tariff Proposal.
Program Overview Solar resource will be built by j uwi, (pronounced “you-vee”), a developer based out of Boulder, Colorado. Solar farm will be located.
Solving the Energy Puzzle Understanding the Rules of Energy Delivery Electricity Natural Gas Tariffs Solar Combined Heat and Power Generation Distribution.
Developing and Implementing Energy Management Programs at a Wastewater Utility Frank Dick, PEAaron Kraft Wastewater EngineerProject Manager City of VancouverVeolia.
A Road Map to Energy Savings: Elements of a Comprehensive Energy Plan Presented by: Kenny Esser, Senior Associate June 18, 2014 Passaic County Division.
Energy Efficiency and Conservation Direct Use Program Proposal Washington Gas Light Co. For Discussion with EmPOWER Maryland Stakeholders January 27, 2012.
1 Pepco and Delmarva Power Demand Side Management Programs Stakeholders Meeting February 20, 2009.
Hawaiienergy.com Walter Enomoto Energy Efficiency Advisor Maui County.
Interim Fuel Factor Adjustment and Surcharge for Under-Recoveries
Utility Bills Reduction by Energy Consumption Management
Narragansett Electric Rate Classes
Economic Operation of Power Systems
NH Energy Efficiency Resource Standard
Island Energy Advisory Committee Board
Energy Efficiency Resource Standards (and Goals)
Energy Efficiency Resource Standards (and Goals)
Presentation transcript:

R OCKY M OUNTAIN P OWER C OMPANY DSM OPT-OUT PROPOSAL Utah Industrial Energy Consumers (UIEC) November 3, 2009

2 Rocky Mountain Power Company DSM What is Opt-Out? Opt-Out recognizes efforts of industrial customers to be efficient without imposing a cost on the utility or on other customers Tariff specifies who is eligible Tariff contains conditions

3 Rocky Mountain Power Company DSM Industrial Customers’ Perspective on DSM Operate in competitive markets Product prices set in the market Profit = Sales Price – Cost Must be efficient in order to reduce costs Energy is a large cost component and must be managed Cost-effective energy efficiency actions reduce costs and improve competitive position Industrial customers historically have pursued improved efficiencies, and continue to do so

4 Rocky Mountain Power Company DSM Why Allow Opt-Out? Industrial customers are highly motivated to pursue increased efficiencies. They historically have done so and will continue to do so. Industrial customers can more effectively identify and implement DSM on their own - - utility help not needed 100% of funds go to improve efficiency when industry does directly (versus only 50%-70% when utility manages)

5 Rocky Mountain Power Company DSM Opt-Out Eligibility: Eligible customer is same as defined in current Schedule 192 (peak load of at least 1,000 kW or annual energy use of 5,000,000 kWh or more Customer has or will implement DSM at Utah facilities at its own cost without utility incentives (or has repaid incentives received during the previous 1 year with interest) DSM measures satisfy Utah Code Section (10)(e) Customer outlines its energy efficiency activities to utility A customer who has opted out may later elect to opt-in, but must stay in the utility program for a minimum of 1 year

6 Rocky Mountain Power Company DSM Examples of Activities by Utah Industrial Customers Installations: Higher efficiency lighting, motors and pumps “Reduced demand” motor starters Variable speed motors Photo-voltaic systems Combined heat and power systems Installed smart metering on all major energy-using processes so they can be monitored and controlled Large customer reports reduction of annual energy usage by 2.9% and peak demand by 4.1% Another customer reports 5% annual energy savings from recent projects

7 Rocky Mountain Power Company DSM Examples of Activities by Utah Industrial Customers Process: Usage by all facilities and processes are benchmarked against each other and against best practices Efficiency goals are established as a result of analysis by internal and external energy and process experts

8 Rocky Mountain Power Company DSM Examples of Opt-Out’s in Other States Missouri A customer may opt-out if it meets one or more of the following criteria: One or more accounts with a demand of 5,000 kW or higher Operates an interstate pipeline pumping station Has accounts that have an aggregate demand of 2,500 kW or more, and the customer has a comprehensive demand- side or energy efficiency program and can demonstrate an achievement of savings at least equal to those expected from utility-provided programs. Missouri Revised Statutes, Section

9 Rocky Mountain Power Company DSM Examples of Opt-Out’s in Other States Oklahoma Opt-out available to customers taking service above 50,000 volts from a direct tap to the transmission system, or customers taking service between 2,000 volts and 50,000 volts for services rendered through a company substation with a transmission voltage source are permitted to opt-out of participation in utility demand-side resource programs. Example: Oklahoma Gas & Electric Company, First Revised Sheet No and ‑ 18 ‑ 01

10 Rocky Mountain Power Company DSM Examples of Opt-Out’s in Other States North Carolina Any industrial or large commercial customer that notifies its electric power supplier that it has implemented or, in accordance with stated, quantifiable goals, will implement alternative demand-side management or energy efficiency measures may elect not to participate in any new demand- side management and energy efficiency measures. North Carolina Public Utilities Commission Rule R8-69

11 Rocky Mountain Power Company DSM Examples of Opt-Out’s in Other States Kentucky Individual industrial customers with energy intensive processes are allowed to implement cost-effective energy efficiency measures on their own, in lieu of measures approved as part of a utility’s demand-side management program, if the alternative measures are not subsidized by other customer classes. Kentucky PSC Rule

12 Rocky Mountain Power Company DSM Examples of Opt-Out’s in Other States Indiana Customers with aggregated maximum annual peak demand greater than 5,000 kW may opt-out of energy efficiency programs if the customer self-certifies that within the last three years it has performed or had performed an energy audit or analysis, or within the next six months will perform an energy audit or analysis and has implemented or has plans for implementing energy efficiency measures. January 30, 2009 Opt-Out Settlement pertaining to Duke Energy Indiana, IURC Cause No , approval pending.

13 Rocky Mountain Power Company DSM Examples of Opt-Out’s in Other States Texas Industrial customers in Texas are not included in utility DSM programs. Texas PUC Rule